Интеграция ибезопасность в странах Азиатского региона 47
Научная статья / Research Article
УДК 316.34
DOI: 10.14258/SSI(2022)2-03
Межэтнические отношения
и миграционная ситуация вАлтайском крае
(по материалам социологического исследования)
Екатерина Владимировна Шахова1,
Светлана Геннадьевна Максимова2
1,2Алтайский государственный университет, Барнаул, Россия
1 EWS05@yandex.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1980-2989
2svet-maximova@yandex.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4613-4966
Аннотация. ,   ,  -
,   , .    -
   .     
       --
,   ,   
 .       -
       -
.        
      . -
 :  ,   -
     ;    
 ,      .
      
        
.      , -
   (n=400)    
.       -
-   (  SPSS 23.0). , 
,       - , 
      ;  -
        -
,  ,  ;   -
.       
 ,    ,  , -
       -
,    ,   .
Society andSecurity Insights № 2 2022 48
Ключевые слова:  ,  , ,
 ,  ,  ,  
Финансирование:       -
     FZMW-2020-0001 « , 
:      ».
Для цитирования: Шахова Е. В., Максимова С.Г. Межэтнические отношения имиграцион-
ная ситуация вАлтайском крае (по материалам социологического исследования) // Society and
Security Insights. 2022. Т. 5, №2. С.47–63. doi: 10.14258/ssi(2022)2-03.
Interethnic Relations and Migration Situation
in Altai Territory Based on Sociological Research
Ekaterina V. Shakhova 1,
Svetlana G. Maksimova2
1Altai State University, Barnaul, Russia,
EWS05@yandex.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1980-2989
2Altai State University, Barnaul, Russia,
svet-maximova@yandex.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4613-4966
Abstract. Issues concerning interethnic relations inthe Russian Federation as a multinational
state, are relevant.  ey are especially important inthe border regions ofthe country. Scienti c
analysis of ways and mechanisms ofharmonization ofinterethnic relations is ofgreat impor-
tance for maintaining the socio-political, economic stability ofmodern society, as well as social
harmony inthe region.  e following indicators are considered: the speci cs ofnational iden-
tity (the degree ofcloseness with people ofthe same nationality, the risk ofdissolving into the
culture ofother peoples); changes ininterethnic relations inthe region over the past  ve years;
access to public bene ts for people ofdi erent nationalities (receiving guaranteed social, medical,
educational services, chances ofemployment, developing their business, holding high positions
ingovernment); attitudes towards migrants and the migration situation ingeneral (the regions
residents’ assessments ofmigrants living inthe region, attitudes towards them, the need to attract
them to the region and support them by the Russian government, possible measures to establish
good neighborly relations between migrants and the local population, the role ofnational dias-
poras inharmonizing such relations, the impact ofpopulation migration on the situation inthe
region as a whole).  e practical value ofthe study lies inthe presentation ofcurrent assessments
ofresidents ofAltai krai about interethnic relations and the migration situation inthe region.  e
empirical basis is the data from a sociological study implemented inthe Altai krai (n = 400) by the
research team ofthe Altai State University.  e obtained data were analyzed using the methods
ofmathematical and statistical data processing (SPSS 23.0 statistical package). It is noted that peo-
ple who have experienced the spread ofinfringement ofrights due to nationality are more likely
than others to be at risk oflosing their nationality; inthe absence ofa su cient number ofchances
to receive high-quality free education, medical care, social services; negative attitudes towards mi-
grants.  e regional situation inthe sphere ofinterethnic relations is not acute and tense, however,
Интеграция ибезопасность в странах Азиатского региона 49
regular monitoring, a set ofmeasures aimed at establishing friendly relations between di erent
nationalities, between migrants and the population inthe Altai krai.
Keywords: interethnic relations, national identity, migration, migration situation, attitude to
migrants, national diasporas, Altai krai
Financial Support: the work was carried out within the framework ofthe state task ofthe
Ministry ofScience and Higher Education ofthe Russian Federation FZMW-2020-0001 „Human
capital, migration and security: transformation inthe new migration conditions inCentral Asia.
For citation: Shahova, E.'V., Maksimova, S.'G. (2022). Interethnic Relations and Migration Situation
inAltai Territory Based on Sociological Research. Society and Security Insights, 5(2), 47–63. (In Russ.).
doi: 10.14258/ssi(2022)2-03.
Введение
       -
 -  (  -
 ,  ,   ,
 , ,  -
 ).  ,   , -
  ,     . -
, . ., . , . . -,   
    (Malinowski, 1944, Merton, 1968,
Parsons, 1973, Radcli e-Brown,1973).
     -
,   ,   .
       
   ,  -
   ,      
      1. «
    ,   
   ,    , -
.,-
   ,   
» (, 22).
     -
   «   
 ,     
  ,   -
   ,    ,
   » (, 218).
. . ,      -
  (. . , . . , . . , . . -
1 Стратегия государственной национальной политики Российской Федерации на период
до2025 года // Официальный интернет-портал правовой информации. URL: http://pravo.gov.ru/
proxy/ips/?docbody=&nd=102161949.
Society andSecurity Insights № 2 2022 50
, . . , . . , . . , . . , . . ,
. .),  ,    
       -
   (, 22).
     -
       
(, 214, , 22, , 219, , 221). -
      -
   (Kunovski, Pomortseva, 221). 
() —     -
 ()       ,
  -  (   
   ) (, 221). -
    ,   -
 (, 216).    , -
 ,    
 .   ,  -
, (,
218).      
  ,    
    .
Методы исследования
       -
      -
  .    :  -
 (    ,  
  );    
   ;     -
  (  , ,
 ,  ,   , 
   );    
  (     ,
 ,      -
 ,      -
    ,   
  ,    
 ).
      -
,      
     FZMW-22-1 « ,
  :     
 ».     -
Интеграция ибезопасность в странах Азиатского региона 51
        (-
     ).  
      -
  ,   
,      -
 187,  . ,   -
,     -
  (  SPSS 23.):  , -
    . 
  4    (63,4% , 36,6% ),
  86,%— , 6,7%     -
, 7,3%   .
Результаты исследования иобсуждение
      , -
      . -
  ,   ,  
 , -   :  
    ,   -
      
(, 218).    ,   
.22.-
 67 865 .,  65 449 . (  56 72 .—  -
 , 8747.—  )1.   
      -
.       
, ,.   -
      -
 .
   ,   
       :
48,1%     , 32,7%— -
 , 11,1%    , 8,1%  -
 (. 1).
,,-
  (    ,  -
 , ) (76,4%).      
,     (— 2,7%, 
— 44,5%),  ,      -
  -   (71,4%) (. 1).
1 Миграция населения Алтайского края // Управление Федеральной службы государственной
статистики поАлтайскому краю иРеспублике Алтай. URL: https://akstat.gks.ru/folder/33247.
Society andSecurity Insights № 2 2022 52
 1—      , %.
Figure 1—  e degree offeeling ofcloseness with representatives ofthe same nationality, %.
 1.
     
    - , %
Table 1.
e risk oflosing national identity, depending on nationality and
cases ofinfringement ofrights due to nationality, %
Рискуете ли Вы утратить свою национальную идентичность Рискую Не рискую
 76,4 23,6
 
 20,7 79,3
  44,5 55,5
  31,1 68,9
   - 
   71,4 28,6
   18,1 81,9
 ,        -
 ,  8,3%  .    -
   ( — 3,6%, 
6,5%,  — 33,3%).
Интеграция ибезопасность в странах Азиатского региона 53
 2.
    
 -  , %
Table 2.
Agreement with the statements, depending on cases
ofinfringement ofrights due to nationality, %
Случаи ущемления прав из-за национальности Таких случаев
небыло
Такие случаи
были
    ,     
  80,5 67,9
 19,5 32,1
       
  73,9 46,4
 26,1 53,6
    ,  
  ,      
 (13,7%  ,   , 63,2%—  -
, 2,8%— , 2,3%— ).  -
 ,    
   ,  -
   21622 ., 22 .   -
     . 
      -
, , ,     -
  (, 22).    -
      ,  
       -
   .  «
      » 
3,2%; «     ,    
»— 24,1% .    ,   -
      -  -
 (. 2).      ,  « 
       
» (49,3%).
       -
       
 .   ,    -
         -
  (   7,4% ),  
 (67,%),    (59,3%),  
 (54,9%).     ,   -
Society andSecurity Insights № 2 2022 54
         -
    (53,7% 56,3% ) (. 2).
 2—       
 , %.
Figure 2— Estimates ofresidents ofthe region on the access
ofpeople ofdi erent nationalities to public goods, %.
      -
,  ,     -
   ( ),  ,   
   -   (. 3).
      -
.-
    (Liu, 212). 
   ,   ,  -
  — ,     
   (74,2%) (. 3).
   —    -
 ,      (62,6%), 8,7%— ,
      ,   , 28,7%
 ,      .   -
       (52,4%), 
 ,   ,   (34,6%), , 
  (13,%). ,     
 ,       
Интеграция ибезопасность в странах Азиатского региона 55
 -  ,   ,     
   (. 4). . .  ,  -
     ,   
     ,  , .
      -
    (,   -
   ,    
),    (  -
     ),  
  : «  
  ,     -
,  » (, 221).    -
      
,    - 
    , - -
   ,    -
 ,     -
   (, 221).
 3.
     
   
  - , %
Table 3.
Estimates ofresidents ofthe region on access to public goods, depending on
nationality and cases ofinfringement ofrights due to nationality, %
Шансы улюдей
разных нацио-
нальностей
Национальная принадлежность Случаи ущемления прав
из-за национальности
русские другие наци-
ональности
смешанная
идентич-
ность
таких случа-
ев небыло
такие слу-
чаи были
   
 73,4 52,0 55,6 73,2 55,6
 24,5 36,0 29,6 22,1 44,4
  2,1 12,0 14,8 4,7 0,0
    
 68,3 52,0 65,5 70,8 42,3
 26,3 48,0 24,1 22,0 57,7
  5,3 0 10,3 7,2 0,0
   
 61,0 42,3 60,7 63,3 50,0
 29,0 46,2 21,4 22,6 50,0
  10,0 11,5 17,9 14,1 0,0
Society andSecurity Insights № 2 2022 56
 3—      , %.
Figure 3— Estimates ofthe residents ofthe region about migrants living inthe region, %.
 4.
     -
    , %
Table 4.
Attitude towards migrants, depending on the infringement ofrights
due to nationality and the risk oflosing nationality, %
Как Вы относитесь кмигрантам
вВашем регионе? Отрицательно Равнодушно Положительно
 13,0 52,4 34,6
   - 
   11,7 56,0 32,4
   28,6 53,6 17,9
    
  35,0 40,0 25,0
  24,0 54,7 21,3
  11,5 53,8 34,6
  7,2 51,9 40,9
   ,     
  (68,7%), 31,3%  ,   .  -
    ,    -
  (    ,  
 ,    .), 
     -
, , ,,   (-
  ,    ,
   .) (. 5).  -
    ,    
Интеграция ибезопасность в странах Азиатского региона 57
  -     
,      .  , 
      -
   ,   ,  
       .
     — -
,   ,  -
  ,   
   (, 213).
 5.
    , % 
Table 5.
e impact ofpopulation migration on the situation inthe region, % ofobservations
Положительное Процент на-
блюдений Отрицательное Процент на-
блюдений
  
  44,4
 «» -


27,7
 

,  -
  
40,6   
 26,6
 
  32,0
 
  -
 
20,8
 
 
 
12,2
 
 
 
17,0
  -
  -
  

10,9  
  15,7
 --
 

8,9
 -
 

12,7
 
 
  
(IT-, -
  )
4,6   -
  12,2
      -
      (-
)      
Society andSecurity Insights № 2 2022 58
   (, 217).   ,  -
,
 :     
,      
  (41,8% ),    -
     ,    
  (35,1% ),  ,   -
     (29,2% ), -
     ,  
   (24,8% ).  
         
4,7% .
  ,     
     :   -
     ,    (48,9% -
),       , -
 —    (35,% ),   
, (29,8%).
       -
    ,  
, ,  . «  -
      -
,    ,    
  » (, 219: 33).  -
    -, -
,      (-
, 22).     , , 
,  ,     , ,
   ,   
(    34,5% );    
  (27,5% );    -
   (17,9% ).   ,
 ,       -
 ,   ,   
(34,% ),     -
   (17,9% ),  
 (11,7%).       
  ,  ,   -
      . , 
     , , -
      .  
     -
 .       
Интеграция ибезопасность в странах Азиатского региона 59
  ,   
,      (-
 …, 219).     -
 ,    -
  .
Заключение
 ,     
,  ,   ,  -
.
      :
       ,
   ;    
;       .
     : -
  ,      
  .      
 ,    ,  
   .     -
    , , -
      
,     
 ,    ,
.
СПИСОК ИСТОЧНИКОВ
 . .,  . .     -
   //  . 214.
7 (363). .12–112.
 . .,  . .    -
    // Society and Security Insights. 219. 1.
.3141.
 . .       // -
   . . 1. . : - , 22.
.4145.
 . .     -
.    ,  -
    //    
     
(19  217 ., . ) /  . . . . .:  , 218. 315 .
 . .,  . .,  . .,  . . 
  :    (-
  ) //    .
Society andSecurity Insights № 2 2022 60
 1: : , , , , -
, . 217. 4 (29). .17-179.
 . .,  . .     -
  // . 22. 3. .12–29. DOI: 1.25136/249-
7144.22.3.31639.
 . .      // -
 . 22. 1(22). .7679.
 . .,  . .,  . .   -
      -
   // Siberian Socium. 219. . 3, 2. .1834. DOI: 1.21684/2587-
8484-219-3-2-18-34.
 . .,  . .,  . .   -
-     // 
. 213. 11(19). .123–127.
     , -
   :    
 219  / .  . .,  . .,  . . . ; :
  , 22. 174 .
 . .        //
  . 221. 1-2. .53–68.
 . .    : 
 //    «  
» / . . . . . :  , 221. .55–57.
 . .,  . .,  . .   -
    // Society and Security Insights. 218. 1(3).
.13415. DOI: https://doi.org/1.14258/ssi(218)3-8.
 . .      -
   //  . 216. 11 (95). .6–62.
 . .      -
    // . 22. . 28, 3. .87–91.
DOI: https://doi.org/1.31171/vlast.v28i3.7315.
 . .,  . .    : -
  //  . 218. 2 (1). .145149.
 . .,  . .      -
       // Society and
Security Insights. 22. 3. .134–145.
 . .     // -
-  ().  
     COVID-19. 221. 1.
.9–16. DOI: 1.19181/INAB.221.1.1.
 . .    : -
  //   :  
Интеграция ибезопасность в странах Азиатского региона 61
. 22. 4 (158). .499–52. DOI: 1.14515/monitoring.22.4.126.
Kunovski M. N., Pomortseva N. V. Phenomenon ofe ective interethnic interaction as an
object ofinterdisciplinary research // Amazonia Investiga. 221. no. 1 (41). P.267274.
DOI: https://doi.org/1.3469/AI/221.41.5.25.
Liu J. H. A Cultural Perspective on Intergroup Relations and Social Identity // Online
Readings inPsychology and Culture. 212. no. 5 (3). P.113.
Malinowski B. A Scienti c eory ofCulture, and Other Essays. University ofNorth
Carolina Press, 1944.
Merton R. K. Social  eory and Social Structure. New York:  e Free Press. 1968.
Parsons . Some A erthoughts on «Gemeinscha and Gesellscha » // A New Evaluation.
Essays and Documents / ed. W. J. Cahnmann, T.Ferdinand. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1973.
P.151159.
Radcli e-Brown A. R.  e Methods of Ethnology and Social Anthropology. Method
inSocial Anthropology. Bombay. 1973.
REFERENCES
Arutjunjan, Ju. V., Drobizheva, L. M. (214). Traversed path and issues ofcontemporary
Russian ethnosociology. Sociologicheskie Issledovaniya, 7(363), 12-112. (In Russ.).
Gorbunova, A. A., Maksimov, M. B. (219). Adaptation potential of ethnic diasporas
inborder regions ofRussia. Society and Security Insights, 1, 3141. (In Russ.).
Drobizheva, L. M. (22). Interethnic harmony inthe face ofnew challenges. In: Z. H.Sa-
ralieva (Ed.). Socialnye Processy Sovremennoj Rossii. Vol. 1. Nizhny Novgorod: Izd-vo
NISOC (pp.4145). (In Russ.).
Drobizheva, L. M. (218). Study ofethnicity and inter-ethnic relations insociology. Re-
search inthe eld ofethnicity, inter-ethnic relations and the history ofnational policy.
In: V. A. Tishkov (Ed.). Materials ofthe session ofthe Scienti c Council ofthe Russian
Academy ofSciences on complex problems ofethnicity and interethnic relations, 19 De-
cember 2017. Moscow. Moscow: IEA RAN. (In Russ.).
Djatlov, A. V., Pan lova, Ju. S., Pshegusova, G. S., Gerasimov, G. I. (217).  e intereth-
nic relations inthe multiethnic region: features ofperception by the population (from
materials ofthe South of Russia). Vestnik Adygejskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta.
Seriya 1: Regionovedenie:  loso ya, istoriya, sociologiya, yurisprudenciya, politologiya,
kulturologiya, 4(29), 17–179. (In Russ.).
Kashhaeva, M. V., Marakulin, D. A. (22). National communities as a factor
of counter-action against extremism. Sociodinamika, 3, 1229. DOI: 1.25136/249-
7144.22.3.31639. (In Russ.).
Kenenov, T. V. (22).  eory ofinter-ethnic relations inresearch works. Vestnik nauki,
1(22), 7679. (In Russ.).
Maximova, S. G., Omelchenko, D. A., Noyanzina, O. E. (219).  e trust ofmigrants to-
wards recipient society inthe context ofsocial security inthe Russian border regions
of Russia. Siberian Socium, 3(2), 18–34. DOI: 1.21684/2587-8484-219-3-2-18-34. (In
Russ.).
Society andSecurity Insights № 2 2022 62
Maximova, S. G., Avdeeva, G. S., Maksimov, M. B. (213). Migration processes and so-
cio-economic security inborder regions ofRussia. Vestnik AGAU, 11(19), 123127.
(InRuss.).
Smirnova, T. B., Stepanov, V. V., Starchenko, R. A. (Eds.) (22). Inter-ethnic relations
and migration situation inthe regions ofUral, Siberia, and the Far East ofRussia. Expert
report on the study ofpublic opinion in2019. Moscow; Omsk: Izdatelskij centr KAN.
(InRuss.).
Mukomel, V. I. (221). Migration situation and migrants inthe perception ofRussians.
Vestnik Rossijskoj Nacii, 1–2, 5368. (In Russ.).
Mukomel, V. I. (221). Perspectives ofdemographic development ofRussia: regional as-
pect. In: Jakovenko N. V. (Ed.). Material ofthe International demographic forum «De-
mography and global challenges. Voronezh: Cifrovaya poligra ya (pp.55–57). (In Russ.).
Noyanzina, O. E., Gorbunova, A. A., Saryglar, S. A. (218). Social context ofmigration
processes inthe Altai krai. Society and Security Insights, 1(3), 134-15. DOI: https://doi.
org/1.14258/ssi(218)3-8. (In Russ.).
Romanenko, N. M. (216). Inter-ethnic relations as an important element ofsocial and
political reality. Chelovecheskij Kapital, 11(95), 6–62. (In Russ.).
Sabirova, N. S. (22). National policy ofcontemporary Russia inthe context ofin-
ter-ethnic interactions within a State. Vlast’, 28(3), 87–91. DOI: https://doi.org/1.31171/
vlast.v28i3.7315. (In Russ.).
Chekryzhova, O. I., Tarasova, E. V. (218). Migration ofpopulation ofthe Altai krai: ret-
rospective analysis. Izvestiya AltGU, 2(1), 145149. (In Russ.).
Shahova, E. V., Shheglova, D. K. (22). Dynamics ofattitudes ofthe Altai krai residents
towards migration situation and inter-ethnic relations inthe region. Society and Security
Insights, 3, 134–145. (In Russ.).
Shhegolkova, E. Ju. (221). Inter-ethnic relations during pandemics. Informacionno-an-
aliticheskij byulleten’ (INAB). Mezhnacionalnye otnosheniya i rossijskaya identich-
nost’ v slozhnyh usloviyah pandemii COVID-19, 1, 916. DOI: 1.19181/INAB.221.1.1.
(InRuss.).
Shhegolkova, E. Ju. (22). Interethnic relations inthe assessments ofRussians: socio-
logical analysis. Monitoring obshhestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i social’nye pere-
meny, 4(158), 49952. DOI: 1.14515/monitoring.22.4.126. (In Russ.).
Kunovski, M. N., Pomortseva, N. V. (221). Phenomenon ofe ective interethnic interac-
tion as an object ofinterdisciplinary research. Amazonia Investiga, 10(41), 267–274. DOI:
https://doi.org/1.3469/AI/221.41.5.25. (In Russ.).
Liu, J. H. (212). A Cultural Perspective on Intergroup Relations and Social Identity. On-
line Readings inPsychology and Culture, 5(3), 1–13.
Malinowski, B. A. (1944). Scienti c eory of Culture, and Other Essays. University
ofNorth Carolina Press.
Merton, R. K. (1968). Social  eory and Social Structure. New York:  e Free Press.
Parsons T. (1973). Some A erthoughts on «Gemeinscha and Gesellscha ». In:
W. J.Cahnmann, T.Ferdinand (Eds). A New Evaluation. Essays and Documents (pp.151–
Интеграция ибезопасность в странах Азиатского региона 63
159). Leiden: E. J. Brill.
Radcli e-Brown, A. R. (1973). e Methods ofEthnology and Social Anthropology. Meth-
od inSocial Anthropology. Bombay.
ИНФОРМАЦИЯ ОБАВТОРАХ/ INFORMATION ABOUT THE AUTHORS
  — --
 -, - ,  -
 , . , .
Ekaterina V. Shakhova— laboratory researcher ofthe Research and Development Sup-
port Department, Altai State University, Barnaul, Russia.
  — - . , , . 
     , 
 , . , .
Svetlana G. Maksimova— Dr. Sci. (Sociology), Professor, head. Department ofSocial
and Youth Policy, Institute for the Humanities, Altai State University, Barnaul, Russia.
Статья поступила вредакцию 24.04.2022;
одобрена после рецензирования 15.05.2022;
принята кпубликации 20.05.2022.
The article was submitted 24.04.2022;
approved after reviewing 15.05.2022;
accepted for publication 20.05.2022.