Society andSecurity Insights № 1 2023 32
Научная статья / Research Article
УДК 304.444
DOI: 10.14258/SSI(2023)1-02
Ментальные репрезентации религиозности взеркале
психосемантических измерений: региональные аспекты
Дарья Алексеевна Омельченко1,
Светлана Геннадьевна Максимова2,
Оксана Евгеньевна Ноянзина3
1Алтайский государственный университет, Барнаул, Россия,
daria.omelchenko@mail.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2839-5070
2Алтайский государственный университет, Барнаул, Россия,
svet-maximova@yandex.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4613-4966
3Главный информационно-вычислительный центр
Министерства культуры Российской Федерации, Москва, Россия,
noe@list.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1252-6021
Аннотация.       -
 ,    :  -
    ,   
 ,  .    -
 ,     , -
   (  
  )    
 ,         -
 ,    ,   ,
 ,   .  
       -
 ( ,  ,  ,  , n =
200).     — « (), 
  ,     », «  
-,   », «  ,    », «
(),    », « (),   -
  »,    « »
 ...    -
—        . -
   ,      
  .     -
      .
Ключевые слова:,  , ,  -
,  
Интеграция ибезопасность встранах азиатского региона 33
Финансирование:        22-28-01120
«      :
 ,  » (2022–2023 .).
Для цитирования: Омельченко Д.]А., Максимова С.]Г., Ноянзина О.]Е. Ментальные репре-
зентации религиозности взеркале психосемантических измерений: региональные аспекты //
Society andSecurity Insights. 2023. Т. 6, №1. С.32–55. doi: 10.14258/ssi(2023)1-02.
Mental Representations ofReligiousness inthe Mirror
ofPsychosemantic Measurement: Regional Facets
Daria A. Omelchenko1,
Svetlana G. Maximova2,
Oksana E. Noyanzina3
1Altai State University, Barnaul, Russia,
daria.omelchenko@mail.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2839-5070
2 Altai State University, Barnaul, Russia,
svet-maximova@yandex.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4613-4966
3Main Information andComputer Center
of theMinistry ofCulture ofthe Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia,
noe@list.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1252-6021
Abstract. e religiosity ofRussians is changing under thein uence ofglobal andlocal factors
that characterize the post-industrial development ofsociety: the repertoire of religious move-
ments andbeliefs is changing, religious practices andperceptions offaith andattitudes toward
believers are being transformed. Being simultaneously a social andindividual quality, re ecting
individual experiences andthein uence ofsociety, theexisting norms andinstitutionalized (con-
structed by social actors andformed inthe course ofsocialization) social perceptions ofreligion
andfaith, religiosity is re ected inthe public consciousness inthe form ofgeneralized images,
whose characteristics have common, common to all Russians, andunique components, deter-
mined by di erent factors.  e article presents theresults ofpsychosemantic studies infour bor-
der regions ofRussia (Altai Territory, Novosibirsk Region, Altai Republic, Republic ofTuva, n =
200).  e images offour carriers ofreligiosity— “I am a believer, I follow theteachings ofthe
church, I consider myself a follower ofa certain religion, “I believe inGod inmy own way, but I do
not practice a particular religion, “I cannot say whether I believe or not”, “I am not a believer, such
things do not interest me, “I am not a believer because religious teachings are wrong”, assessed by
thestatements from thescale ofSpiritual personality” inadaptation ofG. V. Ozhiganova. Several
semantic spaces are constructed andinterpreted— common forall regions ofthe study andsep-
arate foreach region.  e authors conclude that thehypothesis ofthe existence ofcommon bases
ofcategorization is only partially true.  e con guration ofthe images inthe space correlates with
theethno-religious features ofthe region andre ects thespeci city ofthe regional mentality.
Keywords: religiousness, images ofbelievers, psychosemantics, mental representations, bor-
der regions
Society andSecurity Insights № 1 2023 34
Financial Support: thearticle was prepared as part ofRussian Science Foundation project
22-28-01120, “Models ofConstructing Religious Identity inBorderland Regions ofRussia: In-
stitutional Mechanisms, Strategies, andPractices” (2022–2023).
For citation: Omelchenko, D.]A., Maximova, S.]G., Noyanzina, O.]E. (2023). Mental Representations
ofReligiousness inthe Mirror ofPsychosemantic Measurement: Regional Facets. Society andSecu-
rity Insights, 6(1), 32–55. (InRuss.). doi: 10.14258/ssi(2022)1-02.
Введение
       
 ,     -
,   .    -
 ,    -
       ,
  ,    « -
»      
  (Turner, 214).
     -
  ,    ,  
       . 
       -
   ,    -
  .    ,
      -
,,
   ,  -
  ,     (Hall, Delport, 213).
  ,     -
      
   (, 217).
      -
 —   ,  -
        .
     
      ,
    ,   -
  ,   
 Howarth, 22; Lichterman, 28).  ,  -
    ,  ,
,   ,   -
   ,   
 ,    . -
       -
      (,
216; , 22).        -
Интеграция ибезопасность встранах азиатского региона 35
 ,    -
.       
—   ,  ( ),
  ( ),    -
    —  , ,
,     ,  -
,   —   
 (  ) .
      
   .    
   . ,    
  /   ,  -
    () , -
 —  ,     
 ( ) (Allport, Ross, 1967). 
 . , .     
,,-
  ,   : духовной идентич-
ности,    ,  
,       ;
идентичности порелигиозной группе—   ,
      (-
  ),  личной выгоды отпринадлежно-
сти крелигиозному сообществу—   , -
   -  ,   
  ., , ,  социальных выгод отпринадлеж-
ности крелигиозному сообществу,    -
,      
      , , -
 .. (, , 216; Van Camp, Barden, Sloan, 216).
,,
«»   ,    
  ,     -
    .   
  ,   -
      
  , «» -
    .
 ,   ,  -
       -
,  ,   ,  -
    ,   
      -
Society andSecurity Insights № 1 2023 36
.    (. . , . . , . . 
.)       -
      (, 216).
 ,    (, . . ,
. . ), ,  ,  -
      ,

(,,),-
        «»,
     , ,  - 
   . , . .  -
      ,
..       , 
     (.   ,  
 , ,     
).      ,
     (, 23).
       .  
,  ,     
,      
   ,   
( ,   ),  
 ,     , 
      «».
         -
      -
.       
 . . ,  « » 
,     
     — «-
 ,     
  » (, 25).    
 - ,  -
      () -
    .
,   - .     -
   ,     ,
  ,    
  . ,    .  . .-
 (212)     -
      
.    ,     -
—,
Интеграция ибезопасность встранах азиатского региона 37
  ,   ,   -
  .     -
 ,      -
,     .

  ,    
      
  .    -
,   ,     -
     ( ) .  
   ,   
       -
   ,    ,
 ,   .  ,   -
    , ,  -
 ,    ,   
(—
   ,    -
 )      ,
     -
    (, , 27). 
  , «»,  -
 « »    .  -
      
       -
      
 .      -
     ,  
,      ,  
     , -
     .
Методологические основы исследования
      -
  , ,   ,  -,
- -   ( ), -
—    ,  , .. -
     ,   .
    , -
    ,   ,
    (, 197), 
, (Horley, 212)-
  (Osgood, 1964, Heise, 197)   
Society andSecurity Insights № 1 2023 38
     
     (, , 218). -
     
    (Pollack, 1998; Raskin, 22), 
-  . .   
. .,
 ,   ,  , 
, ,     -
  , «  »,  -
  (, 25).
  «   -
   , ,    , -
   » (, 27).   
    - 
(       ,
     ) -
  ,      -
 ,    ,  ,
  .     
    , -
      ,
       -
   .     
  ,   
     , -
         
.     «-
   » (, , , 218).
       
      
 « »,    -
  (« »,  . )  
      ,  
   .   
      
     ,  .  
  «     -
 (.        
   ,    ,
 , ,    
  ,    (, , 221).
    -
     :  , -
Интеграция ибезопасность встранах азиатского региона 39
 ,      ( 
 : n = 2 . 18 7 —  ,
n= 5). 2— 1
222 .  -    -
  (, ,   —  
 ).     . -
 ,    ,
,       -
  ,   , 
    (Vila, 25).   
25   .    -
  — , ,- .
 ,  ,   -
   —  ,   -
 (, , , ,  , ,
, , , ).   
 ,  ,  — , ,
  ,  —  - --
 .
      
      -
  «»,     -
 ,     
     : «
(),    ,    -
 », «   -,   »,
« ,    », « (),   
», « (),     ».
     -  -
, -,       -
,     (, ,
),-,
    ,    
,  -,     
    «»,  -
    .   
     « » 
 (Anas, Husain, 218; Husain, Luqman, Jahan, 212),  -
     
.. .     .. (219; 22).
28,-
— « » « » 
  :
Society andSecurity Insights № 1 2023 40
1.   :     -
 ,     -
     (, ,
,).
2. :  ,  , ,
     .
3.  :    -
   ,   , , -
   .
4.  ,  , , -
 ,  .
5.   :    
 ,  ,    -
 ,      ,  -
    .
       
 , -
-  (, ,  ), 
 ( ),  ,   (-
   )   ( -
 ,   ,  -
 —    ). 
,
       .
Основные результаты исследования
        
    .  
    (  ) 
      .   -
    ,   
  ,     
 ,    -
       .
     .
        -
 ,  69,2%  .   
,. .-
  . , ,    
   ,   
    ,   
    ,  
  .
Интеграция ибезопасность встранах азиатского региона 41
   (  
 ),  
e results offactor analysis (principal components
analysis with varimax rotation), united data
Компонента
Ф1 Ф2 Ф3
    0,810
   0,811
    0,769
    0,688
     0,688
 / 0,621
   0,695
   0,674
    0,705
   0,668
 /  0,549
     0,655
 / 0,528 0,504
    0,588
   0,779
   
(  ,   ) 0,516
   0,520 ,
     , 0,532
    0,569 ,
    0,668
   0,707
    0,788
    0,454
     0,738 ,
    ,   0,758 ,
   ,   0,678
     0,531
   0,628
Society andSecurity Insights № 1 2023 42
  (24,5% )   
,    ,  -
,   , ,  -
   : «   » (,788),
«,» (,758), «
  » (,738), «  » (,77), « 
» (,668), «       » (,655), «
 » (,628), « / » (,549), « /»
(,528), «   » (,569).     
   - ,  
     ,  -
  .
    (22,6%)   
,: «» (,81), «»
(,811), «   » (,769), «  -
» (,688), « » (,688), «-
/» (,621), ,     ,— « 
  (  ,   )» (,516),
«  » (,52), «    »
(,531).      , 
,  , —    -
,     .
  (22,1%)   : «  -
» (,779), «   » (,75), « 
» (,668), «» (,695), «»
(,674), « /» (,54), «   » (,588), « 
  » (,532). ,     -
 ,    -
  ,    
    «» 
 (. .).
 ,    , -
   .   , -
  ,    (. 1) ,
  « » « (),    
 ()»    , -
  .    
 ( )  (   -
 ),  «»    
,  «   -»   
,,-
    «»,     -
      . 
Интеграция ибезопасность встранах азиатского региона 43
«  »   «»  
 ,   -
.
       (  )
,     «»  
 .  ,  ,  
        -
     « », -
 ,    ,  
 «»,     
 .
   —   , 
   ,    : 
    , «   
»      -
,      .  ,
   ,     -
,  ,  ,   -
     ,    
,   «»   
.       ,
        « 
,    » «   -».
 1—    
  ( ).
Figure 1— Semantic spaces ofrole positions, the rst three factors (united data).
Society andSecurity Insights № 1 2023 44
  ,    
 .
Алтайский край
,
,    ,     , 
     .
         -
  1,,  72,3% .
 2—       ( ).
Figure 2— Semantic spaces ofrole positions, the rst three factors (the Altai krai).
  (25,4% )   , 
 ,    ,  
    «   »,  
   ,       
     .   -
     ,   
  (24,1%  ).  
     «»  «   
(  ,     ,     
     ,,  ,  -
  ,    «  -
 »,    ,  .
  (22,8%)     ,
  ,   ,  -
 «   »,   .
  «»     
  .   «» «-
Интеграция ибезопасность встранах азиатского региона 45
,    »  
    .   -
  «  ,    » «  -
»,    «   -»   
       (. 2).
,,-
  ,  ,  
, —      -
( «», «»).
   ,  ( -
   )   «   -»).
Республика Алтай
        ,
     .    ,
     (   27,%, 23,2%
21,3%),   ,     -
    . ,   -
    ,   -
     .
  ,    , 
 ,    (  
),   , ,
 ,      — -
    ,    . 
       ,  
     ,   
,    ,   ,
 «»,   ,  
    .
    ,  
  ,   
,     « -
»   «» ,   -
-    .
   (. 3)    -
       -
. ,         «
  -»,   «  -
».   ( )   -
  ,   ,    
      
.    ,  -
 ,    ,
Society andSecurity Insights № 1 2023 46
      .   -
 ,   
 ,     -
 ,     .
 3—    
  ( ).
Figure 3— Semantic spaces ofrole positions, the rst three factors (the Republic ofAltai).
Республика Тыва
-
,.-
    (    26,6%,
17,6%, 16,1%, 12,6% 9,%).
       ,
 ,  ,  (-
) ,   .   
,  ,   
  , —   , -
    .    -
     .
       -
     , 
,.—-
 ( : «  » (,86), « 
 » (,734)). —    
 «   » (,779) «   -
» (,864).  ,     
  ,   (   -
   )   , 
    ,  -
   .
Интеграция ибезопасность встранах азиатского региона 47
 4—    
  ( ).
Figure 4— Semantic spaces ofrole positions, the rst three factors (the Republic ofTyva).
      ,    
,      -
 ,   .  « 
 -»    ,   
  ,    -
   .  «»   -
()—,
,   .   -
      
,       
Society andSecurity Insights № 1 2023 48
  ( )   -
.         -
 «  ,    »,    
  (   ),  
     (  ),
       
      . ,  
,   ,     -
  ,   (. 4).
Новосибирской области     
 ,  19,7%, 18,8%, 16,5% 14,8% .
     —  -
 ,   , 
. —
  .    , 
,—
, ,   ,    
.       -
   .      -
  ( — «   » (,812),
«  » (,786), «   » (,67)).
      -
   ,  , -
 .        
,     ( -
 — «   » (,75), « -
 » (,62)).
      -
    ,   -
     (. 5,
  ).    , 
      ( -
),    ( 
).       (. 5,  )
    ,    -
    .   -
     ,  
     ,
   , —   
,   ,    -
     ( , 
,   , ),    -
     .
Интеграция ибезопасность встранах азиатского региона 49
,    (. 5 )  -
: 
 ,   , -
,  ,   «   -»,
       
,     , ,  
 .
 5—    
  ( ).
Figure 5— Semantic spaces ofrole positions, the rst four factors (the Novosibirsk Oblast).
Дискуссия иосновные выводы исследования
      -
    ,  
Society andSecurity Insights № 1 2023 50
,      -
     , 
  .   -
       -
      , -
     ,  
    .   -
,    (  ), -
   ,   -
       
,   ,    -
    ,  -
 ,     .
     , 
   ,    -
  .  ,  -
  , —    
 ,     .
  ,     -
    . ,  -
,      ,  -
     ,    ;
       , 
  ,     
,, —.
,-
 ,    ,   -
  ,   
  .
      
(  )     -
  —   -
 .        -
— , ,   ,   
   , —  -
 ,   «-»— .
     . -,
     ,    
,   ,  
 .      -
 ,        -
   .    
     ,
Интеграция ибезопасность встранах азиатского региона 51
, ,    . 
,   ,     
   . ,  -
   ,    -
    ,    --
  .   
    (, ,
, )     
.
СПИСОК ИСТОЧНИКОВ
 E. . . .: -. 27. 136.
 . .     -
  //  - . 216. 18.
.9–26.
 . .      t
//    :  -
. .  /  . . . . , . . . :
  , 22. . 137143.
 . .,  . . (27).    //
  . 27. 4. . 8–16.
 . . :  «» //  .
25. 3. . 153–168.
 . .,  . .  : 
. .: , 218. 592 .
 . .,  . .    
//     : . . XVII .
.-. . . . , 221. . 144148.
 . .   « » 
 // Experimental Psychology. 219. . 1, 12(4).
 . . -     -
   :   -
  //  .: -
 . 22. 17 (4). . 637-655.
 . .,  . .,   .   -
 //    . 215. 8 (2). . 5–31.
 . .  . .: , 25. 48 .
 . .      // -
 . 216. 1 (1). . 118127.
 . .     // 
. 217. 3. . 4463. doi: 1.19181/socjour.217.23.3.5363
Society andSecurity Insights № 1 2023 52
 . ., , . . -  -
    //   -
. 216. 7 (2). . 35–5.
 . . :     //  
 . . :  « », 23. . 112
–145.
Allport G. W., Ross J. M. Personal religious orientation andprejudice. Journal ofperson-
ality andsocial psychology. 1967. Vol. 5, No. 4. P. 432–433.
Anas M., Husain A. Revision ofSpiritual Personality Inventory // Journal ofthe Indian
Academy ofApplied Psychology. 218. Vol. 44, No. 2, 288295.
Hall H., Delport C. S.  e young adult’s perception ofreligion andformal structures:
A postmodern perspective // HTS:  eological Studies. 213. Vol. 69, No. 1. Art. #216,
1p. http://dx.doi.org/1.412/hts.v69i1.216.
Heise D. R.  e semantic di erential andattitude research // Attitude measurement.
197. No. 4. P. 235–253.
Horley J. Personal construct theory andhuman values // Journal ofHuman Values. 212.
Vol. 18, No. 2. P. 161171.
Howarth C. Identity inwhose eyes?: therole ofrepresentations inidentity construction
// Journal forthetheory ofsocial behaviour. 22. Vol. 32, No. 2. P. 145162.
Huber S., Huber O. W.  e centrality ofreligiosity scale (CRS) // Religions. 212. Vol. 3,
No. 3. P. 71724.
Husain A., Luqman N. & Jahan M. Spiritual Personality Inventory. New Delhi: Prasad
Psycho Corporation, 212.
Kelly G. A. A brief introduction to personal construct theory / D. Bannister (Ed.), Per-
spectives inpersonal construct theory. New York: Academic, 197. P. 1–29.
Lichterman P. Religion andtheconstruction ofcivic identity // American Sociological
Review. 28. Vol. 73, No. 1. P. 83–14.
Osgood C. E. Semantic di erential technique in the comparative study ofcultures //
American Anthropologist. 1964. Vol. 66, No. 3. P. 1712.
Pollack M. A. Constructivism, social psychology, andelite attitude change: Lessons from
an exhausted research program // Social Psychology, andElite Attitude Change: Lessons
from an Exhausted Research Program, 1998. URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=21812
( : 15.12.222). http://dx.doi.org/1.2139/ssrn.21812.
Raskin J. D. Constructivism inpsychology: Personal construct psychology, radical con-
structivism, andsocial constructionism // American communication journal. 22. Vol.
5, No. 3. P. 125.
Turner B. S. Religion andcontemporary sociological theories // Current Sociology. 214.
Vol. 62, No. 6. P. 771788.
Van Camp D., Barden J., Sloan L. Social andindividual religious orientations exist with-
in both intrinsic andextrinsic religiosity // Archive forthePsychology ofReligion. 216.
Vol. 38, No. 1. P. 22–46.
Интеграция ибезопасность встранах азиатского региона 53
Vila P. Border identi cations: Narratives ofreligion, gender, andclass on theUS-Mexico
border. University ofTexas Press, 25. 32 p.
REFERENCES
Artemyeva, E. (27). Psychology ofsubjective semantics. Moscow: Izd-vo LKI. (In Russ.).
Bogachev, M. I. (216). On theformation ofan integral approach to theconceptualiza-
tion ofreligiosity. Vestnik ofthe Svyato-Philaretovsky Institute, 18, 9–26. (In Russ.).
Ivanov, R. V. (22). New religiosity and religious identity among young people. In:
A. P.Romanova, D. A. Chernichkin (Eds.). Religious Identity andIntercultural Commu-
nications, Materials ofthe All-Russian Scienti c Seminar (pp. 137143). Astrakhan: As-
trahanskij gosudarstvennyj universitet. (In Russ.).
Kubryakova, E. S., & Demyankov, V. Z. (27). To theproblem ofmental representa-
tions. Issues ofCognitive Linguistics, 4, 8–16. (In Russ.).
Lebedev, S. D. (25). Religiosity: insearch oftheRubicon. Sociological Journal, 3, 153
168. (In Russ.).
Mitina, O. V., & Petrenko, V. F. (218). Political psychology: a psychosemantic approach.
Moscow: Soium. (In Russ.).
Mitina, O. V, & Tsoy, S. V. (221). Psychosemantic analysis ofperceptions ofhate. In:
Digital technologies inthe service ofpedagogy andpsychology. Collection ofarticles ofthe
XVII All-Russian Scienti c-Practical Conference with international participation (pp.
144148). Kolomna. (In Russ.).
Ozhiganova G. V. (219). Adaptation ofthe questionnaire «Spiritual personality» inthe
Russian-speaking sample. Experimental Psychology, 1(12). (In Russ.).
Ozhiganova, G. V. (22). Spiritual and moral qualities of personality and empathy
as components ofhigher moral abilities: veri cation of the relationship on the Rus-
sian sample. Vestnik ofthe Peoples’ Friendship University ofRussia. Series: Psychology
andPedagogy, 17(4), 637655. (In Russ.).
Petrenko, V. F., Mitina, O. V., & Karitsky I. N. (215). To theproblem ofthe study ofmen-
tality. Historical psychology andsociology ofhistory, 8(2), 5–31. (In Russ.).
Petrenko, V. F. (25). Fundamentals ofpsychosemantics. St. Petersburg : Piter. (In Russ.).
Ryzhova, S. V. (217). Religiosity inthe context ofthe culture oftrust. Sociological Jour-
nal, 3, 4463. doi: 1.19181/socjour.217.23.3.5363. (In Russ.).
Ryzhova, S. V. (216). Peculiarities ofstudying thereligious identity ofRussians. Socio-
logical Studies, 10(1), 118127. (In Russ.).
Khukhlaev, O. E., & Shorokhova, V. A. (216). Socio-psychological study of religious
identity inOrthodox youth. Social Psychology andSociety, 7(2), 35–5. (In Russ.).
Chesnokova, V. F. (23). Votserkovlenie: Phenomenon andways ofits study. In: Ten
years of sociological observations (pp. 112–145). Moscow : Fond «Obshchestvennoe
mnenie». (InRuss.).
Allport, G. W., & Ross, J. M. (1967). Personal religious orientation andprejudice. Journal
Society andSecurity Insights № 1 2023 54
ofpersonality andsocial psychology, 5(4), 432–433.
Anas, M., Husain, A. (218). Revision ofSpiritual Personality Inventory. Journal ofthe
Indian Academy ofApplied Psychology, 44(2), 288–295.
Hall, H., & Delport, C. S. (213).  e young adults perception ofreligion andformal
structures: A postmodern perspective. HTS:  eological Studies, 69(1), Art. #216, 1 p.
http://dx.doi.org/1.412/hts.v69i1.216.
Heise, D. R. (197).  e semantic di erential andattitude research. Attitude measure-
ment, 4, 235–253.
Horley, J. (212). Personal construct theory andhuman values. Journal ofHuman Val-
ues, 18(2), 161–171.
Howarth, C. (22). Identity inwhose eyes?: therole ofrepresentations inidentity con-
struction. Journal forthetheory ofsocial behaviour, 32(2), 145–162.
Huber, S., & Huber, O. W. (212).  e centrality ofreligiosity scale (CRS). Religions, 3(3),
71–724.
Husain, A., Luqman, N. & Jahan, M. (212). Spiritual Personality Inventory. New Delhi:
Prasad Psycho Corporation.
Kelly, G. A. (197). A brief introduction to personal construct theory / D. Bannister (Ed.),
Perspectives inpersonal construct theory. New York: Academic, 197. P. 129.
Lichterman, P. (28). Religion andtheconstruction ofcivic identity. American Socio-
logical Review, 73(1), 8314;
Osgood, C. E. (1964). Semantic di erential technique inthe comparative study ofcul-
tures. American Anthropologist, 66(3), 171–2.
Pollack, M. A. (1998). Constructivism, social psychology, andelite attitude change: Les-
sons from an exhausted research program. Social Psychology, andElite Attitude Change:
Lessons from an Exhausted Research Program. https://ssrn.com/abstract=21812, http://
dx.doi.org/1.2139/ssrn.21812.
Raskin, J. D. (22). Constructivism inpsychology: Personal construct psychology, radical
constructivism, andsocial constructionism. American communication journal, 5(3), 1–25.
Turner, B. S. (214). Religion andcontemporary sociological theories. Current Sociology,
62(6), 771–788.
Van Camp, D., Barden, J., & Sloan, L. (216). Social andindividual religious orientations
exist within both intrinsic andextrinsic religiosity. Archive forthePsychology ofReli-
gion, 38(1), 2246.
Vila, P. (25). Border identi cations: Narratives of religion, gender, and class on
theUS-Mexico border. University ofTexas Press.
ИНФОРМАЦИЯ ОБ АВТОРАХ / INFORMATION ABOUT THE AUTHORS
  — . . ,   -
  ,   ,  -
 , . , .
Интеграция ибезопасность встранах азиатского региона 55
Daria A. Omelchenko— Cand. Sci. (Sociology), Associate Professor at theDepartment
ofSocial andYouth Policy, Institute ofHumanities, Altai State University, Barnaul, Russia.
  — - . , , . 
     , 
 , . , .
Svetlana G. Maximova— Dr. Sci. (Sociology), Professor, head. Department ofSocial
andYouth Policy, Institute ofHumanities, Altai State University, Barnaul, Russia
  — . . , ,  -
-      -
, . , .
Oksana E. Noyanzina— Cand. Sci. (Sociology), theHead ofthe Information andAnaly-
sis Department ofthe Main Computing Center ofthe Ministry ofCulture ofthe Russian
Federation, Moscow, Russia.
Статья поступила вредакцию 15.01.2023;
одобрена после рецензирования 01.02.2023;
принята кпубликации 15.03.2023.
The article was submitted 15.01.2023;
approved after reviewing 01.02.2023;
accepted forpublication 15.03.2023.