КРАТКИЕ СООБЩЕНИЯ ИПЕРВЫЙ
ИССЛЕДОВАТЕЛЬСКИЙ ОПЫТ
BRIEF COMMUNICATIONS AND THE FIRST
RESEARCH EXPERIENCE
Научная статья / Research Article
УДК 316.65
DOI: 10.14258/SSI(2023)3-11
Представления студенческой молодежи осемейном насилии
Маргарита Вячеславовна Матвеенко1
Оксана Юрьевна Каплун2
1Дальневосточный федеральный университет, Владивосток, Россия,
matveenko.mv@dvfu.students.ru, https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6540-6941
2Дальневосточный федеральный университет, Владивосток, Россия,
kaplun.oi@dvfu.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1150-4269
Аннотация.       :  -
        -
,    ,   
  .     
 : , , , -
   .  ,    
 ,    ,
      .     -
       , 
   .
        
  ,       -
 ,     .  
Краткие сообщения ипервый исследовательский опыт 191
       -
.
      «— »  -
       -
  ,      -
     .   
    .
Ключевые слова:,  ,    ,
 ,  ,  ,  ,  -
 
Финансирование:       
   (  22-08-06-006.  -
:        
  ).
Для цитирования: Матвеенко М.В., Каплун О.Ю. Представления студенческой молодежи
одомашнем насилии // Society and Security Insights. 2023. Т. 6, № 3. С.190–203. doi: 10.14258/
ssi(2023)3-11
e Student-Age Population Image
of Domestic Abuse
Margarita V. Matveenko1
Oksana Yu. Kaplun2
1 Far Eastern Federal University, Vladivostok, Russia,
matveenko.mv@dvfu.students.ru, https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6540-6941
2 Far Eastern Federal University, Vladivostok, Russia,
kaplun.oi@dvfu.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1150-4269
Abstract. e problem ofdomestic violence does not lose its relevance: ina changing society,
the institution ofthe family isalso undergoing constant changes, contacts within the family are
being transformed, and there isan escalation ofnegative trends ininterpersonal communication.
e consequences ofdomestic violence have the broadest pro le ofaction: at the physiological, in-
trapersonal, interpersonal, institutional, and global levels. Domestic violence, being inherently an
unlawful phenomenon that infringes on personal integrity and dignity, isstill perceived insociety
as an ordinary phenomenon. However, one can con dently assert its unambiguously negative
impact on both the social structure and the mental organization ofthe individual.  is work aims
to explore the student-age youths ideas about domestic violence, since it isyoung people who are
both a re ection ofmodern society and a  agship ofchange within it. Identi cation ofstudents
views on domestic violence was carried out through an appeal to the psychodiagnostic appara-
tus.  e study revealed the dominant level oftrust inthe myths about domestic violence among
students, revealed the absence ofsigni cant di erences inthe answers of boys and girls.  is
Society andSecurity Insights № 3 2023 192
indicates a fairly deep spread offalse ideas related to domestic violence, the eradication ofwhich
seems to be a di cult, but quite feasible process, which should originate not so much within an
individual, but ina system ofsocial relationships. We also assume the existence ofa general trend
towards the uni cation ofstandards ofeducation for both sexes. Inaddition, inthe context ofthe
spread ofhumanistic values, it isquite natural to adopt a critical view ofthe problem ofdomestic
violence. Finally, respondents who are inclined to minimize the damage ofdomestic violence are
more likely to justify the abuser.  is can be explained by the young peoples belief that violence
must be earned and that its actor has good reason to ‘punish’ his partner inthis way.
Keywords: Russia, domestic violence, domestic violence myths acceptance, students, abuse,
countermeasures, marriage and family, security
Financial Support: the work was supported by the Far Eastern Federal University Founda-
tion, Project  22-08-06-006  e Philosophy oflaw: crime and punishment as a problem ofthe
social justice and eficiency in the era of globalization.
For citation: Matveenko, M.V., Kaplun, O.Yu. (2023). The student-age population image ofdo-
mestic abuse. Society and Security Insights, 6(3), 190–203. (InRuss.). doi: 10.14258/ssi(2023)3-11
Введение
    ,    -
 ,  .    -
     .  ,  
    ,     -
, —   — , 
   ,      -
    .
        -
,,
    .  
    ,    ,
      
  .
         -
  , ,  
,     (, 219; ,
21).        
   ,   (, 222: 81): -
     ,  -
  «»      ,
,       
(, 219: 73).     — 
 ,    
,      (-
, 222; , 217; , 221; , 222).
Краткие сообщения ипервый исследовательский опыт 193
Методы исследования
Цель, задачи игипотеза исследования
       -
    .   
  :
1.         
.
2.       
 .
3.      -
    .
4.     -
 .  .
    
        .
        
 ,    -
 ,   .  
        ,
-, ,   
,  .
   :
1.        -
  .
2. ,      ,
    .
Методология исследования
        -
    ,  , -
   ,   --
        IBM SPSS
Statistics 27.    :
1.      (. ).
2.     (. -).
Описание выборки
  «   »  -
  -    14  35 
1. ,   ,    

,   ,     -
1 Омолодежной политике вРоссийской Федерации: Федеральный закон от30.12.2020 № 489-
ФЗ (последняя редакция). URL: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_372649/.
Society andSecurity Insights № 3 2023 194
     .     -
      -
     .  
        -
     .
       -
     -
 17  25 .     5 .
Понятие «семейное насилие»
. .      , -
 ,     -
 ,       -
, , ,   ; 
      -
    (, 217: 315). . .  . .
   . . ,   -
   «     
 ,  ,    -
  ,   » (, ,
21: 316).
       -
    ,   (, -
, 222: 81):     
,    «»    -
  , ,  
   (, 219: 73).  ,   -
      ,    -
       : -
       (, 22: 89),
       . 
. . ,       -
       ,  ,
.,-
,      -
       (,
219: 73). . .      «
 , ,  , 
        -
   » (, 218: 13).
 ,     
       
 ,      -
    - .
Краткие сообщения ипервый исследовательский опыт 195
       
  (, 218: 11): , -
,  .
 ,       -
  , ,    -
      -  
       -
.        
 : , ,  ,
—   (, 218: 131).
Анализ представлений о проблеме семейного насилия в отечественной
изарубежной литературе
      ,  
  .      , 
       
      -
 (, , 222: 81).    
  ,    -
    (, , 221: 292).
       
   .   
      ,
      -
 .    
   ,    -
 .  , ,   ,  -
  : «   » « -
      ».   
 -    , -
—    (, 22: 91). -
      «  
»,       -
 ,     
      (, 221:
39–31).        -
 .       -
    (, 218: 235).
 ,     -
   ,     -
,      1.  
    ,    -
1 Как информационная кампания может изменить отношение к домашнему насилию. URL:
https://news.un.org/ru/interview/2022/11/1435087.
Society andSecurity Insights № 3 2023 196
 ,        
.        
 ,      . 
        (,
, 222: 82).       -
,     « »  -
   (, 219: 7).
. .      ,  
  : ,   -
 , , ,  -  ,
 ,      (-
, ,  ., 222). ,   , ,
-
,   ,     -
 ,      
   (, 219: 73).
      
      
      -
   (, ,  ., 219: 937).
Результаты эмпирического исследования
        
  (.).
—     , %.
Figure— Domestic violence myths acceptance level, %.
   ,  ,  
      : 7% -
Краткие сообщения ипервый исследовательский опыт 197
     .  
       
,      
  .       -
       
  ,   , -
 ,  ,
        , 
  .
    (p>,5),  -
  :      
  (. 1).
  1.
Table 1.
    
Male and female sample mean comparison
 N25
 48,7
 N25
 44
T 1,3
p, . 0,2
      
    ,  
   .      -
       -
        -
   , ,  ,  
   «»,   «» .   
, ,   ,    -
     — 
   . , ,   
    .
        
 «» « ».
   (p<,5),    -
    . ,   
       «-
» « » (. 2).
Society andSecurity Insights № 3 2023 198
 2.
Table 2.
   
«» « »
Pearson correlation coe cient between ‘Minimization’ and ‘Exoneration’ scale
 

  0,6
p, . () 0
N50
         ,
   ,   
.  ,     -
 :     « », -
,        .
       
 , «»   . 
   . C    
 -
    .
-,      :
     « »,
       .
      -
, , , ,
      .
-,  «  »   -
    ,  
,-
.      
  ,    
 ,      -
  .
-,     , -
   ,    
,        ,  
   .
,      
   ,     
 ,    .  ,  , 
      
      , 
Краткие сообщения ипервый исследовательский опыт 199
      
 .
Выводы
-,       
    .     
     ,  , -
 -     -
     . , , -
  ,   —   
 ,  —   .
  , ,      
,      
      .
, ,    ,  -
   ,    
.         ,  
          «-
»  .
 ,     , -
    ,   -
      . ,
  — ,   — -
       -
 .     
   :    -
      .
        -
:   ,  -
   , ,  
       --
        
 .
       -
,   ,     ,
       -
  .
       -
,       -
 .
      .
-,-
         U--
Society andSecurity Insights № 3 2023 200
 —      , 
        -
       -
        -
. -,      
r     «» « »
 ,      : 
-
        .
 ,      -
         -
     : -
  ,    
    .
СПИСОК ИСТОЧНИКОВ
 . .      //
    . 218.  7. . 234237.
,.,.—
   ,     -
  //  - . 217.  92.
.62–64.
 . .   () :  -
   //   
. 22.  111. . 87–96.
 . .  ()    -
  //    . 217. 3. . 31–
319.
 . .     .  « -
  » // . 221.  8(4). . 33–317.
 . .,  . .,  . .    
 : , ,  . -
: , 222. 123 .
 . .,  . .,  . .   -
     //  . 217.  3.
.11–126.
 . .,  . .,  . .,  . .,  . .,
 . .,  . .     -
    ( ) //  
,   . 219. 5. . 936–939.
 . .    ,    -
 // - . 219.  1. . 7176.
Краткие сообщения ипервый исследовательский опыт 201
 . .,  . . -   
:   // . 221.  4. . 29–295.
 . .,  . .  : ,   -
  ,    //  -
. 221.  12–2. . 9711.
 . .,  . .    
  //  :   .
219. . 6575.
. .,. ., «-
 »,   ,    //
 . 21.  12. . 31–317.
 . .,  . .,  . .,  . .,  . . 
        // -
   . 222.  3.
 . .,  . .  :   // -
    . 222.  72. . 81–84.
 . .    :  
// Lex Russica. 218.  9(142). . 129–138.
 . .,  . .,  . .,  . ., -
. . ,     //  
 . 222.  1.
 . .       //
Via scientiarum—  . 222.  3. . 27–32.
 . .     :
  // . 222.  2(39). . 9513.
Gombul O. Nurses attitudes towards violence imposed on women by her husband inthe
family and their professional role inviolence // Nursing Research Journal. 2. no. 1.
P. 1932.
Peters J. Measuring Myths about Domestic Violence: Development and Initial Valida-
tion ofthe Domestic Violence Myth Acceptance Scale // Journal ofAggression, Mal-
treatment & Trauma. 28. no. 16(1). P. 121.
Petretic-Jackson P., Genell S. Domestic violence blame scale // Journal ofInterpersonal
Violence. 1994. no. 18(7). P. 695–716.
REFERENCES
Arhipova, A. S. (218). International practice ofdomestic violence countering. Mezh-
dunarodnyj zhurnal gumanitarnyh i estestvennyh nauk, 7, 234237.
Blazhevska, V., Stoimenovska, K. (217). Personality pro le di erences among women
victims ofdomestic violence and women who are not victims ofdomestic violence. Mezh-
dunarodnyj nauchno-issledovatel’skij zhurnal, 9–2, 62-64. doi:1.2367/IRJ.217.63.92
Volosova, N. Yu. (22). Domestic abuse concept: controversial issue of terminology
Society andSecurity Insights № 3 2023 202
consistency. Voprosy rossijskogo i mezhdunarodnogo prava, 111, 87–96. (InRuss.)
Volosova, N. Yu. (217). Domestic abuse as a problem ofinterdisciplinary nature. Vo-
prosy rossijskogo i mezhdunarodnogo prava, 3, 31319. (InRuss.)
Dunaeva, O. N. (221). Overcoming domestic violence incontemporary China.  e law
against domestic violence. Viktimologiya, 8(4), 33317. (InRuss.)
Istomina, O. B., Lukina, A. A., Kakaulina, E. V. (222). Institution ofthe family inmodern
Russian society: essence, organization, operation dynamic. Irkutsk: Asprint (InRuss).
Kachaeva, M. A., Dozorceva, E. G., Nuckova, E. V. (217). A er-e ects ofdomestic vio-
lence experience for women and girls. Psihologiya i parvo, 3, 11–126. (InRuss.)
Kekelidze, Z. I., Kachaeva, M. A., Haritonova, N. K., Vasyanina, V. I., Shishkina, O. A.,
Skibina, N. V., Nazarova, L. N. (219). Medical aspects ofthe problem ofdomestic vi-
olence against women and girls (literature review). Problemy social’noj gigieny, zdra-
voohraneniya i istorii mediciny, 5, 936–939. (InRuss.)
Letova, N. V. (219). General domestic violence preconditions, its generic features, and
special aspects. Social’no-politicheskie nauki, 1, 7176. (InRuss.)
Makashova, T. P., Bachanova, V. V. (221). Domestic violence against women inRussia:
articulation ofissue. Viktimologiya, 4, 29295. (InRuss.)
Matveeva, E. V., Pinegina, N. M. (221). Domestic violence: the problem, determining
factors and e ects on female victims. Nauchnyj al’manah, 12–2, 9711. (InRuss.)
Noskova, E. V., Petrakevich, T. V. (219). General aspects and consequences ofmodern
domestic violence. In: Domestic violence: prevention and responsibility. Tomsk (pp. 65–
75). (InRuss.)
Puchnin, V. M., Shunyaev, S. V. (21).  e meaning ofthe de nitions that make up the
concept ofdomestic violence as an asocial phenomenon that encroaches on the freedom
ofthe individual. Vestnik TGU, 12, 31317. (InRuss.)
Rajkova, K. A., E mov, A. A., Savenkova, E. N., Giryuk, S. A., Korsak, V. O. (222). Do-
mestic violence problem and solutions analysis inmodern world. Sovremennye problemy
nauki i obrazovaniya, 3. (InRuss.)
Sadykov, R. M., Bolshakova, N. L. (222). Domestic violence: essence and forms. Mezh-
dunarodnyj zhurnal gumanitarnyh i estestvennyh nauk, 72, 81–84. (InRuss.)
Salamova S. Ya. (218). Domestic violence inmodern Russia. Lex Russica, 9(142), 129
138. (InRuss.)
Fedoseeva, L. A., Ilyushina, E. S., Krasilnikova, G. A., Chegulova, A. A., Berdnikova,
K. E. (222). Types, forms, and consequences ofdomestic violence, Sovremennye nauch-
nye issledovaniya i innovacii, 1. (InRuss.)
Shpilinova, A. Yu. (222). Decriminalization ofdomestic abuse and its consequences.
Via scientiarum— Doroga znanij, 3, 2732. (InRuss.)
Shchepel’kov, V. F. (222). Countering domestic abuse inRussian Federation: current
situation and perspectives. Kriminalist, 2(39), 92–13. (InRuss).
Gombul, O. (2). Nurses attitudes towards violence imposed on women by her hus-
Краткие сообщения ипервый исследовательский опыт 203
band inthe family and their professional role inviolence. Nursing Research Journal, 1,
19–32.
Peters, J. (28). Measuring Myths about Domestic Violence: Development and Initial
Validation ofthe Domestic Violence Myth Acceptance Scale. Journal ofAggression, Mal-
treatment & Trauma, 16(1), 121.
Petretic-Jackson, P., Genell, S. (1994). Domestic violence blame scale. Journal ofInterper-
sonal Violence, 18(7), 695–716.
СВЕДЕНИЯ ОБАВТОРАХ / INFORMATION ABOUT THE AUTHORS
   — - 
    , . -
, .
Margarita V. Matveenko— research assistant at the Department ofPsychology and Ed-
ucation ofFar Eastern Federal University, Vladivostok, Russia.
  — . . , ,   -
   , . -
, .
Oksana Yu. Kaplun— Cand. Sci. (Sociology), Associate Professor at the Department
ofPsychology and Education ofFar Eastern Federal University, Vladivostok, Russia.
Статья поступила вредакцию 14.07.2023;
одобрена после рецензирования 03.08.2023;
принята кпубликации 15.08.2023.
The article was submitted 14.07.2023;
approved after reviewing 03.08.2023;
accepted for publication 15.08.2023.