СОЦИАЛЬНЫЕ, КУЛЬТУРНЫЕ
ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ ИБЕЗОПАСНОСТЬ
SOCIAL, CULTURAL RESEARCHES AND SECURITY
Научная статья / Research Article
УДК 331.54
DOI: 10.14258/SSI(2023)3-07
Молодежь вмире профессий будущего:
позиционирование ипрофессиональная идентичность
Алла Владимировна Зинич1
Светлана Геннадьевна Максимова2
Дарья Алексеевна Омельченко3
Юлия Николаевна Ревякина4
1Омский государственный аграрный университет, Омск, Россия,
av.zinich@omgau.org, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2265-5633
2Алтайский государственный университет, Барнаул, Россия,
maksimova@socio.asu.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4613-4966
3Алтайский государственный университет, Барнаул, Россия,
omelchenko@edu.asu.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2839-5070
4Омский государственный аграрный университет, Омск, Россия,
yun.revyakina@omgau.org, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4641-9670
Аннотация.     -
    .   -
 ,   ,   
  ,  ,     -
,       . 
       , -
      ,  
Society andSecurity Insights № 3 2023 130
,   ,    .   -
       , 
   .   
  ,       2021 .
    .     
,       -
 ,    ,  -
 .        -
   .   , 
    , -
      . 
     
     . ,  
  ,     -
,       -
  ,      .  
         
 ,    « » . 
, ,          
     .
Ключевые слова: ,  , , , -
 ,  
Финансирование:      
   ( 19-29-07366  -
      -
 ).
Для цитирования: Зинич А. В., Максимова С. Г., Омельченко Д. А., Ревякина Ю. Н. Моло-
дежь вмире профессий будущего: позиционирование ипрофессиональная идентичность //
Society and Security Insights. 2023. Т. 6, № 3. С.129–143. doi: 10.14258/ssi(2023)3-07.
Youth inthe World ofProfessions ofthe Future:
Positioning and Professional Identity
Alla V. Zinich1
Svetlana G. Maximova2
Daria A. Omelchenko3
Yulia N. Revyakina4
1 Omsk State Agrarian University, Omsk, Russia,
av.zinich@omgau.org, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2265-5633
2Altai State University, Barnaul, Russia,
maksimova@socio.asu.ru, https://orcid.org/ 0000-0002-4613-4966
Социальные, культурные исследования ибезопасность 131
3Altai State University, Barnaul, Russia,
omelchenko@edu.asu.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2839-5070
4Omsk State Agrarian University, Omsk, Russia,
yun.revyakina@omgau.org, https://orcid.org/0000-0000-2222-2222
Abstract. Currently, the digitalization oftechnological and business processes leads to se-
rious changes inthe labor market.  e article presents an analysis ofthe main trends ofyouth
behavior inthe labor market due to the accelerating processes ofdigitalization ofthe economy.
Empirical data were obtained as a result ofa survey conducted on the basis ofa sociological
study of2021 inten regions ofthe Siberian Federal District. Its main purpose was to assess the
main concerns associated with the gradual displacement ofa person from the world ofprofes-
sions and widespread robotics, the introduction ofarti cial intelligence systems, machine learn-
ing, etc. As a result, the attitudes ofyoung people towards their future inthe context ofdigital
business transformation are revealed. New are the results that allow us to assess the formation
and necessity ofsupra-professional skills that are indemand inthe digital economy, taking into
account the geographical factor.  e ideas ofprofessional self-determination ofmodern youth
and the importance ofthe process ofrealizing their professional potential are investigated. It
isrevealed that young people are quite optimistic, looking at the horizon oftheir professional
future, understanding the need to receive additional education and improve inorder to  t into
the realities ofthe new digital economy. When building their professional trajectories, young
people pay great attention not only to  nancial issues, but also to having the opportunity to
“bene t” society.
Keywords: youth, labor market, digitalization, uncertainty, sociological research, professional
identity
Financial Support: the work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research
(project No. 19-29-07366 Interdisciplinary approach to professional self-determination ofrural
youth inthe conditions ofdigitalization ofthe economy).
For citation: Zinich, A. V., Maximova, S. G., Omelchenko, D. A., Revyakina, Yu. N. (2022). Youth
inthe World ofProfessions ofthe Future: Positioning and Professional Identity. Society and Security
Insights, 6(3), 129–143. (InRuss.). doi: 10.14258/ssi(2023)3-07.
Введение
    , 
.-
   -,  
    ,    -
,  .     ,  
       .
  ,     -
       
,  . ,  ,
,         ,
      -
      
(Kosenchuk, Zinich, 221; Piątkowski, 22).
Society andSecurity Insights № 3 2023 132
GáborSzabó-Szentgróti      -
 ,      -
  .  ,     -
          
(GáborSzabó-Szentgróti, 221).      -
      ,  
       .
       -
,        -
.   (, , 217; Gavrina, 217) -
,      
     ,      
  .   ,  
        ?
   - ,   
    ( ) 
    ,   
 .      
, , ,    
   ,   -  -
  (Novakova, 22).
    K. Hat G. Stoeglehner,  ,
       
,      (Hat, Stoeglehner, 22).  -
,        -
 ,    ,  
 ,    .   
      .
        -
  C. B. Frey M. A. Osborne,   
    72 .  
     
    ,   -
      (Frey et all., 217).
        ,
    .  COVID-19
,       -
   ,      -
,
  (Omelchenko, 221).    -
    ,   -
       
  (Piroșcă, 221).
Социальные, культурные исследования ибезопасность 133
  M. Khokhlova,    -
,     «»   
,.
      
       
  .    -
  ,  .  -
   M. Khokhlova    
     (Khokhlova, 219).
        , -
  ,     
   (Piątkowski, 22).   
28 .        -
    2%.    -
        -
    .   
  —   ,  
 ,     -
 (Caliendo, Schmidl, 216; Berger, Frey, 216; Kluve, 214).
  ,     
  , -
  ,     -
    .  ,  
A.Larsson,       
 (Larsson, Teigland, 22).
Методы исследования
      , -
      -
 ,    , 
.       -
 .     
     .  -
      ,
  221 .     -
 :  , , ,   
, , , ,   .-
     1435 ,  
      , -
  .    -
  592 .    
  - ,   -
,    .  -
Society andSecurity Insights № 3 2023 134
  - (   
).    -
    SPSS.    
   ,   
(, 217).
     -
     :   -
  ;   , 
    ;  -
    .
Результаты
      -
    ,     — -
 ,  .  ,  
     
    ,   -
    ,  -
    . T  ,
   ,     
     -
 ,       -
  ,   
  .   - -
      
  .  ,  
      -
,      
,       -
    ,  ,   
   (Bührer, Hagist, 217).
      
      .
  ,     -
, , .   -
     ,   -
  ,    .  — 
  - ,     -
  ,   
 ,    -
, ,     ,
  ,   , 
—    (, 219).
Социальные, культурные исследования ибезопасность 135
      
?     -   -
  ,    ,  -
     ,  -
     ? 
       .
       , 
      ,    -
,      , 
 .    ,   
    ,   
        
.   1 ,   ,   -
   ,     
  (26,7%),     (1415%)
     ,   
 (6,5%),    (1,%).   
,    ,   , , 
       
(38–46%),          -
 (2%).    (14,7%)   (11,%) 
  , , ,    
 (       -
  — 3–33%),     
     ( 37% 
)     (2,%) (. 1).  ,
,   , -  
     .
 1—      
    , %
Figure 1— Distribution ofanswers to the question about the displacement ofa person
from the labor market by modern technologies inthe regional context, %
1 Различия оценивались с помощью критерия χ2 и z-критерия для сравнения пропорций
столбцов споправкой Бонферонни для множественных сравнений. Приводятся отличия, зна-
чимые покрайней мере на5%-м уровне.
Society andSecurity Insights № 3 2023 136
       -
    ( )   ( , 
   )      -
 ,     -
 .   ,   
    « »,  / 
     .   
      -
   ,    .
,
:,
   21,6%    17,2%
  ,     -
    (14,3%; . 2).    
   -  ,     -
,       , 
     , , ,  -
  .
 2—      
     , %
Figure 2— Distribution ofanswers to the question about choosing a job ina
high-tech company and matching the candidacy by study regions, %
Обсуждение
      (61,8%)  -
       -
,      
Социальные, культурные исследования ибезопасность 137
,      .   
      ,    
  «»,     -
    .
    ?     
    ?  -
      ,  
 ,    .
     ,  -
   ,  — ,  , 
 ,      , 
  ,   
 ,   ,  
 .
       
,      -
 ,  ,  ,    -
  .   17 ,  
    : -
 ,  ,  , -
 ,   ,  ,
,  , 
 ,  (),   ,
,    ,   -
 (  ),  ,  -
 ,   .
      
.—-
  (12 ),   (3 )  -
 (4–5)  (12 ),  (3 )  
(4–5) .   ( -
)        . -
      .
        
,   ,   ,
  ,   (    -
    6% ).     -
 ,  ,  (56–58%).
      () -
, ,    , -
 ,  ,  
( 4%  53%  ,     3,2–3,5 ).
,        
Society andSecurity Insights № 3 2023 138
,       -
,   ,      -
.       
 (39,4%  ,  — 3,12), 
     (27,4%
 ,   2,67).
      
 (  )  (,4 < r < ,6), ..  -
   «   ,  , 
 ,   ».     
  ,      
      -
., ( 4%)-
  ,  , -
 .   (35–38%)   
     , 
 ,  . 
 (2527% )      
  , ,  , -
 ,        -
 .
      -
      -
  ,       -
   .
 ,  -
       
,  ,     -
     .  
       -
    ,    -
   (   -
,       
 ,     ).
    -,   -
    ,    -
,      ,
      
 ,       
«»,,
  ,  -
 , ,      -
  ,      -
Социальные, культурные исследования ибезопасность 139
 .   ,    
 ,   —  — -
      .    -
,     ,  — 
    .
.
Table.
   
,    
Assessment ofthe formation and necessity ofsupra-
professional skills indemand inthe digital economy
 
 -
 
,
%




, %




, %
 
 3,79 64,0 4,59 89,9 25,9
  3,75 63,1 4,54 88,0 24,9
  3,71 60,9 4,5 87,5 26,6
 
  3,7 60,5 4,61 90,5 30,0
  3,7 60,3 4,54 88,7 28,4
 3,64 57,5 4,6 90,0 32,5
  3,64 57,4 4,36 82,8 25,4
   3,59 55,7 4,48 87,2 31,5
  
( 
)
3,53 53,0 4,48 87,7 34,7
 3,48 52,0 4,43 84,6 32,6
  3,35 46,3 4,33 82,9 36,6
 
 3,31 44,8 4,31 81,5 36,7
  3,32 44,3 4,19 78,3 34,0
  3,23 40,6 4,37 84,1 43,5
  3,21 40,3 4,29 81,6 41,3

 3,12 39,4 4,22 78,0 38,6

()  2,67 27,4 3,99 71,0 43,6
Примечание: средние значения идоли высоких оценок (4 и5 баллов) (данные упорядочены посамооценке)
Society andSecurity Insights № 3 2023 140
Заключение
       -
        
    .  
( 7%),
        
.       
 .        
   ,     -
         . ,
      .  -
         
       , -
 .
СПИСОК ИСТОЧНИКОВ
 . .       -
//..
217.  9(4). . 28–4.https://doi.org/1.385/278-389-217-9-4-28-4
. .  // 
  . 219.  42.
 . .,  . .,  . .   
      //  . 217.
.3,  4. .579–586.
 . .,  . .     :
    //  - -
. .217. .1. 4. . 376396.
Berger T., Frey C. Structural Transformation inthe OECD: Digitalisation, Deindustrial-
isation and the Future ofWork, OECD Social, Employment and Migration // Working
Papers. 216. No. 193. http://dx.doi.org/1.1787/5jlr6882f7-en
Bührer C., Hagist C. e e ect ofdigitalization on the Labor Market. In e Palgrave
Handbook ofmanaging continuous business transformation. 217. pp. 115– 137. http://
dx.doi.org/1.157/978-1-137-6228-2_5
Caliendo M., Schmidl R. Youth unemployment and active labor market policies inEu-
rope // IZA J Labor Policy. 216.  5.1. https://doi.org/1.1186/s4173-16-57-x
Frey C., Osborne B., Michael A.  e future ofemployment: How susceptible are jobs
to computerisation? // Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 213. Vol. 114(C),
pp.25428. https://doi.org/1.116/j.techfore.216.8.19
Hat K., Stoeglehner G. Spatial Dimension ofthe Employment Market Exposition to Dig-
italisation—  e Case ofAustria // Sustainability. 22. Vol. 12(5). P. 129. https://doi.
org/1.339/su1251852
Khokhlova M. Youth Labour Market: European Experience inRussian Context //World
Социальные, культурные исследования ибезопасность 141
Eonomy and International Relations. 219. Vol. 63, No 9. Pp. 118128. https://doi.
org/1.2542/131-2227-219-63-9-118-128
Kluve J. Youth labor market interventions // IZA World of Labor. 214. https://doi:
1.15185/izawol.16
Kosenchuk O. V., Kulapov M. N., Diner Y. A., Zinich A. V., Revyakina Yu. N., Adelf-
inskiy A. O. Transformation ofEducation Processes and Preparation ofCompetencies
for the Digital Economy // International Journal ofCriminology and Sociology. 221.
Vol.1. . 192–198. https://doi.org/1.6/1929-449.221.1.23
Larsson A., Teigland R.  e digital transformation of labor: Automation, the gig
economy and Welfare // Routledge Studies inLabour Economics. 219. http://dx.doi.
org/1.4324/978429317866
Maximova S. G., Omelchenko D. A., Noyanzina, O. E. International migration inborder
regions ofRussia: Structural modeling ofpublic attitudes //RUDN Journal ofSociology.
219. Vol. 19(4). . 737755. https://doi:1.22363/2313-2272-219-19-4-737-755
Novakova L.  e impact oftechnology development on the future ofthe labour mar-
ket inthe Slovak Republic // Technology inSociety. 22. Vol. 62. https://1.116/j.tech-
soc.22.11256
Omelchenko I., Antonova G., Danilina M., Popkov S., Botasheva L. Digitalization
inthe Labor Market inRussia // SHS Web ofConferences, 221. https://doi.org/1.151/
shsconf/22193121
Piątkowski Marcin J. Expectations and Challenges inthe Labour Market inthe Con-
text ofIndustrial Revolution 4..  e Agglomeration Method-Based Analysis for Poland
and Other EU Member States // Sustainability. 22. Vol. 12(13). P. 129. https://doi.
org/1.339/su12135437
Piroșcă G. I., Șerban-Oprescu G. L., Badea L., Stanef-Puică M.-R., Valdebenito C. R. Dig-
italization and Labor Market— A Perspective within the Framework ofPandemic Crisis
// Journal of eoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research. 221. Vol. 16. Pp.
28432857. https://doi.org/1.339/jtaer167156
Szabó-Szentgróti G., Végri B., Varga J. Impact ofIndustry 4. and Digitization on La-
bor Market for 23-Veri cation ofKeynes Prediction // Sustainability. 221. Vol.13(14).
pp.119. https://doi.org/1.339/su1314773
REFERENCES
Gavrina, E. G. (217).  e in uence ofthe digital economy on the development ofthe
modern labor market. Scienti c research ofthe Faculty ofEconomics. Electronic maga-
zine, 9(4), 284. Doi:1.385/278-389-217-9-4-28-4. (InRuss.)
Koznov, A. B. (219).  e impact ofdigitalization on the labor market. International
Journal ofHumanities and Natural Sciences, 4(2). (InRuss.)
Maksimova, S. G., Noyanzina, O. E., Omelchenko, D. A. (217).  e model ofsocial ex-
clusion ofpersons ofolder age groups inthe regions ofSiberia. Successes ofgerontology,
30(4), 579–586. (InRuss.)
Sizova, I. L., Khusyainov, T. M. (217). Labor and employment inthe digital economy:
Society andSecurity Insights № 3 2023 142
problems ofthe Russian labor market. Bulletin ofSt. Petersburg University. Sociology,
10(4), 376–396. (InRuss.)
Berger, T., & Frey, C. (216). Structural Transformation inthe OECD: Digitalisation,
Deindustrialisation and the Future ofWork, OECD Social, Employment and Migration.
Working Papers, 193. doi:1.1787/5jlr6882f7-en.
Bührer, C., Hagist, C. (217).  e e ect ofdigitalization on the Labor Market. In e
Palgrave Handbook ofmanaging continuous business transformation (. 115–137).
doi:1.157/978-1-137-6228-2_5.
Caliendo, M., Schmidl, R. (216). Youth unemployment and active labor market policies
inEurope. IZA J Labor Policy, 5(1). doi:1.1186/s4173-16-57-x.
Frey, C., Osborne, B., Michael, A. (213).  e future ofemployment: How susceptible are
jobs to computerisation? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114(C), 254–28.
doi:1.116/j.techfore.216.8.19.
Hat, K., Stoeglehner, G. (22). Spatial Dimension ofthe Employment Market Expo-
sition to Digitalisation— e Case ofAustria. Sustainability, 12(5), 1–29. doi:1.339/
su1251852
Khokhlova M. (219). Youth Labour Market: European Experience inRussian Context.
World Eсonomy and International Relations, 63(9), 118–128. doi:1.2542/131-2227-
219-63-9-118-128.
Kluve, J. (214). Youth labor market interventions. IZA World ofLabor, doi: 1.15185/
izawol.16.
Kosenchuk, O. V., Kulapov, M. N., Diner, Y. A., Zinich, A. V., Revyakina Yu. N., Adelf-
inskiy A. O. (221). Transformation ofEducation Processes and Preparation ofCompe-
tencies for the Digital Economy. International Journal ofCriminology and Sociology, 10,
192198. Doi:1.6/1929-449.221.1.23.
Larsson, A., Teigland, R. (219).  e digital transformation oflabor: Automation, the gig
economy and Welfare. Routledge Studies inLabour Economics, doi:1.4324/978429317866.
Maximova, S. G., Omelchenko, D. A., Noyanzina, O. E. (219). International migra-
tion inborder regions ofRussia: Structural modeling ofpublic attitudes. RUDN Journal
ofSociology, 19(4), 737–755. doi:1.22363/2313-2272-219-19-4-737-755.
Novakova, L. (22).  e impact oftechnology development on the future ofthe la-
bour market inthe Slovak Republic. Technology in Society, 62. doi://1.116/j.tech-
soc.22.11256.
Omelchenko, I., Antonova, G., Danilina, M., Popkov, S., Botasheva, L. (221). Dig-
italization inthe Labor Market inRussia. SHS Web of Conferences, doi:1.151/
shsconf/22193121.
Piątkowski, Marcin J. (22). Expectations and Challenges inthe Labour Market inthe
Context ofIndustrial Revolution 4..  e Agglomeration Method-Based Analysis for Po-
land and Other EU Member States. Sustainability, 12(13), 129. doi:1.339/su12135437.
Piroșcă, G. I., Șerban-Oprescu, G. L., Badea, L., Stanef-Puică, M.-R., Valdebenito C. R.
(221). Digitalization and Labor Market— A Perspective within the Framework ofPan-
demic Crisis. Journal of eoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 16,
Социальные, культурные исследования ибезопасность 143
28432857. doi:1.339/jtaer167156.
Szabó-Szentgróti, G., Végri, B., Varga, J. (221). Impact ofIndustry 4. and Digitiza-
tion on Labor Market for 23-Veri cation ofKeynes’ Prediction. Sustainability, 13(14),
1–19. doi:1.339/su1314773
ИНФОРМАЦИЯ ОБАВТОРАХ / INFORMATION ABOUT AUTHORS
   — . . ,   
    , . , .
Alla V. Zinich— Cand. Sci. (Economics), Associate Professor ofthe Department ofMan-
agement and Marketing ofOmsk State Agrarian University, Omsk, Russia.
  — - . , , 
      
, . , .
Svetlana G. Maximova— Dr. Sci. (Sociology), Professor, Head ofthe Department ofSo-
cial and Youth Policy ofthe Altai State University, Barnaul, Russia.
  — . . ,   
    , .,
.
Daria A. Omelchenko— Cand. Sci. (Sociology), Associate Professor at the Department
ofSocial and Youth Policy, Institute ofHumanities, Altai State University, Barnaul, Russia.
  —    
  , . , .
Yulia N. Revyakina— Public Relations Manager ofOmsk State Agrarian University,
Omsk, Russia.
Статья поступила вредакцию 22.07.2023;
одобрена после рецензирования 05.09.2023;
принята кпубликации 05.09.2023.
The article was submitted 22.07.2023;
approved after reviewing 05.09.2023;
accepted for publication 05.09.2023.