Интеграция ибезопасность встранах Азиатского региона 39
Научная статья / Research Article
УДК 291.11
DOI: 10.14258/SSI(2023)4-03
Многомерный подход коценке религиозности населения
вазиатском приграничье России
Светлана Геннадьевна Максимова1
Оксана Евгеньевна Ноянзина2
Дарья Алексеевна Омельченко3
1, 3 Алтайский государственный университет, Барнаул, Россия
2Главный информационно-вычислительный центр Министерства культуры Российской Феде-
рации, Москва, Россия
1 svet-maximova@yandex.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4613-4966
2 noe@list.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1252-6021
3 daria.omelchenko@mail.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2839-5070
Аннотация. — -
,
,
, « -
» . -
, , -
, .
-
— , , ,
(n = 400 ).
(Centrality CRS . -
), ()— (-
), (), -
.
, , -
,
,
. , -
, -
.
, ,
() —
« », ,
.
Society andSecurity Insights № 4 2023 40
Ключевые слова: , , -
, ,
, , -
, , -
Финансирование: 22-28-01120
« :
, » (2022-2023 .).
Для цитирования: Максимова С.#Г., Ноянзина О.#Е., Омельченко Д.#А. Многомерный подход
к оценке религиозности населения вазиатском приграничье России // Society and Security
Insights. 2023. Т. 6, № 4. С. 39–60. doi: 10.14258/ssi(2023)4-03.
Multidimensional Approach to Evaluation ofPopulation
Religiosity inRussia’s Asian Borderlands
Svetlana G. Maximova1
Oksana E. Noyanzina2
Daria A. Omelchenko3
1, 3 Altai State University, Barnaul, Russia
2Main information and computing center ofthe Ministry ofCulture ofthe Russian Federation,
Moscow, Russia
1 svet-maximova@yandex.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4613-4966
2 noe@list.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1252-6021
3 daria.omelchenko@mail.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2839-5070
Abstract: e article is focused on an analysis ofsociological methods ofevaluation ofreligi-
osity inthe context ofcurrent transformations ofreligious consciousness and worldview, theblur-
ring ofboundaries between thesecular and thereligious, and theprevalence ofhybrid variants
ofreligious identity, which imply religiosity “beyond confession” and passive religious practices.
e authors defend thevision ofreligiosity as a multidimensional construct that combines objec-
tive and subjective, static and dynamic, internal and external characteristics and manifestations.
e authors present theresults ofsociological studies ofthe population’s religiosity infour border
regions ofRussia— Altai Krai, Novosibirsk Oblast, Republic ofAltai, and Republic ofTyva (n =
400 ineach region). e Centrality CRS index (Centrality CRS Sh. Huber) is used as themain tool
for analyzing religiosity, which allows for an assessment on ve dimensions (levels)— cognitions
(information), belief (ideology), personal and public practices and religious experience, taking
into account thepolyconfessional nature ofregional societies. e objectives ofthe study were
to compare theresults obtained on thenational sample with theresults inthe conditions ofthe
border region and its separate regions characterized by ethno-confessional uniqueness, to analyze
theindividual dimensions ofreligiosity and their interrelation with thegeneral index on thebasis
offactor analysis. It is shown that theindex has good psychometric properties, and its individual
Интеграция ибезопасность встранах Азиатского региона 41
dimensions are well described by a single-factor structure. e level ofreligiosity inall four re-
gions generally corresponds to theall-Russian level, while there are serious di erences between
theregions, caused not only by theaxis national (ethnic) regions— multi-ethnic regions with
adominant Russian and Orthodox population, but also by individual dimensions.
Keywords: religiosity, border regions, Centrality ofReligiosity Scale (CRS), intellectual com-
ponent ofreligiosity, ideological component ofreligiosity, component ofpublic religious practices,
component ofpersonal religious practices, component ofreligious experience, multidimensional
approach to religiosity
Financial Support: thearticle was prepared as part ofRussian Science Foundation project
22-28-01120, “Models ofConstructing Religious Identity inBorderland Regions ofRussia: In-
stitutional Mechanisms, Strategies, and Practices” (2022-2023).
For citation: Maximova, S.#G., Noyanzina, O.#E., Omelchenko, D.#A. (2023). Multidimensional Ap-
proach to Evaluation ofPopulation Religiosity inRussia’s Asian Borderlands. Society and Security
Insights, 6(4), 39–60. (In Russ.). doi: 10.14258/ssi(2022)4-04.
Введение
, -
,
. -
-
(Berger, 1974), . . ,
« » (,
22).
-
.
,
, , , -
, , -
(Lenski, 1961; , 216; , , 219),
, -
, (-
, 211; , 22).
-
«» ,
, , -
/ . , . -
-
(Bullard, 216), . , «
» (Davie, 26), «-
», (Voas, Day, 21). ,
, 1, -
/, «»
1 ESS Data Portal. URL://www.eureopeansocialsurvey.org.
Society andSecurity Insights № 4 2023 42
, , -
, ,
«, », «» «-
» , . -
, (,
, 1 ..)
, /
, , -
. ,
(., ., Glock, 1962; , ,
211; Hill, Hood, 1999; King, Hunt, 1972), «»
« » (Hilty, Morgan, 1985),
, 1968, 1969,
1972 1975 . . . . , -
,
, , -
.
-
.
(., ., . . ,
. ., . ., . .)
, -
( ),
(, , 212; , 214,
216; , 214; , , 215),
, , -
— — -
(Holt, Clark, Wang, et al., 214; Joshanloo, Daemi, 215).
-
,
. , -
. -
, . , . , . , . , , -
, (. , . , . ). ,
. , -
.,
(, 27)
.
. (22), , «»
, -
,
,
1 www.worldvalueswurvey.org, www.issp.org.
Интеграция ибезопасность встранах Азиатского региона 43
, «», «» «-
»,
.
, -
, .
-
,
. -
(
), ,
( , )
(Glock, 1962; , , 211; Allport, Ross, 1967; , , 218).
-
«», .. -
-
. , «»
«» , .
« », -
. (25) ,
, .. -
, «» ,
«» (,
). . , ,
, —
, ,
, . (211) -
.
-
,
, ..
( .). -
, -
,
(,
..), -
, .
, -
«» ,
, , , ,
(, 214).
-
Society andSecurity Insights № 4 2023 44
, . , -
, -
. , ,
. ., -
, (, , 211),
. . , «»
(,
, 218). -
—
« » (, 22).
, , , -
, , ( -
) .
. , -
-
— -
,
( ) -
. (5 , .-
) « », —
(, 25).
. -
() (, 25), -
,
, .. -
. « »,
. , -
, ,
-
-
() .
, , , .-
(211), . (212).
-
, ,
. -
, -
(, , -
),
, ,
,
Интеграция ибезопасность встранах Азиатского региона 45
, -
. , . .
: ( -
), ( ), (
), (
, ),
( , -
).
, -
(, -
, ,
..) (Glock, Stark, 1968). . .,
, -
, -
(, 219), -
: 1)
2) .
( , -
, ( -
), ,
) : , , -
. -
, ,
, (), .
, -
, , -
,
, ,
(« ,
. ), , -
, «-
» (-, 215), « -
» (Davie, 26), (, 25),
(, 214) -
.
, -
,
, - -
, .
, , -
, -
,
, ,
Society andSecurity Insights № 4 2023 46
-
, ,
-
(Machado, Turner, Trygve, 218). -
-
. , , -
, ,
,—
.
Методы иматериалы
«
» (— CRS),
25 1 (
) (, , 218; Huber et al., 22). -
() — -
, , , -
.
CRS , . (Glock,
1962, 1973) . (Glok, Stark, 1968), ,
(Wimberley, 1989; Stryker,
198; Homans, 1974), -
, .
,
, -
. , ..
, , -
, , -
, ,
. -
: 15, 1 .
-
, , -
, , -
, .
CRS-15,
, -
. ., «
, ..
-
… -
Интеграция ибезопасность встранах Азиатского региона 47
,8 ,93 ,92 ,96 CRS-15» (. (, ,
218: 156). ,
2,45 ,96 .
( -
) -
( -
)
CRS 1, 5, . . -
: «»— 4, 5,
, «»— 2,1 3,9 , «» – 1, 2,.
-
, : -
, , , .
, -
.
, -
- ,
, -
.
— 222 . - - (
, n = 4
) - -
,
18 7 , . -
,
, - -
, -
, , -
.
Результаты исследования
, ,
( 31%),
. -
(36%), -
1. ,
:
1 Здесь и далее для оценки значимости региональных различий представленные выводы
одостоверности вариаций сделаны наоснове проведения процедуры тестирования покри-
терию хи-квадрат, все выявленные различия достоверны— 2, р ≤ 0,005.
Society andSecurity Insights № 4 2023 48
51%, — 37%
, , ,
, -
(49%). -
, — 9%,
-
, .
,
(36%), « » (-
) (16%), 5%,
(52%)
(16%). , ,
, , -
, -
, -
.
, , ,
.
, -
-
-
. , ,
(19,9%) -
, , 15,2%
.
— 38,8%, — 19,7%,
— : 14,4%
13,4% . , -
.
-
, ,
(, , ..). ,
, 11%,
(18,6%) (15,3%) (. 1).
, -
— ,
, , ,
, , , -
«» ( ).
, , — -
, , ,
«», «» , .
Интеграция ибезопасность встранах Азиатского региона 49
«»
, -
, .. . , -
, , . -
,
, .
1— , %.
Figure 1— Respondents’ religious auto-identi cation, %.
2 -
.
2,41 (sd = ,86),
,
. ( , 218).
, 2,75 (sd = ,75),
— , 2,52
(sd = ,87).
— 2,36 (sd = ,87) , -
— 2,16 (sd = ,82) (. 2).
Society andSecurity Insights № 4 2023 50
2—
, .
Figure 2— Centrality ofReligiosity Scale (CRS) index infour border
regions, mean values and standard deviations.
-
. 3,9%
.
, «»,
«» «» . ,
,
«», -
. -
38,9% , (57,2%)
, ,
, .
-
. -
— « »,
, -
.
, -
(79,6% ), , -
«»
, «-
» .
-
(2,4%), , , , -
(4,3% 6%).
Интеграция ибезопасность встранах Азиатского региона 51
—
6%, -
, .
—
(54,9%), (32,5%) -
.
—
3,3%, — 41,8%, -
(54,9%) . ,
,
, -
52,9% , , -
2,4%, — 44,7%.
, , -
, , -
, .
-
, -
( = –,4),
( = –,29) ( = –,9), —
(= ,7) ( = ,3). ,
(. 3).
3— (, 218)
.
Figure 3— Di erence between thetest norm for Russia (Hubert, Hubert 218) and
thecalculated values ofthe religiosity centrality index inthe border regions ofRussia.
-
. -
Society andSecurity Insights № 4 2023 52
,515 PRPC3/IdC21
,797 ROC5/LRPC4 ,
, max = ,18
ROC5/PRPC3 ( -
). -
, -
, , ,
.
2 ,
« ». -
— ,
(λ > ,7), -
(.).
« » 69,5% (-
) 72–73% ( )
, .
,
, ,5,
,13 (IdC2/ PRPC3, ).
( )
Factor weights inthe structure ofreligiosity centrality scales
(components with thehighest loadings are marked inbold)
IC1 0,858 0,862 0,858 0,753
IdC2 0,845 0,845 0,803 0,881
PRPC3 0,812 0,779 0,799 0,798
LRPC4 0,911 0,897 0,880 0,879
ROC5 0,896 0,879 0,848 0,851
Дискуссия изаключение
-
,
1 Здесь идалее втаблицах использованы аббревиатуры: IC1— интеллектуальный компонент
религиозности, IdC2 — идеологический компонент религиозности, PRPC3 — компонент пу-
бличных религиозных практик, LRPC4 — компонент личных религиозных практик, ROC5 —
компонент религиозного опыта, RCI— индекс центральности религиозности.
2 Значения меры адекватности выборки Кайзера-Мейера-Олкина (KMO) — [0,8; 0,9] и теста
сферичности Бартлетта (p < 0,0001) свидетельствуют овысокой адекватности факторного ана-
лиза кэмпирическим данным.
Интеграция ибезопасность встранах Азиатского региона 53
-
. -
— -
,
, (
4 )— , -
-
. -
,
, , -
«», -
.
-
2,57 , -
— 3,1 . -
,
2,83 , —
, — ,
(2,41 ). -
:
— 3,33 ,
, -
. -
— 43,3% , -
. , ,
-
.
,
, , -
, : ,
,
, , ( —
) , , -
—
2,7 , -
— 2,12 , —
1,98 .
: 5,4%
-
, 63,7% -
— 3,9%— . ,
, ,
Society andSecurity Insights № 4 2023 54
( ) -
, -
. , -
,
: 6% ,
,
(7% 4,5%). -
:
— 8,4%, -
— (63,8%).
, -
2,53 , -
,
, — , — -
. -
, —
,
, , — , —
.
8,2%
, -
— .
,
:
, — .
, —
, — , — -
,
,
, — . -
-
-
(7,9%) (6,9%), —
(3,3%). 5,9%,
(45% 49,4% ). -
, -
, —
(
, — ),
(6,8%).
Интеграция ибезопасность встранах Азиатского региона 55
-
2,41.
. 3,9%
-
. - -
. ,
,
, , ,
.
СПИСОК ИСТОЧНИКОВ
. . -
// : --
- . 216. 18. . 9–26.
. ., . .
: , ? //
. 219. 4. . 128–151.
. . :
// . 211. 12. . 77–87.
. ., . . : -
( . ) // .
I: . . . 212. . 3. . 57–67.
. ., . .
// . 219. 3. . 161–184.
. . -
. : -, 214. 278 .
. . :
// : -
: . . VI . :
, 22. . 4962–4979.
. . . --
. . : , 25. 447 .
. . « »:
// . I: . -
. . 216. . 5. . 99–12.
. . : -
// : 4. 214. 39.
.99–126.
. . -
// . 214.
11. C. 93–15.
Society andSecurity Insights № 4 2023 56
. ., . . // -
. 215. 1. . 145–151.
. . - :
// --
. 1: . . 215. 3.
.62–8.
. . «» «»: //
. : . 214.
1. . 5–25.
. . . -
: XVII— XXI . Saarbrücken: LAP Lambert Academia Publishing,
211. 382 .
. . : , 217. 967 .
. ., . . :
// . 25. 4. . 35–
45.
., . :
// . 211. 12. . 69–76.
. . -
// . . . 22. 2. . 122–13.
., . (CRS) // :
4. 218. 47. . 144–171.
. . :
XX . . : , 25. 34 .
- . :
// , , . 215.
1. . 254–268.
Allport G. W., Ross J. M. Personal religious orientation and prejudice // Journal ofPer-
sonality and Social Psychology. 1967. Vol. 5, No. 4. P. 432–443.
Berger P. L. Modern identity: Crisis and continuity // W. S. Dillon (Ed.), e cultural
drama: Modern identities and social ferment. Washington, DC : Smithsonian Institu-
tion Press, 1974. P. 158–181.
Bullard G. e World’s Newest Major Religion: No Religion // e New Your Times.
April, 22. 216. URL: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/216/4/16422-atheism-ag-
nostic-secular-nones-rising-religion.html (Accessed 1 October 223).
Davie G. Is Europe an Exceptional Case? // e Hedgehog Review. 26. P. 23–34.
Davie G. New Approaches inthe Sociology ofReligion: AWestern Perspective // Social
Compass. 24. No. 53. P. 73–84.
Glock C. Y. On theStudy ofReligious Commitment // Religious Education. 1962. Vol.
57. No. 4. P. 98–11.
Интеграция ибезопасность встранах Азиатского региона 57
Glock C. Y. Religion inSociological Perspective: Essays inthe Empirical Study ofReli-
gion. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Co., 1973. 315 p.
Glock . Y. On theStudy ofReligious Commitment // Religious Education, Researh Sup-
plement. 1962. No. 42. P. 99–1.
Glock h., Stark R. e Nature ofReligious Commitment. Berkley, 1968. 23 p.
Hill P. C., Hood R. W. Measures ofreligiosity. Birmingham, Alabama: Religious Educa-
tion Press, 1999. 531 p.
Hilty D. M., Morgan R. L. Construct validation for theReligious Involvement Inventory:
Replication // Journal for theScienti c Study ofReligion. 1985. Vol. 24, No. 1. P. 75–86.
Holt C. L., Clark E. M., Wang M. Q., Williams B. R., Schulz E. e Religion-Health
Connection Among African Americans: What Is theRole ofSocial Capital? // Journal
ofCommunity & Applied Social Psychology, 214. No. 25. P. 1–18.
Homans G. C. Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. New York: Harcourt Brace Jova-
novich, 1974. 44 p.
Huber S., Ackert M., Scheiblich H. Religiosität inunterschiedlichen Religionskulturen—
Vergleiche auf der Basis der Centrality ofReligiosity Scale // Cultura & psyche. 22. Vol.
1, No. 1–2. P. 171–185.Springer Nature Switzerland 1.17/s43638-2-7-3.
Joshanloo M., Daemi F. Self-esteem mediates therelationship between spirituality and
subjective well-being inIran // International Journal ofPsychology. 215. Vol. 5, No. 2.
P. 115–12.
King M. B., Hunt R. A. Measuring the Religious Variable: Replication // Journal for
theScienti c Study ofReligion. 1972. Vol. 11, No. 3. P. 24–251.
Lenski G. e Religious Factor: ASociological Study ofReligion’s Impact on Politics,
Economics, And Family Life. Garden City, N. Y. : Doubleday, 1961. 381 p.
Machado D. L., Turner B. S., Trygve E. W. Borderland Religion: Ambiguous practices
ofdi erence, hope and beyond. Routledge, 218. 188 .
Stark R., Glock C. Y. American Piety: e Nature ofReligious Commitment. Los Ange-
les, CA : Berkeley Univ. Press, 1968, 23 p.
Stryker S. Symbolic Interactionism: ASocial Structural Version. Menlo Park, CA : Ben-
jamin/Cummings, 198, 161 p.
Voas D., Day A. Recognizing Secular Christians: Toward and Unexcluded Middle inthe
Study ofReligion // e Arda Association ofReligion Data Archives Guiding Paper Se-
ries. 21. No. 1–2. P. 115–12.
Wimberley D. W. Religion and Role-Identity: A Structural Symbolic Interactionist
Conceptualization ofReligiosity // e Sociological Quarterly. 1989. Vol. 3, No. 1.
P.125–142.
REFERENCES
Bogachev, M. I. (216). On theformation ofan integral approach to theconceptualiza-
tion ofreligiosity. e Light ofChrist Enlightens All: Almanac ofSt. Philaret’s Orthodox
Society andSecurity Insights № 4 2023 58
Christian Institute, 18, 9–26. (In Russ.).
Borisova, O. N., Pavlyutkin I. . (219). Variability ofmodels ofmodern urban polygyny:
revival oftradition, new marriages or network e ects? Mir Rossii, 4, 128–151. (In Russ.).
Breskaya, O. Yu. (211). Studying religiosity: to theneed for an integral approach. Socio-
logical Studies, 12, 77–87. (In Russ.).
Zabaev, I. V., Prutskova, E. V. (212). Community ofthe Orthodox church: spatial local-
ization and factors offormation (on theexample ofMoscow). Vestnik PSTGU. Series I:
eology. Philosophy. Religious Studies, 3, 57–67. (In Russ.).
Zadorin, I. V., Khomyakova, A. P. (219). Religious self-identi cation ofrespondents
inmass surveys. Politiya, 3, 161–184. (In Russ.).
Kargina, I. G. (214). Sociological re exions of modern religious pluralism. Moscow :
MGIMO-University. (In Russ.).
Lebedev, S. D. (22). Sociological dimension ofreligiosity: to thetypology ofthe main
approaches. In: Sociology and society: traditions and innovations inthe social develop-
ment ofregions: Collection ofreports ofthe VI All-Russian Sociological Congress (pp.
4962–4979). Tyumen : Rossijskoe obshchestvo sociologov. (In Russ.) DOI 1.19181/kon-
gress.22.584.
Mchedlov, M. P. (25). Religious studies essays. Religion inthe spiritual and socio-politi-
cal life ofmodern Russia. Moscow: Nauchnaya Kniga. (In Russ.).
Oreshina, D. . (216). “Partner parish”: cooperation ofclergy and laity as a factor inthe
development ofsocial activity inmodern parishes ofthe Russian Orthodox Church.
Vestnik PSTGU. Series I: eology. Philosophy. Religious Studies, 5, 99–12. (In Russ.).
Oreshina, D. A. (214). Studying parish communities insociology: research contexts and
main approaches to conceptualization. Sociology: 4M, 39, 99–126. (In Russ.).
Podlesnaya, M. A. (214). Features ofnetwork and niche approaches inthe study ofthe
Orthodox parish inRussia and abroad. Bulletin ofthe Institute ofSociology, 11, 93–15.
(In Russ.).
Podlesnaya, M. A., Melnikova, V. V. (215). Religious community inthe life ofthe disa-
bled. Sociological studies, 10, 145–151. (In Russ.).
Prutskova, E. V. (215). Relation ofreligiosity and value-normative indicators: a factor
of religious socialization. Bulletin ofthe Orthodox Svyato-Tikhonovsky Humanitarian
University. Series 1: eology. Philosophy, 3, 62–8. (In Russ.).
Rutkevich, E. D. (214). From “Religiosity” to “Spirituality”: European context. Bulletin
ofthe Peoples’ Friendship University ofRussia. Series: Sociology, 1, 5–25. (In Russ.).
Sinelina, Yu. Yu. (217). Cycles ofsecularization inthe history ofRussia. Sociological anal-
ysis: theend ofXVII— thebeginning ofXXI century. Saarbrücken: LAP Lambert Aca-
demia Publishing. (In Russ.).
Taylor, C. (217). Secular Age. Moscow : BBI. (In Russ.).
Filatov, S. B., Lunkin, R. N. (25). Statistics ofRussian religiosity: magic numbers and
ambiguous reality. Sociological Studies, 4, 35–45. (In Russ.).
Интеграция ибезопасность встранах Азиатского региона 59
Faulkner, D., De Jong, G. (211). Religiosity in ve dimensions: an empirical analysis.
Sociological Research, 12, 69–76. (In Russ.).
Khlopkova, O. V. (22). Transformation ofapproaches to thestudy ofreligiosity inso-
cial sciences. Man. Sotsium. Society, 2, 122–13. (In Russ.).
Huber, S., Huber, O. (218). Religiosity Centrality Scale (CRS) / Translated from English
by E. V. Prutskova, K. V. Markin. Sociology: 4M, 47, 144–171. (In Russ.).
Chesnokova, V. F. (25). Tight path: e Process ofRussian Population’s Voterization at
theEnd ofthe 20th Century. Moscow : Akademicheskij Proekt. (In Russ.).
Hervieux-Leger, D. (215). In Search ofCertainty: Paradoxes ofReligiosity inDeveloped
Modern Societies. State, Religion, Church inRussia and Abroad, 1, 254–268. (In Russ.).
Allport, G. W., Ross, J. M. (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal
ofPersonality and Social Psychology, 5(4), 432–443.
Berger, P. L. (1974). Modern identity: Crisis and continuity. In: W. S. Dillon (Ed.), e
cultural drama: Modern identities and social ferment (pp. 158–181). Washington, DC :
Smithsonian Institution Press.
Bullard, G. (216). e World’s Newest Major Religion: No Religion. e New Your Times.
April, 22. URL: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/216/4/16422-atheism-agnos-
tic-secular-nones-rising-religion.html.
Davie, G. (26). Is Europe an Exceptional Case? e Hedgehog Review, Spring & Sum-
mer, 23–34.
Davie, G. (24). New Approaches inthe Sociology ofReligion: AWestern Perspective.
Social Compass, 53, 73–84.
Glock, C. Y. (1962). On theStudy ofReligious Commitment. Religious Education, 57(4),
98–11.
Glock, C. Y. (1973). Religion inSociological Perspective: Essays inthe Empirical Study
ofReligion. Belmont, CA : Wadsworth Publishing Co.
Glock, . Y. (1962). On theStudy ofReligious Commitment. Religious Education, Re-
searh Supplement, 42, 99–1.
Glock, h., Stark, R. (1968). e Nature ofReligious Commitment. Berkley.
Hill, P. C., Hood, R. W. (1999). Measures ofreligiosity. Birmingham, Alabama : Religious
Education Press.
Hilty, D. M., Morgan, R. L. (1985). Construct validation for theReligious Involvement
Inventory: Replication. Journal for theScienti c Study ofReligion, 24(1), 75–86.
Holt, C. L., Clark, E. M., Wang, M. Q., Williams B. R., Schulz E. (214). e Reli-
gion-Health Connection Among African Americans: What Is theRole ofSocial Capital?
Journal ofCommunity & Applied Social Psychology, 25, 1–18.
Homans, G. C. (1974). Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. New York : Harcourt Brace
Jovanovich.
Huber, S., Ackert, M., Scheiblich, H. (22). Religiosität inunterschiedlichen Religion-
skulturen— Vergleiche auf der Basis der Centrality ofReligiosity Scale. Cultura & psy-
Society andSecurity Insights № 4 2023 60
ché, 1(1–2), 171–185.Springer Nature Switzerland 1.17/s43638-2-7-3.
Joshanloo, M., Daemi, F. (215). Self-esteem mediates therelationship between spiritual-
ity and subjective well-being inIran. International Journal ofPsychology, 50(2), 115–12.
King, M. B., Hunt, R. A. (1972). Measuring theReligious Variable: Replication. Journal
for theScienti c Study ofReligion, 11(3), 24–251.
Lenski, G. (1961). e Religious Factor: ASociological Study ofReligion’s Impact on Poli-
tics, Economics, And Family Life. Garden City, N.Y. : Doubleday.
Machado, D. L., Turner, B. S., Trygve, E. W. (218). Borderland Religion: Ambiguous prac-
tices ofdi erence, hope and beyond. Routledge.
Stark, R., Glock, C. Y. (1968). American Piety: e Nature ofReligious Commitment. Los
Angeles, CA: Berkeley Univ. Press.
Stryker, S. (198). Symbolic Interactionism: ASocial Structural Version. Menlo Park, CA:
Benjamin/Cummings.
Voas, D., Day, A. (21). Recognizing Secular Christians: Toward and Unexcluded Mid-
dle inthe Study ofReligion. e Arda Association ofReligion Data Archives Guiding
Paper Series, 1–20, 115–12.
Wimberley, D.W. (1989). Religion and Role-Identity: AStructural Symbolic Interaction-
ist Conceptualization ofReligiosity. e Sociological Quarterly, 30(1), 125–142.
ИНФОРМАЦИЯ ОБ АВТОРАХ / INFORMATION ABOUT THE AUTHORS
— - . , , .
,
, . , .
Svetlana G. Maximova— Dr. Sci. (Sociology), Professor, head. Department ofSocial and
Youth Policy, Institute ofHumanities, Altai State University, Barnaul, Russia
— . . , -
- , -
, .
Oksana E. Noyanzina — Cand. Sci. (Sociology), Main information and computing
center ofthe Ministry ofCulture ofthe Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
— . . , -
, , -
, . , .
Daria A. Omelchenko— Cand. Sci. (Sociology), Associate Professor at theDepartment
ofSocial and Youth Policy, Institute ofHumanities, Altai State University, Barnaul, Russia.
Статья поступила вредакцию 25.10.2023;
одобрена после рецензирования 18.11.2023;
принята кпубликации 18.11.2023.
The article was submitted 25.10.2023;
approved after reviewing 18.11.2023;
accepted for publication 18.11.2023.
