ВОСПРИЯТИЕ СОЦИАЛЬНОЙ БЕЗОПАСНОСТИ НАСЕЛЕНИЕМ РЕГИОНОВ АЗИАТСКОГО ПРИГРАНИЧЬЯ РОССИИ (НА ПРИМЕРЕ АЛТАЙСКОГО КРАЯ)
Статья боковой панели
Опубликован:
апр 8, 2020
Ключевые слова:
социальная безопасность, восприятие риска, угрозы социальной безопасности, приграничный регион, азиатское приграничье, Алтайский край
Основное содержание статьи
Дарья Алексеевна Омельченко
Email: daria.omelchenko@mail.ru
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2839-5070
Светлана Геннадьевна Максимова
Email: svet-maximova@yandex.ru
Оксана Евгеньевна Ноянзина
Email: noe@list.ru
Аннотация
Социальная безопасность выступает важнейшим приоритетом политики государства, обобщающим все остальные виды безопасности, выступающие необходимыми условиями для ее обеспечения. Социологические опросы с использованием психосемантических методов, проведенные в одном из регионов азиатского приграничья (Алтайский край, 2019 г., n = 75), показали, что социальная безопасность в регионе определяется его жителями через вероятность реализации экономических рисков — потери дохода и средств к существованию, утраты кредитоспособности и зависит от выраженности нутриционных и транспортных рисков, рисков заболеваемости смертельными, неизлечимыми болезнями, рисков халатности и некомпетентности специалистов в различных областях социальной практики. Социально-экономическая нестабильность и недоверие к базовым социальным институтам, отвечающим за безопасность жизни и здоровья населения, формируют негативные установки населения в отношении социальной безопасности.
Скачивания
Данные скачивания пока недоступны.
Metrics
Загрузка метрик ...
Детали статьи
Как цитировать
Омельченко, Д. А., Максимова, С. Г., & Ноянзина, О. Е. (2020). ВОСПРИЯТИЕ СОЦИАЛЬНОЙ БЕЗОПАСНОСТИ НАСЕЛЕНИЕМ РЕГИОНОВ АЗИАТСКОГО ПРИГРАНИЧЬЯ РОССИИ (НА ПРИМЕРЕ АЛТАЙСКОГО КРАЯ). Society and Security Insights, 3(1), 13-36. https://doi.org/10.14258/ssi(2020)1-01
Раздел
ИНТЕГРАЦИЯ И БЕЗОПАСНОСТЬ В СТРАНАХ АЗИАТСКОГО РЕГИОНА
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.
Литература
Кузнецов В.Н. Социология безопасности: Формирование культуры безопасности в трансформирующемся обществе. М.: Республика, 2002.
Левашов В.К. Глобализация и социальная безопасность. Социологические исследования, 2002, No. 3, 19–28.
Лига М.Б. Социальная безопасность и качество жизни: концептуальный анализ. Ученые записки Забайкальского государственного университета. Серия: Социологические науки, 2013, 4(51), 170–177.
Молчанов А.В. Социальная феноменология риска: концептуальный анализ. Дисс. … канд. филос. наук. Саратов: Саратовский гос. ун-т, 2008.
Петренко В.Ф., Супрун А.П. Методологический манифест психосемантики. Психологический журнал, 2016, 37(3), 5–14.
Петренко В.Ф., Митина О.В., Гладких Н.Ю. Психосемантика мягкой силы в геополитике. Социологические исследования, 2018, 1(1), 40–51.
Самыгин С.И., Латышева А.Т., Черевик К.С. Социальная безопасность как социокультурная деятельность. Гуманитарные, социально-экономические и общественные науки, 2016, No. (1-2), 58–62.
Силласте Г.Г. Женщина как объект и субъект социальной безопасности. Социологические исследования, 1998, No. 12, 62–72.
Симонович Н.Е., Киселёва И.А. Проблемы социальной безопасности человека в современном обществе. Национальные интересы: приоритеты и безопасность, 2013, No. 44, 48–52.
Яницкий О.Н. Социология риска: ключевые идеи. Мир России. Социология. Этнология, 2003, 12(1), 3–35.
Яницкий О.Н. «Турбулентные времена» как проблема общества риска. Общественные науки и современность, 2011, No. 6, 155–164.
Bronfman N.C., Cisternas P.C., López-Vázquez E., Cifuentes L.A. Trust and risk perception of natural hazards: implications for risk preparedness in Chile. Natural Hazards, 2016, 81(1), 307–327.
Douglas M., Wildavsky A. How can we know the risks we face? Why risk selection is a social process. Risk Analysis, 1982, 2(2), 49–58.
Eiser J.R., Donovan A., Sparks R.S.J. Risk perceptions and trust following the 2010 and 2011 Icelandic Volcanic Ash Crises. Risk Analysis, 2015, 35(2), 332-343.
Fischhoff B., Slovic P., Lichtenstein S., Read S., Combs B. How Safe Is Safe Enough? A Psychometric Study of Attitudes Toward Technological Risks and Benefits. In: The Perception of Risk. Routledge, 2016. pp. 118–141.
Fransella F., Bell R., Bannister D. A manual for repertory grid technique. John Wiley & Sons, 2004.
Glendon A.I., Dorn L., Davies D.R., Matthews G., Taylor R.G. Age and gender differences in perceived accident likelihood and driver competences. Risk Analysis, 1996, 16(6), 755–762.
Gustafsod P.E. Gender Differences in risk perception: Theoretical and methodological erspectives. Risk Analysis, 1998, 18(6), 805–811.
Hardy C., Maguire S. Organizing risk: Discourse, power, and “riskification”. Academy of Management Review, 2016, 41(1), 80–108.
Heine S.J., Lehman D.R. Cultural variation in unrealistic optimism: Does the West feel more vulnerable than the East? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1995, 68(4), 595–607.
Heise D.R. The semantic differential and attitude research. Attitude Measurement, 1970, 4, 235–253.
Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. In: Handbook of the fundamentals of financial decision making: Part I, 2013. pp. 99–127.
Markus H.R., Kitayama S. Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 1991, 98(2), 224–253.
Oltedal S., Moen B. E., Klempe H., Rundmo T. Explaining risk perception: An evaluation of cultural theory. Trondheim: Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 2004, 85(1–33).
Osgood C.E. Semantic differential technique in the comparative study of cultures 1. American Anthropologist, 1964, 66(3), 171–200.
Osgood C.E., Suci G.J., Tannenbaum P.H. The measurement of meaning. University of Illinois press, 1957.
Price P.C. A group size effect on personal risk judgments: Implications for unrealistic optimism. Memory & Cognition, 2001, 29(4), 578–586.
Sjöberg L.A discussion of the limitations of the psychometric and cultural theory approaches to risk perception. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 1996, 68(3–4), 219–225.
Sjöberg L. Factors in risk perception. Risk Analysis, 2000, 20(1), 1–12.
Slovic P. What does it mean to know a cumulative risk? Adolescents' perceptions of short‐term and long‐term consequences of smoking. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2000, 13(2), 259–266.
Slovic P., Fischhoff B., Lichtenstein S. Rating the risks. In: Risk/benefit analysis in water resources planning and management. Springer, Boston, MA, 1981. pp. 193–217.
Wachinger G., Renn O., Begg C., Kuhlicke C. The risk perception paradox—implications for governance and communication of natural hazards. Risk Analysis, 2013, 33(6), 1049–1065.
Wildavsky A., Dake K. Theories of risk perception: Who fears what and why? Daedalus, 1990, 41–60.
REFERENCES
Kuznetsov, V.N. (2002). Sociologiya bezopasnosti: Formirovanie kul'tury bezopasnosti v transformiruyushchemsya obshchestve [Sociology of security: formation of security culture in the society under transformation]. Moscow: Respublika.
Levashov, V.K. (2002). Globalizaciya i soсial'naya bezopasnost' [Globalization and social security]. Sociologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological studies], (3), 19–28.
Liga, M. B. (2013). Social'naya bezopasnost' i kachestvo zhizni: konceptual'nyj analiz [Social security and quality of life: conceptual analysis]. Uchenye zapiski Zabaikalskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Sociologicheskie nauki [Scholarly Notes of Transbaikal State University. Series: Sociological Sciences], 4(51), 170–177.
Molchanov, A.V. (2008). Social'naya fenomenologiya riska: konceptual'nyi analiz [Social phenomenology of risk: conceptual analysis] (PhD Thesis). Saratov: Saratov State University.
Petrenko, V.F., & Suprun, A.P. (2016). Metodologicheskij manifest psihosemantiki [Methodological manifesto of psychosemantics]. Psihologicheskij zhurnal [Psychological Journal] urnal, 37(3), 5–14.
Petrenko, V.F., Mitina, O.V., & Gladkih, N.Yu. (2018). Psihosemantika myagkoj sily v geopolitike [Psychosematics of the soft power in geopolitics]. Sociologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological studies], 1(1), 40–51.
Samygin, S.I., Latysheva, A.T., & Cherevik, K.S. (2016). Social'naya bezopasnost' kak sociokul'turnaya deyatel'nost' [Social security as sociocultural activity]. Gumanitarnye, social'no-ekonomicheskie i obshchestvennye nauki [Humanities, social-economic and social sciences], (1-2), 58–62.
Sillaste, G.G. (1998). Zhenshchina kak ob"ekt i sub"ekt sotсal'noij bezopasnosti [Woman as an object and subject of social security]. Sociologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological studies], (12), 62–72.
Simonovich, N.E., & Kiseleva, I.A. (2013). Problemy social'noj bezopasnosti cheloveka v sovremennom obshchestve [Issues of human security in contemporary society]. Nacional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost' [National interests: priorities and security], (44), 48–52.
Yanickij, O.N. (2003). Sociologiya riska: klyuchevye idei [Sociology of risk: key ideas]. Mir Rossii. Sociologiya. Etnologiya [World of Russia. Sociology. Ethnology], 12(1), 3–35.
Yanickij, O.N. (2011). «Turbulentnye vremena» kak problema obshchestva riska [“Times of turbulence” as an issue of risk society]. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost' [Social sciences and contemporary world], (6), 155–164.
Bronfman, N.C., Cisternas, P.C., López-Vázquez, E., & Cifuentes, L.A. (2016). Trust and risk perception of natural hazards: implications for risk preparedness in Chile. Natural Hazards, 81(1), 307–327.
Douglas, M., & Wildavsky, A. (1982). How can we know the risks we face? Why risk selection is a social process. Risk Analysis, 2(2), 49–58.
Eiser, J.R., Donovan, A., & Sparks, R.S.J. (2015). Risk perceptions and trust following the 2010 and 2011 Icelandic Volcanic Ash Crises. Risk Analysis, 35(2), 332–343.
Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., Lichtenstein, S., Read, S., & Combs, B. (2016). How Safe Is Safe Enough? A Psychometric Study of Attitudes Toward Technological Risks and Benefits. In: The Perception of Risk (pp. 118–141). Routledge.
Fransella, F., Bell, R., & Bannister, D. (2004). A manual for repertory grid technique. John Wiley & Sons.
Glendon, A.I., Dorn, L., Davies, D.R., Matthews, G., & Taylor, R.G. (1996). Age and gender differences in perceived accident likelihood and driver competences. Risk Analysis, 16(6), 755–762.
Gustafsod, P.E. (1998). Gender Differences in risk perception: Theoretical and methodological erspectives. Risk Analysis, 18(6), 805–811.
Hardy, C., & Maguire, S. (2016). Organizing risk: Discourse, power, and “riskification”. Academy of Management Review, 41(1), 80–108.
Heine, S.J., & Lehman, D.R. (1995). Cultural variation in unrealistic optimism: Does the West feel more vulnerable than the East? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(4), 595.
Heise, D.R. (1970). The semantic differential and attitude research. Attitude measurement, 4, 235–253.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (2013). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. In: Handbook of the fundamentals of financial decision making: Part I (pp. 99–127).
Markus, H.R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224.
Oltedal, S., Moen, B.E., Klempe, H., & Rundmo, T. (2004). Explaining risk perception: An evaluation of cultural theory. Trondheim: Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 85(1–33).
Osgood, C.E. (1964). Semantic differential technique in the comparative study of cultures 1. American Anthropologist, 66(3), 171–200.
Osgood, C.E., Suci, G.J., & Tannenbaum, P.H. (1957). The measurement of meaning (No. 47). University of Illinois press.
Price, P.C. (2001). A group size effect on personal risk judgments: Implications for unrealistic optimism. Memory & Cognition, 29(4), 578–586.
Sjöberg, L. (1996). A discussion of the limitations of the psychometric and cultural theory approaches to risk perception. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 68(3–4), 219–225.
Sjöberg, L. (2000). Factors in risk perception. Risk Analysis, 20(1), 1–12.
Slovic, P. (2000). What does it mean to know a cumulative risk? Adolescents' perceptions of short‐term and long‐term consequences of smoking. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13(2), 259–266.
Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., & Lichtenstein, S. (1981). Rating the risks. In: Risk/benefit analysis in water resources planning and management (pp. 193–217). Springer, Boston, MA.
Wachinger, G., Renn, O., Begg, C., & Kuhlicke, C. (2013). The risk perception paradox—implications for governance and communication of natural hazards. Risk Analysis, 33(6), 1049–1065.
Wildavsky, A., & Dake, K. (1990). Theories of risk perception: Who fears what and why? Daedalus, 41–60.
Левашов В.К. Глобализация и социальная безопасность. Социологические исследования, 2002, No. 3, 19–28.
Лига М.Б. Социальная безопасность и качество жизни: концептуальный анализ. Ученые записки Забайкальского государственного университета. Серия: Социологические науки, 2013, 4(51), 170–177.
Молчанов А.В. Социальная феноменология риска: концептуальный анализ. Дисс. … канд. филос. наук. Саратов: Саратовский гос. ун-т, 2008.
Петренко В.Ф., Супрун А.П. Методологический манифест психосемантики. Психологический журнал, 2016, 37(3), 5–14.
Петренко В.Ф., Митина О.В., Гладких Н.Ю. Психосемантика мягкой силы в геополитике. Социологические исследования, 2018, 1(1), 40–51.
Самыгин С.И., Латышева А.Т., Черевик К.С. Социальная безопасность как социокультурная деятельность. Гуманитарные, социально-экономические и общественные науки, 2016, No. (1-2), 58–62.
Силласте Г.Г. Женщина как объект и субъект социальной безопасности. Социологические исследования, 1998, No. 12, 62–72.
Симонович Н.Е., Киселёва И.А. Проблемы социальной безопасности человека в современном обществе. Национальные интересы: приоритеты и безопасность, 2013, No. 44, 48–52.
Яницкий О.Н. Социология риска: ключевые идеи. Мир России. Социология. Этнология, 2003, 12(1), 3–35.
Яницкий О.Н. «Турбулентные времена» как проблема общества риска. Общественные науки и современность, 2011, No. 6, 155–164.
Bronfman N.C., Cisternas P.C., López-Vázquez E., Cifuentes L.A. Trust and risk perception of natural hazards: implications for risk preparedness in Chile. Natural Hazards, 2016, 81(1), 307–327.
Douglas M., Wildavsky A. How can we know the risks we face? Why risk selection is a social process. Risk Analysis, 1982, 2(2), 49–58.
Eiser J.R., Donovan A., Sparks R.S.J. Risk perceptions and trust following the 2010 and 2011 Icelandic Volcanic Ash Crises. Risk Analysis, 2015, 35(2), 332-343.
Fischhoff B., Slovic P., Lichtenstein S., Read S., Combs B. How Safe Is Safe Enough? A Psychometric Study of Attitudes Toward Technological Risks and Benefits. In: The Perception of Risk. Routledge, 2016. pp. 118–141.
Fransella F., Bell R., Bannister D. A manual for repertory grid technique. John Wiley & Sons, 2004.
Glendon A.I., Dorn L., Davies D.R., Matthews G., Taylor R.G. Age and gender differences in perceived accident likelihood and driver competences. Risk Analysis, 1996, 16(6), 755–762.
Gustafsod P.E. Gender Differences in risk perception: Theoretical and methodological erspectives. Risk Analysis, 1998, 18(6), 805–811.
Hardy C., Maguire S. Organizing risk: Discourse, power, and “riskification”. Academy of Management Review, 2016, 41(1), 80–108.
Heine S.J., Lehman D.R. Cultural variation in unrealistic optimism: Does the West feel more vulnerable than the East? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1995, 68(4), 595–607.
Heise D.R. The semantic differential and attitude research. Attitude Measurement, 1970, 4, 235–253.
Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. In: Handbook of the fundamentals of financial decision making: Part I, 2013. pp. 99–127.
Markus H.R., Kitayama S. Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 1991, 98(2), 224–253.
Oltedal S., Moen B. E., Klempe H., Rundmo T. Explaining risk perception: An evaluation of cultural theory. Trondheim: Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 2004, 85(1–33).
Osgood C.E. Semantic differential technique in the comparative study of cultures 1. American Anthropologist, 1964, 66(3), 171–200.
Osgood C.E., Suci G.J., Tannenbaum P.H. The measurement of meaning. University of Illinois press, 1957.
Price P.C. A group size effect on personal risk judgments: Implications for unrealistic optimism. Memory & Cognition, 2001, 29(4), 578–586.
Sjöberg L.A discussion of the limitations of the psychometric and cultural theory approaches to risk perception. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 1996, 68(3–4), 219–225.
Sjöberg L. Factors in risk perception. Risk Analysis, 2000, 20(1), 1–12.
Slovic P. What does it mean to know a cumulative risk? Adolescents' perceptions of short‐term and long‐term consequences of smoking. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2000, 13(2), 259–266.
Slovic P., Fischhoff B., Lichtenstein S. Rating the risks. In: Risk/benefit analysis in water resources planning and management. Springer, Boston, MA, 1981. pp. 193–217.
Wachinger G., Renn O., Begg C., Kuhlicke C. The risk perception paradox—implications for governance and communication of natural hazards. Risk Analysis, 2013, 33(6), 1049–1065.
Wildavsky A., Dake K. Theories of risk perception: Who fears what and why? Daedalus, 1990, 41–60.
REFERENCES
Kuznetsov, V.N. (2002). Sociologiya bezopasnosti: Formirovanie kul'tury bezopasnosti v transformiruyushchemsya obshchestve [Sociology of security: formation of security culture in the society under transformation]. Moscow: Respublika.
Levashov, V.K. (2002). Globalizaciya i soсial'naya bezopasnost' [Globalization and social security]. Sociologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological studies], (3), 19–28.
Liga, M. B. (2013). Social'naya bezopasnost' i kachestvo zhizni: konceptual'nyj analiz [Social security and quality of life: conceptual analysis]. Uchenye zapiski Zabaikalskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Sociologicheskie nauki [Scholarly Notes of Transbaikal State University. Series: Sociological Sciences], 4(51), 170–177.
Molchanov, A.V. (2008). Social'naya fenomenologiya riska: konceptual'nyi analiz [Social phenomenology of risk: conceptual analysis] (PhD Thesis). Saratov: Saratov State University.
Petrenko, V.F., & Suprun, A.P. (2016). Metodologicheskij manifest psihosemantiki [Methodological manifesto of psychosemantics]. Psihologicheskij zhurnal [Psychological Journal] urnal, 37(3), 5–14.
Petrenko, V.F., Mitina, O.V., & Gladkih, N.Yu. (2018). Psihosemantika myagkoj sily v geopolitike [Psychosematics of the soft power in geopolitics]. Sociologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological studies], 1(1), 40–51.
Samygin, S.I., Latysheva, A.T., & Cherevik, K.S. (2016). Social'naya bezopasnost' kak sociokul'turnaya deyatel'nost' [Social security as sociocultural activity]. Gumanitarnye, social'no-ekonomicheskie i obshchestvennye nauki [Humanities, social-economic and social sciences], (1-2), 58–62.
Sillaste, G.G. (1998). Zhenshchina kak ob"ekt i sub"ekt sotсal'noij bezopasnosti [Woman as an object and subject of social security]. Sociologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological studies], (12), 62–72.
Simonovich, N.E., & Kiseleva, I.A. (2013). Problemy social'noj bezopasnosti cheloveka v sovremennom obshchestve [Issues of human security in contemporary society]. Nacional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost' [National interests: priorities and security], (44), 48–52.
Yanickij, O.N. (2003). Sociologiya riska: klyuchevye idei [Sociology of risk: key ideas]. Mir Rossii. Sociologiya. Etnologiya [World of Russia. Sociology. Ethnology], 12(1), 3–35.
Yanickij, O.N. (2011). «Turbulentnye vremena» kak problema obshchestva riska [“Times of turbulence” as an issue of risk society]. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost' [Social sciences and contemporary world], (6), 155–164.
Bronfman, N.C., Cisternas, P.C., López-Vázquez, E., & Cifuentes, L.A. (2016). Trust and risk perception of natural hazards: implications for risk preparedness in Chile. Natural Hazards, 81(1), 307–327.
Douglas, M., & Wildavsky, A. (1982). How can we know the risks we face? Why risk selection is a social process. Risk Analysis, 2(2), 49–58.
Eiser, J.R., Donovan, A., & Sparks, R.S.J. (2015). Risk perceptions and trust following the 2010 and 2011 Icelandic Volcanic Ash Crises. Risk Analysis, 35(2), 332–343.
Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., Lichtenstein, S., Read, S., & Combs, B. (2016). How Safe Is Safe Enough? A Psychometric Study of Attitudes Toward Technological Risks and Benefits. In: The Perception of Risk (pp. 118–141). Routledge.
Fransella, F., Bell, R., & Bannister, D. (2004). A manual for repertory grid technique. John Wiley & Sons.
Glendon, A.I., Dorn, L., Davies, D.R., Matthews, G., & Taylor, R.G. (1996). Age and gender differences in perceived accident likelihood and driver competences. Risk Analysis, 16(6), 755–762.
Gustafsod, P.E. (1998). Gender Differences in risk perception: Theoretical and methodological erspectives. Risk Analysis, 18(6), 805–811.
Hardy, C., & Maguire, S. (2016). Organizing risk: Discourse, power, and “riskification”. Academy of Management Review, 41(1), 80–108.
Heine, S.J., & Lehman, D.R. (1995). Cultural variation in unrealistic optimism: Does the West feel more vulnerable than the East? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(4), 595.
Heise, D.R. (1970). The semantic differential and attitude research. Attitude measurement, 4, 235–253.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (2013). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. In: Handbook of the fundamentals of financial decision making: Part I (pp. 99–127).
Markus, H.R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224.
Oltedal, S., Moen, B.E., Klempe, H., & Rundmo, T. (2004). Explaining risk perception: An evaluation of cultural theory. Trondheim: Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 85(1–33).
Osgood, C.E. (1964). Semantic differential technique in the comparative study of cultures 1. American Anthropologist, 66(3), 171–200.
Osgood, C.E., Suci, G.J., & Tannenbaum, P.H. (1957). The measurement of meaning (No. 47). University of Illinois press.
Price, P.C. (2001). A group size effect on personal risk judgments: Implications for unrealistic optimism. Memory & Cognition, 29(4), 578–586.
Sjöberg, L. (1996). A discussion of the limitations of the psychometric and cultural theory approaches to risk perception. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 68(3–4), 219–225.
Sjöberg, L. (2000). Factors in risk perception. Risk Analysis, 20(1), 1–12.
Slovic, P. (2000). What does it mean to know a cumulative risk? Adolescents' perceptions of short‐term and long‐term consequences of smoking. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13(2), 259–266.
Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., & Lichtenstein, S. (1981). Rating the risks. In: Risk/benefit analysis in water resources planning and management (pp. 193–217). Springer, Boston, MA.
Wachinger, G., Renn, O., Begg, C., & Kuhlicke, C. (2013). The risk perception paradox—implications for governance and communication of natural hazards. Risk Analysis, 33(6), 1049–1065.
Wildavsky, A., & Dake, K. (1990). Theories of risk perception: Who fears what and why? Daedalus, 41–60.