THE INCLUSION OF PENALTIES IN CONTRACTS FOR WORKER TRAINING AT THE EXPENSE OF THE EMPLOYER

Keywords: apprenticeship, training agreement, invalidity of contract terms, responsibility of the employee, refunding employers’expenditure

Abstract

This article analyzes the legal nature and content of the agreements for the training of the worker the employer's expense. It is concluded that the relationship between the employee and the employer, based on the agreements, do not go beyond the subject of labour law. The inclusion in the agreement of training conditions of civil law (including the enforcement of obligations arising from labour relations, civil law) is contrary to the labour legislation. In addition, stresses that in the legal literature and case law there is no convergence of views regarding the composition of the employer's expenses reimbursed in accordance with art. 249 of the LC RF. Code level is proposed to clarify which costs relate to costs associated with the training of the employee (or, on the contrary, indicate what costs the employer cannot be recovered).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Yulia Mikhailenko, Altay state university

Candidat of Law, Assistant Professor of the Chair of Labor, Environmental Law and Civil Procedure of Altai State University. E-mail: mihailenqo@ya.ru

References

1. Глебов В.Г. Ученический договор: Автореф. дис. … канд. юрид. наук. Томск, 2005.
2. Занданов И. Как возмещать расходы (затраты), связанные с обучением работников (лиц, ищущих работу). Кадровик. Трудовое право для кадровика. 2007. № 5. С. 45-51.
3. Занданов И.В. Ученический договор и договор о повышении квалификации: общее и особенное. Журнал российского права. 2009. № 12. С. 85-94.
4. Киселева Е.В. Правовая природа ученического договора. Правовая мысль в образовании, науке и практике. 2018. № 3 (7). С. 52-56.
5. Харитонов М. Учеба за счет компании. Какой договор заключать – ученический или об обучении. Кадровое дело. 2017. № 4. С. 84-89.

REFERENCES
1. Glebov V.G. Apprenticeship [Utchenitcheskij dogovor: Autoref. dis. ... cand. yurid. Nauk]. Tomsk, 2005.
2. Zandanov I. How to reimburse (costs) related to the training of workers (job seekers). [Kak vozmeshchat’ raskhody (zatraty) svyazannye s obucheniem rabotnikov (lic ishchushchih rabotu]. Trained worker. Labor law for the personnel officer. 2007. No 5. Pp. 45-51.
3. Zandanov I.V. Apprenticeship and advanced professional contract: general and special [Uchenicheskij dogovor i dogovor o povyshenii kvalifikacii: obshchee i osobennoe]. Journal of Russian law. 2009. No 12. Pp. 85-94.
4. Kiseleva E.V. Legal nature of apprenticeship [Pravovaja priroda uchenicheskogo dogovora]. Law idea in education, science and practice. 2018. No. 3 (7). Pp. 52-56.
5. Kharitonov M. Studies at the expense of the company. Any agreement to conclude – apprenticeship or about training. [Ucheba za schet kompanii. Kakoj dogovor zaklyuchat' – uchenicheskij ili ob obuchenii]. Employment case. 2017. No 4. Pp. 84-89.
Published
2018-12-27
How to Cite
Mikhailenko, Y. (2018). THE INCLUSION OF PENALTIES IN CONTRACTS FOR WORKER TRAINING AT THE EXPENSE OF THE EMPLOYER. Legal Linguistics, (9/10), 70-78. https://doi.org/10.14258/leglin(2018)9-1005
Section
Legal hermeneutics