Acta Biologica Sibirica

Peer-reviewed journal in biological sciences
Research Article

Floristic diversity and taxonomic structure of the Lower Amu Darya State Biosphere Reserve (Uzbekistan): a grid-based assessment

1 Institute of Botany, the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Uzbekistan, 32 Durmon Yuli St., Tashkent, 100125, Uzbekistan
✉
Corresponding author: Komiljon Sh. Tojibaev — ktojibaev@mail.ru
Academic Editor
R. Yakovlev
Received
23 August 2026
Accepted
30 September 2026
Published
25 October 2026
ABSTRACT

Floristic knowledge of arid deltaic ecosystems remains limited by fragmented data and inconsistent methodologies, constraining reliable assessment of biodiversity patterns and long-term ecological change. Addressing this gap, we present a grid-based floristic assessment of the Lower Amu Darya State Biosphere Reserve (Uzbekistan), a representative ecotonal system at the interface of desert and riparian environments. Using a regular 2 × 2 km grid comprising 89 cells, we compiled an integrated dataset combining herbarium records, field collections, photographic observations, and recent georeferenced occurrence data. In total, 310 vascular plant taxa (173 genera, 44 families) were recorded. The flora is dominated by Amaranthaceae, Asteraceae, Poaceae, Brassicaceae, and Fabaceae, a taxonomic composition characteristic of the Turanian floristic province and shaped by arid and saline environmental conditions. Taxonomic structure is characterized by relative stability at the family level but higher turnover at the genus level. The flora also shows increasing dominance of xerophytic and halophytic taxa, accompanied by a decline of hygrophilous elements. Grid-based assessment revealed pronounced spatial heterogeneity in species richness and only partial correspondence with collection density, indicating uneven floristic coverage across the reserve. These patterns suggest ongoing floristic reorganization that may be associated with aridification, hydrological alteration, and anthropogenic pressure linked to the desiccation of the Aral Sea. Beyond the regional context, the study demonstrates the value of grid-based approaches for detecting biodiversity change in data-limited dryland systems and provides a transferable framework for long-term ecological monitoring.

Keywords:

Floristic diversity grid-based mapping species richness tugai ecosystems Lower Amu Darya riparian vegetation arid ecosystems Central Asia

Introduction

The Lower Amu Darya State Biosphere Reserve, situated in the lower reaches of the Amu Darya River in northwestern Uzbekistan, represents an important protected area within the arid landscapes of the region. Its natural environment is characterized by the interaction between desert conditions and riverine habitats, where water availability plays a fundamental role in determining vegetation distribution and community composition. Within this environmental setting, riparian habitats support vegetation that differs substantially from the surrounding desert communities in its ecological requirements and structural organization (Bakhiev et al. 2008). The reserve therefore provides an important setting for investigating floristic diversity across contrasting habitats and understanding the contribution of riverine ecosystems to regional plant diversity.

Desert vegetation constitutes a major component of the arid lowland ecosystems of Central Asia, where plant communities develop under conditions of limited precipitation, high evaporative demand, and pronounced seasonal fluctuations in water availability. The vegetation of these landscapes comprises a diverse range of ecological and structural types, including xerophytic shrublands, desert herbaceous communities, and riparian vegetation associated with major river systems (Bakhiev et al. 1987).

Among these vegetation types, tugai (Uzbek: to'qay) represents a distinctive component of arid ecosystems, occurring primarily as narrow riparian belts along major rivers (Korovin 1961). Although traditionally regarded as a forest type, tugai is now understood as a structurally complex mosaic of tree, shrub, and herbaceous communities shaped by hydrological dynamics, conservation status, and varying degrees of anthropogenic transformation (Bakhiev et al. 1994; Treshkin 2011; Kuzmina and Treshkin 2012; Rakhimova et al. 2023). These ecosystems contribute to the ecological and floristic heterogeneity of desert landscapes by supporting plant assemblages associated with riverine environments.

Tugai vegetation constitutes a major component of the reserve's vegetation cover and is closely associated with the hydrological conditions of the Amu Darya River. In Uzbekistan, tugai ecosystems occurring along major rivers, particularly the Amu Darya and Syr Darya, form distinctive riparian forests embedded within the desert landscapes of Central Asia. These ecosystems comprise a heterogeneous assemblage of tree, shrub, and herbaceous communities, whose composition and spatial distribution are influenced by river dynamics and the availability of water (Korolyuk et al. 2024). The Amu Darya delta and its tugai ecosystems represent a distinctive component of Central Asian flora, characterized by a specific taxonomic composition and vegetation structure rather than exceptionally high species richness (Korolyuk et al. 2025). The most comprehensive account of the regional flora was provided by Bakhiev et al. (1987), who documented 655 vascular plant species belonging to 304 genera and 75 families, representing approximately 64.8% of the flora of Karakalpakstan. However, subsequent studies have reported substantially lower estimates. For example, Khaydarov et al. (2016) recorded 301 species belonging to 157 genera and 61 families. These discrepancies may reflect differences in spatial delimitation, sampling design, taxonomic treatment, and data standardization, highlighting the need for systematic and spatially consistent floristic assessments.

The ecological importance of these ecosystems is further emphasized by ongoing changes in the composition and structure of riparian vegetation. Evidence from the Lower Amu Darya indicates a progressive homogenization of tugai vegetation, with the proportion of plant communities sharing similar species composition increasing markedly over recent decades. This trend reflects a substantial reduction in compositional heterogeneity and suggests ongoing degradation of riparian ecosystems. Consistent with this pattern, analyses of vegetation structure across tree, shrub, and herbaceous layers have revealed declines in key dominant species, including Populus euphratica and P. pruinosa, accompanied by reductions in shrub and perennial grass abundance (Rakhimova et al. 2023; Korolyuk et al. 2024). Together, these changes indicate a simplification of floristic composition and a shift towards more xerophytic assemblages under altered hydrological regimes and climatic stress.

Against this background, protected areas play an important role in conserving regional biodiversity and providing reference systems for assessing changes in vegetation and floristic composition. However, understanding the conservation significance of such areas requires more than a general inventory of plant species. Reliable assessments must also consider taxonomic composition, spatial patterns of species richness, and variation in sampling intensity. In particular, differences in sampling effort can influence observed patterns of floristic diversity and complicate comparisons among individual areas (Vallet et al. 2012). A grid-based approach provides a spatially explicit framework for organizing floristic records, examining the distribution of documented species richness, and identifying areas where additional botanical surveys may be required (Seregin 2013). Applying this approach to the Lower Amu Darya State Biosphere Reserve is therefore important for improving the understanding of its floristic composition, evaluating the spatial distribution of documented plant diversity, and establishing a consistent basis for future biodiversity monitoring.

The aim of this study is to provide a comprehensive assessment of vascular plant diversity and taxonomic structure within the Lower Amu Darya State Biosphere Reserve using a grid-based approach (Seregin 2013). Specifically, we (i) document the current composition of the flora, (ii) analyse its taxonomic structure, and (iii) assess spatial patterns of species richness and sampling intensity. By integrating historical and contemporary floristic data within a spatially explicit analytical framework (Seregin 2021), this study establishes a baseline for long-term biodiversity monitoring and contributes to a broader understanding of floristic diversity and its documentation in arid riverine ecosystems.

Materials and methods

Study area

The Lower Amu Darya State Biosphere Reserve, originally established as the Badai-Tugai Reserve in 1971 (Zapovedniki Uzbekistana 1986; An et al. 1980) represents one of the largest remaining refugia of tugai ecosystems in Central Asia (Kuzmina and Treshkin 2012; Reymov et al. 2024). Located in the lower course of the Amu Darya River, the reserve supports well-developed riparian vegetation and important tugai-associated biodiversity, including the Bukhara deer (Cervus elaphus bactrianus) (Lim 1991). Administratively, the Lower Amu Darya State Biosphere Reserve is located within the Amudarya and Beruniy districts of the Republic of Karakalpakstan, Uzbekistan (approximately 41°59'25" N, 60°21'45" E), and covers an area of about 687.17 km². Geographically, the territory occupies the lower reaches of the Amu Darya and is bounded by the Ustyurt Plateau to the west, the Unguz Karakum Desert to the south, the Kyzylkum Desert and the Sultan Uvais Mountains to the east, and the Aral Sea to the north. It is subdivided into three functional zones: a strictly protected core area, a buffer zone, and a transition zone (Fig. 1).

Map of the Lower Amu Darya State Biosphere Reserve
Figure 1. Map of the Lower Amu Darya State Biosphere Reserve.

The reserve is situated within the Irano-Turanian floristic region and the lower Amu Darya botanical-geographical context of Uzbekistan, and is characterized by a heterogeneous mosaic of ecosystems, including riparian forests, wetlands, desert communities, and anthropogenically modified landscapes (Takhtajan 1986; Tojibaev et al. 2014; Tojibaev et al. 2016; Tojibaev et al. 2017). Vegetation patterns are primarily structured by strong environmental gradients, particularly soil salinity, groundwater depth, and fluvial dynamics. Tugai communities are dominated by species such as Populus euphratica, Elaeagnus angustifolia, and Tamarix spp., while adjacent desert areas support psammophytic and halophytic vegetation, including representatives of Haloxylon, Salsola, and Calligonum. Wetland habitats host hydrophytic and hygrophytic species associated with periodically flooded environments (Bakhiev et al. 1987; Rakhimova et al. 2023).

The geomorphology is dominated by flat alluvial plains formed through long-term sediment accumulation in the Amu Darya delta. The substrate consists of relatively young alluvial deposits, mainly sands, sandy loams, and clay sediments, associated with both active and abandoned river channels. This dynamic fluvial landscape reflects the river system's historical instability and plays a key role in shaping habitat heterogeneity and vegetation distribution. Soil conditions are highly variable, with widespread salinization and the presence of alluvial and meadow soils typical of arid deltaic environments (Bakhiev 1985).

The climate is sharply continental and extremely arid, with mean annual temperatures of 10–12°C. Winters are relatively cold (mean January temperature −4.5 to −7.6°C), while summers are hot and dry, with high solar radiation and temperatures frequently exceeding 40°C. Annual precipitation is very low (79–108 mm), with most falling in winter and spring, while summer precipitation is negligible. Potential evapotranspiration greatly exceeds precipitation, resulting in persistent water deficit and strong environmental stress typical of arid ecosystems (Korolyuk et al. 2024; Reymov et al. 2024).

Table 1. Geographic and recent climatic characteristics of the study area based on ClimateEngine point-based gridded datasets for 2022–2025, with supplementary temperature and precipitation diagrams
ParameterValue / description
East longitude60.3625°E
North latitude41.9903°N
Study area687.17 km²
Altitude55 m a.s.l.
Climate data sourceClimateEngine point-based gridded data
Temperature datasetERA5 daily mean temperature
Precipitation datasetCHIRPS 5-day precipitation
Data period2022–2025
Mean annual temperature14.60°C
Mean annual precipitation95.37 mm/year
Hottest monthJuly, mean 29.75°C
Coldest monthJanuary, mean −1.82°C
Wettest monthMay, mean 20.34 mm
Driest monthJuly, mean 1.53 mm
Climatic subzoneArid
Temperature and precipitation diagram
Supplementary temperature and precipitation diagram for the study area (ClimateEngine, 2022–2025).
Second climate diagram
Supplementary climatic diagram for the study area (ClimateEngine, 2022–2025).

To complement the literature-based climatic description, recent climate parameters for the ClimateEngine extraction point representing the study area were calculated from ClimateEngine gridded datasets for 2022–2025 (Climate Engine 2026). ERA5 daily mean temperature data indicated a mean annual temperature of 14.60°C (Hersbach et al. 2020), whereas CHIRPS 5-day precipitation data indicated a mean annual precipitation of 95.37 mm/year (Funk et al. 2015).

Hydrological context

The Lower Amu Darya State Biosphere Reserve represents one of the last remaining hydromorphic areas with tree and shrub vegetation within the desert plains of Central Asia. The reserve was established in the mid-1970s, coinciding with the construction of major hydroengineering structures, including the Takhiatash (1974) and Tuyamuyun (1980) dams. These developments substantially altered the hydrological regime of the Amu Darya River, resulting in a decrease in water level by approximately 4.0–4.5 m over the subsequent decades (Kuzmina and Treshkin 2012). As a consequence, natural flooding events, which are critical to maintaining tugai ecosystems, have largely been absent. Between 1976 and 1998, no flooding was recorded within the reserve, with only episodic inundation events observed in 1998 and 2002. Under current conditions, the natural hydrological processes that support tugai vegetation have been significantly reduced (Rakhimova et al. 2023).

Despite these pressures, the reserve remains a key biodiversity refuge and supports the world's largest population of Bukhara deer (Cervus elaphus bactrianus), with more than 2,000 individuals. As one of the best-preserved remnants of deltaic tugai ecosystems, the Lower Amu Darya State Biosphere Reserve provides an important case study for assessing patterns of vascular plant diversity and evaluating the effectiveness of protected areas under ongoing environmental change (Rakhimova et al. 2023; Korolyuk et al. 2024; Reymov and Pulatov 2016; Reymov et al. 2024).

Floristic data collection and sampling design

Floristic data collection and spatial analysis were conducted using a grid-based framework, consistent with recent spatial floristic and conservation-oriented studies in Uzbekistan (Tojibaev et al. 2022; Tojibaev et al. 2023; Juramurodov et al. 2025). The study area was divided into regular 2 × 2 km grid cells, resulting in 89 cells.

Field surveys were conducted within each grid cell across the main habitat types. Sampling was conducted during the peak vegetation period in tugai ecosystems (April–mid-May), when most species are detectable and identifiable. Within each grid cell, fieldwork included route surveys, targeted collection of herbarium specimens, and recording of vascular plant occurrences to capture local environmental heterogeneity (Shcherbakov and Mayorov 2006a, 2006b).

The final dataset comprised 4,872 georeferenced occurrence records representing 310 vascular plant taxa, including 3,000 field-collected specimens, 372 historical herbarium specimens preserved in TASH and the herbarium of the Karakalpakstan branch of the Academy of Sciences, more than 850 georeferenced photographic records, and additional floristic observations from surveys conducted mainly during 2022–2025. Voucher specimens were prepared in accordance with standard herbarium protocols and deposited at the TASH. All occurrence records were critically evaluated for taxonomic consistency and spatial accuracy. Records with uncertain identification, ambiguous locality information, or low spatial precision were excluded from the analysis. Historical records were georeferenced retrospectively based on locality descriptions.

Geographic coordinates were recorded during field surveys with GPS devices, whereas historical records were georeferenced retrospectively from locality descriptions using Google Earth and available cartographic resources. For species richness calculations, repeated records of the same species within a single grid cell were treated as a single occurrence. Each occurrence record was assigned to a habitat category, including tugai forest, floodplain, wetland margin, sandy desert, saline soil, takyr, and anthropogenically modified habitat.

All validated records were assigned to corresponding grid cells using GIS. Spatial analyses were conducted in ArcGIS 10.8.2. For each grid cell, species richness (SR) was calculated as the total number of recorded species. Collection density (CD) was calculated as the number of occurrence records per cell and used as a proxy for sampling effort (Seregin 2014; Tojibaev et al. 2022). These metrics were used to evaluate spatial variation in floristic diversity and sampling intensity and to identify under-sampled areas and potential biases in the dataset.

Taxonomic identification and data standardization

Species identification was based on field collections and critical examination of herbarium specimens. Taxonomic determination followed regional floras, including the Illustrated Guide to Higher Plants of Karakalpakstan and Khorezm (Korovina et al. 1982–1983), the latest editions of the Flora of Uzbekistan (Sennikov 2017a, 2017b, 2019, 2022, 2023a, 2023b), and the Conspectus Florae Asiae Mediae (Vvedensky 1968–1993). Identifications were verified through comparison with authenticated specimens in the TASH herbarium and by consulting international and regional databases. Nomenclature was standardized according to Plants of the World Online (POWO 2026), including GBIF (2026), supplemented by regional resources including GMOCA (2026) and Plantarium (2026). Taxonomically complex groups were critically evaluated in consultation with taxonomic specialists to ensure consistency in species delimitation.

The taxonomic circumscription of families follows PPG I (2016) for ferns and fern allies, Christenhusz et al. (2011) for gymnosperms, and APG IV (2016) for angiosperms.

A taxonomically verified checklist of vascular plant species recorded in the Lower Amu Darya State Biosphere Reserve is provided in the Suppl. material 1.

All records were critically revised to remove duplicates, resolve synonymy, and exclude doubtful identifications. Species were assigned to families and genera according to current taxonomic concepts.

Data limitations and uncertainty

Despite the integration of field and herbarium data, sampling intensity was uneven across the study area, as indicated by variation in CD among grid cells. This may have affected species richness estimates in some poorly accessible parts of the reserve. Historical herbarium records also do not necessarily reflect recent changes in species distributions within this rapidly changing deltaic system. In addition, species detectability varied across habitat types and survey periods, potentially affecting the completeness of the floristic inventory.

Results

Floristic composition and taxonomic structure

The floristic inventory of the Lower Amu Darya State Biosphere Reserve, based on a grid-based mapping approach, recorded 310 vascular plant taxa belonging to 173 genera and 44 families. The documented species represent approximately 47% of the flora of the Lower Amu Darya region (Bakhiev et al. 1987), indicating substantial coverage of the regional species pool within the study area.

Herbarium data contributed significantly to the compiled dataset. The primary sources included the TASH and the herbarium of the Karakalpakstan branch of the Academy of Sciences. These collections comprise 372 specimens representing 253 species, collected between 1928 and 2017 (Table 2). The integration of historical herbarium records with recent field data ensured comprehensive taxonomic coverage.

Table 2. Summary of herbarium specimens from the study area preserved in TASH and the Karakalpakstan herbarium, including collection period, number of families, genera, species, and specimens
HerbariaCollection periodFamilyGeneraSpeciesSpecimens
TASH1928–20172373125147
Karakalpakstan herbaria1960–19754099134225
Total1928–201743140253372

Cultivated plants, including trees and shrubs introduced through human activity, were excluded from the analysis to ensure that the dataset reflects the natural and semi-natural flora of the reserve (Krasovskaya and Levichev 1986).

Taxonomic structure

The proportional representation of major taxonomic groups in the study area is presented in Table 3.

Table 3. Taxonomic composition of major plant groups in the flora of the Lower Amu Darya State Biosphere Reserve
TaxaSpecies%Genus%Family%
Equisetophyta20.6410.5712.27
Pinophyta30.9710.5712.27
Magnoliophyta:305
  Magnoliopsida25883.2213980.363375
  Liliopsida4715.173218.5920.46
Total31010017310044100

Angiosperms constitute the vast majority of the documented flora, representing 305 species (98.4%) of all recorded taxa. Eudicots dominate this group with 258 species (83.22% of the total flora), whereas monocots comprise 47 species (15.17%). The overall ratio of monocots to eudicots is approximately 1:4.1, which is consistent with patterns reported for arid floras of the Turanian province. Notably, this ratio closely matches earlier data from the Lower Amu Darya region (Bakhiev et al. 1987), indicating the stability of this taxonomic structure despite the biosphere reserve's spatial delimitation.

An important metric for evaluating the overall taxonomic structure of a flora is the average number of genera and species per family. In the studied flora, each family comprises, on average, 3.9 genera and 7 species, indicating the predominance of several species-rich families (e.g., Asteraceae, Amaranthaceae, and Poaceae) together with numerous species-poor families.

Leading families and genera

General taxonomic proportions provide a broad overview of floristic structure; however, the composition and ranking of leading families offer a more informative measure of floristic organization (Kamelin 1973; Krasovskaya and Levichev 1986; Khokhryakov 2000; Tojibaev 2010). Among the studied flora, ten families are represented by six or more species and constitute the leading families (Table 4).

These leading families account for a substantial proportion of the total species richness and thus play a key role in shaping the taxonomic structure of the flora. To assess the stability and dynamics of this structure, the spectrum of leading families was compared with historical data for the Lower Amu Darya region (Bakhiev et al. 1987).

Table 4. Leading family spectrum of the flora of the Lower Amu Darya State Biosphere Reserve
Lower Amu Darya; Bakhiev 1987Lower Amu Darya State Biosphere Reserve
FamilySpecies%FamilySpecies%
Amaranthaceae11016.79Amaranthaceae6621.29
Asteraceae8212.52Asteraceae4113.23
Poaceae619.31Poaceae278.71
Brassicaceae527.94Brassicaceae247.27
Fabaceae385.80Fabaceae216.77
Boraginaceae365.50Boraginaceae185.81
Polygonaceae284.27Polygonaceae113.55
Cyperaceae213.21Convolvulaceae92.9
Caryophyllaceae172.60Salicaceae61.93
Ranunculaceae121.83Tamaricaceae61.93
Total45769.77Total22973.84

The comparison of the leading family spectra reveals a high degree of congruence in both the composition and ranking of the top three families, as well as in their relative contributions to the flora. This consistency indicates the long-term stability of the core taxonomic structure of the Lower Amu Darya flora and suggests that its primary floristic framework has remained largely unaffected by recent environmental changes.

In contrast, differences between the spectra are expressed mainly in the relative proportions and internal composition of dominant families. In the contemporary spectrum, the relatively high proportion of Amaranthaceae can be attributed in part to recent taxonomic revisions, particularly the inclusion of Amaranthus L. within this family. However, this factor is not decisive, as the genus is represented by only four species in the reserve and does not significantly affect the family's overall contribution. Instead, the dominance of Amaranthaceae is primarily driven by the high diversity of chenopod taxa (Chenopodiaceae s.l.), which account for approximately 60% of the family diversity recorded for the Lower Amu Darya.

In the broader regional flora of the Lower Amu Darya, Bakhiev et al. (1987) reported a high diversity of chenopod lineages within Amaranthaceae s.l., including genera such as Alexandra, Arthrophytum, Borsczowia, Cornulaca, Girgensohnia, Halopeplis, Halimocnemis, Horaninovia, Kirilovia, Nanophyton, Panderia, Petrosimonia, and Piptoptera. In the present reserve-level dataset, however, the dominance of Amaranthaceae is mainly associated with salt-tolerant genera recorded within the biosphere reserve, including Anabasis, Atriplex, Bassia, Caroxylon, Halimocnemis, Salsola, Suaeda, and related taxa.

This pattern reflects the ecological filtering of the flora towards salt-tolerant and drought-adapted lineages under increasing aridity and soil salinization.

The second rank of leading families is fully consistent with Bakhiev's (1987) data, further reinforcing the stability of the floristic core. However, slight quantitative deviations in species richness and relative contributions point to gradual rebalancing within these families rather than structural turnover.

More pronounced differences emerge in the third rank, where shifts in the composition and position of Polygonaceae, Convolvulaceae, and Salicaceae indicate reorganization among subdominant elements. In the present study, Polygonaceae occupies the leading position within this group, represented by 11 species, which is approximately 2.5 times lower than previously reported. While this difference partly reflects the more restricted spatial extent of the biosphere reserve (species–area effect), it also suggests a contraction or redistribution of suitable habitats for these taxa over time.

The most substantial divergence between the spectra concerns Cyperaceae. Previously included among the leading families with 21 species (3.21%) (Bakhiev et al. 1987), it is absent from the leading group in the current dataset. This shift represents not merely a taxonomic fluctuation but a structural change in the flora, linked to the loss and degradation of wetland habitats. As Cyperaceae is primarily composed of hygrophilous taxa, its decline reflects hydrological disruption, reduced flooding regimes, and the desiccation of deltaic ecosystems under both climatic and anthropogenic pressures. Historical dominance of genera such as Carex, Cyperus, and Schoenoplectus contrasts sharply with their current reduced representation.

The analysis of the leading genera spectrum provides a more refined understanding of floristic structure and internal differentiation than family-level patterns. This approach allows the identification of species-rich genera, the evaluation of their relative contributions, and the assessment of distribution patterns, thereby revealing key taxonomic centres that shape the flora (Tojibaev 2010; Tolmachev 1974). As such, the leading genera spectrum is widely used in modern floristic studies as an effective tool for comparative analysis and for detecting structural differences among regional floras.

Applying the same framework as for leading families, the spectrum of leading genera (Table 5) in the Lower Amu Darya State Biosphere Reserve was analysed in comparison with historical data (Bakhiev 1987). In contrast to the relative stability observed at the family level, the genus-level structure appears markedly more dynamic, limiting direct one-to-one comparisons. This reflects the higher sensitivity of genera to ecological filtering and environmental change.

According to Bakhiev et al. (1987), the leading genera of the Lower Amu Darya flora were Astragalus (19 species), Artemisia (13), and Atriplex (12), followed by Suaeda (11), Tamarix (10), and Halimocnemis (8). This composition clearly reflects the dominance of xerophytic and halophytic lineages under arid and saline conditions. In the contemporary flora of the biosphere reserve, Astragalus retains its leading position, indicating continuity of the floristic core. However, the remaining genera show substantial reorganization, with shifts in both ranking and species richness that prevent direct correspondence with the historical spectrum. At the same time, a consistent pattern is observed in the continued prominence of halophytic genera within Amaranthaceae (e.g., Suaeda, Halimocnemis, Atriplex), as well as the stable presence of Artemisia and Tamarix, which remain key structural elements of the flora.

Table 5. Leading genera spectrum of the flora of the Lower Amu Darya State Biosphere Reserve
Lower Amu Darya Bakhiev 1987Lower Amu Darya State Biosphere Reserve, 2026
GeneraSpecies%GeneraSpecies%
Astragalus192.9Astragalus92.9
Artemisia131.9Suaeda82.6
Atriplex121.9Caroxylon61.9
Suaeda111.7Halimocnemis61.9
Tamarix101.5Heliotropium61.9
Halimocnemis81.2Artemisia51.6
Heliotropium71.1Atriplex51.6
Cousinia81.2Convolvulus51.6
Potamogeton81.2Tamarix51.6
Total9614.6Total5517.7

Among the leading genera of the Lower Amu Darya State Biosphere Reserve, Astragalus retains its leading position (9 species; 2.9%), confirming its role as a stable taxonomic core of the regional flora (Tojibaev et al. 2015). However, beyond this persistent element, the genus-level structure shows substantial reorganization relative to historical data (Bakhiev et al. 1987). Only a limited subset of leading genera is shared between the two spectra, while several formerly dominant taxa have declined in rank or disappeared from the leading group, indicating a pronounced turnover at the genus level.

At the same time, key compositional similarities persist. Halophytic genera of Amaranthaceae, particularly Suaeda, Caroxylon, and Atriplex, remain consistently prominent, reflecting the continued dominance of salt-tolerant lineages. In addition, the relatively high ranking of Heliotropium (6; 1.9%), together with Artemisia, Tamarix, and Convolvulus (5 each; 1.6%), indicates the persistence of xerophytic and psammophytic elements as fundamental components of the flora.

The observed differences between the spectra arise from two distinct but interacting sources. First, part of the discrepancy is taxonomic in origin. Historical data (Bakhiev et al. 1987) were not supported by published voucher specimens or an explicit species list, limiting their reproducibility. This is exemplified by Salsola L., reported with 21 species but not represented among the leading genera in the present dataset. Subsequent molecular phylogenetic studies have demonstrated that Salsola s.l. comprises multiple distinct lineages, now segregated into genera such as Caroxylon, Kali, Climacoptera, and Halothamnus (Akhani et al. 2007). Thus, part of the apparent turnover reflects improved taxonomic resolution rather than genuine floristic change.

Second, the restructuring of the genus spectrum may reflect ecological responses to increasing aridity, soil salinization, and reduced flooding frequency in the deltaic system. Conversely, the decline or disappearance of previously recorded genera suggests contraction of suitable habitats and loss of ecological niches under combined climatic and anthropogenic pressures.

Spatial framework and data coverage

Preliminary inspection of the grid-based data indicated pronounced spatial heterogeneity in taxon richness across the study area. Higher values were generally associated with tugai and floodplain habitats, whereas desert and highly saline areas showed lower richness.

In contrast, CD reveals a non-uniform sampling effort across the study area. Areas of high sampling intensity are primarily associated with accessible locations, while remote and less accessible zones remain comparatively undersampled. Notably, spatial patterns of SR and CD do not fully coincide, indicating potential sampling bias and suggesting that some floristically rich areas may remain insufficiently documented.

Using a regular 2 × 2 km grid (89 cells), spatial patterns of floristic diversity were assessed across the Lower Amu Darya State Biosphere Reserve. The analysis was based on a final dataset of 4,872 georeferenced occurrence records representing 310 vascular plant taxa, including 372 historical herbarium specimens from collections in Tashkent and Nukus, 3,000 field-collected specimens, more than 850 georeferenced photographic records, and additional floristic observations from surveys conducted between 2022 and 2025, thereby ensuring broad spatial and temporal coverage of the study area.

SR across the Lower Amu Darya State Biosphere Reserve exhibits pronounced spatial heterogeneity. The highest richness was recorded in slightly more than 11% of grid cells (10 cells), each supporting 136–180 species. Intermediate-high values (103–135 species) were observed in 21 cells, followed by a similar number of cells (24) with 58–102 species. Very low richness levels (30–57 species) were documented in 34 cells (Table 6, Fig. 4). High-richness cells are primarily concentrated within the core zone of the biosphere reserve, particularly in the Nazarhan and Baday sections. These areas correspond to remnant floodplain and tugai habitats, where relatively higher moisture availability and habitat heterogeneity support elevated plant diversity. In contrast, low-richness cells are predominantly found in deserts and highly saline areas, reflecting strong environmental constraints on species' occurrence.

Table 6. Summary statistics of species richness and collection density across grid cells
CategoryGrid cells, n (%)SRGrid cells, n (%)CDHabitat type
High richness1011.2136–1802022.4153–186Tugai forests, river valleys, wetland margins
Moderate richness2123.6103–1351112.4120–152Stony and gravelly slopes, takyrs
Low richness242758–102242768–119River valleys, desert
Very low richness3438.230–573438.240–67Salt flats, solonchaks, highly saline
Species richness across the Lower Amu Darya State Biosphere Reserve
Figure 2. Species richness across the Lower Amu Darya State Biosphere Reserve.

CD also shows marked spatial variability across the reserve. The highest values (153–186 records per cell) were recorded in 20 grid cells. In addition, 11 cells, representing 12.4% of all grid cells, were characterized by relatively high sampling intensity (120–152 records per cell). Sampling effort declined across the remaining cells: 24 cells contained 68–119 records, and 34 cells contained 40–67 records (Table 6, Fig. 5).

A comparison of SR and CD patterns reveals a clear mismatch between species richness and sampling intensity. While areas of high SR generally coincide with floodplain and tugai habitats, elevated CD values are partly associated with accessibility and survey focus. Several grid cells with moderate to high SR exhibit comparatively low CD, indicating that parts of the reserve remain undersampled.

Overall, these patterns reflect the combined influence of environmental gradients – particularly water availability and habitat heterogeneity – and uneven sampling effort. The identified discrepancies between SR and CD highlight priority areas for further floristic surveys and suggest that current estimates of species diversity may still underestimate the reserve's full floristic potential.

Collection density across the Lower Amu Darya State Biosphere Reserve
Figure 3. Collection density across the Lower Amu Darya State Biosphere Reserve.

Discussion

To our knowledge, this study represents the first comprehensive standardized, spatially explicit assessment of floristic diversity in the Lower Amu Darya State Biosphere Reserve using a grid-based mapping approach. It expands upon the preliminary grid-mapping results reported by Babadzhanov (2026) by integrating historical herbarium records, field-collected specimens, georeferenced photographic records, taxonomic standardization, species-richness and collection-density analyses, and comparison with historical floristic data. Unlike previous studies based on aggregated and non-standardized data, the present study provides a reproducible framework for analysing taxon richness, taxonomic structure, and the spatial organization of plant diversity. By integrating historical and contemporary records, our results enable a comparison of floristic patterns over more than four decades.

The dominance of Amaranthaceae, Asteraceae, Poaceae, Brassicaceae, and Fabaceae is consistent with the floristic structure of the Irano-Turanian deserts and reflects adaptation to arid and saline environmental conditions. The stable presence of genera such as Astragalus, Artemisia, Tamarix, and Suaeda highlights the importance of xerophytic and halophytic elements in the flora.

The occurrence of hydrophilous taxa (e.g., Populus, Salix, Phragmites) reflects the contribution of floodplain and tugai habitats and emphasizes the ecotonal character of the flora.

Spatial patterns of SR reveal pronounced heterogeneity (Fig. 4), with diversity hotspots concentrated in the core zone (Nazarhan and Baday). These areas are associated with active floodplain processes and greater habitat heterogeneity.

The mismatch between SR and CD indicates uneven sampling effort across the reserve. Several grid cells with relatively high SR but low CD suggest that parts of the flora remain insufficiently documented.

In a temporal context, the results indicate substantial floristic reorganization over the past decades. While a stable taxonomic core persists, shifts in ecological composition are evident. In particular, the increasing prominence of halophytic and xerophytic taxa – reflected in the dominance of Amaranthaceae and associated genera (e.g., Suaeda, Caroxylon) – contrasts with the decline of hygrophilous elements, including taxa typically associated with wetland environments.

Importantly, floristic reorganization is expressed differently across taxonomic scales. While the leading families remain relatively stable (Table 4), genus-level patterns exhibit substantially higher turnover, indicating that ecological change is primarily manifested at finer taxonomic levels. This is accompanied by a clear shift in functional composition, with an increasing dominance of xerophytic and halophytic taxa – particularly within Amaranthaceae – and a decline of hygrophilous elements, including wetland-associated groups such as Cyperaceae. Together, these patterns suggest directional environmental filtering that is likely associated with aridification, salinization, and hydrological alteration.

This restructuring is consistent with regional-scale environmental change driven by the desiccation of the Aral Sea. Reduced flooding frequency, increased soil salinity, and the expansion of desertified substrates have likely promoted stress-tolerant assemblages while constraining wetland-dependent taxa. Similar shifts towards xerophytic and halophytic dominance have been reported in other arid regions of Central Asia under ongoing aridification.

Despite uneven sampling in some parts of the reserve, the study highlights the importance of the Lower Amu Darya State Biosphere Reserve as a key refuge of tugai-associated biodiversity within the rapidly changing landscapes of the Aral Sea region.

Conclusion

The present study provides the first standardized grid-based assessment of the flora of the Lower Amu Darya State Biosphere Reserve. By integrating field surveys, herbarium collections, photographic observations, and georeferenced occurrence records, the study documents 310 vascular plant taxa and reveals substantial spatial heterogeneity in species richness and collection density across the reserve. The results provide an updated floristic baseline for one of the largest remaining tugai ecosystems in Central Asia and enable future comparison of floristic patterns over time. The observed mismatch between species richness and sampling intensity indicates that floristic diversity remains insufficiently documented in some parts of the reserve, particularly in environmentally heterogeneous and less accessible areas. Although uneven sampling effort remains a limitation, the grid-based framework made it possible to identify undersampled territories and provides a practical basis for targeted future surveys and long-term floristic monitoring.

Overall, the study demonstrates the value of standardized grid-based approaches for floristic inventory and spatial analysis in arid riverine ecosystems of Central Asia. The compiled dataset and spatial framework provide an important foundation for future floristic, vegetation, and conservation studies in the lower Amu Darya region, particularly under ongoing aridification and hydrological changes associated with the Aral Sea crisis.

Acknowledgments

This study was conducted within the framework of the State Program "Digital Nature: Development of a Digital Platform for the Flora of Uzbekistan" (2025–2029), implemented by the Institute of Botany of the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Uzbekistan, and was additionally supported by the projects "Taxonomic Revision of Polymorphic Families in the Flora of Uzbekistan" (A-FA-2021-427) and "Biodiversity Centers of the Transboundary Territories of Uzbekistan and Their Current Status" (No. FL-9024093685).

References

Akhani H, Edwards G, Roalson EH (2007) Diversification of the Old World Salsoleae s.l. (Chenopodiaceae): molecular phylogenetic analysis of nuclear and chloroplast data sets and a revised classification. International Journal of Plant Sciences 168(6): 931–956. https://doi.org/10.1086/518263

An ES, Botman KS, Goncharov BE, Dudura IM, Kulbashnaya LY (Eds) (1980) Protected areas of Uzbekistan [Zapovednye territorii Uzbekistana]. Uzbekistan Publishing House, Tashkent, 71 pp. [In Russian]

Angiosperm Phylogeny Group, Chase MW, Christenhusz MJM, Fay MF, Byng JW, Judd WS, Soltis DE, Mabberley DJ, Sennikov AN, Soltis PS, Stevens PF (2016) An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 181: 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/boj.12385

Babadzhanov JR (2026) Main results of grid-based mapping of the flora of the Lower Amu Darya State Biosphere Reserve. In: Khismatullin DR (Ed.) Eurasian Scientific Initiative: Research and Solutions: Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, Moscow, February 28, 2026. Scientific and Educational Portal "GENESIS", Moscow, 61–67. https://doi.org/10.34660/INF.2026.24.52.257

Bakhiev A (1985) Ecology and succession of plant communities in the Lower Amu Darya. Fan, Tashkent, 192 pp. [In Russian]

Bakhiev A, Viktorov SV, Sagitov BN (1987) Floristic and ecological-geobotanical studies in Karakalpakia. Vol. 1. Fan, Tashkent, 271 pp. [In Russian]

Bakhiev AB, Treshkin SE, Kuzmina ZhV (1994) Current state of tugai forests in Karakalpakstan and their protection. Karakalpakstan Publishing House, Nukus, 72 pp. [In Russian]

Bakhiev AB, Treshkin SE, Kuzmina ZhV, Mamutov NK (2008) Monitoring of tugai ecosystems in the Baday-Tugai Nature Reserve. In: Proceedings of the Scientific and Practical Conference "Problems of Biodiversity Conservation in Protected Natural Areas of Uzbekistan". Nukus, 28–31. [In Russian]

Christenhusz MJM, Reveal JL, Farjon A, Gardner MF, Mill RR, Chase MW (2011) A new classification and linear sequence of extant gymnosperms. Phytotaxa 19: 55–70.

Climate Engine (2026) ClimateEngine.org. Desert Research Institute and University of California Merced. Available from: https://www.climateengine.org/ [Accessed 13 May 2026]

Funk C, Peterson P, Landsfeld M, Pedreros D, Verdin J, Shukla S, Husak G, Rowland J, Harrison L, Hoell A, Michaelsen J (2015) The climate hazards infrared precipitation with stations: a new environmental record for monitoring extremes. Scientific Data 2: 150066. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2015.66

GBIF (2026) Global Biodiversity Information Facility Home Page. Available from: https://www.gbif.org [Accessed 13 May 2026]

GMOCA (2026) Grid mapping of Central Asia Plants. Available from: http://www.gmoca.org [Accessed 13 May 2026]

Hersbach H, Bell B, Berrisford P, Hirahara S, Horányi A, Muñoz-Sabater J, Nicolas J, Peubey C, Radu R, Schepers D, Simmons A, Soci C, Abdalla S, Abellan X, Balsamo G, Bechtold P, Biavati G, Bidlot J, Bonavita M, De Chiara G, Dahlgren P, Dee D, Diamantakis M, Dragani R, Flemming J, Forbes R, Fuentes M, Geer A, Haimberger L, Healy S, Hogan RJ, Hólm E, Janisková M, Keeley S, Laloyaux P, Lopez P, Lupu C, Radnoti G, de Rosnay P, Rozum I, Vamborg F, Villaume S, Thépaut JN (2020) The ERA5 global reanalysis. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 146(730): 1999–2049. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803

Juramurodov I, Uralov R, Makhmudjanov D, Chunfang L, Akbarov F, Pulatov S, Karimov B, Turginov O, Tojibaev K (2025) Assessment of plant diversity in the Surkhan-Sherabad Region, Uzbekistan by grid mapping. Journal of Arid Land 17(3): 394–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-025-0096-5

Kamelin RV (1973) Florogenetic analysis of the natural flora of mountainous Central Asia. Nauka, Leningrad, 356 pp. [In Russian]

Khaydarov KhQ, Zhalov KhN, Toshpo'latov YSh (2016) Diversity of the plants of Uzbekistan tugai forests and their origin. Ziyokor, Samarkand, 148 pp. [In Uzbek]

Khokhryakov AP (2000) Taxonomic categories and plant systematics. Nauka, Moscow, 196 pp. [In Russian]

Korolyuk AYu, Shomurodov HF, Khabibullaev BS, Sadinov ZS (2024) Composition and structure of tugai communities in the indication of ecological conditions in the Lower Amu Darya. Contemporary Problems of Ecology 17(1): 106–111. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995425524010074

Korolyuk AYu, Shomurodov HF, Khabibullaev BS (2025) Syntaxonomy of riparian forests of the lower reaches of the Amudarya River. Turczaninowia 28(2): 51–61. https://doi.org/10.14258/turczaninowia.28.2.4

Korovin EP (1961) Vegetation of Central Asia and Southern Kazakhstan. Vol. 1. Academy of Sciences of the Uzbek SSR, Tashkent, 452 pp. [In Russian]

Korovina ON, Bakhiev AA, Tadzhitdinov MT, Sarybaev B (1982–1983) Illustrated guide to higher plants of Karakalpakia and Khorezm. Vols 1–2. Fan, Tashkent. [In Russian]

Krasovskaya LS, Levichev IG (1986) Flora of the Chatkal Nature Reserve. Fan Uzbek SSR, Tashkent, 176 pp. [In Russian]

Kuzmina ZV, Treshkin SE (2012) Riparian forests and the possibility of their modern restoration. Arid Ecosystems 2(3): 165–176. https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079096112030080

Lim VP (1991) Feeding of the Bukhara deer in the Baday-Tugai Reserve. In: Ecology, protection and acclimatization of mammals in Uzbekistan. Fan UzSSR, Tashkent, 84–90. [In Russian]

Plantarium (2026) Plants and lichens of Russia and neighboring countries: open online atlas and illustrated guide to plant identification. Available from: https://www.plantarium.ru/ [Accessed 13 May 2026]

POWO (2026) Plants of the World Online. Facilitated by the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Available from: http://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org [Accessed 13 May 2026]

PPG I (2016) A community-derived classification for extant lycophytes and ferns. Journal of Systematics and Evolution 54(6): 563–603. https://doi.org/10.1111/jse.12229

Rakhimova NK, Shomurodov KF, Sharipova VK, Saitjanova USh, Sadinov JS (2023) Using biodiversity indices to assess the current state of tugai vegetation of the Amu Darya River, Uzbekistan. Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity 24(1): 467–472. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d240153

Reymov MP, Pulatov AS (2016) Some aspects of ecosystem service analysis in the Lower Amu Darya State Biosphere Reserve in Uzbekistan. Irrigatsiya va Melioratsiya 3: 64–69.

Reymov PR, Khudaybergenov YaG, Eshimbetova MO (2024) Mapping the current state of the Lower Amu Darya State Biosphere Reserve. Economics and Society [Ekonomika I Sotsium] 4: 479–482. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11176963

Sennikov AN (Ed.) (2017a) Flora of Uzbekistan. Vol. 1. Navruz Publishers, Tashkent, 173 pp. [In Russian]

Sennikov AN (Ed.) (2017b) Flora of Uzbekistan. Vol. 2. Navruz Publishers, Tashkent, 200 pp. [In Russian]

Sennikov AN (Ed.) (2019) Flora of Uzbekistan. Vol. 3. Ma'naviyat Publishers, Tashkent, 201 pp. [In Russian]

Sennikov AN (Ed.) (2022) Flora of Uzbekistan. Vol. 4. AS RUz "Fan" Publishers, Tashkent, 239 pp. [In Russian]

Sennikov AN (Ed.) (2023a) Flora of Uzbekistan. Vol. 5. AS RUz "Fan" Publishers, Tashkent, 469 pp. [In Russian]

Sennikov AN (Ed.) (2023b) Flora of Uzbekistan. Vol. 6. Ma'naviyat Publishers, Tashkent, 209 pp. [In Russian]

Seregin AP (2013) Floristic grid mapping: global experience and current trends. Vestnik Tverskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta, Seriya Biologiya i Ekologiya 32: 210–245. [In Russian]

Seregin AP (2014) Flora of Vladimir Oblast, Russia: grid data analysis. KMK Scientific Press, Moscow, 441 + 56 pp. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.1148.2407 [In Russian, with English abstract]

Seregin AP (2021) Flora of Vladimir Oblast, Russia: an updated grid dataset (1867–2020). Biodiversity Data Journal 9: e68046. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.9.e68046

Shcherbakov AV, Mayorov SR (2006a) Floristic studies: methodology and data analysis. KMK Scientific Press, Moscow, 95 pp. [In Russian]

Shcherbakov AV, Mayorov SR (2006b) Inventory of flora and herbarium practice basics: methodological guidelines. KMK Scientific Press, Moscow, 50 pp. [In Russian]

Takhtajan AL (1986) Floristic Regions of the World. University of California Press, Berkeley, 522 pp.

Thiers B (continuously updated) Index Herbariorum: A global directory of public herbaria and associated staff. New York Botanical Garden's Virtual Herbarium. Available from: http://sweetgum.nybg.org/ih/ [Accessed 13 May 2026]

Tojibaev KSh (2010) Flora of the South-Western Tian-Shan within the Republic of Uzbekistan. Fan, Tashkent, 100 pp. [In Russian]

Tojibaev KSh, Beshko NYu, Azimova DE, Turginov OT (2015) Distribution patterns of species of the genus Astragalus L. sections Macrocystis, Laguropsis and Chaetodon in the territory of the Mountainous Central Asian province. Turczaninowia 18(2): 17–38. https://doi.org/10.14258/turczaninowia.18.2.3

Tojibaev KSh, Beshko NYu, Popov VA (2016) Botanical-geographical regionalization of Uzbekistan. Botanicheskii Zhurnal 101(10): 1105–1132. https://doi.org/10.1134/S000681361610001X [In Russian]

Tojibaev KSh, Beshko NYu, Popov VA, Jang CG, Chang KS (2017) Botanical Geography of Uzbekistan. Korea National Arboretum, Pocheon, Republic of Korea, 250 pp.

Tojibaev KSh, Beshko NYu, Turginov OT, Mirzalieva D (2014) New records for Fabaceae in the flora of Uzbekistan. Flora Mediterranea 24: 25–35. https://doi.org/10.7320/Fl-Medit24.025

Tojibaev KSh, Karimov FI, Hoshimov HR, Gulomov R, Lazkov GA, Jang CG, Gil HY, Jang JE, Batoshov AR, Iskandarov A, Choi HJ (2023) Important plant areas (IPAs) in the Fergana Valley (Central Asia): the Bozbu-Too-Ungortepa massif. Nature Conservation 51: 13–70. https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.51.94477

Tojibaev KSh, Karimov FI, Hoshimov HR, Jang CG, Na NR, Park MS, Chang KS, Gil HY, Baasanmunkh S, Choi HJ (2022) Important plant areas (IPAs) in the Fergana Valley (Central Asia): the badlands of the northern foothills. Nature Conservation 49: 1–30. https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.49.84834

Tolmachev AI (1974) Introduction to plant geography. Leningrad State University Press, Leningrad, 244 pp. [In Russian]

Treshkin SE (2011) Degradation of tugai forests in Central Asia and the possibilities of their restoration. Abstract of Doctoral Dissertation in Agricultural Sciences. All-Russian Research Institute of Agroforestry, Volgograd, 47 pp. [In Russian]

Vallet J, Rambaud M, Coquel L, Poncet L, Hendoux F (2012) Effort d'échantillonnage et atlas floristiques – exhaustivité des mailles et caractérisation des lacunes dans la connaissance [Sampling effort and floristic atlases: survey completeness of localities and description of knowledge gaps]. Comptes Rendus Biologies 335(12): 753–763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crvi.2012.11.005

Vvedensky AI (Ed.) (1968–1993) Conspectus Florae Asiae Mediae. Vols 1–10. Fan, Tashkent. [In Russian]

Zapovedniki Uzbekistana [Nature Reserves of Uzbekistan] (1986) Mehnat, Tashkent, 216 pp. [In Russian]

Supplementary material 1

Title: Annotated checklist of vascular plants recorded in the Lower Amu Darya State Biosphere Reserve

Authors: Janibek Babajanov, Komiljon Sh. Tojibaev

Data type: checklist

License: Open Database License (ODbL) — http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/

Link: https://journal.asu.ru/biol/article/view/20572/17511

How to cite this article:

Babajanov J, Tojibaev KSh (2026) Floristic diversity and taxonomic structure of the Lower Amu Darya State Biosphere Reserve (Uzbekistan): a grid-based assessment. Acta Biologica Sibirica 12: 1357–1378. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23588563