The tribe Lychnideae A. Br., 1843 (Caryophyllaceae Juss., 1789) in the flora of Southern Siberia: opportunities and prospects for utilization*

Aleksandr S. Revushkin1, Daria I. Kazantseva1

1 National Research Tomsk State University, 36 Lenin Ave., Tomsk, 634050, Russia Corresponding author: Daria I. Kazantseva (da46611@gmail.com)

Academic editor: R. Yakovlev | Received 7 August 2025 | Accepted 16 September 2025 | Published 4 December 2025 |

http://zoobank.org/9B1E728D-D7A7-4BA1-B6C4-68412F62B11E

Citation: Revushkin AS, Kazantseva DI (2025) The tribe Lychnideae A. Br., 1843 (Caryophyllaceae Juss., 1789) in the flora of Southern Siberia: opportunities and prospects for utilization. Acta Biologica Sibirica 11: 1331–1337. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17787137

 

Abstract

This study investigates the biodiversity and biochemical potential of the tribe Lychnideae (Caryophyllaceae) within the unique and extreme environments of Southern Siberia. The research is motivated by the premise that the region's specific climatic stressors drive the synthesis of unique secondary metabolites, such as ecdysteroids and phenolic compounds, with prospective pharmacological applications. Through integrated field studies (2017–2023), herbarium specimen analysis, and a systematic literature review, we evaluated the species composition, distribution, and phytochemical profiles of the local Lychnideae flora. Applying a standardized resource assessment algorithm, we categorized the 44 documented species. Results indicate that 19 species (43.2%) possess significant bioprospecting potential, meriting further investigation for sustainable use via wild harvest or controlled cultivation. Concurrently, five species (11.4%) were identified as threatened, underscoring an urgent need for dedicated conservation measures. This work highlights the critical dual mandate in phytochemical research: the sustainable utilization of promising plant resources for drug discovery and the imperative conservation of biodiversity to ensure the resilience and continuity of these natural pharmacopeias.

Keywords

Lychnideae, Southern Siberia, biodiversity conservation, medicinal plants, secondary metabolites, ecdysteroids, flavonoids, sustainable use, phytochemistry

Introduction

The rapid advancement of pharmacology has intensified the search for new sources of biologically active compounds, with medicinal plants representing a critical frontier. Southern Siberia, characterized by its unique biodiversity and extreme climatic conditions, is a particularly promising region for phytochemical discovery. Local flora offers a diverse reservoir of compounds with potential anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, antimicrobial, and immunomodulatory properties, among others.

Plants that evolve under environmental stressors, such as sharp temperature fluctuations, water scarcity, and high solar radiation, often synthesize unique secondary metabolites as adaptive mechanisms (Yeshi et al. 2022). These specialized compounds frequently exhibit significant biological activity, making them valuable candidates for the development of natural therapeutics and preventive agents. Beyond its pharmacological potential, the study of such flora contributes essential data for the conservation of biodiversity and ecosystem management. Findings on plant distribution and bioactivity can inform evidence-based strategies for the sustainable use and conservation of plant populations, thus helping to preserve species diversity.

Within this context, species of the tribe Lychnideae A. Br., 1843 (Caryophyllaceae Juss., 1789) have emerged as a notable focus. Their potential was initially identified during phytochemical screening of the Altai Mountain flora and has been substantiated in subsequent studies (Revina et al. 1988; Volodin et al. 2013). These results underscore the importance of further investigation into the Lychnideae tribe to systematically identify and characterize its biologically active compounds.

Materials and methods

Study Area and Rationale

Southern Siberia was selected as the study region due to its rich floristic diversity and pronounced ecological gradients. The defined area encompasses latitudes 49–57°N and longitudes 65–120°E, spanning approximately 850 km north-south and 4,000 km west-east. This vast territory includes a mosaic of ecosystems, from the southeast Siberian Plain to the mountainous regions of Altai, Khakassia, Tuva, and the western Sayan, providing a representative range of habitats for phytochemical investigation.

Taxon Focus

The research focuses on the Lychnideae tribe A. Br., 1843 (Caryophyllaceae Juss., 1789), a group noted for its significant biochemical potential in preliminary screenings (Revina et al. 1988; Volodin et al. 2013).

Field and Herbarium Studies

Field studies were conducted between 2017 and 2023 in key regions of Southern Siberia, including the southeastern West Siberian Plain, the Altai Mountains, Khakassia, Tuva, and the Western Sayan Mountains. These investigations aimed to determine species composition, distribution patterns, and ecological characteristics. Data were supplemented by examining herbarium specimens from the P.N. Krylov Herbarium of Tomsk State University (TK) and the Herbarium of Moscow State University (MW). Additionally, critical floristic literature was consulted to verify and complement field findings (Shishkin 1936; Kovtonyuk & Zuev 1993; Vlasova 2012; Ebel 2012).

Systematic Literature Review

A systematic review of the scientific literature was performed to collate and analyze data on key secondary metabolites within the Lychnideae tribe, including ecdysteroids, phenols, flavonoids, and their glycosides. Priority was given to recent screening studies and systematic reviews; where these were unavailable, data from focused phytochemical investigations were considered. The literature search utilized PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases and was restricted to publications from 2000 to 2024 to ensure contemporary relevance. Key references informing the analysis include Zibareva (2000, 2009). Ramazonov et al. (2007), Bajpai et al. (2008), Munkhzhargal et al. (2010), Smolyakova et al. (2010), Darmogray et al. (2015, 2017), Novozhilova et al. (2015), Plotnikov et al. (2017), Olennikov (2019), Kozhanova et al. (2020), Zibareva et al. (2022) and Smakosz et al. (2024).

Evaluation of Bioprospecting Potential

The potential of each species as a source of biologically active compounds was evaluated based on a set of practical and ecological criteria: habitat range, frequency of occurrence, population abundance, and the feasibility of introduction into cultivation. This assessment was structured using a standardized algorithm developed to evaluate the potential of plant resources (Revushkin et al. 2023).

Results

Taxonomic Composition of Lychnideae in Southern Siberia

The investigation identified 44 species from the Lychnideae tribe (Caryophyllaceae) within the Southern Siberian region, distributed in 10 genera: Agrostemma L. (1 species), Coccyganthe Rchb. (1), Elisanthe (Fenzl ex Endl.) Rchb. (4), Gastrolychnis (Fenzl) Rchb. (6), Lychnis L. (3), Melandrium Röhl. (2), Oberna Adans. (2), Otites Adans. (6), Silene L. (18), and Steris Adans. (1).

Conservation and Sustainable Use Assessment

Applying the standardized evaluation algorithm (Revushkin et al. 2023), species were classified according to their conservation status, phytochemical promise, and recommended resource management strategy (Table 1). Using the standardized algorithm (Revushkin et al. 2023), the species were categorized into four groups based on their potential for sustainable use and conservation priority.

Category I: Species with Documented Negative Agroeconomic Impact. No extant species within the tribe in Southern Siberia fall into this category. The historical agroeconomic impact of Agrostemma githago L., a former weed toxic due to the content of gipsogenin (Nadezhkin 2010), has been neutralized by modern agricultural practices.

Category II: Species with Demonstrated Bioprospecting Potential. This group comprises 19 species (43.2%) with documented ethnopharmacological use and/or preliminary phytochemical evidence supporting further investigation. They are subdivided by the recommended resource management pathway:

IIa: Species Suitable for Sustainable Wild Harvest. Twelve species (15.6% of the total), characterized by a sufficient population size and distribution, are candidates for regulated wild collection. These include the following. Agrostemma githago, Coccyganthe flos-cuculi (L.) Fourr., Elisanthe noctiflora (L.) Rupr., Lychnis chalcedonica L., Melandrium album (Mill.) Garcke, M. dioicum (L.) Coss. & Germ., Oberna behen (L.) Ikonn., Silene amoena L., S. chlorantha (Willd.) Ehrh., S. graminifolia Otth., S. jenisseensis Willd., and S. nutans L.

IIb: Species Recommended for Ex Situ Conservation and Cultivation. Seven species (15.6%), including several with restricted ranges, are prioritized for introduction into cultivation to reduce harvest pressure on wild populations. This group includes: Elisanthe firma (Siebold & Zucc.) Devyatov & V.N.Tikhom., Otites parviflorus (Ehrh.) Grossh., O. wolgensis (Hornem.) Grossh., Silene armeria L., S. dichotoma Ehrh., as well as the regionally threatened E. viscosa (L.) Rupr. and S. sibirica (L.) Pers. (listed in the Red Data Books of Tomsk Region, 2023, and Tyumen Region, 2020, respectively).

IIc: Species Requiring Biotechnological Approaches (e.g., Tissue Culture). No species were assigned to this category based on current propagation data. However, biotechnological methods remain a prospective research avenue to improve metabolite yield, particularly for species adapted to extreme environments (Thakur et al. 2019).

Category III: Species with Undetermined or Low Current Bioprospecting Potential. This group consists of 21 species (47.7%) for which phytochemical and pharmacological data are currently lacking or insufficient to assess practical application. This classification is not definitive and may be revised with future research. The group includes: Elisanthe aprica (Turcz.) Peschkova, Gastrolychnis brachypetala (Hornem.) Tolm. & Kozhanch., G. gracilis (Tolm.) Czerep., G. saxatilis (Turcz. ex Fisch. & C.A.Mey.) Peschkova, G. uniflora (Ledeb.) Tzvelev, Lychnis sibirica L., Oberna procumbens Murr., Otites baschkirorum (Janisch.) Holub, O. exaltatus (Friv.) Holub, O. jenissensis Klokov, O. medius (Litv.) Klokov, Silene chamarensis Turcz., S. fruticulosa Bieb., S. intramongolica Lazkov, S. multiflora (Ehrh.) Pers., S. stylosa Bunge, S. turgida Bieb. ex Bunge, S. turczaninovii Lazkov, S. zuntoreica Zuev, and Steris viscaria (L.) Raf.

Category IV: Species of High Conservation Priority (Threatened). Five species (11.4%) are identified as conservation priorities due to their threatened status and inclusion in regional Red Data Books, necessitating in situ protection measures: Gastrolychnis popovii Peschkova (Red Data Book of Buryatia, 2013), G. tristis (Bunge) Czerep. (Red Data Book of Altai Krai, 2016; Red Data Book of Kuzbass, 2021), Lychnis fulgens Fischer (Red Data Book of the Transbaikal Territory, 2016), Silene altaica Pers., and S. incurvifolia Kar. et Kir. (Red Data Book of Altai Krai, 2016).

Conclusion

Investigation of the Lychnideae tribe (Caryophyllaceae) in Southern Siberia substantiates its considerable value as a reservoir of diverse biologically active compounds, particularly ecdysteroids, flavonoids, and phenolic derivatives. Through a comprehensive analysis of the composition, distribution, and ecological characteristics of the species, this study has systematically identified taxa with a high bioprospecting potential, categorizing them according to sustainable use pathways: direct utilization of stable wild populations, introduction into cultivation and, where applicable, biotechnological propagation.

A critical finding is the identification of several threatened species requiring urgent conservation measures, highlighting the intrinsic link between biodiversity preservation and sustainable development of phytochemical resources. The protection of these rare species is essential to maintain both regional biodiversity and potential genetic resources.

These results underscore the need for continued interdisciplinary research, focusing on detailed phytochemical profiling, pharmacological validation, and ecological study of prioritized species. Such efforts are fundamental in translating the inherent chemical diversity of the Lychnideae into novel, evidence-based natural products with targeted pharmacological activities, while concurrently informing strategies for the conservation and sustainable management of this important botanical resource.

References

Bajpai VK, Shukla S, Kang SC (2008) Chemical composition and antifungal activity of essential oil and various extract of Silene armeria L. Bioresource technology 99(18): 8903–8908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.04.060

Chandra S, Rawat DS (2015) Medicinal plants of the family Caryophyllaceae: a review of ethno-medicinal uses and pharmacological properties. Integrative Medicine Research 4(3): 123–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imr.2015.06.004

Darmogray VN, Erofeeva NS, Darmogray SV, Filippova AS, Morozova VA, Dubodelova GV (2015) Qualitative and quantitative determination of ecdysteroids and polyphenolic compounds in the herb of Otites parviflorus Grossh. Advances in Current Natural Sciences 12: 21–25. [In Russian]

Darmogray SV, Erofeeva NS, Filippova AS, Dubodelova GV, Morozova VA, Darmogray VN (2017) Chemotaxonomic study of some species of the Caryophyllaceae Juss. family, belonging to different subfamilies. International Journal of Applied and Fundamental Research (1-2): 287–290. [In Russian]

Ebel AL (2012) Synopsis of the flora of north-west part of Altay-Sayan province. Irbis, Kemerovo, 566 pp. [In Russian]

Kovtonyuk NK, Zuev VV (1993) Family Caryophyllaceae. In: Malyshev LI, Peshkova GA (Eds) Flora of Siberia. Volume 6. Nauka, Novosibirsk. P. 11–95 [In Russian]

Kozhanova AM, Tuleuov BI, Kudabaeva PK, Temirgaziev BS, Seilkhanov TM, Seidakhmetova RB, Salykeeva LK, Adekenov SM (2020) Synthesis, NMR spectroscopic study of α-, β-, and γ-cyclodextrin inclusion complexes of 2-deoxyecdysone and their anti-inflammatory activity. Macroheterocycles 13(3): 292–297. https://doi.org/10.6060/mhc200602t [In Russian]

Munkhzhargal N, Zibareva LN, Lafont R, Pribytkova LN, Pisareva SI (2010) Investigation of ecdysteroid content and composition of Silene repens indigenous in Mongolia and introduced into western Siberia. Russian journal of bioorganic chemistry 36: 923–928. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1068162010070216 [In Russian]

Nadezhkin SN, Kuznetsov IY (2010) Useful, harmful, and poisonous plants: a reference book. KnoRus, Moscow, 248 p. [In Russian]

Novozhilova E, Rybin V, Gorovoy P, Gavrilenko I, Doudkin R (2015) Phytoecdysteroids of the East Asian Caryophyllaceae. Pharmacognosy Magazine 11(Suppl 1): S225. https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-1296.157746

Olennikov DN (2019) Ecdysteroids, flavonoids, and phenylpropanoids from Silene nutans. Chemistry of Natural Compounds 55: 127–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10600-019-02632-8

Plotnikov M, Zibareva L, Vasil’ev A, Aliev O (2017) An Extract of Lychnis chalcedonica as the Basis for Developing a Novel Ecdysteroid-Containing Formulation with Actoprotector Activity. Pharmaceutical Chemistry Journal 51: 800–805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11094-017-1696-y

Ramazonov NS, Mamadalieva NZ, Bobaev ID (2007) Phytoecdysteroids from five species of the genus Silene. Chemistry of Natural Compounds 43(1): 117–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10600-007-0049-6

Red Data Book of Altai Krai (2016) Volume 1. Altai State University Publishing House, Barnaul, 292 p.

Red Data Book of Kuzbass (2021) Third Edition. VEKTOR-PRINT, Kemerovo, 240 p. [In Russian]

Red Data Book of the Republic of Buryatia (2013) Rare and endangered species of animals, plants, and fungi. Third edition. Publishing House of the Buryat Scientific Center SB RAS, Ulan-Ude, 687 pp. [In Russian]

Red Data Book of the Transbaikal Territory (2017) Plants. Dom Mira, Novosibirsk, 366 p. [In Russian]

Red Data Book of Tomsk Region (2023) Third Edition. Protsvet, Tomsk, Elista, 579 p. [In Russian]

Red Data Book of the Tyumen Region (2020) Third Edition. Technoprint, Kemerovo, 460 p. [In Russian]

Revina TA, Revushkin AS, Rakitin AV (1988) Ecdysteroid-containing species in the flora of the Altai Mountains. Plant Resources 4: 565–569. [In Russian]

Revushkin AS, Kasterova EA, Chigodaikina DS, Zibareva LN (2023) Search for new sources of bioactive compounds in the flora of Southern Siberia and evaluation of the potential for their use. Acta Biologica Sibirica 9: 23–34. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7679976

Shikov AN, Narkevich IA, Flisyuk EV, Luzhanin VG, Pozharitskaya ON (2021) Medicinal plants from the 14th edition of the Russian Pharmacopoeia, recent updates. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 268: 113685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2020.113685

Shishkin BK (1936) Fam. LX. Caryophyllaceae Juss. In: Shishkin BK (Ed.) Flora of the USSR. Publishing House of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Moscow, Leningrad. P. 394–870 [In Russian]

Smakosz A, Matkowski A, Nawrot-Hadzik I (2024) Phytochemistry and biological activities of Agrostemma Genus – A Review. Plants 13(12): 1673. https://doi.org/10.3390/ plants13121673

Smolyakova IM, Avdeenko SN, Kalinkina G, Yusubov MS, Zibareva LN (2010) Study of the chemical composition of Lychnis chalcedonica, cultivated in Western Siberia. Part II. HPLC chromatographic study of phenolic compounds and ecdysteroids of Lychnis chalcedonica, cultivated in Western Siberia. Chemistry of Plant Raw Materials (3): 95–102. [In Russian]

Taldybay A, Aidarbayeva D, Kurmantayeva A, Mussaev K, Amanbekova D, Joltukova B (2024) Medicinal plants in the flora of Zhetysu Alatau, Zhetysu Region, Kazakhstan. Caspian Journal of Environmental Sciences 22(3): 567–579.

Thakur M, Bhattacharya S, Khosla PK, Puri S (2019) Improving production of plant secondary metabolites through biotic and abiotic elicitation. Journal of Applied Research on Medicinal and Aromatic Plants 12: 1–12. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmap.2018.11.004

Vlasova NV (2012) Family Caryophyllaceae Juss. In: Baikov KS (Ed.) Conspectus Florae Asiaticae Russiae: Vascular Plants. Publishing House of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, 69–91 p. [In Russian]

Volodin VV, Shadrin DM, Pylyna YI, Druz YI, Volodina SO, Chadin IF, Dainan L (2013) Molecular phylogeny and chemotaxonomy of ecdysteroid-containing plants of the families Caryophyllaceae Juss. and Asteraceae Dumort. Bulletin of Biotechnology and Physical and Chemical Biology named after Yu.A. Ovchinnikov 9(1): 21–27. [In Russian]

Yeshi K, Crayn D, Ritmejerytė E, Wangchuk P (2022) Plant Secondary Metabolites Produced in Response to Abiotic Stresses Has Potential Application in Pharmaceutical Product Development. Molecules 27(1): 1–31. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27010313

Zibareva L (2000) Distribution and levels of phytoecdysteroids in plants of the genus Silene during development. Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology 43(1): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6327(200001)43:1%3C1::AID-ARCH1%3E3.0.CO;2-D

Zibareva LN (2009) Phytoecdysteroids of Caryophyllaceae Juss. Contemporary Problems of Ecology 2(5): 476–488. http://doi.org/10.1134/S1995425509050154

Zibareva LN, Filonenko ES, Chernyak E, Morozov SV, Kotelnikov OA (2022) Flavonoids of some species of the Silene genus. Chemistry of Plant Raw Materials (3): 109–118. https://doi.org/10.14258/jcprm.20220310592 [In Russian]