ГОСУДАРСТВО, ГРАЖДАНСКОЕ
ОБЩЕСТВО ИСТАБИЛЬНОСТЬ
STATE, CIVIL SOCIETY AND STABILITY
Тип статьи Научная статья / Research Article
УДК 316.48: 343.852
DOI: 10.14258/SSI(2023)3-03
Воздаяние для всех:
квопросу опоследствиях наказания для семьи осужденного
Оксана Юрьевна Каплун 1
Хельмут Кури 2
Евгений Иванович Ильченко3
1Дальневосточный федеральный университет, Владивосток, Россия,
kaplun.oi@dvfu.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1150-4269
2 Институт изучения преступности, безопасности иправа общества Макса Планка.
Фрайбург, Германия;
helmut.kury@web.de https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0319-5603
3Дальневосточный федеральный университет, Владивосток, Россия,
ilchenko.ei@students.dvfu.ru, https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6264-42984
Аннотация. , ,
. ,
, .
: -
. , ,
. ,
, ,
. -
, , , -
Society andSecurity Insights № 3 2023 64
, , . — -
, ,
. ,
, .
,
, , -
. ,
: , , -
. ,
— ,
. , , -
:
. , -
, , -
, .
Ключевые слова: , , , -
, , , -
,
Финансирование:
( 22-08-06-006. -
:
.
Для цитирования: Каплун О.Ю. Кури Х., Ильченко Е.И. Воздаяние для всех: квопросу опо-
следствиях наказания для семьи виновного // Society and Security Insights. 2023. Т. 6, № 3.
С.63–74. doi: 10.14258/ssi(2023)3-03.
Everyone isGuilty: an Issue ofthe Consequences for the Family
ofthe Perpetrator
Oksana Yu. Kaplun1
Helmut Kury2
Evgeny I. Ilchenko3
1Far Eastern Federal University, Vladivostok, Russia,
kaplun.oi@dvfu.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1150-4269
2 Max Planck Institute for the Study ofCrime, Security and Law Freiburg, Germany,
helmut.kury@web.de, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0319-5603
3Far Eastern Federal University, Vladivostok, Russia,
ilchenko.ei@students.dvfu.ru, https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6264-42984
Abstract. e purpose ofthis paper isto show that the family ofconvicted criminal has nan-
cial, social and psycho-emotional di culties. e main goal ofthe deprivation ofliberty ofa per-
Государство, гражданское общество истабильность 65
son convicted ofcommitting a crime isto punish the perpetrator. However, the criminal’s family
isalso punished, inthe sense that family members have a numerous hardship. At present, inthe
era ofmass incarceration, a signi cant number offamilies feel the harmful consequences ofthe
imprisonment ofone oftheir members. ere isalmost no information inthe Russian scienti c
literature about the processes that arise infamilies a er the arrest ofa criminal. So this article pays
considerable attention to the analysis ofthe results ofinternational research. e paper shows that
since each family isdi erent from the others, the consequences ofimprisonment experienced
by them are di erent. On the one hand, the removal ofa delinquent from the family structure,
which has a destructive e ect on family members, can have a positive e ect. On the other hand,
the detention ofa family member isa complete disaster, inwhich everything changes, changes
dramatically. Family members ofprisoners experience deep forms ofdiscrimination that exacer-
bate already existing forms, such as ethnic, economic and gender discrimination and inequality. It
should be noted that all members ofthe prisoner’s family su er from the consequences: parents,
brothers and sisters, but wives and children have the hardest time. at’s why the emphasis inthis
article ison the designation ofthe consequences experienced by women— o cial and uno cial
marriage partners ofmen, who committed crime. All the family cares and burdens that a man
used to carry out now are shi ed to a woman: she becomes both the sole earner and a single
parent. Women are forced to overcome nancial, socio-psychological di culties, condemnation
ofthe inner circle, bureaucratic obstacles, shortcomings ofthe judicial and penitentiary systems.
Keywords: criminal, negative consequences, delinquent behavior, family relations, crimino-
logical research, collateral damage, life imprisonment, punishment
Financial Support: the work was supported by the Far Eastern Federal University Founda-
tion, Project 22-08-06-006 e Philosophy oflaw: crime and punishment as a problem ofthe
social justice and e ciency inthe era ofglobalization.
For citation: Kaplun O.Yu. KuryH., IlchenkoE.I. (2023). Everyone isguilty: an issue ofthe conse-
quences for the family ofthe perpetrator. Society and Security Insights, 6(3), 63–74. (InRuss.). doi:
10.14258/ssi(2023)3-03.
Введение
-
1. - -
. , -
« »,
, ,
, .
, , ,
, . -
, -
, -
, .
,
, , ,
1 https://ria.ru/20211118/zaklyuchennye-1759608221.html?ysclid=lkw7ehlsgy761527198
Society andSecurity Insights № 3 2023 66
.
.
Лишение свободы преступника: благо или зло для его семьи?
. ,
,
,
. -
,
(Watts H., Nightingale D.& Adding, 1996).
, -
. —
,
, . , ,
/ -
, ,
. -
:
, «» , -
(, , 213).
.
, (
) . , . .
: « ,
,
, .
, » (Sinko R. et al, 22: 324).
Последствия лишения свободы для семьи преступника
. . ,
,
, ,
: ;
,
; (Hagan, Dinovitze, 1999). -
, , , ,
, ,
, , -
, .
, , ,
. -
-
. « »
. . ,
Государство, гражданское общество истабильность 67
. ,
, ,
, , . -
; ,
, (Carlson, Cervera, 1992).
. . ,
, ,
(Kury, Kern, 23). , -
,
-
. -
. , -
.
-
- .
Финансовые последствия
, -
- . ,
, «» , ,
, -
. , , -
.
, -
. ,
, -
(Hagan, Dinovitze, 1999).
-
, .
, , -
.
, , -
( ),
. « .
, -
» (Kury, 22: 117). ,
.
, -
. ,
. -
,
.
(Hagan, Dinovitze, 1999).
Society andSecurity Insights № 3 2023 68
-
. , .
, : , -
, , ,
«»; -
, , , . « .
» (Hairston, Oliver,23).
Социально-психологические последствия. Стигматизация
- ,
, , ,
(Kury, 22).
- -
(Hairston, Oliver,23). -
, ,
. ,
, - .
, -
. -
-
, , ,
(Carlson, Cervera, 1992). , -
. ,
-
. -
, , -
(Turney, 214). ,
, . -
, -
. ., «
, ,
, » (Watts H., Nightingale D.& Adding, 1996: 58).
—
. ,
, ,
(Kotova, 22).
, , ,
. , «
„ “»
(Hagan, Dinovitze, 1999: 121). -
, - , - ,
-, . . : «
Государство, гражданское общество истабильность 69
, : „ ?“ ,
: „ ?“»
(Hairston, Oliver, 23: 8).
, -
, , -
. , -
.
,
(Kotova, 22). , -
-
, ,
(Sinko R. et al, 22).
-
, , -
,
, . -
, ,
. -
,
(Sinko R. et al, 22). ,
, . -
. ,
, .
Посещение тюрем, свидания сзаключенными
, ,
, , -
, , (Kury,
22). , , -
, ,
. , -
, -
, . -
. ,
. , ,
, , -
, , -
, .
, , ,
(Kaplun, 217).
-
Society andSecurity Insights № 3 2023 70
. , , -
. -
,
.
,
-
, . ., 1995 .
, -
. 1999 .
. . . , ,
15 -
, . -
, ,
, , , -
.
.
. , , -
, -
, -
. . . , ,
,
(, 216).
,
,
(, 216: 55). -
. ., ,
« —
», ,
, ; -
,
(, 216
:54). -
, 37,1% -
(, 28).
()
. . , , -
-
;
. , , -
Государство, гражданское общество истабильность 71
-
.
. . ,
, -
. ,
, ,
,
(,
216). -
, / -
, , .
«»
, 2
. . .
, ,
« » (,
216). , -
, -
, : « Y.
, . ,
. , , , -
-
. , , .
: «!
. !» (, 216: 162).
,
, -
, -
. , ,
.. ,— ; , , ,
, ? ? , -
, . , ,
—
. , -
, , , .
;
, , :
, ,
, -
.
Society andSecurity Insights № 3 2023 72
Заключение
, , , -
: -, -
, -, -
, ,
.
-
, -
, .
-
.
, , -
.
СПИСОК ИСТОЧНИКОВ
., . . :
// . 213. 2. . 24–256.
. . »
// . 216. 3. . 139–163.
. . -
// . 216. 1(5). . 53–75.
. . : --
. - . -, 28. 192 .
CarlsonB. E., CerveraN. Inmates and their wives: Incarceration and family life. Lon-
don: Greenwood, 1992. 178 .
HaganJ., Dinovitze R. Collateral Consequences ofImprisonment for Children, Com-
munities, and Prisoners // Crime and Justice. 1999. 26. . 21–162.
HairstonC. F., Oliver W. Women’s experiences with men’s incarceration and reentry //
Women, Girls, & Criminal Justice, 23. 7(5). . 65–8.
HouchinR. Social exclusion and imprisonment inScotland. Glasgow: Glasgow Caledo-
nian University, 25.89 .
KaplunO. Y. Female criminality inRussia: a research note from a penal colony // In-
ternational journal ofcomparative and applied criminal justice. 217. 3. . 231–24.
Kotova A. Beyond courtesy stigma: Towards a multi-faceted and cumulative model
ofstigmatization offamilies ofpeople inprison. Forensic Science International: Mind
and Law. 22. 1. . 121 (1–8).
KuryH. e e ects ofprison sentences on the family members and the community //
European and Asian Law Review. 22. 3 (2). . 115–123.
KuryH., Kern J. Frauen und Kinder von Inha ierten. Eine vergessene Gruppe // Krim-
inologisches Journal. 23. 35. . 97–11.
Государство, гражданское общество истабильность 73
LightR. Why Support Prisoners’ Family-Tie Groups? // e Howard Journal. 1993. 32.
. 322–329.
SinkoR. et al. Experience ofstigma post incarceration: A qualitative study // e Open
Journal ofOccupational erapy. 22. Vol. 8, 3. . 1–16.
TurneyK. e consequences ofpaternal incarceration for maternal neglect and harsh
parenting // Social Forces. 214. 92(4). . 167–1636.
WattsH., NightingaleD. Adding It Up: e Economic Impact ofIncarceration on In-
dividuals, Families, and Communities // Journal ofthe Oklahoma Criminal Justice Re-
search Consortium. 1996. 3. . 55–62.
REFERENCES
Kuri H., Ilchenko O. Yu. (213). e e ectiveness ofpunishment: results ofinternational
research. Aktual’nye problemy ekonomiki i prava, 2, 24–256.
Mukhina, V. S. (216). Psychological and social assistance to convicts for life. Razvitie
lichnosti, 3, 139–164.
Shigurov, A. B. A practice ofthe European court ofhumn rights on the protection
ofconvicted. Mir nauki i obrazovania, 1(5), 53–75.
Khachikyan A. M. Imprisonment: Criminological and penal problems. Erevan: Izd-vo
Erevanskogo gos. un-ta 28.
Carlson,B. E., Cervera,N. (1992) Inmates and their wives: Incarceration and family life.
London: Greenwood.
Hagan, J., Dinovitzer, R. (1999) Collateral Consequences ofImprisonment for Children,
Communities, and Prisoners. Crime and Justice, 26, 21–162.
Hairston,C. F., Oliver, W., (26) Women’s experiences with men’s incarceration and
reentry. Women, Girls, & Criminal Justice, 7(5), 65–8.
Houchin, R (25). Social exclusion and imprisonment inScotland. Glasgow: Glasgow
Caledonian University.
Kaplun, O. (217). Female criminality inRussia: a research note from a penal colony.
International journal ofcomparative and applied criminal justice, 41(3), 231–24.
Kotova,A. (22). Beyond courtesy stigma: Towards a multi-faceted and cumulative
model ofstigmatization offamilies ofpeople inprison. Forensic Science International:
Mind and Law, 1, 121 (1–8).
Kury, H. (22) e e ects ofprison sentences on the family members and the commu-
nity. European and Asian Law Review, 3(2), 115-123.
Kury, H., Kern,J. (23). Frauen und Kinder von Inha ierten. Eine vergessene Gruppe.
Kriminologisches Journal, 35, 97–11.
Light,R. (1993) Why Support Prisoners’ Family-Tie Groups? e Howard Journal, 32,
322–329.
Sinko, R., DeAngelis, T., Alpajora,B., Beker, J., Kramer, I. (22). Experience ofstigma post
incarceration: A qualitative study. e Open Journal ofOccupational erapy, 8(3), 1–16.
Society andSecurity Insights № 3 2023 74
Turney, K. (214). e consequences ofpaternal incarceration for maternal neglect and
harsh parenting. Social Forces, 92(4), 167–1636.
Watts,H., Nightingale,D. (1996) Adding It Up: e Economic Impact ofIncarceration
on Individuals, Families, and Communities. Journal ofthe Oklahoma Criminal Justice
Research Consortium, 3, 55–62.
СВЕДЕНИЯ ОБАВТОРАХ / INFORMATION ABOUT THE AUTHORS
— . . , , -
, -
, .
Oksana Yu. Kaplun— Cand. Sci. (Sociology), Ass. Professor. Ass. Professor Department
ofPsychology and Education ofFar Eastern Federal University, Vladivostok, Russia.
— - . , -
(
, ), ., -
.
Helmut Kury— Prof. Dr. habil. Dipl. Psych., Prof. h.c. mult. Former: Senior Research-
er at Max-Planck-Institute for Foreign and International Penal Law (currently the Max
Planck Institute for the Study ofCrime, Security and Law)— Department ofCriminol-
ogy and Prof. at the University ofFreiburg, Germany.
— -
, , .
Evgeny I. Ilchenko— student ofFar Eastern Federal University, Vladivostok, Russia.
Статья поступила вредакцию 14.07.2023;
одобрена после рецензирования 03.08.2023;
принята кпубликации 15.08.2023.
The article was submitted 14.07.2023;
approved after reviewing 03.08.2023;
accepted for publication 15.08.2023.
