The anatomical structure peculiarities of various species of the genus Salsola L.
УДК: 582.662:581.823+526.52
Keywords:
Anatomical structure of the leaf and stem, eugalophytes, halophytes, integumentary tissue, genus Salsola, palisade parenchyma, succulents
Abstract
The features of the anatomical structure of Salsola arbuscula Pall., S. tragus L., S. paulsenii Litv. are presented. It is noted that the leaf blades of the studied species belong to the salsoloid type. The mesophyll of the leaf is centric. The hypoderma plays the role of the water-bearing parenchyma. In the water-bearing parenchyma of S. tragus and S.paulsenii calcium oxalate crystals have been found. In the central part of the leaf there is a single conducting beam of thecollateral type in all species. A characteristic feature in the anatomical study of the stem of S. tragus is the peculiarity ofthe collenchyma, which lies only in the area of protrusions and forms up to 7 layers of cells. The general features of theorganization of the studied species are the similarity in the succulent structure of the leaf blade, which causes large-cellwater-bearing parenchyma and the rounded shape of the cells in the three studied species of saltwort.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Metrics
Metrics Loading ...
References
Аминова А. А., Серебряная Ф. К., Денисенко О. Н. Морфолого-анатомическое исследование солянки иберийской (Salsola iberica (Sennen & Pau) Botsch.), произрастающей на территории Республики Дагестан // The Journal of scientific articles “Health and Education Millennium”, 2016. – Vol. 18, № 2. – P. 709–720.
Барыкина Р. П. Справочник по ботанической микротехнике. Основы и методы. – М.: Изд-во МГУ, 2004. – 312 с.
Бочанцев В. П. Род Salsola L., краткая история его развития и расселения // Бот. журн., 1969. – Т. 54, №7. – С. 989–1001.
Варминг Е. Распределения растений в зависимости от внешних условий (экологическая география растений). – СПб.: Акц. Общ. Брогауз–Ефрон, 1902. – 474 с.
Иванова Н. А., Музычко Л. М. Анатомическое строение листьев у растений на засоленных почвах // Вестник Нижневартовского государственного университета, 2013. – № 3. – С. 3–8.
Поляков П. П., Голоскоков В. П. Род Salsola L. (Chenopodiaceae) // Флора Казахстана. Т. ІІІ. – Алма-Ата, 1960. – С. 262–273.
Тайсумов М. А., Абду А. С., Магомадова Р. С., Астамиров М. А. Классификация галофитов терско-кумской низменности по анатомо-физиологическим признакам // Вестник Академии наук Чеченской Республики, 2014. №1(22). – С. 35–46.
Тутаюк В. Х. Анатомия и морфология растений. – М.: Высш. школа, 1980. – 317 с.
Bercu R., Bavaru E. Anatomical aspects of Salsola kali subsp. ruthenica (Chenopodiaceae) // Phytologia Balcanica Sofia, 2004. – Vol. 10(2–3). – Pp. 227–232.
Butnik A. A., Ashurmetov O. A., Nigmanova R. N., Payzieva S. A. Ecological anatomy of desert plants in Central Asia. (Half–shrubs, shrubs). Tashkent, 2001. – Fan 2. – P. 132.
Butnik A. A., Duschanova G. M., Yusupova D. M., Abdullaeva A. T., Abdinazarov S. H. Types leaf mesophyll species of Chenopodiaceae Vent. Central Asia and their role in the monitoring of desertification // Journal of Novel Applied Sciences, 2017. – Vol. 6(1). – P. 13–21.
Dubravka M. M., Jadranka Ž. L., Lana N. Z., Ljiljana S. M. Structural adaptation of Salsola soda L. (Chenopodiaceae) from inland and maritime saline area // Jour. Nat. Sci, MaticaSrpska Novi Sad, 2013. – № 125. – P. 55–67.
Kadereit G., Borsch T., Weising K., Freitag H. Phylogeny of Amaranthaceae and Chenopodiaceae and theevolution of C4 photosynthesis // Int. Jour. Plant: Sci. University of Chicago, 2003. –Vol. 164(6). – Pp. 959–986.
Lauterbach M., Billakurthi K., Kadereit G., Ludwig M., Westhoff P., Gowik U. C3 cotyledons are followed by C4 leaves: intra–individual transcriptome analysis of Salsola soda (Chenopodiaceae) // Journal of Experimental Botany, 2017. – Vol. 68, №2. – Pp. 161–176.
Pyankov V. J., Vosnesenskaya E. V., Kondratschik A., Black C. Comparative anatomical and biochemical analysis in Salsola (Chenopodiaceae) species with and without a kranz type leaf anatomy: a possible reversion of C4 to C3 photosynthesis // American Journal of Botany, 1997. – Vol. 84(5). – Pp. 597–606.
Toderich K. N., Li V. V., Black C. C., Yunusov T. R., Shuiskaya E. V., Mardanova G. K., Gismatullina L. G.. Linkage studies of structure, isoenzymatic diversity and some biotechnological procedures for Salsola species under desert saline environments / Biosaline Agriculture and Salinity Tolerance in Plants. – Birkhouser Verlop AG Basel Boston–Berlin, 2005. – Pp. 73–82.
Uzma M., Anjum P., Syeda Q. Comparative Pharmacognostic evaluation of some species of the genera Suaeda and Salsola leaf (Chenopodiaceae) // Pak. J. Pharm. Sci., 2014. – Vol. 27, № 5. – Pp. 1309–1315.
Voznesenskaya E. V., Franceschi V. R., Artyusheva E. G., Black C. C., Pyankov V. I., Edwards G. E. Development of the C4 Photosynthetic Apparatus in cotyledons and leaves of Salsola richteri (Chenopodiaceae) // J. Plant. Sciences, 2003. – Vol. 164(4). – Pp. 471–487.
Voznesenskaya E. V., Koteyeva N., Akhani H., Roalson E., Edwards G. E. Structural and phylogenicalanalyses in Salsoleae (Chenopodiaceae) indicate multiple transitions among C3 intermediate and C4 photosynthesis // Jour. of Experimental Botany, 2013. – Vol. 64(12). – Pp. 3583–3604.
Wen Z., Zhang M. Salsola laricifolia, another C3–C4 intermediate species in tribe Salsoleae s. l. (Chenopodiaceae). // Photosynth Res, 2015. – № 123. – Pp. 33–43.
Барыкина Р. П. Справочник по ботанической микротехнике. Основы и методы. – М.: Изд-во МГУ, 2004. – 312 с.
Бочанцев В. П. Род Salsola L., краткая история его развития и расселения // Бот. журн., 1969. – Т. 54, №7. – С. 989–1001.
Варминг Е. Распределения растений в зависимости от внешних условий (экологическая география растений). – СПб.: Акц. Общ. Брогауз–Ефрон, 1902. – 474 с.
Иванова Н. А., Музычко Л. М. Анатомическое строение листьев у растений на засоленных почвах // Вестник Нижневартовского государственного университета, 2013. – № 3. – С. 3–8.
Поляков П. П., Голоскоков В. П. Род Salsola L. (Chenopodiaceae) // Флора Казахстана. Т. ІІІ. – Алма-Ата, 1960. – С. 262–273.
Тайсумов М. А., Абду А. С., Магомадова Р. С., Астамиров М. А. Классификация галофитов терско-кумской низменности по анатомо-физиологическим признакам // Вестник Академии наук Чеченской Республики, 2014. №1(22). – С. 35–46.
Тутаюк В. Х. Анатомия и морфология растений. – М.: Высш. школа, 1980. – 317 с.
Bercu R., Bavaru E. Anatomical aspects of Salsola kali subsp. ruthenica (Chenopodiaceae) // Phytologia Balcanica Sofia, 2004. – Vol. 10(2–3). – Pp. 227–232.
Butnik A. A., Ashurmetov O. A., Nigmanova R. N., Payzieva S. A. Ecological anatomy of desert plants in Central Asia. (Half–shrubs, shrubs). Tashkent, 2001. – Fan 2. – P. 132.
Butnik A. A., Duschanova G. M., Yusupova D. M., Abdullaeva A. T., Abdinazarov S. H. Types leaf mesophyll species of Chenopodiaceae Vent. Central Asia and their role in the monitoring of desertification // Journal of Novel Applied Sciences, 2017. – Vol. 6(1). – P. 13–21.
Dubravka M. M., Jadranka Ž. L., Lana N. Z., Ljiljana S. M. Structural adaptation of Salsola soda L. (Chenopodiaceae) from inland and maritime saline area // Jour. Nat. Sci, MaticaSrpska Novi Sad, 2013. – № 125. – P. 55–67.
Kadereit G., Borsch T., Weising K., Freitag H. Phylogeny of Amaranthaceae and Chenopodiaceae and theevolution of C4 photosynthesis // Int. Jour. Plant: Sci. University of Chicago, 2003. –Vol. 164(6). – Pp. 959–986.
Lauterbach M., Billakurthi K., Kadereit G., Ludwig M., Westhoff P., Gowik U. C3 cotyledons are followed by C4 leaves: intra–individual transcriptome analysis of Salsola soda (Chenopodiaceae) // Journal of Experimental Botany, 2017. – Vol. 68, №2. – Pp. 161–176.
Pyankov V. J., Vosnesenskaya E. V., Kondratschik A., Black C. Comparative anatomical and biochemical analysis in Salsola (Chenopodiaceae) species with and without a kranz type leaf anatomy: a possible reversion of C4 to C3 photosynthesis // American Journal of Botany, 1997. – Vol. 84(5). – Pp. 597–606.
Toderich K. N., Li V. V., Black C. C., Yunusov T. R., Shuiskaya E. V., Mardanova G. K., Gismatullina L. G.. Linkage studies of structure, isoenzymatic diversity and some biotechnological procedures for Salsola species under desert saline environments / Biosaline Agriculture and Salinity Tolerance in Plants. – Birkhouser Verlop AG Basel Boston–Berlin, 2005. – Pp. 73–82.
Uzma M., Anjum P., Syeda Q. Comparative Pharmacognostic evaluation of some species of the genera Suaeda and Salsola leaf (Chenopodiaceae) // Pak. J. Pharm. Sci., 2014. – Vol. 27, № 5. – Pp. 1309–1315.
Voznesenskaya E. V., Franceschi V. R., Artyusheva E. G., Black C. C., Pyankov V. I., Edwards G. E. Development of the C4 Photosynthetic Apparatus in cotyledons and leaves of Salsola richteri (Chenopodiaceae) // J. Plant. Sciences, 2003. – Vol. 164(4). – Pp. 471–487.
Voznesenskaya E. V., Koteyeva N., Akhani H., Roalson E., Edwards G. E. Structural and phylogenicalanalyses in Salsoleae (Chenopodiaceae) indicate multiple transitions among C3 intermediate and C4 photosynthesis // Jour. of Experimental Botany, 2013. – Vol. 64(12). – Pp. 3583–3604.
Wen Z., Zhang M. Salsola laricifolia, another C3–C4 intermediate species in tribe Salsoleae s. l. (Chenopodiaceae). // Photosynth Res, 2015. – № 123. – Pp. 33–43.
Published
2020-10-08
How to Cite
Osmonali B. B., Akhtaeva N. Z., Vesselova P. V., Kudabayeva G. M., Kurbatova N. V. The anatomical structure peculiarities of various species of the genus Salsola L. // Проблемы ботаники Южной Сибири и Монголии, 2020. Vol. 19, № 2. P. 146-154 DOI: 10.14258/pbssm.2020093. URL: http://journal.asu.ru/bpssm/article/view/pbssm.2020093.
Section
Systematics of different taxa. Morphology and biology of different species
