The relationship between productivity and resistance in different ecotypes of Siberian stone pine grown in Southern Siberia
УДК 58.02:58.084.2:581.2
Abstract
We analyze the relationship between productivity and resistance to pests and pathogens in 23-year-old clones from latitudinal, longitudinal and altitudinal ecotypes of Siberian stone pine in the clone archive. Variation in stem volume, which were used as an integral indicator of differences in productivity, were almost 3-fold both between latitudinal ecotypes in favor of the southern one, and between altitudinal ecotypes in favor of the low-altitudinal one, while longitudinal ecotypes differed by 1.3 times in favor of the western one. Ecotypes varied drastically in the number and depth of biotic injuries. Ecotypes with low productivity also had lower resistance. The northern, easternmost and high-altitudinal ecotypes were largely infestated by Pineus cembrae, and were also the only ecotypes that were severely affected by micromycetes, which led to a decrease in foliage, destruction of crown parts, and sometimes to the death of trees. In general, the northern and high-altitudinal ecotypes had the lowest productivity and resistance, the central ecotypes had medium productivity and medium or high resistance. The remaining ecotypes, including the local one, had both high productivity and high resistance.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Авров Ф. Д. Экология и селекция лиственницы // Проблемы региональной экологии, 1996. - Вып. 7. - 214 с.
Алексеев В. А. Диагностика жизненного состояния деревьев и древостоев // Лесоведение, 1989. - № 4. - С. 51-57.
Жук Е. А., Горошкевич С. Н. Факторы внутривидовой дифференциации кедра сибирского вдоль широтного и высотного профилей // Хвойные бореальной зоны, 2012. - Т. 27, № 3-4. - С. 61-66.
Кривец С. А., КоровинскаяЕ. Н. Экология сибирского кедрового хермеса в селекционных культурах кедра сибирского в Томской области // Известия Санкт-Петербургской лесотехнической академии, 2009. - № 187. - С. 159-167.
Кузнецова Г. В. Опыт создания клоновой плантации кедровых сосен в Красноярской лесостепи // Хвойные бореальной зоны, 2007. - Т. 24, № 2-3. - С. 217-224.
Climent J., Prada M. A., Calama R., Chambel M. R., de Ron D. S., Alia R. To grow or to seed: ecotypic variation in reproductive allocation and cone production by young female Aleppo pine (Pinus halepensis, Pinaceae) // American Journal of Botany, 2008. - Vol. 95, № 7. - P. 833-842.
Cremer K. W. Relations between reproductive growth and vegetative growth of Pinus radiata // Forest Ecology and Management, 1992. - Vol. 52, № 1-4. - P. 179-199.
Joyce D. G., Lu P., Sinclair R. W. Genetic Variation in height growth among populations of Eastern white pine (Pinus strobus L.) in Ontario // Silvae Genetica, 2002. - Vol. 51, № 4. - P. 136-142.
Joshi J., Schmid B., Caldeira M. C., Dimitrakopoulos P. G., Good J., Harris R. Local adaptation enhances performance of common plant species // Ecology Letters, 2001. - Vol. 4. - P. 536-544.
Koenig W. D., Knops J. M. Patterns of annual seed production by Northern Hemisphere trees: a global perspective // American Naturalist, 2000. - Vol. 155, № 1. - P. 59-69.
Lind E. M., Borer E., Seabloom E., Adler P., Bakker J. D., Blumenthal D. M., Crawley M., Davies K., Firn J., Gruner D. S., Harpole W. S., Hautier Y., Hillebrand H., Knops J., Melbourne B., Mortensen B., Risch A. C., SchuetzM., Stevens C., Wragg P. D. Life-history constraints in grassland plant species: a growth-defence trade-off is the norm // Ecology Letters, 2013. - Vol. 16, № 4. - P. 513-521.
Liu Y., Erbilgin N., Cappa E. P., Chen C., Ratcliffe B., Wei X., Klutsch J. G., Ullah A., Azcona J. S., Thomas B. R., El-Kassaby Y. A. Decoupling of height growth and drought or pest resistance tradeoffs is revealed through multiple common-garden experiments of lodgepole pine // Evolution, 2023. - Vol. 77, № 3. - P. 893-906.
McKown A. D., Guy R. D., Quamme L., Klapste J., La Mantia J., Constabel C. P., El-Kassaby Y. A., Hamelin R. C., Zifkin M., Azam M. S. Association genetics, geography and ecophysiology link stomatal patterning in Populus trichocarpa with carbon gain and disease resistance trade-offs // Molecular Ecology, 2014. - Vol. 23, № 23. - P. 5771-5790.
Obeso J. R. The costs of reproduction in plants // New Phytologist, 2002. - Vol. 155, № 3. - P. 321-348.
Puentes A., Zhao T., LundborgL., Bjorklund N., Borg-Karlson A.-K. Variation in methyl jasmonate-induced defense among Norway spruce clones and trade-offs in resistance against a fungal and an insect pest // Frontiers of Plant Science, 2021. - Vol. 12, article 678959.
Rehfeldt G. E., Leites L. P., Bradley St Clair J., Jaquish B. C., Saenz-Romero C., Lopez-Upton J., Joyce D. G. Comparative genetic responses to climate in the varieties of Pinus ponderosa and Pseudotsuga menziesii: clines in growth potential // Forest Ecology and Management, 2014. - Vol. 324. - P. 138-146.
Skulason B., Hansen O. K., Nielsen U. B. Provenance variation in phenology and frost tolerance in Subalpine fir (Abies lasiocarpa) planted in Denmark and Iceland // Forests, 2018. - Vol. 9, article 17.
Torres-Sanchez E., Menendez-Gutierrez M., Villar L., Diaz R. The effects of provenance, climate, and chemical defense on the resistance of Pinus pinaster Aiton to Bursaphelenchus xylophilus (Steiner and Buhrer) // Annals of Forest Science, 2023. - Vol. 80, article 33.
Vasey G .L., Urza A. K., Chambers J. C., Pringle E. G., Weisberg P. J. Clinal variations in seedling traits and responses to water availability correspond to seed-source environmental gradients in a foundational dryland tree species // Annals of Botany, 2023 - Vol. 132, № 2.- P. 203-216.
Zhuk E. A., Goroshkevich S. N. Growth and reproduction in Pinus sibirica ecotypes from Western Siberia in a common garden experiment // New Forests, 2018. - Vol. 49. - P. 159-172.
Zhuk E. Shoot structure variation in latitudinal and longitudinal ecotypes of Pinus sibirica in a common garden experiment // FORESTIST, 2020. - Vol. 70, № 2. - P. 160-165.
