LABOUR PROTECTION AND HUMANISATION: INTEGRATIONAL CONCEPTION IN INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE OF SOCIAL AND LABOR RELATIONS IN ORDER TO SOLVE PROBLEMS OF LABOUR OPPORTUNISM AT ENTERPRISES AND IN INTER-FIRM INTERACTIONS
Abstract
The article is devoted the problems of overcoming labor opportunism in the field of labor protection the causes of which are explained by the contradictions between the humanistic goals in this field of management and the economic interests of management of both enterprises and their cooperative associations. Financial benefit is only in reducing the cost of measures to improve labor conditions and ensure its safety. As a result, instead of the benefits, enterprises and cooperative networks suffer very significant losses. The authors point of view is in the solution of the problem in the institutional transformation of social and labor relations of enterprises and networks aimed at strengthening such types of social and labor relations as partnership, and the weakening of such types as opportunism (institutional and labor). Institutional transformation is proposed to be carried out on the principles of humanization of labor, which should be integrated into the existing system of labor protection. This methodological approach is recommended to be used both in individual enterprises and in networks of interfirm interactions, organized and functioning in the form of value chains.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Солженицын А. И. Национальная идея — сбережение народа // Гудок. 11.06.2005.
Армстронг М. Практика управления человеческими ресурсами. 8‑е изд-е. СПб., 2004. 832 с.
Генкин Б. М. Экономика и социология труда. 6‑е изд., доп. М., 2006. 448 с.
Зонова О. В., Нехода Е. В. Качество трудовой жизни в Российской Федерации: измерение и оценка. М., 2017. 232 с.
Мескон М. Х., Альберт М., Хедоури Ф. Основы менеджмента. М., 1992. 702 с.
Слезингер Г. Э. Труд в условиях рыночной экономики. М., 1996. 336 с.
Экономика труда и социально-трудовые отношения / под ред. Г. Г. Меликьяна, Р. П. Колосовой. М., 1996. 623 с.
Беляев В. И., Самсонов Р. А., Пяткова О. Н. Экспликация, таксономия и институциональная трансформация трудового оппортунизма в системе социально-трудовых отношений предприятия // Журнал экономической теории. № 4. 2015. С. 98–113.
Оппортунизм в структуре в структуре социально-трудовых отношений / колл. авт. под ред. В. И. Беляева, А. Н. Мельникова, Р. А. Самсонова. Барнаул, 2015. 236 с.
Карнаух Н. Н. Охрана труда. М., 2011. 380 с.
Самойлюк Т. А. Гуманизация труда — основное направление повышения качества трудовой жизни // Креативная экономика. 2014. Т. 8. № 5. С. 40–46.
REFERENCES
The Labor Code of the Russian Federation dated December 30, 2001 No. 197‑FZ (as amended on June 28, 2014). «Consultant Plus».
Solzhenitsyn, A. I. National idea — saving people. Gudok, 11.06.2005 (in Russian).
Armstrong, M. (2004) The practice of human resource management. 8th ed. Saint Petersburg, 832 (in Russian).
Genkin, B. M. (2006) Economics and sociology of labor. 6th ed., ext. Moscow, 448 (in Russian).
Zonova, O. V. & Nekhoda, E. V. (2017) Quality of working life in the Russian Federation: measurement and evaluation. Moscow, 232 (in Russian).
Meskon, M. H., Albert M. & Hedouri F. (1992) Fundamentals of Management. Moscow, 702 (in Russian).
Slezinger, G. E. Labor in a market economy. (1996) Moscow, 336 (in Russian).
Labor Economics and Labor Relations (1996) Ed. G. G. Melikyan & R. P. Kolosova. Moscow, 623 (in Russian).
Belyaev, V. I., Samsonov, R. A. & Pyatkova, O. N. (2015) Explication, taxonomy and institutional transformation of labor opportunism in the system of social and labor relations of an enterprise. Journal of Economic Theory, 4, 98–113 (in Russian).
Opportunism in the structure in the structure of social and labor relations (2015) Ed. V. I. Belyaev, A. N. Melnikova & R. A. Samsonov. Barnaul, 236 (in Russian).
Karnaukh, N. N. Occupational Safety and Health (2011). Moscow, 380 (in Russian).
Samoylyuk, T. A. (2014) Humanization of labor as the main direction of improving the quality of working life. Creative Economics, vol. 8, no 5, 40–46 (in Russian).
Copyright (c) 2018 Economics Profession Business
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Economics Profession Business is a golden publisher, as we allow self-archiving, but most importantly we are fully transparent about your rights.
Authors may present and discuss their findings ahead of publication: at biological or scientific conferences, on preprint servers, in public databases, and in blogs, wikis, tweets, and other informal communication channels.
Economics Profession Business (EPB) allows authors to deposit manuscripts (currently under review or those for intended submission to EPB) in non-commercial, pre-print servers such as ArXiv.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
