COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF BORDER REGIONS OF A NUMBER OF FOREIGN CONTRIES AND RUSSIA

УДК 339.9

  • K. B. Badarchy Tuvinian Institute for Exploration of Natural Resources SB RAS (Kyzyl, Russia) Email: herel_badarchi@mail.ru
  • V. K. Sevek Tuva State University (Kyzyl, Russia) Email: vsevek@mail.ru
  • A. A. Sereezhikpei Tuva State University (Kyzyl, Russia) Email: anna.sereerhikpey@mail.ru
Keywords: border region, border types, interregional differentiation

Abstract

The article is devoted to the issue of assessing the level of socio-economic development of border regions in foreign countries in the context of similar domestic experience. The analysis is based on a comparison of the countries of the world in terms of the level of interregional differentiation in terms of gross regional product per capita and a correlation analysis of the GRP per capita with the share of the titular ethnic group in the structure of the population of border regions, as a significant subjective influencing factor. The analysis shows that the deepest lag of border territories is characteristic of multi-ethnic states with administrative division along ethnic lines. A typical representative of countries with a cultural and civilizational type of border area is China, for which the correlation between the indicators of gross regional product per capita and the relative share of the titular ethnic group in the composition of the population in the border areas as of 2010 was 0.55. At the same time, by the 1920s, China should reduce the gap in the backlog of ethnic border areas to the level of the absence of a connection between the GRP indicator and the share of the titular ethnic group in the population of the provinces. The analysis shows that the cultural and civilizational type of the borderlands, characterized by a relatively low share of the titular ethnic group in the structure of the population, requires that this factor be taken into account as one of the key factors in the implementation of investment projects and integrated projects for the development of such territories. Unlike those for border areas with a relatively homogeneous population structure (spatial-economic type of border areas) with a predominance of the titular ethnic group, it is possible to limit oneself to standard approaches to stimulating economic activity and economic growth. From this point of view, the experience of developing the Tibetan and Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Regions of China may be relevant for solving the problems of the development of Russia's ethnic borderlands.

Downloads

Metrics

PDF views
109
Sep 13 '22Sep 16 '22Sep 19 '22Sep 22 '22Sep 25 '22Sep 28 '22Oct 01 '22Oct 04 '22Oct 07 '22Oct 10 '223.0
| |

Author Biographies

K. B. Badarchy, Tuvinian Institute for Exploration of Natural Resources SB RAS (Kyzyl, Russia)

кандидат экономических наук, старший научный сотрудник

V. K. Sevek, Tuva State University (Kyzyl, Russia)

доктор экономических наук, декан экономического факультета

A. A. Sereezhikpei, Tuva State University (Kyzyl, Russia)

старший преподаватель экономического факультета

References

Бадарчи Х. Б., Дабиев Д. Ф. Типологический анализ приграничных регионов России по уровню социально-экономического развития (на примере Республики Тыва) // Проблемы прогнозирования. 2012. № 2. С. 89-101.

Бадарчи Х. Б., Севек В. К. Анализ приграничных регионов Сибирского Федерального Округа России по уровню социально-экономического развития (на примере Республики Тыва) // Аграрный вестник Урала. 2019. № 4 (183) С. 78-86.

Hansen N. M. The Economic Development of Border Regions. IIASA Research Memorandum. 1976. URL: http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/647/

Tadeusz Palmowski and Gennady M. Fedorov. The Potential For Development Of Russian-Polish CrossBorder Region // Geography, Environment, Sustainability. 2020. Vol. 13. No. 1. Pp. 21-28. DOI: 10.24057/20719388-2019-70.

Бильчак М. В. К оценке потенциала развития приграничных регионов // Балтийский регион. 2011. № 2 (8). С. 139-145.

Стратегия развития приграничных территорий: традиции и инновации: монография / под ред. Л. И. Попковой, Цезарь Мадры, Л. Б. Вардомского. Курск, 2018. 130 с.

Rong M. Population and Society in Contemporary Tibet. Hong Kong, 2011. 390 р.

Зубрицкий Ю. А. Инки-кечуа: Основные этапы истории народа. М., 1975. 190 с.

Кузнецов А. В., Кузнецова О. В. Изменение роли приграничных регионов в региональной политике стран ЕС и России // Балтийский регион. 2019. Т. 11. № 4. С. 58-75.

Хаугсет П. Сценарии Крайнего Севера и субнациональные реалии: политика и практика в приграничной зоне Норвегии и России // Арктика и Север. 2018. № 33. С. 137-156. DOI: 10.17238/issn2221-2698.2018.33.137

REFERENCES

Badarchi KH. B., Dabiyev D. F. Typological analysis of the border regions of Russia in terms of socioeconomic development (on the example of the Tyva Republic) // Problems of forecasting. 2012. № 2. Рр. 89-101.

Badarchi KH. B., Sevek V. K. Analysis of the Frontier Regions of the Siberian Federal District of Russia by the Level of Socio-Economic Developme // Agrarian Bulletin of the Urals. 2019. № 4 (183) Рр. 78-86.

Hansen N. M. The Economic Development of Border Regions. IIASA Research Memorandum. 1976. URL: http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/647/

Tadeusz Palmowski and Gennady M. Fedorov. The Potential For Development Of Russian-Polish CrossBorder Region // Geography, Environment, Sustainability. 2020. Vol. 13. No. 1. Рр. 21-28. DOI: 10.24057/20719388-2019-70.

Bil'chak M. V. Toward an assessment of the development potential of border regions // Baltic region. 2011. № 2 (8). Рр. 139-145.

Strategy for the development of border areas: traditions and innovations: monograph / ed. L. I. Popkovoy, Tsezar» Madry, L. B. Vardomskogo. Kursk, 2018. 130 р.

Rong M. Population and Society in Contemporary Tibet. Hong Kong University Press. 2011. 390 p.

Zubritskiy Yu. A. Inca Quechua: The main stages of the history of the people. M., 1975. 190 р.

Kuznetsov A. V., Kuznetsova O. V. Changing the role of border regions in the regional policy of the EU countries and Russia // Baltic region. 2019. T. 11. № 4. Рр. 58-75.

Khaugset P. High North scenarios and subnational realities: policies and practices in the Norwegian/ Russian border zone // Arctic and North. 2018. № 33. Pp. 137-156. DOI: 10.17238/issn2221-2698.2018.33.137.

Published
2022-09-12
How to Cite
1. Badarchy K. B., Sevek V. K., Sereezhikpei A. A. COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF BORDER REGIONS OF A NUMBER OF FOREIGN CONTRIES AND RUSSIA // Economics Profession Business, 2022. № 3. P. 24-31. URL: http://journal.asu.ru/ec/article/view/epb202234.
Section
ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКИЕ НАУКИ