PRIORITIES OF INCLUSIVE DEVELOPMENT OF THE ANGARA-YENISEI MACROREGION

УДК 332.14

  • G. I. Popodko Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering SB RAS (Novosibirsk, Russia) Email: pgi90@bk.ru
Keywords: Angara-Yenisei macro-region, inclusive development, region, priorities, strategy

Abstract

This article examines the processes of forming new territorial entities — macro-regions, which unite regions with different economic and social potential. Despite the prospects for macro-regions development, which can give an impetus to the economic and social growth of both the individual territory and the country as a whole, many limitations hinder these processes. The Angara-Yenisei macro-region, which includes the Krasnoyarsk Krai, the Irkutsk Region, the Republic of Tuva, and the Republic of Khakassia, currently does not represent a single economic space. Each incorporated region develops according to its own strategic trends determined before they were united in AER. In order to develop a unified strategy for the development of the macro-region, it is proposed to identify the priorities of social and economic development of each of the regions based on an assessment of its inclusiveness. Indicators of inclusive development, combined into blocks — growth and development, inclusiveness, intergenerational equality and sustainability — allowed us to justify the development priorities of each of the regions. The main priority for all regions is to improve the standard of living and reduce poverty among the population. Along with other priority areas, this should be the basis for the overall strategy for the development of the Angara-Yenisei macro-region.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

G. I. Popodko, Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering SB RAS (Novosibirsk, Russia)

доктор экономических наук, ведущий научный сотрудник

References

Стратегия пространственного развития Российской Федерации на период до 2025 года. Утверждена Распоряжением Правительства РФ от 13 февраля 2019 г. № 207-р. URL: http://static.government.ru/media/files/UVAlqUtT08o60RktoOXl22JjAe7irNxc.pdf (дата обращения: 07.06.2023).

Поподько Г. И. Что препятствует ускоренному развитию Ангаро-Енисейского макрорегиона? // Региональная экономика и управление: электронный научный журнал. 2022. № 3 (71). URL: https://eeeregion.ru/article/7104/ (дата обращения: 07.06.2023).

Поподько Г. И. Оценка экономического потенциала и перспективы развития Ангаро-Енисейского макрорегиона // Управленческий учет. 2022. № 4–1. С. 146–154.

Поподько Г. И. Инклюзивное развитие ресурсного региона // Региональная экономика и управление: электронный научный журнал. 2021. № 1. DOI: 10.24412/1999–2645–2021–165–24. URL: https://eeeregion.ru/article/6524 (дата обращения: 07.06.2023).

Rytova E., Gutman S., Sousa C. Regional Inclusive Development: An Assessment of Russian Regions. Sustainability, 2021, vol. 13 (11), 5773. DOI: 10.3390/ su13115773. URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071–1050/13/11/5773/htm (дата обращения: 07.06.2023).

Mikheeva N. Qualitative aspect of the regional growth in Russia: Inclusive development index. Regional Science Policy & Practice, 2020, Vol. 12 (4), Pp. 611–626.

Севастьянова А., Токарев А., Шмат В. Особенности применения концепции инклюзивного развития для регионов ресурсного типа // Регион: экономика и социология. 2017. № 1 (93). С. 213–236.

Шарафутдинов Р. И., Герасимов В. О., Ахметшин Э. М. Адаптированная методика расчета инклюзивного роста и развития регионов Российской Федерации // Экономика и предпринимательство. 2017. № 10–1 (87–1). С. 308–311.

Баринова В. А., Земцов С. П. Инклюзивный рост и устойчивость регионов России // Регион: экономика и социология. 2019. № 1. С. 23–46.

Фридман Ю. А., Речко Г. Н., Логинова Е. Ю., Исупова О. А., Пимонов А. Г. Инклюзивное развитие Кузбасса: опыт оценки // Мир экономики и управления. 2022. Т. 22, № 2. С. 126–141. DOI 10.25205/2542–0429–2022–22–2–126–141

The Inclusive Growth and Development Report 2017. Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum // World Economic Forum. URL: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Forum_IncGrwth_2017.pdf (дата обращения: 07.06.2023).

Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific 2014: Framework of Inclusive Growth Indicators, Special Supplement. Mandaluyong City, Philippines: Asian Development Bank, 2014. URL: http://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/42813/ki2014—special-supplement.pdf (дата обращения: 07.06.2023).

Рейтинг российских регионов России по качеству жизни — 2021. URL: https://ria.ru/20220214/kachestvo_zhizni-1772505597.html (дата обращения 15.04.2023).

Регионы России. Социально-экономические показатели. 2021: Р32 Стат. сб. / Росстат. М., 2021. 1112 с.

Регионы России. Социально-экономические показатели. 2022: Р32 Стат. сб. / Росстат. М., 2022. 1122 с.

REFERENCES

The strategy of spatial development of the Russian Federation until 2025 (Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 207-r of February 13, 2019). URL: http://static.government.ru/media/files/UVAlqUtT08o60RktoOXl22JjAe7irNxc.pdf (date of access: 07.06.2023).

Popodko G. I. What hinders the accelerated development of Angara-Yenisei macro-region? Regional economy and management: electronic scientific journal. No. 3 (71). URL: https://eee-region.ru/article/7104/ (date of access: 07.06.2023).

Popodko G. I. The assessment of economic potential Angara-Yenisei macroregion and prospects for its futher development. Management Accounting. 2022. No. 4–1. Pp. 146–154.

Popodko G. I. The inclusive development of the resource region // Regional economy and management: electronic scientific journal. 2021. No. 1 (65). URL: https://eee-region.ru/article/6524/ (date of access: 07.06.2023) DOI: 10.24412/1999–2645–2021–165–24.

Rytova E., Gutman S., Sousa C. Regional Inclusive Development: An Assessment of Russian Regions. Sustainability, 2021, Vol. 13 (11), 5773. DOI: 10.3390/ su13115773. URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/5773/htm (date of access: 07.06.2023).

Mikheeva N. Qualitative aspect of the regional growth in Russia: Inclusive development index. Regional Science Policy & Practice, 2020, Vol. 12 (4), Pp. 611–626.

Sevastyanova A. E., Tokarev A. N., Shmat V. V. Application features of inclusive development concept in resource regions. Region: Economics & Sociology. 2017. No. 1 (93). Pp. 213–236.

Sharafutdinov R. I., Gerasimov V. O., Akhmetshin E. M. Adapted methods of calculation of inclusive growth and development of the regions of the Russian Federation. Journal of Economy and entrepreneurship. 2017. No. 10–1 (87–1). Pp. 308–311.

Barinova V. A., Zemtsov S. P. Inclusive growth and regional resilience in Russia. Region: Economics & Sociology, 2019, No. 1 (101). Pp. 23–46.

Fridman Y. A., Rechko G. N., Loginova E. Yu., Isupova O. A., Pimonov A. G. Inclusive Development of Kuzbass: Assessment Experience. World of Economics and Management. 2022. Vol. 22. No. 2. Pp. 126–141. DOI 10.25205/2542–0429–2022–22–2–126–141

Sevastyanova A. E., Tokarev A. N., Shmat V. V. Application features of inclusive development concept in resource regions. Region: Economics & Sociology. 2017. No. 1 (93). Pp. 213–236.

Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific 2014: Framework of Inclusive Growth Indicators, Special Supplement. Mandaluyong City, Philippines: Asian Development Bank, 2014. URL: http://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/42813/ki2014—special-supplement.pdf (date of access: 07.06.2023).

Rating of Russian regions of Russia by quality of life — 2021. URL: https://ria.ru/20220214/kachestvo_zhizni-1772505597.html (date of access: 07.06.2023).

Regions of Russia. Socio-economic indicators. 2021: P32 Stat. sat. / Rosstat. Moscow, 2021.1122 p.

Regions of Russia. Socio-economic indicators. 2022: P32 Stat. sat. / Rosstat. Moscow, 2022. 1122 p.

Published
2023-09-11
How to Cite
1. Popodko G. I. PRIORITIES OF INCLUSIVE DEVELOPMENT OF THE ANGARA-YENISEI MACROREGION // Economics Profession Business, 2023. № 3. P. 67-77. URL: http://journal.asu.ru/ec/article/view/epb202339.
Section
ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКИЕ НАУКИ