MODEL OF ENSURING ECONOMIC GROWTH WHILE MINIMIZING NEGATIVE ANTHROPOGENIC IMPACT
УДК 330.366:502.131.1
Abstract
Ensuring economic growth while minimizing ecological damage is becoming increasingly relevant in modern development conditions. The stratification of the global economic system, restrictions caused by the unprecedented imposition of sanctions, disruption of global supply chains, the redirection of key participants in production towards localization and import substitution have led to a change in the structure of material production resources.This circumstance creates a complex of risk factors in the field of ecology, which will lead to an increase in the «cost» of economic development. Transitioning from an extensive growth model to a development based on resource-efficient technologies will help break negative trends. Addressing the challenge of preserving economic growth while reducing negative impact on the environment requires a reevaluation of approaches and the useof forward-looking indicative planning of necessary resources, taking into account the possibilities of secondary waste utilization to minimize negative anthropogenic impact.The research goal is the development of a functional model of sustainable development (over time), based on the principles of replacing natural capital by increasing the use of labor and capital resources with developed institutional support from the state. Such a model ensures the resolution of the conflict between «economic growth — minimizing ecological damage» through the application of the resource efficiency concept, based on the optimal selection of resource. The article outlines directions for the practical implementation of the basic model of ensuring sustainable development, as well as measures for its practical implementation, grouped by production factors.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Буцаев Д.П. Меры поддержки изменят темпы по созданию объектов утилизации ТКО. URL: http://www.reo.ru/tpost/0yymsd53n1-denis-butsaev-meri-podderzhki-izmenyat-t/ (дата обращения: 29.04.2024).
Доля вторсырья в промышленности России к 2030 году достигнет 34%. URL: http://www.sfr.gov.ru/press_center/z_news/~2022/11/24/241117?ysclid=lvh368cwxb249874531/ (дата обращения: 30.04.2024)
Арсаханова З.А., Хажмурадов З.Д., Хажмурадова С.Д. Декаплинг в экономике — сущность, определение и виды // Общество, экономика, управление. 2019. Т. 4. №4. С. 13–18.
Цховребов Э.С. Ресурсосбережение: основные этапы становления, теории и методы, тенденции и перспективы развития в промышленности и строительной индустрии России // Вестник МГСУ. 2020. Т. 15. Вып. 1. С. 112–158. DOI: 10.22227/1997–0935.2020.1.112–158
Майкова С.Э. Снижение ресурсоемкости производства как важнейшее условие обеспечения роста экономики без ущерба для экологии // Отходы и ресурсы. 2021. Т. 8. №2. DOI: 10.15862/07ECOR221.
Майкова С.Э. Ресурсосбережение и ресурсоэффективность как императив устойчивого развития национальной экономики // Бизнес. Образование. Право. 2020. №3 (52). С. 234–238. DOI: 10.25683/VOLBI. 2020.52.343.
Использование передовых производственных технологий в России. URL: http://www.issek.hse.ru/mirror/pubs/share/510535029.pdf/ (дата обращения: 29.04.2024).
В России вводится требование по использованию вторсырья в госзакупках. URL: http://www.tass.ru/ekonomika/16728315?ysclid=lvh313jvr568562771/ (дата обращения: 29.04.2024).
Hart J., Adams K., Giesekam J., Tingley D.D., Pomponi F. Barriers and drivers in a circular economy: the case of the built environment // Procedia CIRP. 2019. Vol. 80. Pp. 619–624. DOI: 10.1016/j. procir. 2018.12.015
Преображенский Б.Г., Толстых Т.О., Шмелева Н.В. Промышленный симбиоз как инструмент циркулярной экономики // Регион: системы, экономика, управление. 2020. №4 (51). С. 37–48.
Игнатов В.И., Катаев Ю.В., Герасимов В.С., Баулин Н.К., Фархшатов М.Н., Фаюршин А.Ф. Анатомия индустрии рециклинга отходов // Вестник Башкирского государственного аграрного университета. 2021. №3. С. 78–88.
Кузнецова Н.А. Рециклинг как один из факторов циркулярной экономики // Актуальные вопросы современной экономики. 2021. №9. С. 367–372.
REFERENCES
Butsaev D.P. Support measures will change the pace of creating MSW recycling facilities. URL: http://www.reo.ru/tpost/0yymsd53n1-denis-butsaev-meri-podderzhki-izmenyat-t/ (date of access: 29.04.2024).
The share of recyclable materials in Russian industry will reach 34% by 2030. URL: http://www.sfr.gov.ru/press_center/z_news/~2022/11/24/241117?ysclid=lvh368cwxb249874531/ (date of access: 30.04.2024).
Arsakhanova Z.A., Khazhmuradov Z.D., Khazhmuradov S.D. Decapling In The Economy — Essence, Definition and Types. Society, Economics, Management. 2019. Vol. 4. No. 4. Pp. 13–18.
Tshovrebov Eduard S. Resource-saving: main formation stages, theories and methods, tendencies and prospects of development in industry and construction of Russia. Bulletin of MGSU. 2020. Vol. 15. Issue. 1. Pp. 112–158. DOI: 10.22227/1997–0935.2020.1.112–158.
Maykova S.E. Reducing the resource intensity of production as the most important condition for ensuring economic growth without compromising the environment. Russian Journal of Resources, Conservation and Recycling, [online] 2 (8). DOI: 10.15862/07ECOR221.
Maykova S.E. Resource saving and resource efficiency as an imperative of sustainable development of the national economy. Business. Education. Law. 2020. No. 3. Pp. 234–239. DOI: 10.25683/VOLBI. 2020.52.343.
Use of advanced production technologies in Russia. URL: http://www.issek.hse.ru/mirror/pubs/share/510535029.pdf/ (date of access: 29.04.2024).
In Russia, a requirement for the use of secondary raw materials in public procurement is being introduced. URL: http://www.tass.ru/ekonomika/16728315?ysclid=lvh313jvr568562771/ (date of access: 29.04.2024).
Hart J., Adams K., Giesekam J., Tingley D.D., Pomponi F. Barriers and drivers in a circular economy: the case of the built environment. Procedia CIRP. 2019. Vol. 80. Pp. 619–624. DOI: 10.1016/j. procir. 2018.12.015.
Preobrazhensky B.G., Tolstykh T.O., Shmeleva N.V. Industrial symbiosis as a tool of the circular economy. Region: systems, economics, management. 2020. No. 4 (51). Pp. 37–48.
Ignatov V.I., Kataev Yu.V., Gerasimov V.S., Baulin N.K., Farkhshatov M.N., Fayurshin A.F. Anatomy of the waste recycling industry. Bulletin of the Bashkir State Agrarian University. 2021. No. 3. Pp. 78–88.
Kuznetsova N. A Recycling as a factor in the circular economy. Current issues of modern economics. 2021. No. 9. Pp. 367–372.
Economics Profession Business is a golden publisher, as we allow self-archiving, but most importantly we are fully transparent about your rights.
Authors may present and discuss their findings ahead of publication: at biological or scientific conferences, on preprint servers, in public databases, and in blogs, wikis, tweets, and other informal communication channels.
Economics Profession Business (EPB) allows authors to deposit manuscripts (currently under review or those for intended submission to EPB) in non-commercial, pre-print servers such as ArXiv.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
