DEVELOPMENT OF METHODOLOGICAL TOOLS FOR ASSESSING THE ECONOMIC SAFETY OF INDUSTRIAL AGGLOMERATION (BASED ON THE EXAMPLE OF PERM AGGLOMERATION)
УДК 338.2 (470.53)
Abstract
This article briefly presents the formation of methodological foundations for the analysis and assessment of economic security in an industrial agglomeration. Digitalization processes have completely changed the tools for managing the region. The study is based on a systemic-institutional paradigm, where a transition in management has been made from «closed-loop» systems to open, self-organizing systems. Reciprocity of goodsand redistribution in case of bankruptcy in industrial organizations required institutional support over a long period. The theory of institutional and economic dysfunctions believes that institutions may not fulfill their functions and fail to achieve their goals. Existing indicative tools for assessing the economic security of an industrial agglomeration are outdated and do not contribute to solving problems in conditions of uncertainty andthe destabilizing impact of economic risks and threats. The development of theoretical foundations is aimed at substantiating the assessment methodology, the purpose of which is to identify and eliminate the dysfunction of institutions, and bring the institutional system to equilibrium, which will significantly speed up and improve the quality of decision-making.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Ворошилов Н.В. Подходы к оценке развитости агломераций на территории России // Проблемы развития территории. 2019. №4 (102). С. 40–54. DOI: 10.15838/ptd. 2019.4.102.2.
Ширяев М.В. Опорные технические университеты как фактор обеспечения многоуровневой экономической безопасности страны: дис. … докт. экон. наук: 08.00.05: экономическая безопасность. Нижний Новгород, 2018. 330 с.
Камолов С. Г. Высокотехнологичная парадигма государственного управления на региональном уровне: дис. … докт. экон. наук. 08.00.05: менеджмент. М., 2020. 405 с.
Берсенёв В.Л. Ведущие центры исследования проблем экономической безопасности в России // Экономика региона. 2019. Т. 15. Вып. 1. С. 29–42.
Bachtler J., Yuill D. Policies and strategies for regional development: a shift in paradigm? // Regional and Industrial Policy Research Paper. 2001. №46.
Луман Н. Социальные системы, очерк общей теории. СПб., 2007. 643 с.
Teubner G. Recht als autopoietisches System. Frankfurt am Main, 1989. S. 38.
Kirsch W., Knyphausen D. Unternehmungen als «autopoietische» Systeme? Managementforschung 1: [Thema: Selbstorganisation und systemische Führung], edited by Wolfgang H. Staehle and Jörg Sydow,. Berlin, Boston, 1991. Pp. 75–102.
Fligstein N. Fields, Power, and Social Skill: A Critical Analysis of The New Institutionalisms // Экономическая социология. 2001. Том 2. №1. C. 4–25.
Эггертссон Т. Экономическое поведение и институты / пер. с англ. М., 2001. 408 с.
Веблен Т. Теория праздного класса. М., 1984. 202 с.
Норт Д. Институты, институциональные изменения и функционирование экономики / пер. с англ. А.Н. Нестеренко. М., 1997. 180 с.
Хайек Ф.А. Пагубная самонадеянность. Ошибки социализма. М., 1992. 133 с.
Нельсон Р. Р., Уинтер С. Дж. Эволюционная теория экономических изменений / пер. с англ. М.Я. Каждана. М., 2002. 535 с.
Фрейдина Е.В. Исследование систем управления: учеб. пособие по специальности «Менеджмент организации» / под ред. Ю.В. Гусева. 2-е изд. стер. М., 2009. 368 с.
Метелева Е.Р. Формирование крупных пространственных социально-экономических систем в сибирском регионе: автореф. … докт. экон. наук. 08.00.05: региональная экономика. Иркутск, 2012. 39 с.
Вебер А. Избранное. Кризис европейской культуры. М., 2012. 568 c.
Портер М. Конкуренция / пер. с англ. М., 2000. 495 с.
Гвоздева М.А., Казакова М.В., Поспелова Е.А. Подходы к определению агломерации // Российское предпринимательство. 2016. Т. 17. №24. C. 3505–3514.
Алексеева Е.В., Быстрова Т.Ю. Ревалоризация индустриального наследия в городской агломерации: пример Большого Екатеринбурга // Известия УрФУ. Серия 1. Проблемы образования, науки и культуры. 2022. Т. 28. №2. С. 97–109.
Колясников В.А. Развитие понятия «городская агломерация» // Академический вестник УРАЛНИИПРОЕКТ РААСН. 2015. №2. С. 10–15.
Российские регионы: экономический кризис и проблемы модернизации / под ред. Л.М. Григорьева, Н.В. Зубаревич, Г.Р. Хасаева. М., 2011. 357 с.
Регионы России. Социально-экономические показатели: статистический сборник. М., 2007. 991 с.
Регионы России. Социально-экономические показатели: статистический сборник. М., 2022. 1122 с.
REFERENCES
Voroshilova N.V. Approaches to assessing the development of agglomerations in Russia. Problems of territorial development. 2019. No. 4 (102). Pp. 40–54. DOI: 10.15838/ptd. 2019.4.102.2.
Shiryaev M.V. Supporting technical universities as a factor in ensuring the multi-level economic security of the country: PhD in Economics: 08.00.05: economic security. Nizhniy Novgorod, 2018. 330 p.
Kamolov S.G. High-tech paradigm of public administration at the regional level: PhD in Economics. 08.00.05: management. Moscow, 2020. 405 p.
Bersenev V.L. The leading centers of research on economic security problems in Russia. The economy of the regions. 2019. Vol. 15. Issue 1. Pp. 29–42.
Bachtler J., Yuill D. Policies and strategies for regional development: a shift in paradigm? Regional and Industrial Policy Research Paper. 2001. No 46.
Luhmann N. Social systems, an essay on the general theory of relativity. Saint-Petersburg, 2007. 643 p.
Teubner G. Recht als autopoietisches System. Frankfurt am Main, 1989. S. 38.
Kirsch W., Knyphausen D. Unternehmungen als «autopoietische» Systeme? Managementforschung 1: [Thema: Selbstorganisation und systemische Führung], edited by Wolfgang H. Staehle and Jörg Sydow, Berlin, Boston, 1991. Pp. 75–102.
Fligstein N. Fields, Power, and Social Skill: a critical Analysis of The New Institutionalisms. Economic Sociology. 2001. Vol. 2. No. 1. Pp. 4–25.
Eggertsson T. Economic behavior and the institute / translated from English. Moscow, 2001. 408 p.
Veblen T. The theory of the leisure class. Moscow, 1984. 202 p.
North D. Institute, institutional changes and functioning of the economy / translated from English by A.N. Nesterenko. Moscow, 1997. 180 p.
Hayek F.A. Pernicious arrogance. The mistakes of socialism. Moscow, 1992. 133 p.
Nelson R.R., Winter S. J. The evolutionary theory of economic change / translated from the English by M.Ya. Kazhdan. Moscow, 2002. 535 p.
Freydina E.B. Research of management systems: studies. Handbook on the specialty «Organization Management» / translated from English by N.Y. Gusev. 2nd ed. p. Moscow, 2009. 368 p.
Meteleva E.R. Formation of large-scale spatial socio-economic systems in the Siberian region: abstract … Doctor of Economics. 08.00.05: Regional economy. Irkutsk, 2012. 39 p.
Weber A. Favourites. The Crisis of European Culture. Moscow, 2012. 568 p.
Porter M. Competition / translated from English. Moscow, 2000. 495 p.
Gvozdeva M.A., Kazakova M.V., Pospelova E.A. Approaches to the definition of agglomeration. Russian entrepreneurship. 2016. Vol. 17. No. 24. Pp. 3505–3514.
Alekseeva E.V., Bystrova T.Y. Restoration of industrial heritage in urban agglomeration: an example of Greater Yekaterinburg. News of UrFU. Series 1. Problems of education, science and culture. 2022. Vol. 28. No. 2. Pp. 97–109.
Kolyasnikov V.A. The development of the concept of «urban agglomeration». Academic Bulletin of UralNIIproekt RAS. 2015. No. 2. Pp. 10–15.
Russian regions: the economic crisis and problems of modernization / translated from English by L.M. Grigorieva, N.V. Zubarevich, G.R. Khasaeva. Moscow, 2011. 357 p.
Regions of Russia. Socio-economic indicators: statistical collection. Moscow, 2007. 991 p.
Regions of Russia. Socio-economic indicators: statistical collection. Moscow, 2022. 1122 p.
Economics Profession Business is a golden publisher, as we allow self-archiving, but most importantly we are fully transparent about your rights.
Authors may present and discuss their findings ahead of publication: at biological or scientific conferences, on preprint servers, in public databases, and in blogs, wikis, tweets, and other informal communication channels.
Economics Profession Business (EPB) allows authors to deposit manuscripts (currently under review or those for intended submission to EPB) in non-commercial, pre-print servers such as ArXiv.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
