ON THE ISSUE OF ASSESSING THE SUSTAINABILITY OF REGIONAL ECONOMIC SYSTEMS
УДК 332.145:502.131.1
Abstract
The article analyzes approaches to assessing the sustainability of regional economic systems, taking into account their ecological subsystem. Definitions of the regional economic system and sustainability are given, approaches to assessing sustainability are considered. The absence of a unified methodology for calculating, composition and structure of criteria for assessing sustainability has been established, and it has been determined that the approach of developing indices and indicators of sustainability is most often used in assessing the sustainability of regional economic systems. The approaches to the development of indices and indicators within the framework of the concept of sustainable development, ESG indicators of sustainability, and the ESG ranking methodology are studied. The underestimation of the ecological subsystem of regional economic systems in assessing their sustainability in all the considered approaches has been revealed. The ecological component is considered either as a resource component or as an assimilation potential, the environment-forming functions of the environment, as a rule, are not taken into account. At the same time, the risks of emergency situations, real and potential economic and social damage from the development of adverse natural processes and phenomena are currently becoming limiting factors for the sustainability of regions. The use of a multicriteria (integral) approach in assessing the sustainability of regions will allow taking into account these risks.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Рыжкова Ю.А., Михнева С.Г. Социальные условия формирования потенциала устойчивости региональных социумов (на примере Приволжского федерального округа) // Известия высших учебных заведений. Поволжский регион. Общественные науки. 2011. №4. С. 200–209.
Ускова Т.В. Управление устойчивым развитием региона: монография. Вологда, 2009. 355 с.
Кормановская И.Р. Устойчивость развития региональных социально-экономических систем в условиях турбулентности // Проблемы современной экономики. 2015. №4 (56). С. 189–192.
Даванков А.Ю., Двинин Д.Ю. Системная самоорганизация сбалансированного развития региональной социо-эколого-экономической системы // Инновационное развитие экономики. 2020. №2. С. 108–116.
Тимофеев Р.А., Ячменев Е.Ф., Тимаев Р.А. Составляющие устойчивого развития региональной социально-экономической системы // Научный вестник: финансы, банки, инвестиции. 2020. №2 (51). С. 232–237.
Гутман Г.В., Мироедов A.A., Федин С.В. Управление региональной экономикой. М., 2001. С. 25.
Любимова М.В., Нестеров В.П., Дмитриева В.С. Проблемы оценки социально-экономического потенциала региона // Региональная экономика: теория и практика. 2007. №4. С. 13–24.
Кулагина Н.А., Благодер Т.П. Перспективы развития социально-экономического потенциала региона как основа обеспечения его экономической безопасности // Вестник Воронежского государственного университета. Серия: Экономика и управление. 2018. №1. С. 77–84.
Dioxin: Seveso disaster testament to effects of dioxin. URL: http://www.getipm.com/articles/sevesoitaly.htm/ (дата обращения: 02.04.2024).
Michelle L. Bell, Devra L. Davis, Tony Fletcher. A Retrospective Assessment of Mortality from the London Smog Episode of 1952: The Role of Influenza and Pollution // Environmental Health Perspective. 2004. Т. 112, вып. 1. С. 6–8. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.6539.
Захарова Е.Н. О когнитивном моделировании устойчивого развития социально-экономических систем // Вестник Адыгейского государственного университета. Серия 1: Регионоведение: философия, история, социология, юриспруденция, политология, культурология. 2007. №1. С. 184–190.
Глинский В.В., Серга Л.К., Хван М.С., Филатов С.А. Разработка методики статистической оценки уровня устойчивого развития социально-экономических систем // Идеи и идеалы. 2013. Т. 1. №3 (17). С. 48–56.
Шаталова О.И., Лебедева Л. П., Шмыгалева П.В. Обоснование методики комплексной оценки устойчивого развития региональных социально-экономических систем // Вестник Северо-Кавказского гуманитарного института. 2017. №1. С. 96–100.
Тарасова Н.П., Кручина Е.Б. Индексы и индикаторы устойчивого развития // Устойчивое развитие: ресурсы России. М., 2004. С. 127–144.
Бобылев С.Н. Индикаторы устойчивого развития для России // Экологическая культура в контексте устойчивого развития. 2011. №1. С. 8–18.
Индикаторы устойчивого развития Томской области. Вып. 3 / под ред. В.М. Кресса. Томск, 2007. 46 с.
Холодков В.В., Бобылев С.Н. Формирование современных показателей экономического развития города Москвы с учетом экологических факторов // На пути к устойчивому развитию России. 2004. №26. С. 28.
Марденская Е.О. Показатели устойчивого развития Псковской области // Региональная экономика: теория и практика. 2017. Т. 15. №8. С. 1488–1500. DOI: 10/24891/re/15.8.1488.
Иванцова Е.А., Постнова М.В., Сагалаев В.А., Матвеева А.А., Холоденко А.В. Экологическая оценка городских агломераций на основе индикаторов устойчивого развития // Вестник Волгоградского государственного университета. Серия 3. Экономика. Экология. 2019. Т. 21. №2. С. 143–156. DOI: 10.15688/j3.92019.2.3.
Дудина Т.Н., Тарасова О.С. О подходах к разработке региональных систем индексов и индикаторов устойчивого развития // Успехи современного естествознания. 2022. №1. С. 23–29.
Копылов В.Н., Шерстюков А.Б. Информационное обеспечение мониторинга устойчивости зданий и сооружений в зоне многолетней мерзлоты России // Вестник кибернетики. 2013. №12. С. 94–105.
Краснощеков В.Н., Ольгаренко Д.Г., Рожкова О.Н. Изменение климата и сельское хозяйство России: проблемы и решения // 06.01.00 Агрономия: Природообустройство. 2017. №2. С. 80–87.
Smith K. et al. Human health: Impacts, adaptation, and co-benefits. Climate Change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: Global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, 2014. Pp. 709–754.
Тарасова О.С. К вопросу об адаптации отраслей народного хозяйства к климатическим изменениям // Успехи современного естествознания. 2023. №10. С. 64–70.
REFERENCES
Ryzhkova Yu.A., Mikhneva S.G. Social conditions for the formation of the sustainability potential of regional societies (on the example of the Volga Federal District). Izvestia of Higher educational institutions. The Volga region. Social sciences. 2011. No. 4. Pp. 200–209.
Uskova T.V. Management of sustainable development of the region: monograph. Vologda, 2009. 355 p.
Kormanovskaya I.R. Sustainability of the development of regional socio-economic systems in conditions of turbulence. Problems of the modern economy. 2015. No. 4 (56). Pp. 189–192.
Davankov A.Yu., Dvinin D.Yu. Systemic self-organization of balanced development of the regional socioecological and economic system. Innovative development of the economy. 2020. No. 2. Pp. 108–116.
Timofeev R.A., Yachmenev E.F., Timaev R.A. Components of sustainable development of the regional socio-economic system. Scientific bulletin: finance, banks, investments. 2020. No. 2 (51). Pp. 232–237.
Gutman G.V., Miroedov A.A., Fedin S.V. Management of the regional economy. Moscow, 2001. P. 25.
Lyubimova M.V., Nesterov V.P., Dmitrieva V.S. Problems of assessing the socio-economic potential of the region. Regional economics: theory and practice. 2007. No. 4. Pp. 13–24.
Kulagina N.A., Blagoder T.P. Prospects for the development of the socio-economic potential of the region as a basis for ensuring its economic security. Bulletin of the Voronezh State University. Series: Economics and Management. 2018. No. 1. Pp. 77–84.
Dioxin: Seveso disaster testament to the effects of dioxin. URL: http://www.getipm.com/articles/sevesoitaly.htm/ (date of access: 02.04.2024).
Michelle L. Bell, Devra L. Davis, Tony Fletcher. A Retrospective Assessment of Mortality from the London Smog Episode of 1952: The Role of Influenza and Pollution. Environmental Health Perspective. 2004. Т. 112. Vol. 1. Pp. 6–8. DOI: 10.1289/ehp. 6539.
Zakharova E.N. On cognitive modeling of sustainable development of socio-economic systems. Bulletin of the Adygea State University. Series 1: Regional Studies: philosophy, history, sociology, law, political science, cultural studies. 2007. No. 1. Pp. 184–190.
Glinsky V.V., Serga L.K., Khvan M.S., Filatov S.A. Development of a methodology for statistical assessment of the level of sustainable development of socio-economic systems. Ideas and ideals. 2013. Vol. 1. No. 3 (17). Pp. 48–56.
Shatalova O.I., Lebedeva L.P., Shmygaleva P.V. Substantiation of the methodology for a comprehensive assessment of the sustainable development of regional socio-economic systems. Bulletin of the North Caucasian Institute of Humanities. 2017. No. 1. Pp. 96–100.
Tarasova N.P., Kruchina E.B. Indices and indicators of sustainable development. Sustainable development: resources of Russia. Moscow, 2004. Pp. 127–144.
Bobylev S. N. Indicators of sustainable development for Russia. Ecological culture in the context of sustainable development. 2011. No. 1. Pp. 8–18.
Indicators of sustainable development of the Tomsk region. Issue 3 / edited by V.M. Kress. Tomsk, 2007. 46 p.
Kholodkov V.V., Bobylev S.N. Formation of modern indicators of economic development of the city of Moscow taking into account environmental factors. On the way to sustainable development of Russia. 2004. No. 26. Pp. 28–28.
Mardenskaya E.O. Indicators of sustainable development of the Pskov region. Regional Economics: Theory and Practice. 2017. Vol. 15. No. 8. Pp. 1488–1500. DOI: 10/24891/re/15.8.1488.
Ivantsova E.A., Postnova M.V., Sagalaev V.A., Matveeva A.A., Kholodenko A.V. Environmental assessment of urban agglomerations based on indicators of sustainable development. Bulletin of the Volgograd State University. Series 3 Economics. Ecology. 2019. Vol. 21. No. 2. Pp. 143–156. DOI: 10.15688/j3.92019.2.3.
Dudina T. N., Tarasova O. S. On approaches to the development of regional systems of indices and indicators of sustainable development. Successes of modern natural science. 2022. No. 1. Pp. 23–29.
Kopylov V. N., Sherstyukov A. B. Information support for monitoring the stability of buildings and structures in the permafrost zone of Russia. Bulletin of Cybernetics. 2013. No. 12. Pp. 94–105.
Krasnoshchekov V. N., Olgarenko D.G., Rozhkova O. N. Climate change and agriculture in Russia: problems and solutions. 06.01.00 Agronomy: Environmental Management. 2017. No. 2. Pp. 80–87.
Smith K. et al. Human health: Impacts, adaptation, and co-benefits. Climate Change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: Global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, 2014. Pp. 709–754.
Tarasova O. S. On the issue of adaptation of branches of the national economy to climate change. Successes of modern natural science. 2023. No. 10. Pp. 64–70.
Economics Profession Business is a golden publisher, as we allow self-archiving, but most importantly we are fully transparent about your rights.
Authors may present and discuss their findings ahead of publication: at biological or scientific conferences, on preprint servers, in public databases, and in blogs, wikis, tweets, and other informal communication channels.
Economics Profession Business (EPB) allows authors to deposit manuscripts (currently under review or those for intended submission to EPB) in non-commercial, pre-print servers such as ArXiv.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
