RELIGIOUS IDENTITY AND SPIRITUAL SECURITY OF POPULATION IN BORDER REGIONS OF RUSSIA
Main Article Content
Abstract
The article presents the results of a sociological study on religious identity and spiritual security among population in four border regions of Russia (Novosibirsk Oblast, Altai Krai, Republic of Altai, Republic of Tyva, mass survey n = 1860; expert survey n = 120). The purpose of the study was to identify the relationship between the level of religiosity of the population and the security in the spiritual sphere of life. The results of the analysis allowed to identify key factors, determining the parameters of spiritual security in border regions. In Altai Krai the main factor was inter-confessional dialogue and state-confessional relations; in Novosibirsk Oblast, the spiritual sphere was determined by almost the entire set of interrelated conditions, except for the openness of religious organizations and the protection of the right to free spiritual choice; the picture was similar in the Republic of Tyva. It was revealed that there is a connection between the level of religiosity of the population and the security of the spiritual sphere of life, an important role in this process is played by religious institutions that support traditional religious culture; religious, ethnic and civil identity of the population; dissemination of religious values and norms.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Article Details
How to Cite
[1]
Maximova, S., Omelchenko, D. and Noyanzina, O. 2022. RELIGIOUS IDENTITY AND SPIRITUAL SECURITY OF POPULATION IN BORDER REGIONS OF RUSSIA. Social Integration and Development of Ethnic Cultures in the Eurasian Space. 1, 12 (Jun. 2022), 142-152.
Section
Статьи
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
1. Максимова С.Г., Омельченко Д.А., Ноянзина О.Е. Международная миграция в приграничных регионах России: опыт структурного моделирования установок населения // Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Социология. 2019. Т. 19. № 4. С. 737-755.
2. Руткевич Е.Д. От «Религиозности» к «Духовности»: Европейский контекст. Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Социология, 2014. №1. С. 5-25.
3. Heelas P. The Spiritual Revolution: From “religion” to “spirituality” // Religion in ModernWorld / Ed. by L. Woodhead, P. Fletcher, H. Kawanami, D. Smith. Routledge, 2002.
4. Heelas P., Houtman D. Research Note: RAMP Findings and Making Sense of the “God Within Each Person, Rather than Out There” // Journal of Contemporary Religion. 2009. Vol. 24. No. 1.
5. Heelas P., Woodhead L., Seel B. et al. The Spiritual Revolution. Why Religion is giving Way to Spirituality. Blackwell Publishing, 2005.
6. Houtman D., Aupers S., Heelas P. Christian Religiosity and new age spirituality: A cross-cultural comparison // Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 2009. No. 48 (1).
7. Huber S. Religion Monitor 2008: Structuring Principles, Operational
8. Huber S., Ackert M., Scheiblich H. Religiosität in unterschiedlichen Religionskulturen – Vergleiche auf der Basis der Centrality of Religiosity Scale. cultura & psyché. 2020. No. 1(1-2), P. 171-185.
9. Voas D. The Rise and Fall of Fuzzy Fidelity in Europe // European Sociological Review. 2009. Vol. 25, №2. P. 156.
10. Voas D., Day A. Recognizing Secular Christians: Toward an Unexcluded Middle in the Study of Religion // ARDA Guiding Paper Series. URL: http://www.thearda.com/rrh/papers/guidingpapers/voas_es say.doc. (дата обращения: 07.02.2023).
11. Voas D., Doebler S. Secularization in Europe: Religious Change between and within Birth Cohorts // Religion and Society in Central and Eastern Europe. 2011. No. 4(1).
2. Руткевич Е.Д. От «Религиозности» к «Духовности»: Европейский контекст. Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Социология, 2014. №1. С. 5-25.
3. Heelas P. The Spiritual Revolution: From “religion” to “spirituality” // Religion in ModernWorld / Ed. by L. Woodhead, P. Fletcher, H. Kawanami, D. Smith. Routledge, 2002.
4. Heelas P., Houtman D. Research Note: RAMP Findings and Making Sense of the “God Within Each Person, Rather than Out There” // Journal of Contemporary Religion. 2009. Vol. 24. No. 1.
5. Heelas P., Woodhead L., Seel B. et al. The Spiritual Revolution. Why Religion is giving Way to Spirituality. Blackwell Publishing, 2005.
6. Houtman D., Aupers S., Heelas P. Christian Religiosity and new age spirituality: A cross-cultural comparison // Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 2009. No. 48 (1).
7. Huber S. Religion Monitor 2008: Structuring Principles, Operational
8. Huber S., Ackert M., Scheiblich H. Religiosität in unterschiedlichen Religionskulturen – Vergleiche auf der Basis der Centrality of Religiosity Scale. cultura & psyché. 2020. No. 1(1-2), P. 171-185.
9. Voas D. The Rise and Fall of Fuzzy Fidelity in Europe // European Sociological Review. 2009. Vol. 25, №2. P. 156.
10. Voas D., Day A. Recognizing Secular Christians: Toward an Unexcluded Middle in the Study of Religion // ARDA Guiding Paper Series. URL: http://www.thearda.com/rrh/papers/guidingpapers/voas_es say.doc. (дата обращения: 07.02.2023).
11. Voas D., Doebler S. Secularization in Europe: Religious Change between and within Birth Cohorts // Religion and Society in Central and Eastern Europe. 2011. No. 4(1).