A karyosystematic study of the tribe Cimicifugeae Torr. et A. Gray (Ranunculaceae Juss.)

UDC 582.675.1:576.316.353.7

  • Mitrenina E. Yu. National Research Tomsk State University Email: emitrenina@gmail.com
  • Erst A. S. Central Siberian Botanical Garden SB RAS Email: erst_andrew@yahoo.com
Keywords: Actaea, Beesia, chromosomes, Cimicifugeae, Eranthis, karyotype evolution

Abstract

In the study, analysis of scientific sources and own data on the karyotype structures of Actaea L., Anemonopsis Siebold Zucc., Beesia Balf.f. et W. W. Sm. and Eranthis Salisb. (tribe Cimicifugeae Torr. et A. Gray) was carried out. The common karyotype parameters for Actaea, Anemonopsis, and Beesia are the basic chromosome number of х = 8 and the somatic chromosome number of 2n = 16. The chromosome sets of these species usually include five pairs of large metacentric chromosomes and three pairs of shorter non-metacentric chromosomes of 2–3 morphological types (general karyotype formula is 2n = 16 = 10m + 6sm/st/t/T). The genus Eranthis exhibits a more pronounced polymorphism both in terms of chromosome number and karyotype structure. Two basic chromosome numbers has been revealed in Eranthis such as х = 8 и х = 7, while somatic chromosome numbers are 2n = 14; 16; 24; 28; 42. Moreover, most species of Eranthis are characterized by a typical karyotype structure for the tribe, including 5 metacentric and 2–3 non-metacentric chromosomes per monoploid set, however, there are a number of exceptions. The tribe Cimicifugeae is well differentiated at the chromosomal level from the phylogenetically related tribe Helleboreae DC.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Малахова Л. А., Козлова А. А., Дуброва Н. А., Карташова Н. Н. Изучение хромосом дикорастущих растений Приобья. IV. Кариотипы Cimicifuga foetida, Actaea erythrocarpa, A. spicata (Ranunculaceae) // Цитология, 1976. – Т. 18. – № 7. – С. 906–909.
Baltisberger M., Hörandl E. Karyotype evolution supports the molecular phylogeny in the genus Ranunculus (Ranunculaceae) // Perspectives in Plant Ecology Evolution and Systematics, 2016. – Vol. 18. – P. 1–14.
Blair A. Karyotypes of five plant species with disjunct distributions in Virginia and the Carolinas // American Journal of Botany, 1975. – Vol. 62, № 8. – P. 833–837.
Colasante M., Ricci S. Forme diploidi e triploidi di Eranthis hyemalis Salisb.: Omologie e differenze nel corredo cromosomico // Annals of Botany, 1974. – Vol. 33. – P. 139–150.
Compton J., Culham A., Gibbings J., Jury S. Phylogeny of Actaea including Cimicifuga (Ranunculaceae) inferred from nrDNA ITS sequence variation // Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, 1998a. – Vol. 26, № 2. – P. 185–197.
Compton J. A., Culham A., Jury S. L. Reclassification of Actaea to include Cimicifuga and Souliea (Ranunculaceae): Phylogeny inferred from morphology, nrDNA ITS, and cpDNA trnL–F sequence variation // Taxon, 1998b. – Vol. 47, № 3. – P. 593–634.
D'amato G., Bianchi G. Heterochromatin and Ag-NOR staining in some species of Helleborus (Ranunculaceae) // Caryologia, 1989. – Vol. 42, № 1. – P. 19–26.
Erst A. S., Sukhorukov A. P., Mitrenina E. Y., Skaptsov M. V., Kostikova V. A., Chernisheva O. A., Troshkina V. I., Kushunina M. A., Krivenko D. A., Ikeda H., Xiang K., Wang W. An integrative taxonomic approach reveals a new species of Eranthis (Ranunculaceae) in North Asia // PhytoKeys, 2020. – Vol. 140. – P. 75–100. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.140.49048
Haider N. A brief review on plant taxonomy and its components // Journal of Plant Science and Research, 2018. – Vol. 34, № 2. – P. 277–292.
Kawano S., Kane J. M., Iltis H. H. Chromosome morphology of the North American species of Actaea (Ranunculaceae) // Canadian Journal of Botany, 1966. – Vol. 44, № 10. – P. 1231–1234.
Kurita M. Cytological studies in Actaea and some other genera. Ranunculaceae IV. The karyotype analysis in Actaea and some other genera // The Japanese Journal of Genetics, 1955. – Vol. 30, № 3. – P. 124–127.
Kurita M. Cytological studies in Ranunculaceae X. Further notes on the karyotype of Anemone, Cimicifuga and Clematis // Shokubutsugaku Zasshi, 1956. – Vol. 69, № 815. – P. 239–242.
Lee H.-W., Park Ch.-W. A karyotypic study on Korean taxa of Cimicifuga (Ranunculaceae) // Korean Journal of Plant Taxonomy, 1998. – Vol. 28, № 4. – P. 385–398.
Levan A., Fredga K., Sandberg A. Nomenclature for centrometric position of chromosomes // Hereditas, 1964. –Vol. 52, № 2. – P. 201–220.
Ling Y. Y., Xiang K. L., Peng H. W., Erst A. S., Lian L., Zhao L., Jabbour F., Wang W. Biogeographic diversification of Actaea (Ranunculaceae): Insights into the historical assembly of deciduous broad-leaved forests in the Northern Hemisphere // Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 2023. – Vol. 186. – P. 107870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2023.107870
Luo J. P., Wang L., Ren C., Yang Q. E., Yuan Q. Taxonomic notes on Cimicifuga nanchuanensis (Ranunculaceae), a hitherto imperfectly known species from China // Nordic Journal of Botany, 2016. – Vol. 34, № 1. – P. 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/njb.00937
Meiners, J., Debener, T., Schweizer, G., Winkelmann, T. Analysis of the taxonomic subdivision within the genus Helleborus by nuclear DNA content and genome-wide DNA markers // Scientia horticulturae, 2011. – Vol. 128, № 1. – P. 38–47.
Mitrenina E. Yu., Erst A. S., Krivenko D. A., Veklich T. N., Leonova T. V., Chernyagina O. A., Yakubov V. V., Xiang K., Ling Yu-Yu, Wang W. A karyomorphological study on Actaea acuminata, A. asiatica, and A. erythrocarpa (Ranunculaceae) // Acta Biologica Sibirica, 2024. – Vol. 10. – P. 1445–1460. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14280678
Mitrenina E. Y., Alekseeva S. S., Badaeva E. D., Peruzzi L., Artemov G. N., Krivenko D. A., Pinzani L., Aytaç Z., Çeçen Ö., Baasanmunkh S., Choi H. J., Mesterházy A., Tashev A. N., Bancheva S., Lian L., Xiang K., Wang W., Erst A. S. Karyotypes and physical mapping of ribosomal DNA with oligo-probes in Eranthis sect. Eranthis (Ranunculaceae) // Plants, 2023. – Vol. 13, № 1. – P. 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13010047
Mitrenina E. Y., Erst A. S., Peruzzi L., Skaptsov M. V., Ikeda H., Nikulin V. Y., Wang W. Karyotype and genome size variation in white-flowered Eranthis sect. Shibateranthis (Ranunculaceae) // PhytoKeys, 2021. – Vol. 187. – P. 207–227. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.187.75715
Mlinarec J., Šatović Z., Mihelj D., Malenica N., Besendorfer V. Cytogenetic and phylogenetic studies of diploid and polyploid members of tribe Anemoninae (Ranunculaceae) // Plant Biology, 2012. – Vol. 14. – P. 525–536.
Park S. Y., Jeon M. J., Ma S. H., Wahlsteen E., Amundsen K., Kim J. H., Suh J. K., Chang J. S., Joung Y. H. Phylogeny and genetic variation in the genus Eranthis using nrITS and cpIS single nucleotide polymorphisms // Horticulture, Environment & Biotechnology, 2019. – Vol. 60. – P. 239–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13580-018-0113-0
Rashid S., Rashid K., Ganie A. H., Nawchoo I. A., Khuroo A. A. Meiotic studies, pollen fertility and seed set of Actaea kashmiriana, an endemic medicinal plant species of Kashmir Himalaya // Cytologia, 2022. – Vol. 87, № 3. – P. 239–244. https://doi.org/10.1508/cytologia.87.239
Rukšāns J. Eranthis kurdica (Ranunculaceae) Rukšāns – A new species of winter aconite (Eranthis, Ranunculaceae) from Iran // International Rock Gardener, 2022. – Vol. 151. – P. 2–18.
Shang X. M. Chromosome studies of subgenus Gymnaconitum endemic to China and Beesia (Ranunculaceae) // Journal of Systematics and Evolution, 1985. – Vol. 23, № 4. – P. 270–274.
Singh G. Plant systematics: an integrated approach. – CRC Press, 2019. – 568 p.
Wang W., Lu A. M., Ren Y., Endress M. E., Chen Z. D. Phylogeny and classification of Ranunculales: Evidence from four molecular loci and morphological data // Perspectives in Plant Ecology Evolution and Systematics, 2009. – Vol. 11. – P. 81–110.
Xiang K. L., Erst A. S., Yang J., Peng H. W., Ortiz R. C., Jabbour F., Erst T. V., Wang W. Biogeographic diversification of Eranthis (Ranunculaceae) reflects the geological history of the three great Asian plateaus // Proc R Soc., 2021. –Vol. 288. – P. 20210281.
Yang Q. E. Does Actaea asiatica have the most symmetric and primitive karyotype in the Ranunculaceae? // Journal of Systematics and Evolution, 1998. – Vol. 36, № 6. – P. 490–495.
Yang Q. E. Karyomorphology of four species in Cimicifuga (Ranunculaceae) from China, with some cytogeographical notes on C. foetida // Journal of Systematics and Evolution, 1999. – Vol. 37, №. 5. – С. 433–444.
Yang Q. E. Cytology of the tribe Trollieae and of the tribe Cimicifugeae in the Ranunculaceae: a comparative study // Journal of Systematics and Evolution, 2002. – Vol. 40, № 1. – P. 52–65.
Yang Q. E., Gu Z. J., Sun H. The karyotype of Beesia deltophylla and its systematic significance // Journal of Systematics and Evolution, 1995. – Vol. 33, № 3. – P. 225–229.
Yuan Q., Yang Q. E. Tribal relationships of Beesia, Eranthis and seven other genera of Ranunculaceae: evidence from cytological characters // Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2006. – Vol. 150, № 3. – P. 267–289. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2006.00477.x
Published
2025-12-30
How to Cite
Mitrenina E. Yu., Erst A. S. A karyosystematic study of the tribe Cimicifugeae Torr. et A. Gray (Ranunculaceae Juss.) // Проблемы ботаники Южной Сибири и Монголии, 2025. Vol. 24, № 2. P. 119-124 DOI: 10.14258/pbssm.2025066. URL: https://journal.asu.ru/bpssm/article/view/pbssm.2025066.