DISTRICTS, AREAS, MACROREGIONS

  • V. I. Tatarenko Siberian State University of Geosystems and Technologies Email: v.i.tatarenko@ssga.ru
  • B. V. Robinson Siberian State University of Geosystems and Technologies Email: kaf.bgd@ssga.ru
  • O. V. Usikova Siberian State University of Geosystems and Technologies Email: o.v.usikova@yandex.ru
DOI_disc_logo https://doi.org/10.14258/epb201950
Keywords: territorial organization, federal district, macroregion, strategic planning, economic development, interregional relations, economic region

Abstract

The proposed article considers three variants of divisions of territories by their spatial location and administrative affiliation in Russia. It now exists 11 economic regions, 8 federal districts, and according to the Strategy for the Spatial Development of Russia up to 2025, planned to form new 12 macro-regions. Analyzed the similarities and differences, advantages and disadvantages of these options. Newly forming macro-regions are considered from the standpoint of the ranking of the subjects of the Federation of the Siberian and Far Eastern districts by investment attractiveness and risk factor of economic activity. Based on the analysis, it was concluded that the various options for spatial division of the country have little effect on the state of the economy as a whole. In relation to Siberia, proposals are presented for the approach to the formation of such an administrative association of territories in order to optimize their economic development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Стратегия пространственного развития Российской Федерации на период до 2025 года [Электрон­ный ресурс]. URL: http://static.government.ru/media/files/UVAlqUtT08o60RktoOXl22JjAe7irNxc.pdf

Ивантер А., Кудияров С. Точки и кочки роста // Эксперт. 2019. № 11.

МЭР предложило поделить Сибирь на три макрорегиона, Меняйло против [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://ndn.info/novosti/21672-mer-predlozhilo-podelit-sibir-na-tri-makroregiona-menyajlo-protiv.

Астахова А. и др. Полюсы риска // Коммерсантъ. 2018. № 231 (тематическое приложение).

Россию предлагают поделить на макрорегионы // Комсомольская правда (в Новосибирске). — 29.08.2018.

Ивантер А., Кудияров С. Страну разверстают по-новому // Эксперт. 2019. № 11.

Макаркин А. Зачем два региона «сослали» на Дальний Восток // Аргументы и факты. 2018. № 47.

Скоробогатый П. Пять шагов, восемь прыжков, двенадцать кувырков // Эксперт. 2019. № 10.

Сибирь Енисейская. Три субъекта Сибирского федерального округа могут объединиться в эконо­мическую зону // Эксперт. 2018. № 14.

Татаренко В. И., Камалов Р. Д. Ресурсный потенциал как фактор экономического роста сибирских регионов // Экономика Профессия Бизнес. 2019. № 1. С. 61-64.

Татаренко В. И., Сидорова Л. А. Актуальные вопросы эффективного использования минерально-сырьевого потенциала в целях повышения уровня социально-экономического развития региона // Гума­нитарные науки и образование в Сибири. 2016. № 4 (22). С. 57-60.

Николаева О. Н. Геоинформационное обеспечение рационального природопользования региона // Теоретические и прикладные вопросы комплексной безопасности: материалы I Междунар. науч.-практ. конф. Петровская академия наук и искусств. 2018. С. 112-114.

Нитяго И. В., Осока Я. С. Оценка факторов конкурентоспособности Новосибирской области // Ком­плексное развитие сельских территорий и инновационные технологии в агропромышленном комплексе: сборник III Междунар. науч.-метод. и практ. конф. 2018. С. 124-127.

Нитяго И. В., Тесля Н. Б. Инновации в стратегическом управлении регионами // Теория и практи­ка современной аграрной науки: сборник национальной (Всероссийской) научной конференции. Ново­сибирск: Новосибирский государственный аграрный университет, 2018. С. 716-720.

Территориальные основы управления. Ч. 1. Территориальная (региональная) экономика и управ­ление: учебное пособие / Г. Г. Шалмина, Е. В. Катункина, В. И. Татаренко и др.; под ред. Г. Г. Шалминой; СГГА. Новосибирск, 2003. 350 с.

REFERENCES

Spatial Development Strategy of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2025. URL: Mode of access: http://static.government.ru/media/files/UVAlqUtT08o60RktoOXl22JjAe7irNxc.pdf.

Ivanter A., Kudiyarov S. Points and bumps growth // Expert. 2019. № 11.

The Ministry of Economic Development proposed to divide Siberia into three macro-regions, Menyaylo versus. URL: https://ndn.info/novosti/21672-mer-predlozhilo-podelit-sibir-na-tri-makroregiona-menyajlo-protiv.

Astakhov A. and others. Risk poles // Kommersant. 2018. № 231 (thematic application).

Russia is offered to be divided into macro regions // TVNZ (in Novosibirsk). 29.08.2018.

Ivanter A., Kudiyarov S. The country is expanded in a new way // Expert. 2019. № 11.

Makarkin A. Why two regions were "banished" to the Far East // AiF. 2018. № 47.

Skorobogaty P. Five steps, eight jumps, twelve rolls // Expert. 2019. № 10.

Siberia Yenisei. Three subjects of the Siberian Federal District can unite in the economic zone // Expert. 2018. № 4.

Tatarenko V. I., Kamalov R. D. Resource potential as a factor of economic growth in Siberian regions // Economy Profession Business. 2019. № 1. Pp. 61-64.

Tatarenko V. I., Sidorova L. A. Topical issues of effective use of mineral potential in order to improve the level of socio-economic development of the region // Humanities and education in Siberia. 2016. № 4 (22). Pp. 57-60.

Nikolaev O. N. Geoinformational support for environmental management in the region // In the collection: theoretical and applied issues of integrated security, materials of the I International Scientific Practical Conference. Peter Academy of Sciences and Arts. 2018. Pp. 112-114.

Nityago I. V., Osok Ya. S. Assessment of competitiveness factors of the Novosibirsk region // In the collection: Integrated development of rural areas and innovative technologies in the agro-industrial complex Collection III of the international scientific-methodical and practical conference. 2018. Pp. 124-127.

Nityago I. V., Teslya N. B. Innovations in the strategic management of the regions // In the collection: The Theory and Practice of Modern Agrarian Science, a collection of the national (All-Russian) scientific conference. Novosibirsk State Agrarian University. 2018. Pp. 716-720.

Shalmina G. G., Katunkina E. V., Tatarenko V. I. and others. Territorial bases of management. Part 1 Territorial (regional) economics and management: A manual/SSGA. Novosibirsk, 2003. 350 p.
Published
2019-12-10
How to Cite
1. Tatarenko V. I., Robinson B. V., Usikova O. V. DISTRICTS, AREAS, MACROREGIONS // Economics Profession Business, 2019. № 4. P. 72-76. URL: http://journal.asu.ru/ec/article/view/epb201950.
Issue
No 4 (2019): Экономика Профессия Бизнес
Section
ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКИЕ НАУКИ

Economics Profession Business is a golden publisher, as we allow self-archiving, but most importantly we are fully transparent about your rights.

Authors may present and discuss their findings ahead of publication: at biological or scientific conferences, on preprint servers, in public databases, and in blogs, wikis, tweets, and other informal communication channels.

Economics Profession Business (EPB) allows authors to deposit manuscripts (currently under review or those for intended submission to EPB) in non-commercial, pre-print servers such as ArXiv.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

 

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).