PROSPECTS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF CONSUMER COOPERATION IN AGRICULTURE IN THE REGION
УДК 631.115.8
Abstract
The article aims to identify the problems of development of agricultural consumer cooperatives in the Altai territory in the food supply system. The stages of changes in the number of consumer cooperatives in Russia are revealed: from 2006 to 2010 — an increase in the number, from 2011 to the present-a decrease in the number with an increase in revenue per organization, a high concentration of income in a large group of cooperatives is shown — 10.0% of cooperatives received 72.11% of the total revenue of all organizations. The paper assesses the current trends of small-scale farming in Russia. On the example of the Altai territory, the main trend of the development of households: in this category, producers reduced the number of livestock, poultry, increasing the number of bee-families; households remain the main producers of potatoes, vegetables, wool, honey commodity, milk and meat cattle, poultry; the marketability of production tends to increase, but remains low. There is practically no reserve for growth in sales volumes due to the development of production and sales cooperation, since no more than five cooperatives actually operate.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Гусаков Е. В. Научные основы и организационно-экономический механизм эффективного функционирования кооперативно-интеграционных объединений в АПК: монография. Минск, 2015. 207 с.
Липски С. А. Малые формы хозяйствования на селе: земельный вопрос и некоторые другие проблемы // Никоновские чтения. 2013. № 18. С. 169-172.
Лысенко Е. Г. Личные подсобные хозяйства населения в структуре сельскохозяйственного производства // Вестник Российской академии сельскохозяйственных наук. 2007. № 1. С. 13-15.
Янбых Р. Г., Сарайкин В. А. Классификация кооперативов и развитие сельскохозяйственной кооперации // АПК: Экономика, управление. 2018. № 7. С. 13-22.
Анциферова О. Ю., Шаляпина И. П. Личные подсобные хозяйства населения в системе кооперации и интеграции производства // Никоновские чтения. 2009. № 14. С. 181-183.
Сычева Ф. А., Чупина И. П. Концепция развития хозяйств населения с учетом периодов и моделей рынка // Аграрный вестник Урала. 2009. № 2. С. 36-39.
Сиптиц С. О., Гатаулина Е. А Влияние факторов на формирование аграрной структуры // Экономика сельского хозяйства России. 2014. № 1. С. 44-49.
Гатаулина Е. А. Аграрная структура крупнокапиталистического типа: состояние, проблемы, возможности // Никоновские чтения. 2016. № 21. С. 156-164.
Хомыков Д. Дружба вместо кооперации. Российские крестьяне предпочитают обращаться за помощью к соседям, а не в кооперативы // Агротехника и технологии. 2019. № 3. URL: https://www.agroinvestor.ru/opinion/article/31728-druzhba-vmesto-kooperatsii/ (дата обращения: 10.07.2020)
Гриценко Г. М. Предпосылки развития сельскохозяйственной потребительской кооперации в Алтайском крае // Вестник Алтайского государственного аграрного университета. 2013. № 8. С. 153-157.
REFERENCES
Gusakov E. V. Scientific bases and organizational and economic mechanism of effective functioning of cooperative and integration associations in the agro-industrial complex: monograph. Minsk, 2015. 207 p.
Lipsky S. A. Small forms of farming in rural areas: the land issue and some other problems // Nikonovskiye chteniya, 2013. № 18. Pp. 169-172.
Lysenko Ye. G. Personal subsidiaries of the population within the structure of agricultural production // Vestnik of the Russian agricultural sciences, 2007. № 1. Pp. 13-15.
Yanbykh R. G. & Saraykin V. A. Classification of cooperatives and development of agricultural cooperation // AIC: economy, management, 2007. № 7. Pp. 13-22.
Antsiferova O. Yu., Shalyapina I. P. Personal subsidiary farms of the population in the system of cooperation and integration of production // Nikonovskiye chteniya. 2009. № 14. Pp. 181-183.
Sycheva F. A. & Chupina I. P. The concept of development of economy of the population taking into account the periods and market models // Agrarian bulletin of the Urals. 2009. № 2. Pp. 36-39.
Siptits S. О., Gataulina E. А. Influence of factors on formation of agrarian structure // Rural economics of Russia. 2014. № 1. Pp. 44-49.
Gataulina E. А. Agricultural structure of a large-capitalist type: state, problems, opportunities // Nikonovskiye chteniya. 2016. № 21. Pp. 156-164.
Homykov D. Friendship instead of cooperation. Russian farmers prefer to seek the assistance of the neighbors, but not in co-operatives // Agricultural machinery and technology. 2019. № 3. URL: https://www.agroinvestor.ru/opinion/article/31728-druzhba-vmesto-kooperatsii/ (date of access: 10.07.2020)
Gritsenko G. M. Prerequisites for agricultural consumer cooperation development in the Altai region // Bulletin of Altai State Agricultural University. 2013. № 8. Pp. 153-157.
Economics Profession Business is a golden publisher, as we allow self-archiving, but most importantly we are fully transparent about your rights.
Authors may present and discuss their findings ahead of publication: at biological or scientific conferences, on preprint servers, in public databases, and in blogs, wikis, tweets, and other informal communication channels.
Economics Profession Business (EPB) allows authors to deposit manuscripts (currently under review or those for intended submission to EPB) in non-commercial, pre-print servers such as ArXiv.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
