THE STUDY OF THE TERRITORIAL AND SECTORAL STRUCTURE OF THE RUSSIAN ECONOMY IN THE CONTEXT OF INTERREGIONAL INTEGRATION: TO THE FORMULATION OF THE PROBLEM
УДК 339.924
Abstract
The authors, taking into account the existing developments, reveal the scientific relevance of the topic, which consists in verifying the existing concepts of regional growth driving forces in relation to regions with an industrial or industrial-agrarian economy.
The authors describe the practical relevance of the study, which, according to the authors, consists in identifying the reasons inherent in the agro-industrial regions as a whole for their lag in socio-economic development.
For the first time, the question of studying the territorial and industrial structure and, in particular, one of its key elements-agro — industrial regions in the context of the formation and development of integration and cooperation processes is raised.
The article considers the most important aspect of the problem — the impact of integration on the development of agro-industrial regions, the possibility of the latter to enter the integration union on an equal partnership basis. The authors explain their position on this issue in a reasoned manner.
The article proposes a classification of agro-industrial regions of Russia by the size of the integration potential. The classification is based on two criteria: the level of socio-economic development and the degree of the region periphery.
At the end of the article, the main priority directions and tasks of the long-term development of the topic under consideration are listed.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Троцковский А. Я., Перекаренкова Ю. А. Типологический анализ многомерных социально-экономических объектов: основные этапы и характеристика ключевых процедур // I Растовские чтения «Современные вызовы региональному социуму: конфликтность и потенциал стабильности»: сборник материалов Международной научно-практической конференции. г. Барнаул, 18-19 мая 2018 г. / под ред. В. В. Нагайцева. Барнаул, 2018. С. 25-29.
Троцковский А. Я., Родионова Л. В. Региональные типологии по специализации и структуре хозяйства: обзор подходов // Управление современной организацией: опыт, проблемы и перспективы. 2018. № 9. С. 25-31.
Kuhn M. Peripheralization: Theoretical Concepts Explaining Socio-Spatial Inequalities // European Planning Studies. 2015. Vol. 23, issue 2. Pp. 367-378. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2013.862518.
Crone M. Re-thinking «peripherality» in the context of a knowledge-intensive, service-dominated economy // Regional Development in Northern Europe: Peripherality, Marginality and Border Issues; edited by M. Danson & P. De Souza. London and New York, 2012. Pp. 49-64. DOI: 10.4324/9780203127247.
Copus A. K. From core-periphery to polycentric development: Concepts of spatial and aspatial peripherality // European Planning Studies. 2001. Vol. 9, issue 4. Pp. 539-552. DOI: 10.1080/09654310123647.
Herrschel T. Regionalisation and marginalisation. Briding old and new divisions in regional governance // Regional Development in Northern Europe: Peripherality, Marginality and Border Issues; edited by M. Danson & P. De Souza. London and New York, 2012. Pp. 30-48. DOI: 10.4324/9780203127247.
Троцковский А. Я. Периферийные регионы как элементы центропериферийной структуры экономики России: понятие, критерии выделения, классификация // Финансовая экономика. 2018. № 7. С. 2249-2251.
Leibert T. The Peripheralization of Rural Areas in Post-Socialist Central Europe: A Case of Fragmenting Development? Lessons from Rural Hungary // Peripeharalization. The Making of Spatial Dependences and Social Injustice; edited by A. Fischer-Tahir, M. Naumann. Wiesbaden, 2013. Pp. 101-120. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-53119018-1.
Smith A., Timar J. Uneven Transformations: Space, Economy and Society 20 Years After the Collapse of State Socialism // European Urban and Regional Studies. 2010. Vol. 17, issue 2. Pp. 115-125. DOI: 10.1177/0969776409358245.
Lang T. Shrinkage, metropolization and peripheralization in East Germany // European Planning Studies. 2012. Vol. 20, issue 10. Pp. 1747-1754. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2012.713336.
Krugman P. Geography and Trade. Cambridge, 1991.
Lasuen J. R. Urbanisation and development. The temporal interaction between geographical and sectoral clusters // Urban Studies. 1973. No. 10 (2). Pp. 163-188.
Сердобинцев Д. В., Лысова Т. А., Алешина Е. А. Формирование механизма кооперационных процессов в агропромышленном комплексе регионов // Фундаментальные исследования. 2016. № 10. С. 201-206.
Развитие интеграционных процессов в агропромышленном комплексе региона: монография. Саратов, 2017. 184 с.
Кочеткова С. А. Теоретические аспекты формирования интегрированных структур в агропромышленном комплексе // Фундаментальные исследования. 2018. № 2. С. 123-127.
Советов П. М. Агропромышленная интеграция: концепции, механизмы, эффективность. Апатиты, 2007. 117 с.
Воробьев С. П., Троцковский А. Я., Воробьева В. В. Интегрированные агропромышленные формирования как опора аграрной экономики Алтайского края: сформированы ли предпосылки? // Экономика Профессия Бизнес. 2019. № 2. С. 21-26. DOI: 10.14258/epb201915.
Бородин В., Гагарина Г. Экономическая интеграция регионов как механизм выравнивания и роста их потенциалов // Федерализм. 2020. № 2. С. 76-91. DOI: 10.21686/2073-1051-2020-2-76-91.
Санникова И. Н., Рудакова Т. А., Кожевина О. В., Бутакова М. М., Соколова О. Н., Юдинцев А. Ю., Трошкина Г. Н., Межов С. И., Дубина И. Н., Махотина А. Р. Условия расширения и оценка уровня региональной интеграции в целях обеспечения экономической безопасности (на материалах Сибирского федерального округа): монография / под ред. И. Н. Санниковой. Барнаул, 2020. 246 с.
Мищенко В. В., Ютяева О. Н. Экономическая безопасность агропромышленных регионов Сибири в условиях интеграции в мировое хозяйство (Алтайский край, Новосибирская, Омская области) // Вестник Алтайского государственного аграрного университета. 2008. № 5 (43). С. 63-68.
Сергиенко А. М. Агропромышленные регионы: динамика доходов населения, неравенства и бедности // Экономика Профессия Бизнес. 2020. № 4. С. 108-117. DOI: 10.14258/epb2019107.
Родионова Л. В. Демографические ограничения устойчивого развития агропромышленных регионов // Экономика Профессия Бизнес. 2020. № 1. С. 89-94. DOI: 10.14258/epb201964.
Бочаров С. Н. и др. Цепочки создания добавленной стоимости в экономике Алтайского края: теоретические и прикладные аспекты: препринт / под ред. С. Н. Бочарова, В. И. Беляева, Р. А. Самсонова и др. Барнаул, 2018. 136 с.
Крюков В. А. Дороги / пути реинтеграции // ЭКО. 2018. № 6. С. 4-6. DOI: 10.30680/ECO0131-7652-2018-6-4-6.
REFERENCES
Trotskovsky A. Ya., Perekarenkova Yu. A. Typological analysis of multidimensional socio-economic objects: the main stages and characteristics of key procedures // I Rastovsky readings «Modern challenges to regional society: conflict and the potential for stability»: collection of materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference. Barnaul, May 18-19, 2018 / ed. by V. V. Nagaytsev. Barnaul, 2018. Pp. 25-29.
Trotskovsky A. Ya., Rodionova L. V. Regional typologies on specialization and structure of the economy: a review of approaches // Management of a modern organization: experience, problems and prospects. 2018. № 9. Pp. 25-31.
Kuhn M. Peripheralization: Theoretical Concepts Explaining Socio-Spatial Inequalities // European Planning Studies. 2015. Vol. 23, issue 2. Pp. 367-378. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2013.862518.
Crone M. Re-thinking «peripherality» in the context of a knowledge-intensive, service-dominated economy // Regional Development in Northern Europe: Peripherality, Marginality and Border Issues; edited by M. Danson & P. De Souza. London and New York, 2012. Pp. 49-64. DOI: 10.4324/9780203127247.
Copus A. K. From core-periphery to polycentric development: Concepts of spatial and aspatial peripherality // European Planning Studies. 2001. Vol. 9, issue 4. Pp. 539-552. DOI: 10.1080/09654310123647.
Herrschel T. Regionalisation and marginalisation. Briding old and new divisions in regional governance // Regional Development in Northern Europe: Peripherality, Marginality and Border Issues; edited by M. Danson & P. De Souza. London and New York, 2012. Pp. 30-48. DOI: 10.4324/9780203127247.
Trotskovsky A. Ya. Peripheral regions as elements of the Central-peripheral structure of the Russian economy: concept, selection criteria, classification // Financial Economics. 2018. № 7. Pp. 2249-2251.
Leibert T. The Peripheralization of Rural Areas in Post-Socialist Central Europe: A Case of Fragmenting Development? Lessons from Rural Hungary // Peripeharalization. The Making of Spatial Dependences and Social Injustice; edited by A. Fischer-Tahir, M. Naumann. Wiesbaden, 2013. Pp. 101-120. DOI: 10.1007/978-3531-19018-1.
Smith A., Timar J. Uneven Transformations: Space, Economy and Society 20 Years After the Collapse of State Socialism // European Urban and Regional Studies. 2010. Vol. 17, issue 2. Pp. 115-125. DOI: 10.1177/0969776409358245.
Lang T. Shrinkage, metropolization and peripheralization in East Germany // European Planning Studies. 2012. Vol. 20, issue 10. Pp. 1747-1754. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2012.713336.
Krugman P. Geography and Trade. Cambridge, 1991.
Lasuen J. R. Urbanisation and development. The temporal interaction between geographical and sectoral clusters // Urban Studies. 1973. № 10 (2). Pp. 163-188.
Serdobintsev D. V., Lysova T. A., Aleshina E. A. Formation of the mechanism of cooperative processes in the agro-industrial complex of regions // Fundamental Research. 2016. № 10. Рp. 201-206.
Development of integration processes in the agro-industrial complex of the region: monograph. Saratov, 2017. 184 p.
Kochetkova S. A. Theoretical aspects of the formation of integrated structures in the agro-industrial complex // Fundamental Research. 2018. № 2. Pp. 123-127.
Sovetov P. M. Agroindustrial integration: concepts, mechanisms, efficiency. Apatity, 2007. 117 p.
Vorobyov S. P., Trotskovsky A. Ya., Vorobyova V. V. Integrated agro-industrial formations as a support of the agrarian economy of the Altai Territory: are the prerequisites formed? // Economics Profession Business. 2019. № 2. Pp. 21-26. DOI: 10.14258/epb201915.
Borodin V., Gagarina G. Economic integration of regions as a mechanism of equalization and growth of their potentials // Federalizm. 2020. № 2. Pp. 76-91. DOI: 10.21686/2073-1051-2020-2-76-91.
Sannikova I. N., Rudakova T. A., Kozhevina O. V., Butakova M. M., Sokolova O. N., Yudintsev A. Yu., Troshkina G. N., Mezhov S. I., Dubina I. N., Makhotina A. R. Conditions for expansion and assessment of the level of regional integration in order to ensure economic security (based on the materials of the Siberian Federal District): monograph / edited by I. N. Sannikova. Barnaul, 2020. 246 p.
Mishchenko V. V., Yutyaeva O. N. Economic security of agro-industrial regions of Siberia in the conditions of integration into the world economy (Altai Krai, Novosibirsk, Omsk regions) // Bulletin of the Altai State Agrarian University. 2008. № 5 (43). Pp. 63-68.
Sergienko A. M. Agroindustrial regions: dynamics of population income, inequality and poverty // Economics Profession Business. 2020. № 4. Pp. 108-117. DOI: 10.14258/epb2019107.
Rodionova L. V. Demographic constraints of sustainable development of agro-industrial regions // Economics Profession Business. 2020. № 1. Pp. 89-94. DOI: 10.14258/epb201964.
Bocharov S. N. et al. Value-added chains in the economy of the Altai Territory: theoretical and applied aspects: preprint / edited by S. N. Bocharov, V. I. Belyaev, R. A. Samsonov et al. Barnaul, 2018. 136 p.
Kryukov V. A. The ways of reintegration // ECO. 2018. № 6. Pp. 4-6. DOI: 10.30680/ECO0131-7652-2018-6-4-6.
Copyright (c) 2021 Александр Яковлевич Троцковский, Алие Мустафаевна Сергиенко, Людмила Васильевна Родионова, Юлия Александровна Перекаренкова, Марина Александровна Сундеева
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Economics Profession Business is a golden publisher, as we allow self-archiving, but most importantly we are fully transparent about your rights.
Authors may present and discuss their findings ahead of publication: at biological or scientific conferences, on preprint servers, in public databases, and in blogs, wikis, tweets, and other informal communication channels.
Economics Profession Business (EPB) allows authors to deposit manuscripts (currently under review or those for intended submission to EPB) in non-commercial, pre-print servers such as ArXiv.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
