THE POTENTIAL FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF CONSUMER COOPERATION IN DAIRY CATTLE BREEDING IN THE REGION
УДК 332:631.115.8
Abstract
The article provides a literary review of the development of consumer cooperation in milk production, identifies municipalities of the Altai Territory with different potential for the development of cooperation of small forms of management in dairy cattle breeding. It is shown that in conditions of a decrease in the number of cows in all categories of management, the proportion of municipalities in the region with the highest and highest potential for the development of consumer cooperation increases. The activity of six agricultural consumer cooperatives in certain rural areas of the region does not allow for the coverage of consumer cooperation in most of the municipal districts with a high potential for the development of joint activities of small business entities in the field of milk production. It is noted that consumer cooperation in agriculture develops only with state support and the presence of initiative entrepreneurs, and in areas with a suitable agrarian structure for the formation of non-profit associations of milk producers, it is still necessary to develop the necessary infrastructure, conduct organizational and educational work.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Лысенко Е. Г. Личные подсобные хозяйства населения в структуре сельскохозяйственного производства // Вестник Российской академии сельскохозяйственных наук. 2007. № 1. С. 13-15.
Гриценко Г. М. Предпосылки развития сельскохозяйственной потребительской кооперации в Алтайском крае // Вестник Алтайского государственного аграрного университета. 2013. № 8. С. 153-157.
Улезько А. В., Нечаев Н. Г., Соковых И. С., Климов А. В. Хозяйствующие субъекты аграрной сферы: ресурсное обеспечение и инновационное развитие: монография. Воронеж, 2013. 277 с.
Altman M. Cooperative Organizations as an Engine of Equitable Rural Economic Development // Journal of Co-operative Organization and Management. 2015. No. 3. Рр. 14-23.
Micu M. M., Stoian E., Alecu E. General Consideration of the Agricultural Holding in Arges County // Procedia Economics and Finance. 2013. No. 6. Рр. 313-318.
Fonte M., Cucco I. Cooperatives and alternative food networks in Italy. The long road towards a social economy in agriculture // Journal of Rural Studies. 2017. No. 53. Рр. 291-302.
Сиптиц С. О., Гатаулина Е. А. Влияние факторов на формирование аграрной структуры // Экономика сельского хозяйства России. 2014. № 1. С. 44-49.
Гатаулина Е. А. Аграрная структура крупнокапиталистического типа: состояние, проблемы, возможности // Никоновские чтения. 2016. № 21. С. 156-164.
Котомина М. А. Расчет потенциала для развития молочной кооперации на основе сложившейся аграрной структуры // Экономика сельского хозяйства России. 2018. № 4. С. 86-90. DOI: 10.32651/20700288-2018-4-86-90.
REFERENCES
Kalugina Z. I. The results of market transformation of the agrarian sector in Russia // ECO. 2013. No. 3. Pp. 31-47.
Lysenko Ye. G. Personal subsidiaries of the population within the structure of agricultural production // Vestnik of the russian agricultural sciences. 2007. No. 1. Pp. 13-15.
Gritsenko G. M. Prerequisites for agricultural consumer cooperation development in the Altai region // Bulletin of Altai state agricultural university. 2013. No. 8. Pp. 153-157.
Ulez’ko A. V., Nechaev N. G., Sokovyh I. S., Klimov A. V. Economic entities of the agrarian sphere: resource provision and innovative development: monograph. Voronezh, 2013. 277 р.
Altman M. Cooperative Organizations as an Engine of Equitable Rural Economic Development // Journal of Co-operative Organization and Management. 2015. No. 3. Pp. 14-23.
Micu M. M., Stoian E., Alecu E. General Consideration of the Agricultural Holding in Arges County // Procedia Economics and Finance. 2013. No. 6. Pp. 313-318.
Fonte M., Cucco I. Cooperatives and alternative food networks in Italy. The long road towards a social economy in agriculture // Journal of Rural Studies. 2017. No. 53. Pp. 291-302.
Siptits S. О., Gataulina E. А. Influence of factors on formation of agrarian structure // Rural economics of Russia. 2014. No. 1. Pp. 44-49.
Gataulina E. А. Agricultural structure of a large-capitalist type: state, problems, opportunities // Nikon’s Readings. 2016. No. 21. Pp. 156-164.
Kotomina M. A. Calculation of potential for development of dairy cooperation on the basis of the developed agrarian structure // Rural economics of Russia. 2018. No. 4. Pp. 86-90. DOI: 10.32651/2070-02882018-4-86-90.
Economics Profession Business is a golden publisher, as we allow self-archiving, but most importantly we are fully transparent about your rights.
Authors may present and discuss their findings ahead of publication: at biological or scientific conferences, on preprint servers, in public databases, and in blogs, wikis, tweets, and other informal communication channels.
Economics Profession Business (EPB) allows authors to deposit manuscripts (currently under review or those for intended submission to EPB) in non-commercial, pre-print servers such as ArXiv.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
