PAYMENT FACTOR FOR POWER IN THE POWER INDUSTRY: PLUSES AND MINUSES FOR THE ECONOMY
УДК 33 (470): 621.31
Abstract
The article deals with the problem of reproduction of generating capacities in the aspect of building a rational investment mechanism. Since it is now working, it cannot satisfy consumers of electricity. Almost all experts say that there is only one alternative — reducing the cost of energy consumption in order to increase the competitiveness of the economy. The pricing mechanism does not allow generating companies to generate capital for their own development. A method was devised to withdraw funds from consumers to support and commission generating capacities through the so-called capacity sale mechanism. However, no matter how this non-economic method of withdrawing funds from consumers is argued, in the end, these amounts place an additional burden on the economy. Obviously, there cannot be an efficiently functioning electric power industry without the «consumption» sector, without developing and growing industry and, as a result, growing productive power consumption. One of the conditions for economic growth is the condition of economically justified production costs. Due to geographic and country conditions, the cost of electrical energy for industrial consumers in the Russian Federation is higher than abroad, and consumption due to climatic conditions is higher. In terms of electricity costs, our industry is losing the competition.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Воропай Н. И., Паламарчук С. И., Стенников В. А. Рынки электрической и тепловой энергии: проблемы, вызовы, тенденции // Международная энергетическая конференция всероссийского открытого постоянно действующего научного семинара «Экономические проблемы энергетического комплекса (семинар А. С. Некрасова) — 2017»: материалы конференции. М., 2017. С. 182-203.
Кутовой Г. П. Нужна новая парадигма (или архитектоника) экономических отношений в электроэнергетике // Энергетик. 2016. № 2. С. 8-13.
Кутовой Г. П. О выборе варианта дальнейших реформ в электроэнергетике: от чего ушли, к чему пришли и как выстраивать отношения в электроэнергетике, обеспечивая ее развитие // Международная энергетическая конференция всероссийского открытого постоянно действующего научного семинара «Экономические проблемы энергетического комплекса (семинар А. С. Некрасова) — 2017»: материалы конференции. М., 2017. С. 209-235.
Межов И. С. Методы и инструменты анализа вертикальных взаимодействий предприятий — участников интеграции // Экономическая наука современной России. 2008. № 4 (43). С. 114-125.
Плещинский А. С., Титов В. В., Межов И. С. Механизмы вертикальных взаимодействий предприятий (вопросы методологии и моделирования). Новосибирск, 2005. 336 с.
Ященко А. В. Влияние структурных и трансакционных издержек на механизм ценообразования при взаимодействии экономики и электроэнергетики // Экономика и предпринимательство. 2021. № 11. С.1314-1318.
Колпаков А. Ю. Возможность сдерживания тарифов на газ и электроэнергию в условиях низкой экономической динамики в России // Международная энергетическая конференция всероссийского открытого постоянно действующего научного семинара «Экономические проблемы энергетического комплекса (семинар А. С. Некрасова) — 2017»: материалы конференции. М., 2017. С. 255-272.
Белобородов С. С. Снижение эмиссии СО2: развитие когенерации или строительство ВИЭ? // Энергосовет. 2018. № 1 (51). С. 16-25. URL: http://www.energosovet.ru/bul_stat.php?idd=687 (дата обращения: 20.01.2022).
Беляев Л. С. Рынки электроэнергии: экономический анализ, практический опыт и особенности их организации на востоке России и в Северо-Восточной Азии. URL: https://isem.irk.ru/symp2010/papers/RUS/S1-03r.pdf (дата обращения: 20.01. 2022).
Кудрявый В. В. Разговор об энергетике // Энергосовет. 2018. № 1 (51). С. 5-8. URL: http://www.energosovet.ru/bul_stat.php?idd=683 (дата обращения: 20.01.2022).
Кутовой Г. П. Электроэнергетика вновь перед выбором варианта дальнейших реформ // Энергосовет. 2018. № 1 (51). С. 26-30. URL: http://www.energosovet.ru/bul_stat.php?idd=688 (дата обращения 20.01.2022).
REFERENCES
Voropay N. I., Palamarchuk S. I., Stennikov V. A. Electricity and thermal energy markets: problems, challenges, trends // International Energy Conference of the All-Russian Open Permanent Scientific Seminar «Economic Problems of the Energy Complex (A. S. Nekrasov’s seminar) — 2017»: materials of the conference. M., 2017. Pp. 182-203.
Kutovoy G. P. We need a new paradigm (or architectonics) of economic relations in the electric power industry // Energetik. 2016. No. 2. Pp. 8-13.
Kutovoy G. P. On the choice of options for further reforms in the electric power industry: what they left, what they came to and how to build relations in the electric power industry, ensuring its development // International Energy Conference of the All-Russian Open Permanent Scientific Seminar «Economic Problems of the Energy Complex (A. S. Nekrasov’s seminar) — 2017»: materials of the conference. M., 2017. Pp. 209-235.
Mezhov I. S. Methods and tools for the analysis of vertical interactions of enterprises — participants in the integration // Economic science of modern Russia. 2008. No. 4 (43). Pp. 114-125.
Pleshchinskii A. S., Titov V. V., Mezhov I. S. Mechanisms of vertical interactions between enterprises (questions of methodology and modeling). Novosibirsk, 2005. 336 p.
Yaschenko A. V. The influence of structural and transaction costs on the pricing mechanism in the interaction of the economy and the electric power industry // Economics and Entrepreneurship. 2021. No. 11. Pp. 1314-1318.
Kolpakov A. Yu. Possibility of restraining tariffs for gas and electricity in conditions of low economic dynamics in Russia // International Energy Conference of the All-Russian open permanent scientific seminar «Economic problems of the energy complex (seminar by A. S. Nekrasov) — 2017»: materials of the conference. M., 2017. Pp. 255-272.
Beloborodov S. S. Reduction of CO2 emissions: development of cogeneration or construction of RES? // Energosovet. 2018. No. 1 (51) Pp. 16-25. URL: http://www.energosovet.ru/bul_stat.php?idd=687 (date of access: 20.01.2022).
Belyaev L. S. Electricity markets: economic analysis, practical experience and peculiarities of their organization in the East of Russia and in Northeast Asia. URL: https://isem.irk.ru/symp2010/papers/RUS/S1-03r.pdf (date of access: 20.01. 2022).
Kudryaviy V. V. Conversation about energy // Energosovet. 2018. No. 1 (51). Pp. 5-8. URL: http://www.energosovet.ru/bul_stat.php?idd=683 (date of access: 20.01.2022).
Kutovoy G. P. The electric power industry again faces a choice of options for further reforms // Energosovet. 2018. No. 1 (51). Pp. 26-30. URL: http://www.energosovet.ru/bul_stat.php?idd=688 (date of access: 20.01.2022).
Economics Profession Business is a golden publisher, as we allow self-archiving, but most importantly we are fully transparent about your rights.
Authors may present and discuss their findings ahead of publication: at biological or scientific conferences, on preprint servers, in public databases, and in blogs, wikis, tweets, and other informal communication channels.
Economics Profession Business (EPB) allows authors to deposit manuscripts (currently under review or those for intended submission to EPB) in non-commercial, pre-print servers such as ArXiv.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
