RISK MANAGEMENT IN AGRICULTURE: ACCOUNTING AND ANALYTICAL ASPECT
УДК 338.43:330.131.7
Abstract
Enterprise risk management enables agricultural organizations to anticipate risks that could affect productivity and performance and take the necessary steps to minimize adverse factors and maximize competitive opportunities. Obtaining reliable risk information enables in resource-constrained settings to assess overall resource needs, prioritize resource use, and improve resource allocation. In addition, the viability of an organization in the medium and long term depends on its ability to anticipate and respond to changes, not only for stable functioning, but also for progressive development. This determines the relevance of the study, the task of which is to analyze and study the prospects for building a risk-based accounting, monitoring and management system. The risk management systems of a number of agricultural organizations in two agro-oriented regions were studied: the Rostov Region and the Altai Territory. The logic of the study consisted in a consistent and interconnected consideration of the problems of the functioning of agriculture in the regions; threats of violation of the economic security of organizations in the analyzed industry; issues of organizing an information system that meets the tasks of risk management; methods and strategies of risk management in agriculture. The authors concluded that it is necessary to transform the accounting and analytical system of agricultural organizations. The main direction of this transformation is the integration of strategy development, management methods and management accounting tools. The measurement of the underlying performance factors and the organization’s response to risk generate strategic opportunities and key competitive capabilities for agricultural organizations.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Ayuningtyas E. S., Harymawan I. Risk Management Committee and Textual Risk Disclosure // Risks. 2022. No. 10 (2). Pр. 3-14.
Yessentemirov A. A., Baibussinova G. K., Talasbek M. L. Risk management in the financing of ico projects: prospects for the use of modern technologies in Kazakhstan // Экономическая серия Вестника ЕНУ им. Л. Н. Гумилева. 2020. № 1. С. 73-88.
Izmailovich S. V. Управление хозяйственными рисками организаций промышленного сектора республики Беларусь // Часопис економiчних реформ. 2018. № 1 (29). С. 100-105.
Licen M., Slapnicar S. Can process accountability mitigate myopic biases? An experimental analysis // J Manag Control. 2022. No. 33. Pр. 1-26.
Pham H. T., Pham T., Truong Quang H., Dang C. N. Supply chain risk management research in construction: a systematic review // International Journal of Construction Management. 2022. No. 2. Pp. 3-12.
Nezamova O. A., Olentsova Ju. A. Risk management at the enterprises of agroindustrial complex // Azimuth of Scientific Research: Economics and Administration. 2021. No. 1 (34). Pр. 229-232.
Аракельянц Э. С. Управленческий учет рисков и резервной системы организации // Kant. 2020. № 4 (37). С. 27-32.
The Global Risks Report 2016. 11th edition. World Economic Forum, 2016.
Регионы России. Основные характеристики субъектов Российской Федерации. 2021: стат. сб. / Росстат. М., 2021. 766 c.
Герасименко О. А., Емтыль З. З. Управление финансовыми рисками как инструмент реализации финансовой стратегии сельскохозяйственных организаций // The Scientific Heritage. 2020. № 45-4 (45). С. 64-71.
Ситникова С. А. Принципы риск-ориентированного управленческого учета // Международный бухгалтерский учет. 2018. Т. 21. № 4. С. 466-478.
Кудин В. В. Проблема формирования риск-ориентированной учетно-аналитической системы в сельскохозяйственных организациях республики Беларусь // Cельское хозяйство — проблемы и перспективы: сборник научных трудов. Гродно, 2017. С. 203-211.
Ostadi B., Zare R. Activity-based costing in the public sector and non-profit organisations: towards risk-based approach // International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management. 2022. No 35 (1). Pр. 1-16.
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations. URL: https://www.coso.org/Pages/default.aspx/ (дата обращения: 27.10.2021).
REFERENCES
Ayuningtyas E. S., Harymawan I. Risk Management Committee and Textual Risk Disclosure // Risks. 2022. No. 10 (2). Pр. 3-14.
Yessentemirov A. A., Baibussinova G. K., Talasbek M. L. Risk management in the financing of ico projects: prospects for the use of modern technologies in Kazakhstan // Economic series of the Bulletin of ENU. L. N. Gumilyov. 2020. No. 1. Pp. 73-88.
Izmailovich S. V. Management of economic risks of organizations of the industrial sector of the Republic of Belarus // Часопис економiчних реформ. 2018. No. 1 (29). Pp. 100-105.
Licen M., Slapnicar S. Can process accountability mitigate myopic biases? An experimental analysis // J Manag Control. 2022. No 33. Pр. 1-26.
Pham H. T., Pham T., Truong Quang H., Dang C. N. Supply chain risk management research in construction: a systematic review // International Journal of Construction Management. 2022. No. 2. Pp. 3-12.
Nezamova O. A., Olentsova Ju. A. Risk management at the enterprises of agroindustrial complex // Azimuth of Scientific Research: Economics and Administration. 2021. No. 1 (34). Pр. 229-232.
Arakeliants E. S. Management accounting of risks and the reserve system of an organization // Kant. 2020. No. 4 (37). Рp. 27-32.
The Global Risks Report. 2016. 11th edition. World Economic Forum, 2016.
Regions of Russia. The main characteristics of the subjects of the Russian Federation. 2021: stat. sat. / Rosstat. M., 2021. P. 766.
Gerasimenko O. A., Emtyl Z. Z. financial risk management as a tool for implementing the financial strategy of agricultural organizations // The Scientific Heritage. 2020. No. 45-4 (45). Рp. 64-71.
Sitnikova S. A. Principles of risk-oriented management accounting // International accounting. 2018. Vol. 21. No. 4. Рp. 466-478.
Kudin V. V. The problem of forming a risk-oriented accounting and analytical system in agricultural organizations of the Republic of Belarus // Agriculture — problems and prospects: сollection of scientific papers. Grodno, 2017. Рp. 203-211.
Ostadi B., Zare R. Activity-based costing in the public sector and non-profit organisations: towards risk-based approach // International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management. 2022. No. 35 (1). Pр. 1-16.
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations. URL: https://www.coso.org/Pages/default.aspx/ (date of access: 27.10.2021).
Economics Profession Business is a golden publisher, as we allow self-archiving, but most importantly we are fully transparent about your rights.
Authors may present and discuss their findings ahead of publication: at biological or scientific conferences, on preprint servers, in public databases, and in blogs, wikis, tweets, and other informal communication channels.
Economics Profession Business (EPB) allows authors to deposit manuscripts (currently under review or those for intended submission to EPB) in non-commercial, pre-print servers such as ArXiv.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
