THE FORMATION OF THE INTERNAL MECHANISM OF THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF THE ENTERPRISES BASED ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ORGANIZATIONAL-ECONOMIC MEASURES (ON THE MATERIALS OF THE COMPANY "ELSIB")

УДК 658.1:338.45

  • D.A. Bezmelnitsyn Research and Production Association "ELSIB" PJSC (Novosibirsk, Russia) Email: gd@elsib.ru
  • V.V. Titov Institute of Economics and Industrial Production Organization SB RAS (Novosibirsk, Russia) Email: titov@ieie.nsc.ru
Keywords: high-tech production, complex economic conditions, cost optimization, enterprise competitiveness, working with markets, cluster model, strategic partners, interconnected business processes, shop-free structure, operational management modeling

Abstract

The paper presents methodological approaches to the formation of development strategy and scientific and practical results obtained in the Research and production Association “ELSIB” PAO for the period 2000-2022. The

Aim of the research is to analyze the results and factors to achieve the strategic goals of the enterprise in terms of reducing the effective demand for its products for these years.

The analysis showed that in difficult economic conditions it is important to build an effective management system that includes certain decision-making mechanisms. Thus, the company should maintain and strengthen the reputation of a reliable partner. The growth of production efficiency and cost optimization allows to increase the competitiveness of the enterprise. Personal work with strategic customers creates long-term relationships. After solving organizational issues in the first place goes to work with the markets. The greatest effect is achieved when implementing the cluster model. Increasing the levels of specialization and deversification leads to an increase in the efficiency of the cluster. The presence of strategic partners allows to provide access to the market segment of packaged supplies.

The development of new product markets requires constant research and development. Innovative technologies and equipment can improve production efficiency. Access to financial resources allows the company to develop and maintain competitive advantages. The main part of the investment should be the company's own funds. The system of coordination of strategic and tactical plans with operational management of production on the basis of network planning and optimization modeling is developed.

The result of the work on the creation of an effective enterprise management system was more than a twofold increase in Contracting in 2022 compared to the volume of orders in 2018.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

D.A. Bezmelnitsyn, Research and Production Association "ELSIB" PJSC (Novosibirsk, Russia)

кандидат экономических наук, генеральный директор научно-производственного объединения «ЭЛСИБ» ПАО

V.V. Titov, Institute of Economics and Industrial Production Organization SB RAS (Novosibirsk, Russia)

доктор экономических наук, главный научный сотрудник; заведующий кафедрой моделирования и управления промышленным производством

References

Бир Стаффорд. Мозг фирмы. М., 2009. 416 с.

Безмельницын Д. А., Артемов А. В. Опыт формирования и реализации стратегии на энергомашиностроительном предприятии // ЭКО. 2013. № 10. С. 129-142.

Гаврилов Д. А. Управление производством на базе стандарта MRP II. СПб., 2003. 340 с.

Горшков В. Г., Маркова В. Д., Калташова Л. И. Диверсификация на промышленном предприятии. Барнаул, 2000. 191 с.

Данилин В. Финансовое и операционное планирование в корпорации. Методы и модели. М., 2014. 616 с.

Каплан Р., Нортон Д. Награда за блестящую реализацию стратегии. Связь стратегии и операционной деятельности — гарантия конкурентного преимущества. М., 2010. 368 с.

Мау Мауэргауз Ю. Е. «Продвинутое» планирование и расписания (АР & S) в производстве и цепочках поставок. М., 2012. 574 с.

Титов В. В. Системная капитализация активов компаний как инструмент экономического стимулирования повышения эффективности их деятельности // Регион: экономика и социология. 2021. № 1. С. 279-291. DOI: 10.15372/REG20210111.

Титов В. В., Безмельницын Д. А. Оптимизация стратегического управления развитием высокотехнологичного бизнеса на основе платформы промышленного кластера // Регион: экономика и социология. 2019. № 1. С. 250-270. DOI: 10.15372/REG20190111.

Титов В. В., Безмельницын Д. А. Развитие систем оперативного управления на высокотехнологичных предприятиях машиностроения с длительным циклом производства // Бизнес. Образование. Право. 2021. № 3 (56). С. 210-217.

Титов В. В. Оптимизация управления промышленной корпорацией: вопросы методологии и моделирования. Новосибирск, 2007. 256 с.

Эшби У. Р. Введение в кибернетику. М., 1969. 432 с.

Alfons Oude Lansink, Spiro E. Stafanou, Magdalena Kapelko. The impact of inefficiency on diversification // Journal of Productivity Analysis. 2015. № 2. Рp. 189-198.

Kaplan R. S., Norton D. P. The Balanced Scorecard — Measures then drive Performance // Harvard Business Review. 1992. Vol. 70. N 1. Pp. 71-79.

Porter M. What is strategy? // Harvard business review. 1996. Vol. 74. № 6. Pp. 61-78.

REFERENCES

Bear Stafford. The Brain of the Firm. M., 2009. 416 p.

Bezmelnitsyn D. A., Artemov A. V. Experience of strategy formation and realization at power engineering enterprise // EKO. 2013. No. 10. Pp. 129-142.

Gavrilov D. A. Production management based on the MRP II standard. SPb., 2003. 340 p.

Gorshkov V. G., Markova V. D., Kaltashova L. I. Diversification at the industrial enterprise. Barnaul, 2000. 191 p.

Danilin V. I. Financial and operational planning in the corporation. Methods and models. M., 2014. 616 p.

Kaplan R. S., Norton D. P. Rewarding brilliant strategy execution. Linking Strategy and Operations — a Guarantee of Competitive Advantage. M., 2010. 368 p.

Mauerhaus J. E. “Advanced” Planning and Scheduling (AR & S) in Production and Supply Chains. М., 2012. 574 p.

Titov V. V. Systemic capitalization of companies' assets as a tool of economic incentives for increasing the efficiency of their activities // Region: Economy and Sociology. 2021. № 1. Pp. 279-291. DOI: 10.15372/ REG20210111.

Titov V. V., Bezmelnitsyn D. A. Optimization of strategic management of high-tech business development based on industrial cluster platform // Region: Economy and Sociology. 2019. No. 1. Pp. 250-270. DOI: 10.15372/ REG20190111.

Titov V. V., Bezmelnitsyn D. A Development of operational management systems in high-tech machine-building enterprises with a long production cycle // Business. Education. Law. 2021. № 3 (56). Pp. 210-217.

Titov V. V. Optimization of industrial corporation management: issues of methodology and modeling. Novosibirsk, 2007. 256 p.

Ashby W. R. Introduction to Cybernetics. M., 1969. 432 p.

Alfons Oude Lansink, Spiro E. Stafanou, Magdalena Kapelko. The impact of inefficiency on diversification // Journal of Productivity Analysis. 2015. No. 2. Рp. 189-198.

Kaplan R. S., Norton D. P. The Balanced Scorecard — Measures then drive Performance // Harvard Business Review. 1992. Vol. 70. No. 1. Pp. 71-79.

Porter M. What is strategy? // Harvard business review. 1996. Vol. 74. No. 6. Pp. 61-78.

Published
2022-12-12
How to Cite
1. Bezmelnitsyn D., Titov V. THE FORMATION OF THE INTERNAL MECHANISM OF THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF THE ENTERPRISES BASED ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ORGANIZATIONAL-ECONOMIC MEASURES (ON THE MATERIALS OF THE COMPANY "ELSIB") // Economics Profession Business, 2022. № 4. P. 24-29. URL: http://journal.asu.ru/ec/article/view/epb202253.
Section
ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКИЕ НАУКИ