ON THE QUESTION OF EVALUATING THE EFFICIENCY OF THE ORGANIZATION OF COOPERATION OF PARTICIPANTS OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH
УДК 001.83
Abstract
The article is devoted to the issues of evaluating the effectiveness of scientific cooperation, including the factors that determine it. Four categories of factors — external, internal, factors of cooperation and teamwork management. The idea of Diane H. Sonnenwald on scientific collaboration as a process. The features of each stage of this process are systematized, which determine the value of scientific cooperation for its participants. Based on a survey of twenty leaders of scientific organizations using analysis of variance, the perception of the value of cooperation in the field of scientific research was evaluated. As the most valuable partners, the respondents named industry organizations that have units that conduct research and development. Higher education organizations do not yet have enough experience in research cooperation. Using the proposed approach to building the profile of each of the partners in research cooperation, the scientific organization is able to respond to factors affecting the effectiveness of these processes.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Горчаков С. Е. Цели, задачи и инструменты реализации национального проекта «Наука» // Журнал правовых и экономических исследований. 2020. № 1. С. 56-59.
Растова Ю. И., Растов М. А. Стратегическое управление современной организацией: эффект синергии концепций // Управленческие науки. 2018. Т. 8. № 3. С. 20-31. DOI: 10.26794/2404-022X-2018-8-3-20-31.
Гасанов Г. С. Современные тенденции бизнес-менеджмента: взаимодействие комплиментарности и ментальности. СПб.: Изд-во СПбГЭУ, 2019. 127 с.
Бабкин А. В., Кудрявцева Т. Ю. Кооперация подрядчиков как модель конкурсного размещения государственных заказов на научную и инновационную продукцию // Экономика и менеджмент в условиях глобальной конкуренции: проблемы и перспективы: труды научно-практической конференции с международным участием. СПб.: Изд-во Санкт-Петербургского политехнического университета Петра Великого, 2016. С. 325-332.
Василенко Н. В. Коллаборация в кластерах: институциональные предпосылки результативности // Новая экономическая реальность, кластерные инициативы и развитие промышленности (ИНПР0М-2016): труды Международной научно-практической конференции. СПб.: Изд-во Санкт-Петербургского политехнического университета Петра Великого, 2016. С. 202-206.
Глухов В. В. Стадии развития государственной научно-технической политики // Экономика и менеджмент в условиях нелинейной динамики. СПб.: Изд-во Санкт-Петербургского политехнического университета Петра Великого, 2017. С. 194-213.
Суслов Е. Ю., Растова Ю. И. Технологии интеграционных решений в инновационном сотрудничестве на пространстве ЕАЭС // Экономика и предпринимательство. 2016. № 7 (72). С. 87-90.
Сигов В. И., Слободской А. Л., Евстигнеева А. О. Институциональные изменения способов хозяйствования в ситуации аномии // Журнал правовых и экономических исследований. 2017. № 2. С. 119-123.
Waruszynski B. T. Collaboration in scientific research. Factors that Influence Effective Collaboration during a Period of Transformational Change: Dissertation Prepared for the Degree of doctor of social sciences Royal Roads University Victoria, British Columbia, Canada. 2017. 285 p.
Sonnenwald D. H. Scientific Collaboration: A Synthesis of Challenges and Strategies. Swedish School of Library and Information Science, Goteborg University and University College of Boras Sweden // Annual Review of Information Science and Technology. 2007. № 41 (1). Рр. 643-681. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242081966_Scientific_Collaboration_A_Synthesis_of_Challenges_and_Strategies. (дата обращения: 06.01.2020 г.). DOI: 10.1002/aris.2007.1440410121.
Оскорбин Н. М., Жилин С. И., Дронов С. В. Сравнение статистической и нестатистической оценок параметров эмпирической зависимости // Известия Алтайского государственного университета. 1998. № 4 (8). С. 22-27.
Трачук А. В., Линдер Н. В. Методика многофакторной оценки инновационной активности холдингов в промышленности // Научные труды Вольного экономического общества России. 2016. Т. 198. № 2. С. 298-308.
REFERENCES
Gorchakov S. E. Goals, objectives and tools for the implementation of the national project “Science” // Journal of legal and economic studies. 2020. No. 1. S. 56-59.
Rastova Yu. I., Rastov M. A. Strategic management of a modern organization: the effect of the synergy of concepts // Management Sciences. 2018. Vol. 8. No. 3. P. 20-31. DOI: 10.26794/2404-022X-2018-8-3-20-31.
Hasanov G. S. Current trends in business management: the interaction of complementarity and mentality. SPb.: Publishing House of SPbGEU, 2019. 127 p.
Babkin A. V., Kudryavtseva T. Yu. Cooperation of contractors as a model of competitive placement of government orders for scientific and innovative products // Economics and Management in a Global Competition: Problems and Prospects: Proceedings of a scientific-practical conference with international participation. SPb.: Publishing House of Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 2016. S. 325-332.
Vasilenko N. V. Collaboration in clusters: institutional prerequisites for effectiveness // New economic reality, cluster initiatives and industrial development (INPR0M-2016): Proceedings of the international scientific-practical conference. SPb.: Publishing House of Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 2016. S. 202206.
Glukhov V. V. Stages of development of the state scientific and technical policy // Economics and management in the conditions of nonlinear dynamics. SPb.: Publishing House of Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 2017. S. 194-213.
Suslov E. Yu., Rastova Yu. I. Technologies for integration solutions in innovative cooperation in the EAEU // Economics and Entrepreneurship. 2016. No. 7 (72). S. 87-90.
Sigov V. I., Slobodskoy A. L., Evstigneeva A. O. Institutional changes in management methods in an anomie situation // Journal of Legal and Economic Research. 2017. No 2. S. 119-123.
Waruszynski B. T. Collaboration in scientific research. Factors that Influence Effective Collaboration during a Period of Transformational Change: Dissertation Prepared for the Degree of doctor of social sciences Royal Roads University Victoria, British Columbia, Canada. 2017. 285 s.
Sonnenwald D. H. Scientific Collaboration: A Synthesis of Challenges and Strategies. Swedish School of Library and Information Science, Goteborg University and University College of Boras Sweden // Annual Review of Information Science and Technology. 2007. № 41 (1). S. 643-681. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242081966_Scientific_Collaboration_A_Synthesis_of_Challenges_and_Strategies. (дата обращения 06.01.2020 г.). DOI: 10.1002/aris.2007.1440410121.
Oskorbin N. M., Zhilin S. I., Dronov S. V. Comparison of statistical and non-statistical estimates of the parameters of empirical dependence // News of Altai State University. 1998. No. 4 (8). S. 22-27.
Trachuk A. V., Linder N. V. Technique of the multiple-factor assessment of innovative activity of holdings in the industry // Scientific works of the Free Economic Society of Russia. 2016. V. 198. No. 2. S. 298-308.
Economics Profession Business is a golden publisher, as we allow self-archiving, but most importantly we are fully transparent about your rights.
Authors may present and discuss their findings ahead of publication: at biological or scientific conferences, on preprint servers, in public databases, and in blogs, wikis, tweets, and other informal communication channels.
Economics Profession Business (EPB) allows authors to deposit manuscripts (currently under review or those for intended submission to EPB) in non-commercial, pre-print servers such as ArXiv.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
