Keywords
biocompatibility
biological preparations
Bacillus
Lactobacillus
biological preparations
Bacillus
Lactobacillus
How to Cite
Dudnik D., Irikitova A., Malkova A., Kozhevnikova E. ASSESSMENT OF BIOCOMPATIBILITY OF BACILLUS SPP. AND LACTOBACILLUS SPP. STRAINS. // BIOAsia-Altai, 2024. Vol. 4, № 1. P. 76-79. URL: http://journal.asu.ru/bioasia/article/view/16118.
Abstract
The article presents the results of a study of the biocompatibility of strains of lactic acid and spore bacteria that are promising for inclusion in biological preparations for agriculture. Biological preparations are an alternative way to combat pathogenic microflora in livestock enterprises. Preparations consisting of 2 or more strains of microorganisms demonstrate great effectiveness. When developing such preparations, it is important to take into account the biocompatibility of microbial cultures.
References
1. Байгазанов А. Н., Финогенов А. Ю., Нуркенова М. К., Икимбаева Н. А., Зайнеттинова Д. Б. Антагонистические свойства бациллярных пробиотических штаммов // Авиценна. 2017. № 10. С. 7–10.
2. Проскурнина И. А. Исследование пробиотических свойств штаммов Bacillus velezensis БИМ в-497 д и Bacillus velezensis БИМ в-1312 д - основы кормовой добавки // Микробные биотехнологии: фундаментальные и прикладные аспекты: Сборник научных трудов. Минск: Республиканское унитарное предприятие Издательский дом «Белорусская наука», 2020. С. 206–216.
3. Саламатзадех А. А., Ганбаров Х. Г., Кафшдарджалал А. М. Влияние условий культивирования на продуцирование молочной кислоты у бактерий рода Lactobacillus // Вестник Московского государственного областного университета. Серия: Естественные науки. 2011. № 2. С. 73–77.
4. Сверчкова, Н. В. Пробиотические препараты на основе бактерий рода Bacillus для животноводства, птицеводства и промышленного рыбоводства // Микробные биотехнологии: фундаментальные и прикладные аспекты: Сборник научных трудов. Минск: Республиканское унитарное предприятие Издательский дом «Белорусская наука», 2020. С. 252–264.
5. Ayyat M. S., El-Nagar H. A., Wafa W. M., Abd El-Latif K. M., Mahgoub S., Al-Sagheer A. A. Comparable Evaluation of Nutritional Benefits of Lactobacillus plantarum and Bacillus toyonensis Probiotic Supplementation on Growth, Feed Utilization, Health, and Fecal Microbiota in Pre-Weaning Male Calves // Animals (Basel). 2023. V 13. doi: 10.3390/ani13213422.
6. Hirozawa M. T., Ono M. A., Suguiura I. M. S., Bordini J. G., Ono E. Y. S. Lactic acid bacteria and Bacillus spp. as fungal biological control agents // J Appl Microbiol. 2023. V. 134. doi: 10.1093/jambio/lxac083.
7. Kimelman H., Shemesh M. Probiotic Bifunctionality of Bacillus subtilis - Rescuing Lactic Acid Bacteria from Desiccation and Antagonizing Pathogenic Staphylococcus aureus // Microorganisms. 2019. V. 7. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms7100407.
8. Kwoji I. D., Aiyegoro O. A., Okpeku M., Adeleke M. A. Multi-Strain Probiotics: Synergy among Isolates Enhances Biological Activities // Biology (Basel). 2021. V. 10. doi: 10.3390/biology10040322.
9. McFarland L. V. Efficacy of Single-Strain Probiotics Versus Multi-Strain Mixtures: Systematic Review of Strain and Disease Specificity // Dig Dis Sci. 2021.V. 66. doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06244-z.
10. Puvanasundram P., Chong C. M., Sabri S., Yusoff M. S. M., Lim K. C., Karim M. Efficacy of Single and Multi-Strain Probiotics on In Vitro Strain Compatibility, Pathogen Inhibition, Biofilm Formation Capability, and Stress Tolerance // Biology (Basel). 2022. V. 11. doi: 10.3390/biology11111644.
11. Ricci A., Allende A., Bolton D., Chemaly M. et. al. Scientific Opinion on the update of the list of QPS‐recommended biological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA // EFSA Journal. 2017. V. 15. P. 4664 [1-177].
12. Soria M. C., Audisio M. C. Inhibition of Bacillus cereus Strains by Antimicrobial Metabolites from Lactobacillus johnsonii CRL1647 and Enterococcus faecium SM21 // Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2014.V. 6. P. 208–216. doi: 10.1007/s12602-014-9169-z.
13. Timmerman H. M., Koning C. J., Mulder L., Rombouts F. M., Beynen A. C. Monostrain, multistrain and multispecies probiotics-A comparison of functionality and efficacy // Int J Food Microbiol. 2004. V. 96. P. 219–233. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.05.012.
14. Tran C., Cock I. E., Chen X., Feng Y. Antimicrobial Bacillus: Metabolites and Their Mode of Action // Antibiotics (Basel). 2022. V. 11. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11010088.
15. Yang J. J., Niu C. C., Guo X. H. Mixed culture models for predicting intestinal microbial interactions between Escherichia coli and Lactobacillus in the presence of probiotic Bacillus subtilis // Benef Microbes. 2015. V. 6. P. 871-877. doi: 10.3920/BM2015.0033.
2. Проскурнина И. А. Исследование пробиотических свойств штаммов Bacillus velezensis БИМ в-497 д и Bacillus velezensis БИМ в-1312 д - основы кормовой добавки // Микробные биотехнологии: фундаментальные и прикладные аспекты: Сборник научных трудов. Минск: Республиканское унитарное предприятие Издательский дом «Белорусская наука», 2020. С. 206–216.
3. Саламатзадех А. А., Ганбаров Х. Г., Кафшдарджалал А. М. Влияние условий культивирования на продуцирование молочной кислоты у бактерий рода Lactobacillus // Вестник Московского государственного областного университета. Серия: Естественные науки. 2011. № 2. С. 73–77.
4. Сверчкова, Н. В. Пробиотические препараты на основе бактерий рода Bacillus для животноводства, птицеводства и промышленного рыбоводства // Микробные биотехнологии: фундаментальные и прикладные аспекты: Сборник научных трудов. Минск: Республиканское унитарное предприятие Издательский дом «Белорусская наука», 2020. С. 252–264.
5. Ayyat M. S., El-Nagar H. A., Wafa W. M., Abd El-Latif K. M., Mahgoub S., Al-Sagheer A. A. Comparable Evaluation of Nutritional Benefits of Lactobacillus plantarum and Bacillus toyonensis Probiotic Supplementation on Growth, Feed Utilization, Health, and Fecal Microbiota in Pre-Weaning Male Calves // Animals (Basel). 2023. V 13. doi: 10.3390/ani13213422.
6. Hirozawa M. T., Ono M. A., Suguiura I. M. S., Bordini J. G., Ono E. Y. S. Lactic acid bacteria and Bacillus spp. as fungal biological control agents // J Appl Microbiol. 2023. V. 134. doi: 10.1093/jambio/lxac083.
7. Kimelman H., Shemesh M. Probiotic Bifunctionality of Bacillus subtilis - Rescuing Lactic Acid Bacteria from Desiccation and Antagonizing Pathogenic Staphylococcus aureus // Microorganisms. 2019. V. 7. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms7100407.
8. Kwoji I. D., Aiyegoro O. A., Okpeku M., Adeleke M. A. Multi-Strain Probiotics: Synergy among Isolates Enhances Biological Activities // Biology (Basel). 2021. V. 10. doi: 10.3390/biology10040322.
9. McFarland L. V. Efficacy of Single-Strain Probiotics Versus Multi-Strain Mixtures: Systematic Review of Strain and Disease Specificity // Dig Dis Sci. 2021.V. 66. doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06244-z.
10. Puvanasundram P., Chong C. M., Sabri S., Yusoff M. S. M., Lim K. C., Karim M. Efficacy of Single and Multi-Strain Probiotics on In Vitro Strain Compatibility, Pathogen Inhibition, Biofilm Formation Capability, and Stress Tolerance // Biology (Basel). 2022. V. 11. doi: 10.3390/biology11111644.
11. Ricci A., Allende A., Bolton D., Chemaly M. et. al. Scientific Opinion on the update of the list of QPS‐recommended biological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA // EFSA Journal. 2017. V. 15. P. 4664 [1-177].
12. Soria M. C., Audisio M. C. Inhibition of Bacillus cereus Strains by Antimicrobial Metabolites from Lactobacillus johnsonii CRL1647 and Enterococcus faecium SM21 // Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2014.V. 6. P. 208–216. doi: 10.1007/s12602-014-9169-z.
13. Timmerman H. M., Koning C. J., Mulder L., Rombouts F. M., Beynen A. C. Monostrain, multistrain and multispecies probiotics-A comparison of functionality and efficacy // Int J Food Microbiol. 2004. V. 96. P. 219–233. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.05.012.
14. Tran C., Cock I. E., Chen X., Feng Y. Antimicrobial Bacillus: Metabolites and Their Mode of Action // Antibiotics (Basel). 2022. V. 11. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11010088.
15. Yang J. J., Niu C. C., Guo X. H. Mixed culture models for predicting intestinal microbial interactions between Escherichia coli and Lactobacillus in the presence of probiotic Bacillus subtilis // Benef Microbes. 2015. V. 6. P. 871-877. doi: 10.3920/BM2015.0033.
Altai State University is a golden publisher, as we allow self-archiving, but most importantly we are fully transparent about your rights.
Authors may present and discuss their findings ahead of publication: at biological or scientific conferences, on preprint servers, in public databases, and in blogs, wikis, tweets, and other informal communication channels.
We allows authors to deposit manuscripts (currently under review or those for intended submission to ABS) in non-commercial, pre-print servers such as ArXiv.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Metrics
Metrics Loading ...