DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT OF INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISE

УДК 338.45:330.34

  • M. V. Konovalov Altai Instrument-Making Plant "Rotor" (Barnaul, Russia) Email: apzrotor@apzrotor.ru
  • I. V. Tsomaeva Altai Instrument-Making Plant "Rotor" (Barnaul, Russia); Polzunov Altai State Technical University (Barnaul, Russia) https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5771-2090 Email: tsomaeva_i@mail.ru
  • A. A. Kiseleva Siberian Institute of Management - branch of RANEPA (Novosibirsk, Russia) Email: kiseleva.aa@inbox.ru
DOI_disc_logo https://doi.org/10.14258/epb202153
Keywords: strategy, business development, process approach, business process design

Abstract

During strategy development and implementation industrial enterprises face conceptual difficulties, that are similar for enterprises of the military-industrial complex due to their institutional, industry and integration characteristics. The article proposes a methodological approach to the strategic management process organization with an emphasis on the implementation stage of strategic development. Also, modern operating concepts, mechanisms and tools for enterprise development management are considered. Current requirements are highly important. Documents regulating the development management business process must comply with the principles of a quality management system (QMS), and mechanisms for analyzing large amounts of information should correspond to the procedure of mathematical modeling, neuroinformatics, hybrid expert systems, adapted at enterprises during previous empirical research.

It is recommended to make employee reward system concern the level of implementation of company’s development projects.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

M. V. Konovalov, Altai Instrument-Making Plant "Rotor" (Barnaul, Russia)

генеральный директор

I. V. Tsomaeva, Altai Instrument-Making Plant "Rotor" (Barnaul, Russia); Polzunov Altai State Technical University (Barnaul, Russia)

доктор экономических наук, заместитель генерального директора по развитию ; заведующий базовой кафедрой при АО АПЗ «Ротор»

A. A. Kiseleva, Siberian Institute of Management - branch of RANEPA (Novosibirsk, Russia)

кандидат экономических наук, доцент

References

Румельт Р. Хорошая стратегия, плохая стратегия. В чем отличие и почему это важно. М., 2014. 435 с.

Осадник В. А. Значение интеграции ресурсного и рыночного подхода для стратегического управления предприятием // Управление предприятием. 2001. № 4. С. 80-86.

Хэмэл Г., Прахалад К. Конкурируя за будущее: создание рынков завтрашнего дня / пер. с англ. М., 2009. 288 с.

Коновалов М. В., Цомаева И. В., Киселева А. А. Ретроспективный анализ стратегии развития промышленного предприятия: выводы и предложения (на примере ОАО АПЗ «Ротор»: монография / под ред. В. А. Бородина. Барнаул, 2018. 182 с.

Цомаева И. В. Совершенствование управления мелкосерийным и серийным производством (на примере ОАО «Алтайский приборостроительный завод «Ротор»») / под ред. В. В. Титова. Новосибирск, 2014. 240 с.

Внедрение сбалансированной системы показателей / Horvath & Partners: пер. с нем. М., 2005. 478 с.

Гурков И. Б. Стратегия и структура корпорации: учеб. пособие. 2-е изд., перераб. М., 2008. 288 с.

Тишков О. И., Цомаева И. В. Методика оценки инновационного потенциала промышленного предприятия // Модернизация российской экономики: инновации, инструменты управления: сб. науч. тр. / под ред. И. С. Межова, В. А. Титовой. Новосибирск, 2011. С. 235-245.

Ефремов В. С., Ханыков И. А. Ключевая компетенция организации как объект стратегического анализа // Менеджмент в России и за рубежом. 2002. № 2. С. 8-33.

Бажанов В. А., Цомаева И. В., Киселева А. А. Совершенствование управления оборонным предприятием в условиях диверсификации производства // Мир экономики и управления. Т. 19. № 3. Новосибирск, 2019. С. 121-130. DOI: 10.25205/2542-0429-2019-19-3-121-131.

Мищенко В. В., Локтев С. А., Межов И. С. Организация производственного менеджмента. Процессное структурирование и аналитическое планирование: учебное пособие. Барнаул, 2004. 179 с.

REFERENCES

Rumelt R. Good strategy, bad strategy. The difference and why it matters. Moscow, 2014. 435 p.

Osadnik V. A. The importance of integration of market and resource approaches for strategic enterprise management // Enterprise Management. 2001. No. 4. Pp. 80-86.

Hamel G., Prahalad K. Competing for the Future: Creating Tomorrow’s Markets / trans. from English. Moscow, 2009. 288 p.

Konovalov M. V., Tsomaeva I. V., Kiseleva A. A. Retrospective Analysis of Industrial Enterprise Development Strategy: Conclusions and Suggestions (on the Example of JSC Altai Instrument-Making Plant “Rotor”) : monograph / ed. by V. A. Borodin. Barnaul, 2018. 182 p.

Tsomaeva I. V. Improving the Management of Small-Scale and Serial Production (on the Example of JSC «Altai Instrument-Making Plant “Rotor”) / ed. by V. V. Titov. Novosibirsk, 2014. 240 p.

Implementation of Balanced Scorecard / Horvath & Partners: translated from German. Moscow, 2005. 478 p.

Gurkov I. B. Strategy and Structure of the Corporation: textbook. 2nd ed. Moscow, 2008. 288 p.

Tishkov O. I., Tsomaeva I. V. Methodology for Assessing the Innovation Potential of an Industrial Enterprise // Modernization of the Russian Economy: Innovations, Management Tools: collected scientific works / ed. by I. S. Mezhov, V. A. Titova. Novosibirsk, 2011. Pp. 235-245.

Efremov V. S., Khanykov I. A. Key Competence of the Organization as an Object of Strategic Analysis // Management in Russia and Abroad. 2002. No. 2. Pp. 8-33.

Bazhanov V. A., Tsomaeva I. V., Kiseleva A. A. Improving Defense Enterprise Management in Terms of Production Diversification // World of Economics and Management. 2019. Vol. 19, No. 3. Pp. 121-131. DOI 10.25205/2542-0429-2019-19-3-121-131.

Mishchenko V. V., Loktev S. A., Mezhov I. S. Organization of Production Management. Process Structuring and Analytical Planning: Textbook. Barnaul, 2004. 179 p.

Published
2021-12-10
How to Cite
1. Konovalov M. V., Tsomaeva I. V., Kiseleva A. A. DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT OF INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISE // Economics Profession Business, 2021. № 4. P. 37-42. URL: http://journal.asu.ru/ec/article/view/epb202153.
Issue
No 4 (2021): ECONOMICS PROFESSION BUSINESS
Section
ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКИЕ НАУКИ

Economics Profession Business is a golden publisher, as we allow self-archiving, but most importantly we are fully transparent about your rights.

Authors may present and discuss their findings ahead of publication: at biological or scientific conferences, on preprint servers, in public databases, and in blogs, wikis, tweets, and other informal communication channels.

Economics Profession Business (EPB) allows authors to deposit manuscripts (currently under review or those for intended submission to EPB) in non-commercial, pre-print servers such as ArXiv.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

 

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).