THE CONCEPT AND APPROACHES TO THE STUDY OF INTEGRATION OF TERRITORIAL SOCIO-ECONOMIC SYSTEMS: TO THE FORMULATION OF THE ISSUE
УДК 332.1 (571.1/.5)
Abstract
The importance of the development of the Russian economy as a comprehensive and sovereign system is increasing under the influence of external shocks. To this matter, the question of the economy’s spatial nature in regards to the deepening of integration processes between regions becomes particularly important.
The purpose of the study is to develop theoretical and methodological foundations for analyzing the mechanisms of integrating the economies of the regions of the Siberian Federal District, assessing the integration potential of the Altai Krai. The empirical object of study is the Altai Krai. The subject of the study are the various forms and types of connections between the region and the regions of the Siberian Federal District.
The paper considers a number of topical issues of interregional integration. A general assessment of the state of scientific research in this area is given. Insufficient empirical knowledge of interregional relations, the absence of comparable methodological approaches to the assessment of integration processes in macroregions are noted.
The possibility of using methodological developments in the field of international integration research for the analysis of interregional interaction is substantiated and shown. Approaches to assessing the degree of «maturity» of interregional integration are outlined.
The «mechanism» of integration is revealed as the unity of the driving forces of this process and the factors that determine it, in relation to different types of interregional relations.
The ambiguity of the consequences of integration for the socio-economic development of regions is shown, depending on the basis on which interregional relations are formed (cooperation or competition).
Downloads
Metrics
References
Кузнецова О. В. Альтернативные подходы к определению роли макрорегионов России в системе государственного управления // Федерализм. 2019. № 4. С. 112-125. DOI: 10.21686/2073-1051-2019-4112-125.
Демьяненко А. Н. Российское экономическое пространство: диалектика процессов интеграции и дезинтеграции // Регионалистика. 2017. Т. 4. № 2. С. 5-10.
Махотаева М. Ю., Бакуменко О. А., Малышев Д. П. Межрегиональное взаимодействие как инструмент развития стратегических приоритетов региона: монография. Псков, 2017. 118 с.
Положенцева Ю. С. Экономическое пространство: теоретические подходы к изучению и методы анализа // Экономика и управление. 2006. № 12. С. 58-69.
Feldman M. The new economics of innovation, spillovers and agglomeration: a review of empirical studies // Economics Innovation and New Technology. 1999. № 8. Pp. 5-25.
Кульков В. М. Экономическое пространство: теоретические аспекты и современные процессы // Вестник Московского университета. Сер. 6. Экономика. 2014. № 1. С. 3-18.
Минакир П. А. «Стратегия пространственного развития» в интерьере концепций пространственной организации экономики // Пространственная экономика. 2018. № 4. С. 8-20. DOI: 10.14530/se.2018.4.008-020.
Минакир П. А., Исаев А. Г., Демьяненко А. Н., Прокапало О. М. Экономические макрорегионы: интеграционный феномен или политико-географическая целесообразность? Случай Дальнего Востока // Пространственная экономика. 2020. Т. 16. № 1. С. 66-69. DOI: 10.14530/se.2020.1.066-099.
Современный словарь иностранных слов. СПб., 1994. 752 с.
Павлов К. В. Об использовании теорий международных экономических отношений при изучении межрегиональных взаимодействий // Региональная экономика: теория и практика. 2012. № 47. С. 54-68.
Krugman P. R. Increasing returns and economic geography // Journal of Political Economy. 1991. Vol. 99. No. 3. Pp. 483-499.
Lucas R. E. On the mechanics of economic development // Journal of Monetary Economics. 1988. Vol. 22. Iss. 1. Pp. 3-42. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3932 (88) 90168-7.
Torre A., Rallet A. Proximity and Localization // Regional Studies. February 2005. Vol. 39. Iss. 1. Pp. 4759. DOI: 10.1080/0034340052000320842.
Ota M., Fujita M. Communications technologies and spatial organization of multi-unit firms in metropolitan areas // Regional Science and Urban Economics. 1993. Vol. 23. Iss. 6. Pp. 695-729.
Ожегов С. Н., Шведова Н. Ю. Толковый словарь русского языка: 80000 слов и фразеологических выражений / Российская АН; Российский фонд культуры. 3-е изд., стер. М., 1995. 928 с.
Крюков В. А., Коломак Е. А. Пространственное развитие России: основные проблемы и подходы к их преодолению // Научные труды Вольного экономического общества России. 2021. Т. 227. № 1. С. 92114. DOI: 10.38197/2072-2060-2021-227-1-92-114.
Крюков В. А., Лавровский Б. Л., Селиверстов В. Е. и др. Сибирский вектор развития // Проблемы прогнозирования. 2020. № 5. С. 46-59. DOI: 10.1134/S1075700720050111.
Лукин Е. В., Ускова Т. В. Межрегиональное экономическое сотрудничество: состояние, проблемы, перспективы: монография. Вологда, 2016. 148 с.
Абдулманапов С. Г. Межрегиональная экономическая интеграция: мировой опыт и перспективы развития на Северном Кавказе // Вестник Дагестанского научного центра РАН. 2012. № 47. С. 127-132.
Бочаров С. Н. и др. Глобальные цепочки создания добавленной стоимости как фактор повышения эффективности экономики региона: монография / под ред. С. Н. Бочарова, В. И. Беляева, Р. А. Самсонова и др. Барнаул, 2019. 216 с.
Миграция сельской молодежи: в фокусе — Алтайский край: коллективная монография / под ред. А. М. Сергиенко. Барнаул, 2019. 324 с.
Тамова Б. А. Межрегиональное экономическое взаимодействие как фактор регионального стратегического развития // Вестник Адыгейского государственного университета. Серия 5: Экономика. 2015. № 4 (170). С. 130-133.
Рубцов Г. Г., Литвиненко А. Н. Роль межрегионального сотрудничества в системе современной региональной экономики РФ // Научно-технические ведомости СПбГПУ. Экономические науки. 2019. Т. 12. № 1. С. 97-110. DOI: 10.18721/JE.12108.
Полякова А. Г., Симарова И. С. Концептуальная модель управления развитием региона с учетом уровня пространственной связанности // Экономика региона. 2014. № 2 (38). С. 32-42.
REFERENCES
Kuznetsova O. В. Alternative approaches to determining the role of macro-regions of Russia in the system of public administration // Federalism. 2019. No. 4. Pp. 112-125. DOI: 10.21686/2073-1051-2019-4-112-125.
Demyanenko A. N. Russian Economic Space: Dialectics of integration and disintegration processes // Regionalistica. 2017. Vol. 4. No. 2. Pp. 5-10.
Makhotaeva M.Yu., Bakumenko O. A., Malyshev D. P. Interregional interaction as a tool for the development of strategic priorities of the region: monograph. Pskov, 2017. 118 p.
Polozhentseva Yu. S. Economic space: theoretical approaches to the study and methods of analysis // Economics and management. 2006. No. 12. Pp. 58-69.
Feldman M. The new economics of innovation, spillovers and agglomeration: a review of empirical studies // Economics Innovation and New Technology. 1999. No. 8. Pp. 5-25.
Kulkov V. M. Economic space: theoretical aspects and modern processes // Bulletin of the Moscow University. Ser. 6. Economics. 2014. No. 1. Pp. 3-18.
Minakir P. A. «Spatial development strategy» in the interior of the concepts of spatial organization of the economy // Spatial Economics. 2018. No. 4. Pp. 8-20. DOI: 10.14530/se.2018.4.008-020.
Minakir P. A., Isaev A. G., Demyanenko A. N., Prokapalo O. M. Economic macro-regions: an integration phenomenon or political and geographical expediency? The case of the Far East // Spatial Economics. 2020. Vol. 16. No. 1. Pp. 66-69. DOI: 10.14530/se.2020.1.066-099.
Modern Dictionary of foreign words. St. Petersburg, 1994. 752 p.
Pavlov K. V. On the use of theories of international economic relations in the study of interregional interactions // Regional economy: theory and practice. 2012. No. 47. Pp. 54-68.
Krugman P. R. Increasing returns and economic geography // Journal of Political Economy. 1991. Vol. 99. No. 3. Pp. 483-499.
Lucas R. E. On the mechanics of economic development // Journal of Monetary Economics. 1988. Vol. 22. Iss. 1. Pp. 3-42. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3932 (88) 90168-7.
Torre A., Rallet A. Proximity and Localization // Regional Studies. February 2005. Vol. 39. Iss. 1. Pp. 4759. DOI: 10.1080/0034340052000320842.
Ota M., Fujitac M. Communications technologies and spatial organization of multi-unit firms in metropolitan areas // Regional Science and Urban Economics. 1993. Vol. 23. Iss. 6. Pp. 695-729.
Ozhegov S. N., Shvedova N. Y. Explanatory Dictionary of the Russian language: 80,000 words and phraseological expressions / Russian Academy of Sciences; Russian Cultural Foundation. 3rd ed., ster. M., 1995. 928 p.
Kryukov V. A., Kolomak E. A. Spatial development of Russia: the main problems and approaches to overcoming them // Scientific works of the Free Economic Society of Russia. 2021. Vol. 227. No.1. Pp. 92-114. DOI: 10.38197/2072-2060-2021-227-1-92-114.
Kryukov V. A., Lavrovsky B. L., Seliverstov V. E., etc. Siberian vector of development // Forecasting problems. 2020. No. 5. Pp. 46-59. DOI: 10.1134/S1075700720050111.
Lukin E. V., Uskova T. V. Interregional economic cooperation: state, problems, prospects: monograph. Vologda, 2016. 148 p.
Abdulmanapov S. G. Interregional economic integration: world experience and prospects for development in the North Caucasus // Bulletin of the Dagestan Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2012. No 47. Pp. 127-132.
Bocharov S. N. and others. Global value chains as a factor in improving the efficiency of the economy of the region: monograph / ed. by S. N. Bocharov, V. I. Belyaev, R. A. Samsonov, etc. Barnaul, 2019. 216 p.
Migration of rural youth: in focus — Altai Krai: a collective monograph / ed. by A. M. Sergienko. Barnaul, 2019. 324 p.
Tamova B. A. Interregional economic cooperation as a factor of regional strategic development // Bulletin of the Adygea State University. Series 5: Economics. 2015. No. 4 (170). Pp. 130-133.
Rubtsov G. G., Litvinenko A. N. The role of interregional cooperation in the system of modern regional economy of the Russian Federation // Scientific and technical bulletin of SPbGPU. Economic sciences. 2019. Vol. 12. No. 1. Pp. 97-110. DOI: 10.18721/JE.12108.
Polyakova A. G., Simarova I. S. Conceptual model of regional development management taking into account the level of spatial connectivity // The economy of the region. 2014. No. 2 (38). Pp. 32-42.
Economics Profession Business is a golden publisher, as we allow self-archiving, but most importantly we are fully transparent about your rights.
Authors may present and discuss their findings ahead of publication: at biological or scientific conferences, on preprint servers, in public databases, and in blogs, wikis, tweets, and other informal communication channels.
Economics Profession Business (EPB) allows authors to deposit manuscripts (currently under review or those for intended submission to EPB) in non-commercial, pre-print servers such as ArXiv.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
