PROBLEMS OF REINDUSTRIALIZATION IN THE REPUBLIC OF TYVA
Abstract
The article presents the results of the analysis of the development of industrial production in the Republic of Tyva: the dynamics of production volumes, indices of physical volume, changes in the industry structure, the share of industry in the gross regional product. The specifics of the process of de-industrialization that occurred in the 1990s in the region are considered, and its definition is given. The expediency of developing a program of reindustrialization as a process of restoring industrial production is shown, its approximate structure, goals and tasks are defined. The program should provide for the support and development of existing industries and livelihoods of the region; facilitating the technological renovation of obsolete production facilities on the basis of developing principles and directions for their modernization. The tendencies of the long-term development of reindustrialization in the region until 2030 are considered within the framework of two scenarios: conservative and modernization. The conservative scenario envisages the preservation of the current trends in industry: the dominance of the fuel and energy sector, the predominance of export of raw materials, the presence of undeveloped production specialization and low labor productivity, the conservation of inefficiency in a number of industrial enterprises due to the use of obsolete technologies and equipment. Development under the modernization scenario assumes active use of competitive advantages of the republic in the mining of mineral raw materials, implementation of large infrastructure projects, transition to an innovative development path.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Мау В. А. На исходе глобального кризиса: экономические задачи 2017-2019 гг. // Вопросы экономики. 2018. № 3. С. 5-29.
Балакина Г. Ф., Ооржак В. О. Проблемы развития промышленного комплекса Республики Тыва в условиях модернизации // Региональная экономика: теория и практика. 2015. № 38 (413). С. 33-43.
Кулешов В. В., Крюков В. А. Реиндустриализация Новосибирской области — учитывать общее, развивать особенное // ЭКО. 2015. № 10. С. 5-29.
Селиверстов В. Е. Программа реиндустриализации экономики Новосибирской области: основные итоги разработки // Регион: экономика и социология. 2016. № 1 (89). С. 108-134.
Унтура Г. А. Инновационное развитие регионов России: неравномерность, кооперация и конкуренция // Регион: экономика и социология. 2015. № 1 (85). С. 275-304.
Земцов С., Баринова В. Смена парадигмы региональной инновационной политики России: от выравнивания к «умной специализации» // Вопросы экономики. 2016. № 10. С. 65-81.
Регионы России. Социально-экономические показатели. 2017 : стат. сб. М. : Росстат, 2017. 1402 с.
Регионы России. Социально-экономические показатели. 2012 : стат. сб. М. : Росстат, 2013. 990 с.
REFERENCES
Mau, V. A. (2018) At the end of the global crisis: the economic challenges of 2017-2019. Issues of Economics, 3, 5-29 (in Russian).
Balakina, G. F., Oorzhak, V. O. (2015) Problems of development of the industrial complex of the Republic of Tuva in the conditions of modernization. Regional economy: theory and practice, 38 (413), 33-43 (in Russian).
Kuleshov, V. V., Kryukov, V. A. (2015) Reindustrialization of the Novosibirsk region — take into account the general, develop special. ECO, 10, 5-29 (in Russian).
Seliverstov, V. E. (2016) Program for the reindustrialization of the economy of the Novosibirsk region: the main results of the development. Region: Economics and Sociology, 1 (89), 108-134 (in Russian).
Untura, G. A. (2015) Innovative development of Russia's regions: unevenness, cooperation and competition. Region: Economics and Sociology, 1 (85), 275-304 (in Russian).
Zemtsov, S., Barinova, V. (2016) Change of the paradigm of the regional innovation policy of Russia: from leveling to «smart specializations Issues of Economics, 2016, 10, 65-81 (in Russian).
Regions of Russia. Social and economic indicators (2017) Statistics Digest. Moscow (in Russian).
Regions of Russia. Social and economic indicators (2012). Statistics Digest. Moscow (in Russian).
Copyright (c) 2018 Economics Profession Business
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Economics Profession Business is a golden publisher, as we allow self-archiving, but most importantly we are fully transparent about your rights.
Authors may present and discuss their findings ahead of publication: at biological or scientific conferences, on preprint servers, in public databases, and in blogs, wikis, tweets, and other informal communication channels.
Economics Profession Business (EPB) allows authors to deposit manuscripts (currently under review or those for intended submission to EPB) in non-commercial, pre-print servers such as ArXiv.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
