YOUTH INNOVATIVENESS IN THE MODERN ECONOMY: AN INTERDISCIPLINARY STUDY IN THE CONTEXT OF THE "GENOTYPE — PERSONALITY — ENVIRONMENT" CONCEPTION
УДК 330.16, 159.923
Abstract
This paper, which has a problem-setting character, actualizes and analyzes the problem of innovativeness of young people in Russia. The authors consider this problem in the framework of a comprehensive interdisciplinary approach to study the interconnectedness of genetic and «environmentally-related» factors of forming personal and professional orientation to innovation. The study of this problem involves the identification of the genetic and environmental economic, social and cultural factors and predictors youth readiness for innovative activities based on comparative socioeconomic, sociocultural, psychodiagnostic and molecular genetic analysis. Understanding the factors and mechanisms of the formation and development of innovativeness is an important research objective that goes also into practical terms, in particular, in the study and implementation of intellectual and innovation potential of regions and territories. Further studies of this problem may contribute to the improvement and refinement of the theoretical concepts of innovativeness and the development of effective methods for empowering personal innovativeness and enhancing the involvement of modern youth in research, entrepreneurial and innovation activities.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Дубина И. Н., Остащенко Т. В. Региональный интеллектуальный капитал, интеллектуальный климат и интеллектуальный потенциал: вопросы определения, оценки и управления // Экономика и управления: проблемы, решения. 2016. № 4. С. 140-149.
Аузан А. А. Социокультурные коды в экономическом анализе // Журнал новой экономической ассоциации. 2013. № 1 (17). С. 173-176.
Атаманова И. В., Богомаз С. А. Инновативность современной молодежи и культурные факторы социально-экономического развития // Социальная и экономическая психология. Сер. «Труды Института психологии РАН». М.: Институт психологии РАН, 2018. С. 281-288.
Клочко В. Е., Краснорядцева О. М. Становление инновационно-активной личности как психологообразовательная проблема // Интеллектуальный потенциал и инновационная активность вузовской молодежи / отв. ред. С. А. Богомаз, О. М. Краснорядцева. Томск: Изд-во ТГУ, 2014. С. 115-128.
Клочко В. Е., Клочко Ю. В. Человек: открытая система в закрытой среде // Сибирский психологический журнал. 2015. № 57. С. 6-16.
Аузан А. А., Никишина Е. Н. Долгосрочная экономическая динамика: роль неформальных институтов // Журнал экономической теории. 2013. № 4. С. 48-57.
Dubina I. N., Carayannis E. G. (Eds.) Creativity, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship Across Cultures: Theory and Practicies. New York: Springer, 2016.
Kirton M. J. Adaptors and innovators: a description and measure. Creativity Assessment: Readings and Resources. Buffalo: Creative Education Foundation Press, 1999, 121-132.
Puccio G. J. Foursight Manual. Buffalo: International Center for Studies in Creativity, 2002.
Plomin R, von Stumm S. The new genetics of intelligence. Nature Reviews. Genetics, 2018, 19 (3): 148159.
Hill W. D., Davies, G., van de Lagemaat, L. et al. Human cognitive ability is influenced by genetic variation in components of postsynaptic signalling complexes assembled by NMDA receptors and MAGUK proteins. Translational Psychiatry, 2014, 4: 341.
Espeseth T., Christoforou A. et al. Imaging and cognitive genetics: the Norwegian Cognitive NeuroGenetics sample. Twin Res Hum Genet, 2012, 15: 442-452.
Davies G., Tenesa A., Payton A. et al. Genome-wide association studies establish that human intelligence is highly heritable and polygenic. Molecular Psychiatry, 2011, 16: 996-1005.
Davies, G. et al. Genetic contributions to variation in general cognitive function: a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies in the CHARGE consortium (N = 53949). Molecular Psychiatry, 2015, 20: 183192.
Savage J. E., Jansen P. R. et al. Genome-wide association meta-analysis in 269,867 individuals identifies new genetic and functional links to intelligence. Nature Genetics, 2018, 50: 912-919.
DeYoung C. G., Hirsh J. B. et al. Testing predictions from personality neuroscience: brain structure and the Big Five. Psychological Science. 2010, 21 (6): 820-828.
DeYoung C. G., Gray JR. Personality neuroscience: Explaining individual differences in affect, behavior, and cognition. The Cambridge handbook of personality psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009, 323-346.
DeYoung C. G., Peterson J. B., Higgins DM. Sources of Openness/Intellect: Cognitive and neuropsychological correlates of the fifth factor of personality. Journal of Personality, 2005, 73: 825-858.
Trampush et al. GWAS meta-analysis reveals novel loci and genetic correlates for general cognitive function: a report from the COGENT consortium. Molecular Psychiatry, 2017, 22: 336-345.
Лебедева Н. М. Ценности и отношение к инновациям: межкультурные различия // Психологический журнал. 2009. Т. 30. № 6. С. 81-92.
Лебедева Н. М., Татарко А. Н. Методика исследования отношения личности к инновациям // Альманах современной науки и образования. Тамбов, 2009.
Kirton M. J. Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory (KAI) manual (2nd edition). Hatfield: Occupational Research Centre, 1987.
Дубина И. Н., Куцев М. Г., Славов П. О. Междисциплинарное исследование подходов к принятию управленческих решений: постановка задачи и предварительные результаты // Управление современной организацией: опыт, проблемы и перспективы. 2017. № 2 (8). С. 118-122.
Дубина И. Н. Управление творчеством персонала в условиях инновационной экономики. М.: Academia, 2009.
Дубина И. Н. Математико-статистические методы в эмпирических социально-экономических исследованиях. М.: Финансы и статистика, 2010.
Costa P. T., McCrae R. R. NEO PI-R professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, 1992.
Хромов А. Б. Пятифакторный опросник личности. Курган: КГУ, 2000.
Barbaranelli C., Caprara G. V. Measuring the Big Five in self-report and other ratings: A multitrait-multimethod study. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 2000, 16: 31-43.
Caprara G. V. et al. Positive effects of promoting prosocial behavior in early adolescence: Evidence from a school-based intervention. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 2014, 38 (4): 386-396.
Богомаз С. А. Модификация опросника «Якоря карьеры»: ценностная ориентация на инновационную и предпринимательскую деятельность // Сибирский психологический журнал. 2012. № 44. С. 101-109.
Inglehart R. F. Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990.
Хабибулин Р. К., Дейнека О. С. Феномен постматериалистических ценностей и проблема политической стабильности // Современные проблемы науки и образования. 2015. № 1 (1). С. 1525.
REFERENCES
Dubina I. N., Ostashchenko T. V. Regional intellectual capital, intellectual climate and intellectual potential: issues of definition, assessment and management. Economics and Management: Problems, Solutions, 2016, 4: 140-149. (In Russ.)
Auzan A. A. Sociocultural Codes in Economic Analysis. Journal of the New Economic Association, 2013, 1 (17): 173-176. (In Russ.)
Atamanova I. V., Bogomaz S. A. Innovation of modern youth and cultural factors of socio-economic development. Social and Economic Psychology. Moscow, 2018, 281-288. (In Russ.)
Klochko V. E., Krasnoryadtseva O. M. The formation of innovatively active personality as a psychological and educational problem. Intellectual potential and innovative activity of university youth. Tomsk: TSU, 2014, 115-128. (In Russ.)
Klochko V. E., Klochko Yu. V. Man: an open system in a closed environment. Siberian Journal of Psychology, 2015, 57: 6-16. (In Russ.)
Auzan A. A., Nikishina E. N. Long-term economic dynamics: the role of informal institutions. Journal of Economic Theory, 2013, 4: 48-57. (In Russ.)
Dubina I. N., Carayannis E. G. (Eds.) Creativity, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship Across Cultures: Theory and Practicies. New York: Springer.
Kirton M. J. Adaptors and innovators: a description and measure. Creativity Assessment: Readings and Resources. Buffalo: Creative Education Foundation Press, 1999, 121-132.
Puccio G. J. Foursight Manual. Buffalo: International Center for Studies in Creativity, 2002.
Plomin R, von Stumm S. The new genetics of intelligence. Nature Reviews. Genetics, 2018, 19 (3): 148159.
Hill W. D., Davies, G., van de Lagemaat, L. et al. Human cognitive ability is influenced by genetic variation in components of postsynaptic signalling complexes assembled by NMDA receptors and MAGUK proteins. Translational Psychiatry, 2014, 4: 341.
Espeseth T., Christoforou A. et al. Imaging and cognitive genetics: the Norwegian Cognitive NeuroGenetics sample. Twin Res Hum Genet, 2012, 15: 442-452.
Davies G., Tenesa A., Payton A. et al. Genome-wide association studies establish that human intelligence is highly heritable and polygenic. Molecular Psychiatry, 2011,16: 996-1005.
Davies G. et al. Genetic contributions to variation in general cognitive function: a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies in the CHARGE consortium (N = 53949). Molecular Psychiatry, 2015, 20: 183-192.
Savage J. E., Jansen P. R. et al. Genome-wide association meta-analysis in 269,867 individuals identifies new genetic and functional links to intelligence. Nature Genetics, 2018, 50: 912-919.
DeYoung C. G., Hirsh J. B. et al. Testing predictions from personality neuroscience: brain structure and the Big Five. Psychological Science. 2010, 21 (6): 820-828.
DeYoung C. G., Gray JR. Personality neuroscience: Explaining individual differences in affect, behavior, and cognition. The Cambridge handbook of personality psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009, 323-346.
DeYoung C. G., Peterson J. B., Higgins DM. Sources of Openness/Intellect: Cognitive and neuropsychological correlates of the fifth factor of personality. Journal of Personality, 2005, 73: 825-858.
Trampush et al. GWAS meta-analysis reveals novel loci and genetic correlates for general cognitive function: a report from the COGENT consortium. Molecular Psychiatry, 2017, 22: 336-345.
Lebedeva N. M. Values and attitudes towards innovation: intercultural differences. Psychological Journal, 2009, 30 (6): 81-92. (In Russ.)
Lebedeva N. M., Tatarko A. N. Methods of researching individual attitudes to innovation. Almanac of modern science and education. Tambov, 2009. (In Russ.).
Kirton M. J. Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory (KAI) manual (2nd edition). Hatfield: Occupational Research Centre, 1987.
Dubina I. N., Kutsev M. G., Slavov P. O. Interdisciplinary study of approaches to making managerial decisions: statement of the problem and preliminary results. Management of a modern organization: experience, problems and prospects, 2017, 2 (8): 118-122. (In Russ.)
Dubina I. N. Creativity management in innovation economy. Moscow: Academia, 2009. (In Russ.)
Dubina I. N. Mathematical and statistical methods in empirical social and economic research. Moscow: Finance and Statistics, 2010. (In Russ.)
Costa P. T., McCrae R. R. NEO PI-R professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, 1992.
Khromov A. B. Five-factor personality questionnaire. Kurgan: KSU, 2000. (in Russ.)
Barbaranelli C., Caprara G. V. (2000). Measuring the Big Five in self-report and other ratings: A multitrait-multimethod study. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 2000, 16: 31-43.
Caprara G. V. et al. Positive effects of promoting prosocial behavior in early adolescence: Evidence from a school-based intervention. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 2014, 38 (4): 386-396.
Bogomaz S. A. Modification of the questionnaire «Career Anchors»: value orientation on innovative and entrepreneurial activity. Siberian Journal of Psychology, 2012, 44: 101-109. (In Russ.)
Inglehart R. F. Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990.
Khabibulin R. K., Deineka O. S. The phenomenon of post-materialistic values and the problem of political stability. Modern problems of science and education, 2015, 1 (1): 1525. (In Russ.)
Economics Profession Business is a golden publisher, as we allow self-archiving, but most importantly we are fully transparent about your rights.
Authors may present and discuss their findings ahead of publication: at biological or scientific conferences, on preprint servers, in public databases, and in blogs, wikis, tweets, and other informal communication channels.
Economics Profession Business (EPB) allows authors to deposit manuscripts (currently under review or those for intended submission to EPB) in non-commercial, pre-print servers such as ArXiv.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
