DEVELOPMENT OF THE YOUTH CREATIVE POTENTIAL IN THE CONDITIONS OF DIGITALIZATION AND DIGITAL SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT

Main Article Content

Victoria A. Shelginskaia Email: victoria.shelg@yandex.ru

Abstract

The high importance of mass creative culture and the active digitalization of all spheres of life, combined with social restrictions during the pandemic, are caused changes in society's perception of cultural and social values. These affect the most psychologically flexible social group, the youth, who are equally open to any innovation and dependent on the socio-psychological and cultural environment. The article raises the problem of formation of an artist-person in the period of digitalization from the point of view of the development of creative potential. Based on a systematic approach and the results of participant observation of the behavior and development of creative users of social networks, the socio-psychological features of the activities of Internet authorities as intermediaries between a person and the cultural environment, as well as the influence of trends in modern online platforms on the creative potential of an individual, were analyzed. A multi-level model of the creative development of a person in the network was presented, taking into account the risks and negative impact from the Internet society. The model includes the stages: passive observation, repetition of the mass pattern, creative activity, separation the art from creativity, and the art level itself. The most dangerous are the passive-affective and detached-creative levels, at which the influence of society on the developing creative personality is strongest and most unpredictable. The results are interesting for specialists in the field of cultural studies, sociology, social psychology, and pedagogical theory and practice in the context of the digital transformation of education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
Shelginskaia, V. A. (2023). DEVELOPMENT OF THE YOUTH CREATIVE POTENTIAL IN THE CONDITIONS OF DIGITALIZATION AND DIGITAL SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT. Society and Security Insights, 6(2), 150-164. https://doi.org/10.14258/SSI(2023)2-10
Section
SOCIAL, CULTURAL STUDIES AND SECURITY
Author Biography

Victoria A. Shelginskaia, Ural Institute of Management - a branch of Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration

postgraduate student of the Department of Personnel Management and Sociology, Ural Institute of Management – a branch of Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Yekaterinburg, Russia.

References

Ан С.А. Возможности преодоления кризиса искусства через Интернет: постановка проблемы // Философские, социологические и психолого-педагогические проблемы современного образования. 2021. № 3. С. 89–191. DOI: 10.37386/2687-0576-2021-3-89-91
Бочарникова И.С. Ониомания как тренд потребления в молодежной среде: социокультурный аспект // Каспийский регион: политика, экономика, культура. 2020. № 1 (62). С. 133–140. DOI: 10.21672/1818-510Х-2020-62-1-133-140.
Докучаев И.И. Кризис ценностей креативной культуры как глобальная проблема современности. Международные Лихачевские научные чтения, 2019. URL: https://www.lihachev.ru/pic/site/files/lihcht/2019/dokladi/DokuchaevII_sec2_rus_290419.pdf (дата обращения 14.10.2022).
Ефремова М.В., Бульцева М.А. Взаимосвязь индивидуальных ценностей и просоциального поведения в онлайн-и офлайн-контекстах // Социальная психология и общество. 2020. № 11 (1). С. 107–126.
Катаева О.В. Цифровизация и виртуализация жизненного мира: оценки и позиции // Интеллект. Инновации. Инвестиции. 2020. № 6. С. 129–136. DOI: 10/25198.2077-7175-2020-6-129
Ковалев В.Н. Риски цифровизации общества. В кн.: Черноморская конференция-2019: Сборник материалов III Черноморской международной научно-практической конференции. Севастополь, 20–22 июня 2019 г. Севастополь: Филиал Московского государственного университета имени М.В. Ломоносова в г. Севастополе, 2019. С. 189–190.
Кожевников С. Б., Ермоленко Г. А. Цифровизация современной культуры и гуманитарная рефлексия // Цифровая гуманитаристика: человек в «прозрачном» обществе. М.: Книгодел, 2021. 144 с.
Корчак К.И. Информационная социализация и её потенциальные угрозы на ступени среднего общего образования в свете тенденции цифровизации // Народное образование. 2021. № 4(1487). С. 184–190.
Кулишов В.В. Массовая культура как фактор социализации и источник рисков воспитания и развития обучающихся: возможные контуры типологии социально-антропологических факторов влияния // Kant. 2019. № 3 (32). С. 66–72.
Лекторский В.А. Познание, действие, реальность // Вопросы философии. 2017. № 9. С. 5–23
Митина И.Д., Тихова В.А. Массовая потребительская культуры: современные тенденции и проблемы в социологии культуры // Сибирский научный вестник. 2020. № 3-4 (41-42). С. 139-144.
Османова А. И. Специфика коммуникации с молодежной аудиторией в виртуальной среде // Медиаскоп. 2019. № 4. С. 10–16.
Репринцев А.В. Искусство и человек в системы духовных ценностей постиндустриального мира: векторы эволюции смыслов и эталонов культуры // Ученые записи. 2021. № 3 (59). С. 242–260.
Сафарян Л.Г. Аннулирование эстетических принципов в ситуационистском спектакле // Terra Aestheticae. 2021. № 2 (8). С. 66–98.
Тихова В.А., Митин С.Н. Понятие социализации и социализационные траектории молодёжи в условиях потребительского общества // Симбирский научный вестник. 2021. № 1 (43). С. 62–68.
Халин В.Г., Чернова Г.В. Цифровизация и ее влияние на российскую экономику и общество: преимущества, вызовы, угрозы и риски //Управленческое консультирование. 2018. №. 10 (118). С. 46–63.
Шишкина Л.И. Креативность и творчество: соотношение понятий // Управленческое консультирование. 2015. № 4 (76). С. 176–182.
Benamar L., Balagué C., Ghassany M. The identification and influence of social roles in a social media product community // Journal of computer-mediated communication. 2017. Vol. 22 , no. 6. P. 337–362.
Bourgeois-Bougrine S., Richard P., Burkhardt J. M., Frantz B., Lubart T. The expression of users’ creative potential in virtual and real environments: An exploratory study // Creative Learning in Digital and Virtual Environments. Routledge, 2020. P. 96–117.
Davis K., Randall D. P., Ambrose A., Orand M. ‘I was bullied too’: stories of bullying and coping in an online community // Information, Communication & Society. 2015. Vol. 18, no. 4. P. 357–375.
Krause H. V., Baum K., Baumann A., Krasnova H. Unifying the detrimental and beneficial effects of social network site use on self-esteem: a systematic literature review // Media Psychology. 2021. Vol. 24, no. 1. P. 10–47.
Parker E., Saker M. Art museums and the incorporation of virtual reality: Examining the impact of VR on spatial and social norms // Convergence. 2020. Vol. 26, no. 5-6. P. 1159–1173.

REFERENCES
An S.A. (2021). Opportunities to Overcome the Art Crisis via the Internet: Statement of the Problem. Filosofskie, sociologicheskie i psihologo-pedagogicheskie problemy sovremennogo obrazovaniya, 3, 89–191. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.37386/2687-0576-2021-3-89-91
Benamar, L., Balagué, C., Ghassany, M. (2017). The identification and influence of social roles in a social media product community. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 22 (6), 337–362.
Bocharnikova I.S. (2020). Oniomania as a consumption trend among young people: a sociocultural aspect. Kaspijskij region: politika, ekonomika, kul'tura, 1 (62), 133–140. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21672/1818-510Х-2020-62-1-133-140.
Bourgeois-Bougrine S., Richard, P., Burkhardt, J. M., Frantz, B., Lubart, T. (2020). The expression of users’ creative potential in virtual and real environments: an exploratory study. Creative Learning in Digital and Virtual Environments (pp.96–117). Routledge.
Davis, K., Randall, D. P., Ambrose, A., Orand, M. (2015). ‘I was bullied too’: stories of bullying and coping in an online community. Information, Communication & Society, 18 (4), 357–375.
Dokuchaev I. I. (2019). Crisis of values of creative culture as a global problem of our time. Mezhdunarodnye Lihachevskie nauchnye chteniya. Available at: https://www.lihachev.ru/pic/site/files/lihcht/2019/dokladi/DokuchaevII_sec2_rus_290419.pdf (accessed 14 October 2022). (In Russ.).
Efremova M.V. Bul'ceva M.A. (2020). The relationship of individual values and prosocial behavior in online and offline contexts. Social'naya psihologiya i obshchestvo, 1, 107–126. (In Russ.).
Halin V.G., Chernova G.V. (2018), Digitalization and its impact on the Russian economy and society: advantages, challenges, threats and risks. Upravlencheskoe konsul'tirovanie, 10 (118), 46–63.
Kataeva O.V. (2020). Digitalization and virtualization of the life world: assessments and positions. Intellekt. Innovacii. Investicii, 6, 129–136. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10/25198.2077-7175-2020-6-129
Korchak K.I. (2021). Information socialization and its potential threats at the level of secondary general education in the light of the digitalization trend. Narodnoe obrazovanie, 4(1487), 184–190. (In Russ.).
Kovalev V.N. Riski tsifrovizatsii obshchestva. In: Black Sea Conference-2019, Paper presenterd at the 3d Conference of Black Sea International Scientific and Practical Conference, Sevastopol, 2019. Sevastopol: a branch of Moscow State University named after M.V. Lomonosov in Sevastopol, 2019. pp. 189–190. (In Russ.).
Kozhevnikov S.B., Ermolenko G.A. (2021). Digitalization of modern culture and humanitarian reflection. Cifrovaya gumanitaristika: chelovek v «prozrachnom» obshchestve. Moskow: Knigodel. 144 p. (In Russ.).
Krause H.V., Baum K., Baumann A., Krasnova H. (2021). Unifying the detrimental and beneficial effects of social network site use on self-esteem: a systematic literature review. Media Psychology, no. 24,10–47.
Kulishev V. V. (2019). Mass culture as a factor of socialization and a source of risks of education and development of students: possible contours of the typology of socio-anthropological factors of influence. Kant, 3 (32), 66–72. (In Russ.).
Lektorskij V.A. (2017). Cognition, action, reality. Voprosy filosofii, 9, 5–23. (In Russ.).
Mitina I. D., Tihova V. A. (2020). Mass consumer culture: current trends and problems in the sociology of culture. Sibirskij nauchnyj vestnik, 3-4 (41-42), 139–144. (In Russ.).
Osmanova A.I. (2019). The specificity of communication with the youth audience in a virtual environment. Mediaskop, 4, 10–16. (In Russ.).
Parker E., Saker M. (2020). Art museums and the incorporation of virtual reality: Examining the impact of VR on spatial and social norms. Convergence, 26 (5-6), 1159–1173.
Reprincev A.V. (2021).Art and Man in the System of Spiritual Values of the Post-Industrial World: Vectors of the Evolution of Meanings and Standards of Culture. Uchenye zapisi, 3 (59),  242–260. (In Russ.).
Safaryan L.G. (2021). Reversal of aesthetic principles in the situationist spectacle. Terra Aestheticae, 2 (8), 66–98. (In Russ.).
Shishkina L.I. (2015). Creativity and creativity: correlation of concepts. Upravlencheskoe konsul'tirovanie, 4 (76), 176–182. (In Russ.).
Tihova V.A., Mitin S.N. (2021). The concept of socialization and socialization trajectories of youth in a consumer society. Simbirskij nauchnyj vestnik, 1 (43), 62–68. (In Russ.).