THE CULTURE OF EVERYDAY LIFE: TRENDS OF CHANGE
Main Article Content
Abstract
Society is the most dynamic structure of being. Determining the direction of its changes is the way to success in planning and implementing any social initiatives and projects. Everyday life is an area where changes underlie many social changes that determine the dynamics of social development. Identifying trends in the culture of everyday life opens up opportunities for scientific planning of the development of society, improving the quality of life and meeting the needs of individuals, that underlines the main relevance of the study. The main purpose of the study is to identify trends in the changing culture of everyday life at the present stage of the development of Russian society. The dialectical method and the system-structural approach allowed us to determine how people's daily communication has changed due to the introduction of information technologies and digitalization into life, how the "visual turn" determines people's interests and their daily contacts, how following the social stratification of Russian society associated with the country's transition to the capitalist path of development, the daily life of people has become diverse. Social groups that differ in the way and style of everyday life have been formed. All of these phenomena have prospects for further development and act as major trends in changing the culture of everyday life, and the scientific novelty and value of the study consists in their identification, analysis and a systematization. The practical significance of this article is seen in the use of its results in the context of the organization of both everyday events and in the planning of further transformations of Russian society, taking into account the changes occurring in the culture of everyday life: digitalization, visualization, the formation of diverse styles of behavior and lifestyles. The use of a historical approach and the reliance on sociological material from VTSIOM made it possible to show that the newly emerged trends exist on a par with the cultural traditions of Russians, with their interest in reading, visiting theaters, exhibitions, museums, which also constitute an important part of their lives. Thus, innovations in the culture of everyday life are combined with traditions of everyday life-such a conclusion derives from this study.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Metrics
Metrics Loading ...
Article Details
How to Cite
Sytykh, O. L. (2023). THE CULTURE OF EVERYDAY LIFE: TRENDS OF CHANGE. Society and Security Insights, 6(1), 86-95. https://doi.org/10.14258/SSI(2023)1-05
Section
SOCIAL, CULTURAL STUDIES AND SECURITY
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.
References
Бауман З. Текучая современность. СПб.: Питер, 2008. 240 с.
Горшков М. К.. Российская повседневность: состояние и проблемы в условиях кризиса // Россия: региональная власть в условиях экономического кризиса. 2010. № 2010. С. 45–64.
Даниэль С. М. Искусство видеть. М.: Амфора, 2006. 206 с.
Иоселиани А.Д. Особенности повседневной жизни человека в цифровом мире // Манускрипт. Тамбов: Грамота, 2020. Том 13. Выпуск 4. C. 115-119.
Кетова К. В., Русяк И. Г. Анализ степени дифференциации населения Российсчкой Федерации по уровню доходов. // E-Scio. 2020. №6 (45). С. 367-378.
Колмогорова А.В. Аргументация в речевой повседневности. М.: Флинта, Наука, 2009. 148 с.
Колодий Н. А., Колодий В. В. Визуальный поворот и его влияние на социальное познание // Известия Томского политехнического университета. 2010. № 6. С. 146–152.
REFERENCES
Bauman, Z. (2008). Fluid modernity. St. Petersburg: Peter. (In Russ.).
Gorshkov, M. K. (2010). Russian everyday life: the state and problems in a crisis. Russia: regional power in the conditions of economic crisis, 2010, 45–64. (In Russ).
Daniel, S. M. (2006). The art of seeing. Moscow: Amphora. (In Russ.).
Ioseliani, A. D. (2020). Features of a person's daily life in the digital world. Manuscript, 13(4), 115–119. (In Russ).
Ketova, K. V., & Rusyak, I. G. (2020). Analysis of the degree of differentiation of the population of the Russian Federation by income level. EScio. 6(45), 367-378.
Kolmogorova, A. V. (2009). Argumentation in everyday speech. Moscow: Flint, Nauka.
(In Russ.).
Kolodiy, N. A., & Kolodiy, V. V. (2010). Visual turn and its influence on social cognition. Proceedings of Tomsk Polytechnic University, 6, 146–152. (In Russ).
Горшков М. К.. Российская повседневность: состояние и проблемы в условиях кризиса // Россия: региональная власть в условиях экономического кризиса. 2010. № 2010. С. 45–64.
Даниэль С. М. Искусство видеть. М.: Амфора, 2006. 206 с.
Иоселиани А.Д. Особенности повседневной жизни человека в цифровом мире // Манускрипт. Тамбов: Грамота, 2020. Том 13. Выпуск 4. C. 115-119.
Кетова К. В., Русяк И. Г. Анализ степени дифференциации населения Российсчкой Федерации по уровню доходов. // E-Scio. 2020. №6 (45). С. 367-378.
Колмогорова А.В. Аргументация в речевой повседневности. М.: Флинта, Наука, 2009. 148 с.
Колодий Н. А., Колодий В. В. Визуальный поворот и его влияние на социальное познание // Известия Томского политехнического университета. 2010. № 6. С. 146–152.
REFERENCES
Bauman, Z. (2008). Fluid modernity. St. Petersburg: Peter. (In Russ.).
Gorshkov, M. K. (2010). Russian everyday life: the state and problems in a crisis. Russia: regional power in the conditions of economic crisis, 2010, 45–64. (In Russ).
Daniel, S. M. (2006). The art of seeing. Moscow: Amphora. (In Russ.).
Ioseliani, A. D. (2020). Features of a person's daily life in the digital world. Manuscript, 13(4), 115–119. (In Russ).
Ketova, K. V., & Rusyak, I. G. (2020). Analysis of the degree of differentiation of the population of the Russian Federation by income level. EScio. 6(45), 367-378.
Kolmogorova, A. V. (2009). Argumentation in everyday speech. Moscow: Flint, Nauka.
(In Russ.).
Kolodiy, N. A., & Kolodiy, V. V. (2010). Visual turn and its influence on social cognition. Proceedings of Tomsk Polytechnic University, 6, 146–152. (In Russ).