MANUFACTURING FEATURES OF HOLLOW SHANK OF THE EARLY IRON AGE CELTS FROM CENTRAL SIBERIA (technoligical classification)
Abstract
At the end of the Late Bronze Age, with the transition to the Early Iron Age, the territory of the Western and Central Siberia became the place where previously unknown technology for manufacturing of hollow shank of Bronze Celts was formed. Analysis of more than 350 bronze Celts allows allocating within the blind sleeve manufacturing technology of two groups. The first group includes products molded in the “classical” technological style. This is a traditional production of the hollow shank of the Celts in bivalve molds with the core clamp to the top of the cooking chamber. The second group consists of the products which were casted with the use of the protrusions system inside the mold. These protrusions prevented the core from displacement. The systematization of objects by the fastening technology resulted in allocation of two methods of core retention: protrusions were fastened to the core or to the inside of the working chamber, or both on the core and the core of the mold (a combined method of fastening). The number of stops varies from one to four. According to classification data allocation was made of 19 different ways of the hollow shank manufacturing in the territory of Central Siberia in the early Iron Age.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Bochkarev V.S. K voprosu o strukture arkheologicheskogo issledovaniya [On the Structure of Archaeological Research]. Tezisy dokladov sessii, posvyashchennoy itogam polevykh arkheologicheskikh issledovaniy 1972 goda v SSSR [Abstracts of the Session Devoted to the Results of the Field Archaeological Research in 1972 in the USSR. Tashkent, 1973. Pp. 56–60 [In Russian]. Бочкарёв В.С. К вопросу о структуре археологического исследования // Тезисы докладов сессии, посвященной итогам полевых археологических исследований 1972 года в СССР. Ташкент, 1973. С. 56-60.
Volkov V.V. Bronzovyy i ranniy zheleznyy vek Severnoy Mongolii [Bronze and Early Iron Age Northern Mongolia]. Ulan-Bator : Izd-vo AN MNR, 1967. 148 p. [In Russian]. Волков В.В. Бронзовый и ранний железный век Северной Монголии. Улан-Батор : Изд-во АН МНР, 1967. 148 с.
Grishin Yu.S. Ocherki po istorii proizvodstva v Priural’e i Yuzhnoy Sibiri v epokhu bronzy i rannego zheleza [Essays on the History of Production in the Urals and Southern Siberia in the Bronze Age and Early Iron Age]. M. : Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1960. 208 p. (MIA, №90). [In Russian]. Гришин Ю.С. Очерки по истории производства в Приуралье и Южной Сибири в эпоху бронзы и раннего железа. М. : Изд-во АН СССР, 1960. 208 с. (МИА, №90).
Gryaznov M.P. Drevnyaya bronza Minusinskikh stepey [Ancient Bronze of the Minusinsk Steppes]. Trudy otdela istorii pervobytnoy kul’tury Gosudarstvennogo Ermitazha [Proceedings of the Department of the History of Primitive Culture of the State Hermitage]. L., 1941. Vol. I. Pp. 137–171 [In Russian]. Грязнов М.П. Древняя бронза Минусинских степей // Труды отдела истории первобытной культуры Государственного Эрмитажа. Т. I. Л., 1941. С. 137-171.
Dergachev V.A. Topory-kel’ty pozdney bronzy Karpato-Podunav’ya. Vyp. 2: Kel’ty i serpy Nizhnego Podunav’ya [Axes – Celts of the Late Bronze Age of the Carpathian-Danube Region. Vol. 2: The Celts and Sickles of the Lower Danube Region. Kishinev : Izd.-poligr. firma «Tsentral’naya tipografiya», 2011. Pp. 48–177 [In Russian]. Дергачёв В.А. Топоры-кельты поздней бронзы Карпато-Подунавья. Вып. 2: Кельты и серпы Нижнего Подунавья. Кишинёв : Изд.-полигр. фирма «Центральная типография», 2011. С. 48-177.
Durakov I.A. K voprosu o tekhnologii proizvodstva pologo lit’ya kulayskoy kul’tury [On the Technology of Production of Hollow Casting of the Kulay Culture]. Arkheologiya vchera, segodnya, zavtra [Archaeology Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow]. Novosibirsk : NGPU, 1995. Pp. 107–112. [In Russian]. Дураков И.А. К вопросу о технологии производства полого литья кулайской культуры // Археология вчера, сегодня, завтра. Новосибирск : НГПУ, 1995. С. 107-112.
Korochkova O.N., Spiridonov I.A., Stefanov V.I. O metalloobrabotke epokhi pozdney bronzy gornolesnogo Zaural’ya: kel’ty kizhirovskogo tipa [On the Late Bronze Age Metal Processing in the Mountain Forest Regions of the Urals: the Celts of the Kizhir Type]. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Vestnik of Kemerovo State University]. 2015. №2 (62). Vol. 6. Pp. 61–67. [In Russian]. Корочкова О.Н., Спиридонов И.А., Стефанов В.И. О металлообработке эпохи поздней бронзы горно-лесного Зауралья: кельты кижировского типа // Вестник Кемеровского государственного университета. 2015. №2 (62). Т. 6. С. 61-67.
Kleyn L.S. Arkheologicheskaya tipologiya [Archaeological Typology]. L., 1991. 447 p. [In Russian]. Клейн Л.С. Археологическая типология. Л. : Академия наук СССР, ЛФ ЦЭНДИСИ, Ленинградское научно-исследовательское объединение археологическое объединение, 1991. 447 с.
Kleyn L.S. Klassifikatsiya i tipologiya [Classification and Typology]. Istoricheskie chteniya pamyati
M.P. Gryaznova [Historical Readings in Memory of M.P. Gryaznov]. Part 1. Omsk, 1987. Pp. 33–35 [In Russian]. Клейн Л.С. Классификация и типология // Исторические чтения памяти М.П. Грязнова. Ч. 1. Омск : [Б.и.], 1987. С. 33-35.
Maksimenkov G.A. Bronzovye kel’ty krasnoyarsko-angarskikh tipov [Bronze Celts of the Krasnoyarsk– Angara Types]. Sovetskaya arkheologiya [Soviet Archaeology]. 1960. №1. Pp. 148–162 [In Russian]. Максименков Г.А. Бронзовые кельты красноярско-ангарских типов // Советская археология. 1960. №1. С. 148-162.
Nenakhov D.A. Tagarskie kel’ty s “gvozdikami” [Tagar Celts with “Studs”]. Arii stepnoy Evrazii: epokha bronzy i rannego zheleza v stepyakh Evrazii i na sopredel’nykh territoriyakh: sb. pamyati E.E. Kuz’minoy [Arias of Steppe Eurasia: the Bronze Age and Early Iron Age in the Eurasian Steppes and Adjacent Territories: in Memory of E.E. Kuzmina]. Barnaul : Izd-vo Alt. un-ta, 2014. Pp. 409–411 [In Russian]. Ненахов Д.А. Тагарские кельты с «гвоздиками» // Арии степной Евразии: эпоха бронзы и раннего железа в степях Евразии и на сопредельных территориях: сб. памяти Е.Е. Кузьминой. Барнаул : Изд-во Алт. ун-та, 2014. С. 409-411.
Trufanov A.Ya. Arkheologicheskiy risunok: opyt metodicheskogo analiza [Archaeological Drawing: the Experience of Methodological Analysis]. Ekaterinburg: Izdatel’skaya gruppa “Karavan”, 2015. 220 p. [In Russian]. Труфанов А.Я. Археологический рисунок: опыт методического анализа. Екатеринбург : Издательская группа «Караван», 2015. 220 с.
Chernetsov V.N. Opyt tipologii zapadnosibirskikh kel’tov [Experience of the Typology of West Siberian Celts]. Kratkie soobshcheniya instituta istorii material’noy kul’tury. Vyp. 17 [Brief Reports of the Institute of History of Material Culture. Vol. 17]. M. : Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1947. Pp. 65–78. [In Russian]. Чернецов В.Н. Опыт типологии западносибирских кельтов // Краткие сообщения Института истории материальной культуры. Вып. 17. М. : Изд-во АН СССР, 1947. С. 65-78.
Chlenova N.L. Proiskhozhdenie i rannyaya istoriya plemen tagarskoy kul’tury [The Origin and Early History of the Tagar Culture Tribes]. M. : Nauka, 1967. Pp. 110–145 [In Russian]. Членова Н.Л. Происхождение и ранняя история племен татарской культуры. М : Наука, 1967. С. 110-145.
Copyright (c) 2017 Теория и практика археологических исследований
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Theory and Practice of Archaeological Research is a golden publisher, as we allow self-archiving, but most importantly we are fully transparent about your rights.
Authors may present and discuss their findings ahead of publication: at biological or scientific conferences, on preprint servers, in public databases, and in blogs, wikis, tweets, and other informal communication channels.
Theory and Practice of Archaeological Research allows authors to deposit manuscripts (currently under review or those for intended submission to ABS) in non-commercial, pre-print servers such as ArXiv.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
2.jpg)
