STRATIGRAPHY AND CULTURAL SEQUENCE OF THE TOLBOR 21 SITE (Northern Mongolia): THE RESULTS OF THE 2014-2016 EXCAVATION CAMPAIGNS AND PERSPECTIVES OF FURTHER INVESTIGATIONS

  • E. P. Rybin Institute of archaeology and Ethnography SB RAS; University of Cambridge Email: rybep@yandex.ru
  • A. M. Khatsenovich Institute of archaeology and Ethnography SB RAS Email: archeomongolia@gmail.com
  • N. Zwyns University of California Email: nzwyns@ucdavis.edu
  • B. Gunchinsuren Institute of history and archaeology, Academy of Sciences of Mongolia Email: bgunchinsuren@yahoo.com
  • C. Paine Cambridge University Email: chp29@cam.ac.uk
  • Ts. Bolorbat Institute of history and archaeology, Academy of Sciences of Mongolia Email: tsbolorbat_72@yahoo.com
  • A. A. Anoikin Institute of archaeology and Ethnography SB RAS Email: anui1@yandex.ru
  • V. M. Kharevich Institute of archaeology and Ethnography SB RAS Email: mihalich84@yandex.ru
  • D. Odsuren Institute of history and archaeology Academy of Sciences of Mongolia Email: odsuren.d_24@yahoo.com
  • G. Margad-Eredene Institute of history and archaeology Academy of Sciences of Mongolia Email: margad7g@gmail.com
DOI_disc_logo https://doi.org/10.14258/tpai(2017)4(20).-12
Keywords: Middle Paleolithic, Upper Paleolithic, Mongolia, stratigraphy, lithic technology, spatial structure

Abstract

The Tolbor-21 site is located in North Mongolia in the valley of the Tulburiingol river. The excavations of 2014-2016 revealed the cultural sequence of development of the monument’s complexes throughout the entire length of the Upper Paleolithic. Cultural residues of the early Paleolithic, and possibly an initial Upper Paleolith from the site excavation are dated within two radiocarbon definitions: 44,640 ± 690 (MAMS-14933) from pit 1 (the depth of about 150 cm.) And the 39,240 ± 360 (MAMS-14936) from pit 2 (depth about 115 cm below the surface). Also, in the sediments of the archaeological horizon 6, a small complex, related to the Middle Paleolithic with an open radiocarbon date of more than 50,000 BP was identified. Excavation 2 revealed five cultural horizons from the final to the initial Upper Paleolith which had not previously been identified there. In the horizon 3B for the first time for the upper Upper Paleolithic of the Tolbor Valley, structured fires were identified. The excavation of the trench in the layer 1 of the dark brown loam (possible paleosoil) of the dark brown loam revealed three artifacts: radial and parallel cores and flake. The depth of occurrence of artifacts is 6 m relative to the day surface and 4.5 m relative to the lower cultural layer of the excavation. All the cultural complexes known in the valley previously belonged to different stages of the Upper Paleolithic. Based on the stratigraphic position of the artifacts of data, we can assume that they are among the most ancient in northern Mongolia cultural stratum.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Derevyanko A.P., Zenin A.N., Rybin E.P., Gladyshev S.A., Tsybankov A.A. Razvitie kamennykh industriy verkhnego paleolita Severnoy Mongolii (po dannym stoyanki Tolbor) [Development of Stone Industries in the Upper Paleolithic of Northern Mongolia (according to the Tolbor Site)]. Chelovek i prostranstvo v kul’turakh kamennogo veka Evrazii [Man and Space in the Cultures of the Stone Age of Eurasia]. Novosibirsk: Izd-vo In-ta arkheologii i etnografii SO RAN, 2006. Pp. 17–42. [In Russian]. Деревянко А.П., Зенин А.Н., Рыбин Е.П., Гладышев С.А., Цыбанков А.А. Развитие каменных индустрий верхнего палеолита Северной Монголии (по данным стоянки Толбор) // Человек и пространство в культурах каменного века Евразии. Новосибирск: Изд-во ИАЭТ СО РАН, 2006. С. 17-42.

Derevyanko A.P., Rybin E.P., Gladyshev S.A., Gunchinsuren B., Tsybankov A.A., Olsen D. Razvitie tekhnologicheskikh traditsiy izgotovleniya orudiy v kamennykh industriyakh rannego etapa verkhnego paleolita Severnoy Mongolii (po materialam stoyanok Tolbor-4 i 15) [Development of Technological Traditions of Making Tools in the Stone Industries of the Early Stage of the Upper Paleolithic of Northern Mongolia (Based on Tolbor-4 and 15 Sites)]. Arkheologiya, etnografiya i antropologiya Evrazii [Archaeology, Ethnography and Anthropology of Eurasia]. 2013. №4 (56). Pp. 21–37. [In Russian]. Деревянко А.П., Рыбин Е.П., Гладышев С.А., Гунчинсурэн Б., Цыбанков А.А., Олсен Д. Развитие технологических традиций изготовления орудий в каменных индустриях раннего этапа верхнего палеолита Северной Монголии (по материалам стоянок Толбор-4 и -15) // Археология, этнография и антропология Евразии. 2013. №4 (56). С. 21 – 37.

Rybin E.P., Gladyshev S.A., Tsybankov A.A. Vozniknovenie i razvitie “otshchepovykh” industriy ranney pory verkhnego paleolita Severnoy Mongolii [The Emergence and Development of “Flake” Industries of the Early Stage of the Upper Paleolithic in Northern Mongolia]. Severnaya Evraziya v antropogene: chelovek, paleotekhnologii, geoekologiya, etnologiya i antropologiya [Northern Eurasia in the Anthropogen: Man, Palaeotechnology, Geoecology, Ethnology and Anthropology]. Irkutsk: Ottisk, 2007. Vol. 2. Pp. 137–153. [In Russian]. Рыбин Е.П., Гладышев С.А., Цыбанков А.А. Возникновение и развитие «отщеповых» индустрий ранней поры верхнего палеолита Северной Монголии // Северная Евразия в антропогене: человек, палеотехнологии, геоэкология, этнология и антропология. Иркутск: Изд-во «Оттиск», 2007. Т.2. С.137-153.

Rybin E.P., Khatsenovich A.M., Pavlenok G.D. Posledovatel’nost’ razvitiya industriy rannego – pozdnego verkhnego paleolita Mongolii [Sequence of the Development of Industries of the early – late Upper Paleolithic of Mongolia]. Izvestiya Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser.: Geoarkheologiya. Etnologiya. Antropologiya [Bulletin of Irkutsk State University]. Series: Geoarchaeology. Ethnology. Anthropology]. 2016. Vol. 16. Pp. 3–23. [In Russian]. Рыбин Е.П., Хаценович А.М., Павленок Г.Д. Последовательность развития индустрий раннего –позднего верхнего палеолита Монголии // Известия Иркутского государственного университета. 2016. Т. 16. Серия «Геоархеология. Этнология. Антропология». С. 3–23.

How to Cite
Rybin E. P., Khatsenovich A. M., Zwyns N., Gunchinsuren B., Paine C., Bolorbat T., Anoikin A. A., Kharevich V. M., Odsuren D., Margad-Eredene G. STRATIGRAPHY AND CULTURAL SEQUENCE OF THE TOLBOR 21 SITE (Northern Mongolia): THE RESULTS OF THE 2014-2016 EXCAVATION CAMPAIGNS AND PERSPECTIVES OF FURTHER INVESTIGATIONS // THEORY AND PRACTICE OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 1. Vol. 20, № 4. P. 158 - 168 DOI: 10.14258/tpai(2017)4(20).-12. URL: http://journal.asu.ru/tpai/article/view/%2820%29.-12.
Issue
Vol 20 No 4 (2017)
Section
FOREIGN ARCHAEOLOGY

Copyright (c) 2017 Теория и практика археологических исследований

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Theory and Practice of Archaeological Research is a golden publisher, as we allow self-archiving, but most importantly we are fully transparent about your rights.

Authors may present and discuss their findings ahead of publication: at biological or scientific conferences, on preprint servers, in public databases, and in blogs, wikis, tweets, and other informal communication channels.

Theory and Practice of Archaeological Research allows authors to deposit manuscripts (currently under review or those for intended submission to ABS) in non-commercial, pre-print servers such as ArXiv.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
    2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).