Khirgisuurs of Y ustyd: Multisp ectral Imagery, Experience of Us ing UAVs for Complex Study
Abstract
The article discusses the methodological issues of remote mapping objects of archaeological heritage using unmanned aerial vehicles. A section of the Yustyd river valley on the territory of the Kosh-Agach district of the Altai Republic was chosen as a polygon. The survey area in 2021 covered the territory of the right bank with the maximum concentration of large objects, first of all, khirgisuurs, which are distinguished by a variety of shapes and internal structures. For multispectral shooting of archaeological sites, an unmanned aerial vehicle DJI Inspire 1 (ver. 2.0) was used, a design feature of which was an additional mini-platform located in the rear of the hull. The platform was mounted for the installation of a Parrot Sequoia camera and an additional battery — a source of autonomous power supply for the camera. The process of photogrammetric processing of images was a computer automated digital processing of photographic materials with the subsequent creation of a mosaic orthomosaic. Agisoft Metashape software was chosen for photogrammetric processing of materials. The results obtained were subjected to index (thematic) processing of multispectral images based on a combination of green, red and near infrared channels. In the course of a comparative analysis of the constructed images, the following regularities were found. The MCARI index makes it possible to detect burial mounds and structural elements expressed in geometry (plan). Detection of various “anomalies” characterizing the presence of small elements in the turf layers is possible with additional filter processing. Thus, it has been established that multispectral imaging is a new high-tech tool for performing work: archaeological exploration, searching for new objects and clarifying the configuration of previously studied objects, when mapping stand-alone sites and archaeological complexes in general.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Krupochkin E.P. Methodological Issues in the Digital Mapping of Archaeological Sites. Arheologiya, etnografiya i antropologiya Evrazii = Archaeology, Ethnology & Anthropology of Eurasia. 2009;3(39):95–102. (In Russ.)
Krupochkin E.P., Slyusarenko I.Yu. Geoarchaeological Analysis of the Sites Dated to Scythian Time from the Yustyt River Valley (South-Eastern Altai): Testing of Methodology and First Results. Problemy arheologii, etnografii, antropologii Sibiri i sopredel’nyh territorij = Problems of Archaeology, Ethnography, Anthropology of Siberia and Adjacent Territories. Novosibirsk: Izd-vo In-ta arheologii i etnografii SO RAN, 2015. Vol. XXI. Pp. 284–288. (In Russ.)
Kubarev V.D. Archaeological sites of the Kosh-Agach region (Gorny Altai). Arheologicheskij poisk (Severnaya Aziya) = Archaeological search (North Asia). Novosibirsk : Nauka, 1980. Pp. 69–91. (In Russ.)
Kubarev V.D. Mounds of Yustyd. Novosibirsk : Nauka, 1991. 186 p. (In Russ.)
Fedoruk A.S., Papin D.V., Krupochkin E.P., Sukhanov S.I. Determining the Boundaries of Archaeological Sites Using UAV Surveys: Solving Problems on the Example of Altai Mountains. Teoriya i praktika arheologicheskih issledovanij = Theory and Practice of Archaeological Research. 2021;33(2):31–43. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.14258/tpai(2021)33(2).-02.
Agisoft Metashape Professional, Version 1.5. Edition User Manual. Available at: https://www.agisoft.com/pdf/metashape-pro_1_5_ru.pdf (accessed 6 November 2021). (In Russ.)
Goossens R., De Wulf A., Bourgeois J., Gheyle W., Willems T. Satellite Imagery and Archaeology: the Example of CORONA in the Altai Mountains. Journal of Archaeological Science. 2006;33:745–755.
Gheyle W. Highlands and Steppes. An Analysis of the Changing Archaeological Landscape of the Altai Mountains from the Eneolithic to the Ethnographic Period. Ghent : Ghent University, 2009. 380 p.
Plets G., Gheyle W., Verhoeven G., De Reu J., Bourgeois J., Verhegge J., Stichelbaut B. Three-Dimensional Recording of Archaeological Remains in the Altai Mountains. Antiquity. 2012;86(333):884–897.
Theory and Practice of Archaeological Research is a golden publisher, as we allow self-archiving, but most importantly we are fully transparent about your rights.
Authors may present and discuss their findings ahead of publication: at biological or scientific conferences, on preprint servers, in public databases, and in blogs, wikis, tweets, and other informal communication channels.
Theory and Practice of Archaeological Research allows authors to deposit manuscripts (currently under review or those for intended submission to ABS) in non-commercial, pre-print servers such as ArXiv.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).