I. NEWTON AND F. TAYLOR: A CONCEPTUAL MODEL OF SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT AND AN OBJECTIVELY DETERMINED LAW OF LABOR PRODUCTION RHYTHM IN ENTERPRISES

УДК 331.103

  • V. I. Belyaev Altai State University (Barnaul, Russia) Email: belyaevvi@mail.ru
Keywords: scientific management, Taylorism, scientific organization of labor, labor process, rhythm of the labor process, economic law

Abstract

The article is devoted to a comparative analysis of Taylor's concept of scientific management and Newton's  forgotten experience of applying the same principles and methods to the organization of labor at the Royal Mint  in England. In contrast to Taylor's concept, Newton applied the physiological rationale for managerial decisions  on labor organization in the mint's production process. He did this in order to increase daily work, but at the same  time, it can also be assessed as an indirect manifestation of the humanization of physical labor, which was not in  Taylor's concept. The essence of his proposal is to harmonize the labor production rhythm of an enterprise in terms  of the heart rate of a normal person, equal to 50–55 heartbeats per minute: according to Newton, the rhythm of  the production process should be less than the normal heart rate, which contributes to an increase in daily output  (the employee gets less tired and can work productively longer), and ensures the preservation of health. The  article draws attention to the fact that in the 1920s. In Russia, there was a movement to adapt Taylor's concept  to the industrial environment of Russian reality in the form of scientific labor organization. A. Gastev, one of the  organizers of this movement, also proposed synchronizing the production rhythm with the heart rate. The article  proves that Newton's proposal, and its verification in experience, make it possible to qualify this proposal as an  objectively determined economic law that is relevant at the present time.  

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

V. I. Belyaev, Altai State University (Barnaul, Russia)

доктор экономических наук, профессор

References

Минцберг Г., Альстрэнд Б., Лэмпел Дж. Школа стратегий. СПб., 2000. С. 336.

Гусейнзаде А.З. Стиль управления Генри Форда и его «преемников» в современное время // Экономика Профессия Бизнес. 2025. № 4. С. 30–36.

Кочерин Е.А. О серии книг «классики менеджмента» // Тейлор Ф.У. Принципы научного менеджмента. М., 1991. С. 4–6.

Тейлор Ф.У. Принципы научного менеджмента. М., 1991. 104 с.

Мескон М.Х., Альберт М., Хедоури Ф. Основы менеджмента. М., 1992. 702 с.

Маркс К. Капитал: критика политической экономии. Т. 1. М., 2017. 1200 с.

Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Манифест Коммунистической партии. М., 1986. 72 с.

Ленин В.И. «Научная» система выжимания пота // ПСС. 5-е изд. М., 1973. Т. 23. С. 18-19.

Левенсон Т. Ньютон и фальшивомонетчик. Как величайший ученый стал сыщиком. М., 2013. 416 c.

Ленин В.И. Очередные задачи советской власти // ПСС. 5-е изд. М., 1974. Т. 36. С. 167-208.

Труды Первой Всероссийской инициативной конференции по научной организации труда и производства. 20-27 января 1921 года. М., 1921. Вып. I-VI. 171 с.

Гастев А.К. Наши задачи // У истоков НОТ: забытые дискуссии и нереализованные идеи / сост. Э.Б. Корицкий. Л., 1990. С. 29-42.

Беляев В.И., Кузнецова О.В. Методология научных исследований. М., 2023. 434 с.

REFERENCES

Mintsberg G., Ahlstrand B., Lampel J. School of Strategies. St. Petersburg, 2000. p. 336.

Huseynzade A.Z. The management style of Henry Ford and his "successors" in modern times. Economics Profession Business. 2025. No. 4. Pp. 30-36.

Kocherin E.A. About the book series "Classics of management". Taylor F.U. Principles of scientific management. Moscow, 1991. Pp. 4-6.

Taylor F.U. Principles of scientific management. Moscow, 1991. 104 p.

Mescon M.H., Albert M., Khedouri F. Fundamentals of Management. Moscow, 1992. 702.

Marx К., Capital: criticism of political economy. Vol. 1. Moscow, 2017. 1200 p.

Marx K., Engels F. Manifesto of the Communist Party. Moscow, 1986. 72 p.

Lenin V.I. "Scientific" system of squeezing sweat. PSS. 5th ed. Moscow, 1973. Vol. 23. Pp. 18-19.

Levenson T. Newton and the counterfeiter. How the greatest scientist became a detective. Moscow, 2013. 416 p.

Lenin V.I. The next tasks of the Soviet government. PSS. 5th ed. Moscow, 1974. Vol. 36. Pp. 167-208.

Proceedings of the First All-Russian Initiative Conference on Scientific Organization of Labor and Production. January 20-27, 1921. Moscow, 1921. Vol. I-VI. 171 p.

Gastev A.K. Our tasks. At the origin of scientific work: forgotten discussions and unrealized ideas. Compiled by E.B. Koritsky. Leningrad, 1990. Pp. 29-42.

Belyaev V.I., Kuznetsova O.V. Methodology of scientific research. Moscow, 2023. 434 p.

Published
2026-03-18
How to Cite
1. Belyaev V. I. I. NEWTON AND F. TAYLOR: A CONCEPTUAL MODEL OF SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT AND AN OBJECTIVELY DETERMINED LAW OF LABOR PRODUCTION RHYTHM IN ENTERPRISES // Economics Profession Business, 2026. № 1. P. 5-14. URL: https://journal.asu.ru/ec/article/view/epb202601.
Section
ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКИЕ НАУКИ

Most read articles by the same author(s)