Риски для личной безопасности пользователей, связанные с нарушениями прав интеллектуальной собственности в электронной коммерции: социальные аспекты
Статья боковой панели
Опубликован:
ноя 9, 2026
Ключевые слова:
электронная коммерция, интеллектуальная собственность, личная безопасность, цифровая грамотность, социальные риски, защита пользователей
Основное содержание статьи
А. В. Покровская
Email: 1142220181@pfur.ru
https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6473-2027
Аннотация
статье рассматривается социальный аспект рисков, связанных с личной безопасностью пользователей электронной коммерции, пострадавших от нарушения их прав в области интеллектуальной собственности (ИС). Проводится анализ наиболее распространенных видов противоправной деятельности, включая производство контрафактной продукции, имитацию дизайна интернет-магазинов, нарушение товарных знаков в интернет-магазинах, а также оценивается влияние этой деятельности на личную безопасность и психологическое благополучие пользователей электронной коммерции. Особое внимание уделяется потере доверия потребителей к интернет-среде и «утечкам»личной информации пользователей в интернет-пространстве в целом. Рекомендации, содержащиеся в данной статье, включают повышение цифровой грамотности пользователей интернет-магазинов,внедрение автоматизированных систем мониторинга источников угроз безопасности и разработку решений по обратной связи; подчеркивается роль координации усилий правительства, бизнес-сектораи организаций гражданского общества в создании необходимой безопасной интернет-среды.
Скачивания
Данные скачивания пока недоступны.
Детали статьи
Как цитировать
Покровская, А. В. (2026). Риски для личной безопасности пользователей, связанные с нарушениями прав интеллектуальной собственности в электронной коммерции: социальные аспекты. Society and Security Insights, 9(3), 129-142. https://doi.org/10.14258/SSI(2026)3-07
Раздел
ГОСУДАРСТВО, ГРАЖДАНСКОЕ ОБЩЕСТВО И СТАБИЛЬНОСТЬ
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.
Литература
Appiah, V., Nti, I. K., & Nyarko-Boateng, O. (2017). Investigating Websites and Web Application Vulnerabilities: Webmaster’s Perspective. International Journal of Applied Information Systems, 12(3), 10-15.
Belcyzk, T. (2002). Domain Names: The Special Case of Personal Names. BUL Rev., 82, 485.
Berman, B. (2008). Strategies to detect and reduce counterfeiting activity. Business Horizons, 51(3), 191-199.
Cai, Y., & Zhu, D. (2016). Fraud detections for online businesses: a perspective from blockchain technology. Financial Innovation, 2(1), 20.
Confente, I., Siciliano, G. G., Gaudenzi, B., & Eickhoff, M. (2019). Effects of data breaches from user-generated content: A corporate reputation analysis. European Management Journal, 37(4), 492-504.
Dahlgreen, J. (2023). Catastrophic fraud loss lies where it falls? Push payment scams and the bank’s duty of care to its customer. Journal of Financial Crime, 30(6), 1845-1852.
Dogan, S. L., & Lemley, M. A. (2004). Trademarks and consumer search costs on the internet. Hous. L. Rev., 41, 777.
Ewing, T. (2012). Indirect exploitation of intellectual property rights by corporations and investors: IP privateering and modern letters of marque and reprisal. Hastings Sci. & Tech. LJ, 4, 1.
Frosio, G. F. (2016). Resisting the resistance: resisting copyright and promoting alternatives. Rich. JL & Tech., 23, 1.
Gana, R. L. (2017). Has creativity died in the Third World? Some implications of the internationalization of intellectual property. In Globalization and Intellectual Property (pp. 433-468). Routledge.
Kedah, Z. (2023). Use of e-commerce in the world of business. Startupreneur Business Digital (SABDA Journal), 2(1), 51-60.
Kim, W., Jeong, O. R., Kim, C., & So, J. (2011). The dark side of the Internet: Attacks, costs and responses. Information systems, 36(3), 675-705.
Kow, Y. M., Chen, Y., Cheng, W., & Nit, S. H. (2017, June). Creative information use among young adults: Challenges for learning and opportunities for media (re) design. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition (pp. 407-420).
Lessig, L. (2004). How big media uses technology and the law to lock down culture and control creativity. New York : Penguin Press, 5(2004), 115.
Mbah, G. O. (2024). US Intellectual Property Law and Its Impact on Business: Recent Developments and Trends. International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 13, 3279-95.
McKay, T. M. (2014). Combating plagiarism using a community of practice approach. South African journal of higher education, 28(4), 1315-1331.
Mironova, O. I., Pluzhnikova, N. I., Akimova, N. N., Nekrasova, M. V., Shagaeva, E. A., & Zhukova, V. I. (2014). Social and psychological factors of the compelled choice of profession. J. Advanced Res. L. & Econ, 5, 147.
Moohr, G. S. (2003). The crime of copyright infringement: An inquiry based on morality, harm, and criminal theory. BUL Rev., 83, 731.
Otim, S., & Grover, V. (2010). E-commerce: a brand name’s curse. Electronic Markets, 20(2), 147-160.
Pager, S. A. (2012). Accentuating the Positive: Building Capacity for Creative Industries into the Development Agenda for Global Intellectual Property Law. Am. U. Int'l L. Rev., 28, 223.
Paul, H., & Nikolaev, A. (2021). Fake review detection on online E-commerce platforms: a systematic literature review. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 35(5), 1830-1881.
Rajendran, R. (2023). Data breach fraudulence and preventive measures in e-commerce platforms. In Advancements in Cybercrime Investigation and Digital Forensics (pp. 161-184). Apple Academic Press.
Samuelson, P. (2003). Mapping the digital public domain: Threats and opportunities. Law & Contemp. Probs., 66, 147.
Smith, C. Y. (2021). Weaponizing Copyright. Harv. JL & Tech., 35, 193.
Trust, T., & Horrocks, B. (2017). ‘I never feel alone in my classroom’: teacher professional growth within a blended community of practice. Professional development in education, 43(4), 645-665.
Zelenkauskaite, A. (2017). Remediation, convergence, and big data: Conceptual limits of cross-platform social media. Convergence, 23(5), 512-527.
Belcyzk, T. (2002). Domain Names: The Special Case of Personal Names. BUL Rev., 82, 485.
Berman, B. (2008). Strategies to detect and reduce counterfeiting activity. Business Horizons, 51(3), 191-199.
Cai, Y., & Zhu, D. (2016). Fraud detections for online businesses: a perspective from blockchain technology. Financial Innovation, 2(1), 20.
Confente, I., Siciliano, G. G., Gaudenzi, B., & Eickhoff, M. (2019). Effects of data breaches from user-generated content: A corporate reputation analysis. European Management Journal, 37(4), 492-504.
Dahlgreen, J. (2023). Catastrophic fraud loss lies where it falls? Push payment scams and the bank’s duty of care to its customer. Journal of Financial Crime, 30(6), 1845-1852.
Dogan, S. L., & Lemley, M. A. (2004). Trademarks and consumer search costs on the internet. Hous. L. Rev., 41, 777.
Ewing, T. (2012). Indirect exploitation of intellectual property rights by corporations and investors: IP privateering and modern letters of marque and reprisal. Hastings Sci. & Tech. LJ, 4, 1.
Frosio, G. F. (2016). Resisting the resistance: resisting copyright and promoting alternatives. Rich. JL & Tech., 23, 1.
Gana, R. L. (2017). Has creativity died in the Third World? Some implications of the internationalization of intellectual property. In Globalization and Intellectual Property (pp. 433-468). Routledge.
Kedah, Z. (2023). Use of e-commerce in the world of business. Startupreneur Business Digital (SABDA Journal), 2(1), 51-60.
Kim, W., Jeong, O. R., Kim, C., & So, J. (2011). The dark side of the Internet: Attacks, costs and responses. Information systems, 36(3), 675-705.
Kow, Y. M., Chen, Y., Cheng, W., & Nit, S. H. (2017, June). Creative information use among young adults: Challenges for learning and opportunities for media (re) design. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition (pp. 407-420).
Lessig, L. (2004). How big media uses technology and the law to lock down culture and control creativity. New York : Penguin Press, 5(2004), 115.
Mbah, G. O. (2024). US Intellectual Property Law and Its Impact on Business: Recent Developments and Trends. International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 13, 3279-95.
McKay, T. M. (2014). Combating plagiarism using a community of practice approach. South African journal of higher education, 28(4), 1315-1331.
Mironova, O. I., Pluzhnikova, N. I., Akimova, N. N., Nekrasova, M. V., Shagaeva, E. A., & Zhukova, V. I. (2014). Social and psychological factors of the compelled choice of profession. J. Advanced Res. L. & Econ, 5, 147.
Moohr, G. S. (2003). The crime of copyright infringement: An inquiry based on morality, harm, and criminal theory. BUL Rev., 83, 731.
Otim, S., & Grover, V. (2010). E-commerce: a brand name’s curse. Electronic Markets, 20(2), 147-160.
Pager, S. A. (2012). Accentuating the Positive: Building Capacity for Creative Industries into the Development Agenda for Global Intellectual Property Law. Am. U. Int'l L. Rev., 28, 223.
Paul, H., & Nikolaev, A. (2021). Fake review detection on online E-commerce platforms: a systematic literature review. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 35(5), 1830-1881.
Rajendran, R. (2023). Data breach fraudulence and preventive measures in e-commerce platforms. In Advancements in Cybercrime Investigation and Digital Forensics (pp. 161-184). Apple Academic Press.
Samuelson, P. (2003). Mapping the digital public domain: Threats and opportunities. Law & Contemp. Probs., 66, 147.
Smith, C. Y. (2021). Weaponizing Copyright. Harv. JL & Tech., 35, 193.
Trust, T., & Horrocks, B. (2017). ‘I never feel alone in my classroom’: teacher professional growth within a blended community of practice. Professional development in education, 43(4), 645-665.
Zelenkauskaite, A. (2017). Remediation, convergence, and big data: Conceptual limits of cross-platform social media. Convergence, 23(5), 512-527.