MEDIA AS SUBJECTS OF THE MEDIA SPACE OF THE TURKIC WORLD: ASSESSMENT OF BASIC CHARACTERISTICS
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6063-4107
Abstract
The architecture of international relations in the Eurasian space is undergoing serious changes, which are associated with the growing influence of Turkey in the Turkic-speaking countries. The significant strengthening of the geopolitical positions of the Turkish state has led to an increase in media content, which is defined as "Turkic". Nowadays, the topic of Turkology has outgrown the boundaries of a narrow academic interest in scientific branches of knowledge (history, ethnology, ethnography, linguistics etc.). At the XI Summit of the Organization of Turkic States (OT), held on November 6 this year in Bishkek, Recep Tayyip Erdogan called on the member countries of the OTG to switch to a single Latin alphabet. We can talk about a clearly expressed information trend that strengthens Turkey's foreign policy leadership in the Turkic world. The call for the transition to a single Turkic alphabet of the Central Asian republics opens up the possibility of forming a mechanism for constructing a "Turkic" media reality. Therefore, it is important to investigate the subjects that determine the content of the media space, and the mass-media that form the "Turkic" information agenda, as well as to assess the relevance of Turkic topics in the mediaspace. To date, research media-analysis tools have been successfully used in Russia, which help in collecting large amounts of data and their subsequent processing. For example,"Medialogy"(www.mlg.ru),"Integrum"(www.integrum.ru),"Public.Ru"(www.public.ru),"SCANInterfax"(www.scan-interfax.ru). Within the framework of this article, an automatic media monitoring and analysis system "Medialogy" was used to collect empirical data, according to keywords,"Turkology","Turkic world", coverage period: 01.01.2024 – 31.10.2024.Content analysis was used as the main research method, which allowed to reveal the patterns and trends of the information flow, determine the intentions of the communicator in the implementation of information stuff in and predict the audience's reaction to the information message. Content-analysis as a research method is most effective because it provides an objective, systematic and quantitative picture of the content of the information flow. Standardized research procedures provide reliable quantitative indicators that made it possible to draw attention to the fact that the Internet and news agencies are the most productive in the production of messages in the "Turkic world" segment of the media-space.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.
References
Белковский С.В., Савинова О.Н. Контент-ананлиз в журналистсковедческих исследованиях. Нижний Новгород: Нижегородский госуниверситет, 2017. 37 с.
Бориснев С.В. Социология коммуникации. М.: ЮНИТИ-ДАНА, 2003. 270 с.
Бузин В.Н., Основные элементы и функциональные связи медиапространства
как объекта управления //Среднерусский вестник общественных наук. 2011. № 3. С. 48-53
Дзялошинский И.М. Современное медиапространство России: М.: Издательство «Аспект Пресс», 2015. —312 с.
Дзялошинский, И.М.Медиапространство России: пробуждение Соляриса. М.: АПК и ППРО, 2012. 422 с.
Елисеева М. А. Медиапространство: социально-философский анализ // Изв. Сарат. ун-та. Нов. сер. Сер. Философия.Психология. Педагогика. 2019. Т. 19, вып. 1. С. 4–7.
Зубанова Л.Б. Современное медиапространство: подходы к исследованию и принципы интерпретации. //Вестник Челябинской государственной академии культуры и искусств. 2008. № 2 (14). С. 6–17.
Кириллина Н.В., Фабричных М.А. Характеристики медиапространства: влияние на поляризацию мнений аудитории //Коммуникология. 2023. Том 11. № 4. С. 51-59
Краснянский Д. E. Современные медиа: средства информирования, пропаганда или механизм конструирования социальной реальности // Динамика современного мирового медиапространства: сборник тезисов по итогам круглого стола (5 декабря 2018 г.). Москва: Издательство Московского университета, 2019. 95, [1] с, С.19-22
Маклюэн Г. М. Понимание медиа: внешние расширения человека. Москва; Жуковский: Канон-пресс-Ц, Кучково поле, 2003. 464 с.
Надыров Р.Н. Тюркский фактор как составляющая международных отношений в Центральной Азии: конструкт «Тюркский мир» // Россия и мир: научный диалог. 2022. № 4(6). С. 50-59
Ним Е. Г. Медиапространство: основные направления исследований. Журнал «Бизнес. Общество. Власть» №14; Москва, 2013. С.31–41.
Скачилова Е.А. Медиапространство в условиях нелинейного усложнения социальной реальности //Коммуникология. 2024. Том 12. № 2. С. 37-43
Шкурко Н.С., Иванова С.Н., Медиапространство как особая социальная структура // АКТУАЛЬНЫЕ ВОПРОСЫ ЭКОНОМИКИ И УПРАВЛЕНИЯ
материалы V Международной научно-практической конференции, под общ. ред. Н.Р. Балынской. Магнитогорск, 2020 С. 206-210
Чумиков А. Н., Динамика современного медиапространства и прогрессивные механизмы его измерения // Динамика современного мирового медиапространства: сборник тезисов по итогам круглого стола (5 декабря 2018 г.). Москва: Издательство Московского университета, 2019. 95, [1] С.11-13
Чумиков А.Н. Социологический инструментарий в измерениях медийного контента // Знак: проблемное поле медиаобразования. 2023. № 1 (47). С. 89–98.
Юдина Е.Н. Медиапространство как новая социологическая категория //Социологические науки. 2008. №2, с.151-154
Adams Paul C. Geographies of Media and Communication: A Critical Introduction. L.: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.
Appadurai A. Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy // Public Culture. 2.2, Spring, 1990.
Berelson B. Communication and Public Opinion // Communications in
Modern Society. Urbana, III, 1951.
Doyle G. Understanding Media Economics. London, 2013.
Innis, H. A. The Bias of Communication. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2008.
Graber D.A. Mass media and American politics. Washington, 1997.
Horkheimer M. Critical theory: selected essays. New York: Continuum, 1972.
McQuailD. Mass Communication Theory. 5 th ed. London: Sage, 2005.
McCombs M., Eyal Ch., Graber D., Weaver D. (1981) Media Agenda-Setting in
the Presidential Election. N.Y.
REFERENCES
Borisnev, S.V. (2003). Sociology of communication. Moscow: UNITY-DANA. (In Russ.).
Buzin, V.N. (2011). Basic elements and functional connections of media space as an object of management Central Russian Bulletin of Social Sciences, 3, 48-53. (In Russ.).
Dzyaloshinsky, I.M. (2015). Modern media space of Russia. Moscow: Publishing House "Aspect Press". (In Russ.).
Dzyaloshinsky, I.M. (2012). Russian media space: the awakening of Solaris. Moscow: APK and PPRO. (In Russ.).
Eliseeva, M. A. (2019). Media space: social and philosophical analysis Izv. Sarat. un-ta. New ser. Ser. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy. T. 19, issue. 1. 4–7. (In Russ.).
Zubanova, L.B. (2008). Modern media space: approaches to research and principles of interpretation. Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk State Academy of Culture and Arts, 2 (14), 6-17. (In Russ.).
Kirillina, N.V., Fabrichnykh, M.A. (2023). Characteristics of the media space: influence on the polarization of audience opinions Communicology, 4, 51-59. (In Russ.).
Krasnyansky. D.E. (2019). Modern media: means of information, propaganda or a mechanism for constructing social reality Dynamics of the modern world media space: a collection of abstracts following the round table (December 5, 2018). Moscow: Moscow University Publishing House, (pp. 19-22). (In Russ.).
McLuhan G. M. (2003). Understanding media: external extensions of man. Moscow; Zhukovsky: Kanon-press-C, Kuchkovo pole. (In Russ.).
Nadyrov, R. N. (2022). The Turkic factor as a component of international relations in Central Asia: the construct of the "Turkic world" Russia and the world: scientific dialogue, 4 (6), 50-59. (In Russ.).
Nim, E. G. (2013). Media space: main directions of research. Magazine "Business. Society. Power",14, 31–41. (In Russ.).
Skachilova, E. A. (2024). Media space in the context of nonlinear complexity of social reality Communicology, Vol.12, 2, 37-43. (In Russ.).
Shkurko, N.S., Ivanova S.N. (2020). Media space as a special social structure TOPICAL ISSUES OF ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT Proceedings of the V International scientific and practical conference, Magnitogorsk (pp. 206-210). (In Russ.).
Chumikov, A.N. (2019). Dynamics of the modern media space and progressive mechanisms for its measurement. Dynamics of the modern world media space: a collection of abstracts based on the results of the round table (December 5, 2018).- Moscow: Publishing House of Moscow University. (pp. 11-13).
Chumikov A.N. (2023). Sociological tools in measuring media content. Sign: problematic field of media education, 1 (47), 89–98. (In Russ.).
Yudina, E.N. (2008). Media space as a new sociological category Sociological science, 2, 151–154. (In Russ.).
Adams, P. C. (2009). Geographies of Media and Communication: A Critical Introduction. L.: Wiley-Blackwell
Appadurai, A. (1990). Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy. Public Culture. 2.2, Spring.
Berelson, B. (1951). Communication and Public Opinion Communications in
Modern Society. Urbana, III.
Doyle, G. (2013). Understanding Media Economics London.
Innis, H. A. (2008). The Bias of Communication. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Graber, D.A. (1997). Mass media and American politics. Washington.
Horkheimer, M. (1972) Critical theory: selected essays. NewYork.
McQuail, D. (2005). Mass Communication Theory. 5 th ed. London: Sage.
McCombs, M., Eyal, Ch., Graber, D., Weaver, D. (1981). Media Agenda-Setting in the Presidential Election. N.Y.