RISK COMMUNICATION AS A MECHANISM FOR TERRITORIAL COMMUNITY SECURITY STATUS FORMATION IN THE PROCESS OF ADAPTATION

  • Alla V. Mozgovaya Institute of Sociology of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy Sciences Email: mozgovai@yandex.ru
Keywords: risk communication, responsibility, risk acceptance, safety status, adaptaton

Abstract

The article presents the rationale for original content of one of important notions of sociology of risk and safety — risk communication. Several scholars treat risk communication as traditional model of information transfer. It is shown that programs of risk communication in foreign practice are based on methodology of information promotion for the benefits of risk producers and evaluations of risk of communication managers. The main postulate is to recognize the indisputable trustworthiness of the information provided to consumers. The author substantiates the methodological productivity of sociological conception of communication and responsibility, where the main postulate is not to provide information, necessary for producers of risk, but to create a common space of representations, estimations of risk and general attitudes, and eventually the space of admissibility of risk and security status.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

БИБЛИОГРАФИЧЕСКИЙ СПИСОК

Мегрелидзе К.Р. Основные проблемы социологии мышления. Тбилиси: Мецниереба, 1975.

Kasperson R.E., Palmlund I. Evaluating Risk Communication. In: V. Covello, D. McCallum, M. Pavlova (Eds.). Effective Risk Communication. The Role and Responsibility of Government and Nongovernment Organizations. Springer, Boston, MA, 1989. Pp.143–158.

Renn O. Risk Communication: Towards a Rational Discourse with the Public. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 1992, 29(3), 465–519.

Renn О. Risk Communication: Insight and Requirements for Designing Successful Communication Programs of Health and Environmental Hazards. In: R.L. Heath, H. Don O’Hair (Eds.). Handbook of Risk and Crisis Communication. Routledge, Talor & Francis, 2015. Pp. 81–99.

REFERENCES

Megrelidze, K.R. (1975). Osnovnye problemy sociologii myshlenija (Main problems of the sociology of thinking). Tbilisi: Mecniereba.

Kasperson, R.E., Palmlund, I. (1989). Evaluating Risk Communication. In: V. Covello, D. McCallum, M. Pavlova (Eds.). Effective Risk Communication. The Role and Responsibility of Government and Nongovernment Organizations (pp. 143–158). Springer, Boston, MA.

Renn, O. (1992). Risk Communication: Towards a Rational Discourse with the Public. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 29(3), 465–519.

Renn, О. (2015). Risk Communication: Insight and Requirements for Designing Successful Communication Programs of Health and Environmental Hazards. In: R.L. Heath, H. Don O’Hair (Eds.). Handbook of Risk and Crisis Communication (pp. 81–99). Routledge, Talor & Francis.

Published
2019-09-09
How to Cite
Mozgovaya, A. V. (2019). RISK COMMUNICATION AS A MECHANISM FOR TERRITORIAL COMMUNITY SECURITY STATUS FORMATION IN THE PROCESS OF ADAPTATION. Society and Security Insights, 2(3), 137-145. https://doi.org/10.14258/ssi(2019)3-6290
Section
SOCIAL, CULTURAL, HISTORICAL STUDIES AND SECURITY