PORCELIAN AND FAIENCE FROM THE EXCAVATIONS OF NEUDACHIN’S ESTATE IN TOBOLSK
Abstract
This article is devoted to the study of the archaeological excavations materials carried out by L. N. Sladkova in 1998, in the upper part of the Tobolsk city, on the territory of Neudachin’s estate (the intersection of modern Oktyabrskaya St. and Academician Yuri Osipov St.). The objects of the study were numerous fragments of porcelain and earthenware products found during excavations. In this research, there was an attempt to determine the place and time of manufacture of porcelain and earthenware products, guided primarily by the information on the manufacturer’s stamps. The publication provided statistical data concerning the species of the discovered artifacts, the material from which they were made, as well as options for their decoration. All the discovered porcelain and earthenware products could be divided by time into items made in Soviet times and in the pre-revolutionary period. In addition, attention was paid to the place of production of fi nds, some information about the porcelain and earthenware products manufacturers was provided. Soviet porcelain and earthenware table- ware of the USSR, apparently, was connected with the orphanage located there at that time, which, taking into account the war and post-war time, could not be provided with any expensive goods. But if we talk about the late 19 th — early 20th century, the situation was probably completely different. Apparently, this place, located not far from the Kremlin, was inhabited by people who occupied a fairly high posi- tion in the society and had the opportunity to surround themselves with expensive imported things, in- cluding dishes of the highest quality. The rank of the owner of Neudachin, who was a valid state councilor, speaks of his high property and social status. This is confirmed by the finds of imported items. It can be assumed that the urban elite lived here at an earlier time. The finds, previously attributed to Chinese and European porcelain, indicate that people with a high level of income lived on the estate.
Downloads
References
Anoshko O. M. Tea Culture Residents of Tobolsk according to Archeological and Historical Data. In: Russian Culture in Archeological Research, 1. Omsk; Surgut : Izdatel’skaya gruppa ANO “Institut arheologii Severa”, 2021. Pp. 204–209. (In Russ.).
Baliunov I. V. Danish Royal Porcelain of the 18thCentury in Tobol ́sk. In: Russian Culture in Archeological Research, 1. Omsk; Surgut : Izdatel’skaya gruppa ANO “Institut arheologi iSevera”, 2021. Pp. 209–213. (In Russ.).
Berdnikov I. M., Berdnikova N. E. On the Timing of the First Burials on the Territory of the Irkutsk Ostrog. In: Russian Culture in Archaeological Research. Omsk:Apel’sin, 2008. Pp. 233–237. (In Russ.).
Bernts V. A., Sabirov T. R. Faience Utensils with Stamps from the Cultural Layer of the Izhevsk Plant Settlement. In: Actual Problems of Studying Historical City-Factories. Izhevsk :Udmurtskijfederal’nyjissledovatel’skijcentrUrO RAN, 2020. Pp. 96–114. (In Russ.).
Bubnova E. A. Old Russian Faience.Moscow :Iskusstvo, 1973. 188 p. (In Russ.).
Bulgakova A. The Evolution of “Botanical” Paintings in European Porcelain. Mir iskusstv:VestnikMezhdunarodnogoinstitutaantikvariata = World of Art:Bulletin of the International Institute of Antiques. 2019;3–4(27–28):28–40. (In Russ.)
Galkina E., Musina R. Kuznetsov. Dynasty and Family Business.Moscow : Galereya «Vremenagoda», 2005. 402 p. (In Russ.).
State Catalog of the Museum Fund of the Russian Federation In: URL: https://goskatalog.ru/portal/#/collections?id=3708061
Evshin A. S. Morphological Description of the Archaeological Collection of Porcelain and Faience on the Basis of Material from the Security Works at 28 Herzen Street in Kirov. In: So- ciety. Science.Innovations (NPK-2019) [Electronic resource].Kirov :Izdatel’stvo VyatGU, 2019. 3 т. 3 CD-ROM.Pp. 242–254.(In Russ.).
Zagvazdina Yа. G. Chinese Porcelain from the Cultural Layer of Tobolsk. In: Russian Culture in Archeological Research. Omsk : Nauka, 2017.Pp. 463–465. (In Russ.).
Zagvazdina Yа. G. Porcelain Dolls from the Estate of Neudachin in Tobolsk. Genesis: istoricheskie issledovaniya = Genesis: Historical Research. 2021;12:198–206. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.25136/2409-868X.2021.12.37063
Kaufman Yu. B.Collection of Ceramics from the Chief Officer’s House in the Kuznetsk Fortress. In: Russian Culture in Archaeological Research. Omsk:Apel’sin, 2008. Pp. 272–280. (In Russ.).
Kozlova-AfanasyevaYe. M. Architectural Heritage of the Tyumen Region.Tyumen : OOO “Izdatel’stvo Iskusstvo”, 2008. 488 p. (In Russ.)
Levchenko T. I., Kryzhanovskyi V. O. Porcelain and Earthenware Excavated in the Upper Kyiv in 2008–2009. In: Russian Culture in Archaeological Research, Omsk:Nauka, 2017. Pp. 282–288. (In Russ.).
Levchenko T. I., Kryzhanovskyi V. O., Ivanov O. K. Porcelain and Earthenware of the Russian Empire from OlegovskayaStreet in Kyiv. In: Russian Culture in Archeological Research. Archeology of the North of Russia.Omsk; Surgut : Izdatel’skayagruppa ANO “Institut arheologii Severa”, 2021. Pp. 214–221. (In Russ.).
Marks of Russian Porcelain and Faience.1750–1960 / comp. T. I. Dulkina.Moscow :Izdatel’stvo Iriny Kasatkinoj, 2003. 422 p. (In Russ.).
Matveev A. V., Anoshko O. M., Siryushova N. F. Ancient Porcelain and Faience from the Cultural Layer of Tobolsk. Vestnikarheologii, antropologiiietnografii = Bulletin of Archaeology, Anthropology and Ethnography 2011;15(2):116–124. (In Russ.).
Musina R. R. Marks of Russian Porcelain (1744–1917). Moscow:Znanie, 1995. 80 p. (In Russ.).
Pavluhina N. “Eternal” Cobalt on Fragile Porcelain.Antikvariat, predmety iskusstva i kollekcionirovaniya = Antiques, Art and Collectibles. 2009;3:4–17. (In Russ.).
Parkhimovich S. G. Collection of Artifacts from the Excavations of the Berezovsky Settlement. In: Russian Culture in Archaeological Research. Omsk:Apel’sin, 2008. Pp. 251–262. (In Russ.).
Politova M. A. Porcelain Doll of the 19 th–21st Centuries: Evolution of Typology, Social Status, Functions. Hudozhestvennayakul’tura = Art Culture. 2020;2:316–335. (In Russ.).
Saukov G. N., Mergeneva K. N. Faience Dishes of Ural Manufacturers of the 19th — early 20 th Centuries from a City Estate Excavation (Kurgan, 21 Kuibyshevast.): Informational Possibilities of Material Source. In: Th e Role of Material Sources in the Information Support of Historical Science.Moscow :Institutnauchnojinformaciipoobshchestvennymnaukam RAN, 2020, Pp. 273–290. (In Russ.).
Semenova V. I. Glass, Faince, Porcelain from the Excavations of Tyumen in 1988. In: Russian Culture in Archaeological Research. Vol. 1.Omsk; Surgut : Izdatel’skayagruppa ANO “Institut arheologi iSevera”, 2021. Pp. 222–228. (In Russ.).
Siberian and TobolskGovernors: Historical Portraits, Documents / ed. by V. V. Konovalov. Tiumen’: Tyumenskijizdatel’skijdom, 2000. 577 p. (In Russ.).
Sladkova L. N. Report on Archaeological Excavations in the Historic Part of the Town of Tobolsk, Tyumen Region, Conducted in the Summer of 1998. In: Scientific Archive of the Tobolsk Historical and Architectural Museum-Reserve. NA-1644.Tobolsk. 1998. 106 p. (In Russ.).
Smyshlyaeva A. A. Сharm of a Doll. IskusstvoEvrazii = Art of Eurasia. 2019;2(13):217–227. (In Russ.).
Tataurov F. S. Systematisation of Archaeological Collections as a Tool to Re-create the Social Image of the Russian Population in West Siberia in the Late 16th — Early 18thCenturies. In: Russian Culture in Archaeological Research, 1. Omsk; Tyumen; Ekaterinburg: Magellan, 2014. Pp. 293–298. (In Russ.).
Tataurov F. S. Faience Ware of the Second Half of the 19thCentury in the Cultural Layer of Tara. In: VaganovskyReadings. Omsk:Amfora, 2018. Pp. 347–349. (In Russ.).
Tataurov S. F., Tataurov F. S. Porcelain and Faience in the Cultural Layer of the City of Tara. BylyeGody = The Old Years. 2019;54(4):1418–1428. (In Russ.).
Tropina M. V. Activities and Fate of the Real State Councilor V.P. Neudachina according to the Documents of the SBITR “State Archive in Tobolsk”. In: Genealogy and Archives. Cheliabinsk :Chelyabinskij Dom pechati, 2020.Pp. 278–289. (In Russ.).
Chernaya M. P. Vaivode’sManor in Tomsk. 1660–1760-ies: Historical and Archaeological Reconstruction. Tomsk:D’Print, 2015. 276 p. (In Russ.)
Yanchenko E. S. Porcelain and Faience Products from the Cultural Layer of the City of Kurgan on the Example of the Excavation of Estates at the Corner of Sovetskaya and Pichugina Streets. In: Archaeology of the Middle Tobol and Adjacent Territories. Kurgan:Izdatel’stvo Kurganskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2016. Pp. 119–123. (In Russ.).
Theory and Practice of Archaeological Research is a golden publisher, as we allow self-archiving, but most importantly we are fully transparent about your rights.
Authors may present and discuss their findings ahead of publication: at biological or scientific conferences, on preprint servers, in public databases, and in blogs, wikis, tweets, and other informal communication channels.
Theory and Practice of Archaeological Research allows authors to deposit manuscripts (currently under review or those for intended submission to ABS) in non-commercial, pre-print servers such as ArXiv.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
2.jpg)
