THE ROLE OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT IN THE INTEGRATION OF SCIENCE, EDUCATION AND BUSINESS

УДК 338.1 + 339.924

  • Z. B. Akhmetova Al-Farabi Kazakh National University (Almaty, Kazakhstan) https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5157-4659 Email: zaurebolat@mail.ru
  • A. K. Kozhakhmetova Al-Farabi Kazakh National University (Almaty, Kazakhstan) https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0833-1085 Email: aselekdream@gmail.com
  • A. D. Asanova Al-Farabi Kazakh National University (Almaty, Kazakhstan) Email: arailymassanova@gmail.com
DOI_disc_logo https://doi.org/10.14258/epb202101
Keywords: project management, commercialization projects, integration of science and business, project efficiency

Abstract

Integration of science, education and business is a driver of economic competitiveness in the context of globalization and building an effective national innovation ecosystem. Project management is considered one of the main tools for improving the efficiency of commercialization projects that are the result of successful integration. The study aims to assess the relationship between project management and performance indicators of integration of science, education and business in the face of commercialization projects. The results of the study revealed that intensive use of the above processes increases the efficiency of projects. Moreover, critical processes were identified that positively affect the timing and cost of commercialization projects. Integration of science, education and business is an effective tool for sustainable development and competitiveness of States in the context of globalization and the formation of a knowledge-based economy and the construction of an effective national innovation ecosystem.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Z. B. Akhmetova, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University (Almaty, Kazakhstan)

кандидат экономических наук, ассоциированный профессор (доцент)

A. K. Kozhakhmetova, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University (Almaty, Kazakhstan)

PhD, старший преподаватель

A. D. Asanova, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University (Almaty, Kazakhstan)

преподаватель

References

Ambekar S., Hudnurkar M. Factorial structure for six sigma project barriers in Indian manufacturing and service industries // TQM J. 2017. Vol. 29 (5). Pp. 744-759.

Battistella C., Colucci K., De Toni A. F., Nonino F. Methodology of business ecosystems network analysis: a case study in Telecom Italia Future Centre // Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2013. Vol. 80 (6). Pp. 1194-1210.

Besner C., Hobbs B. Project management practice, generic or contextual: a reality check // Project Management Journal. 2008. Vol. 39. No. 1. Pp. 16-33.

Bogomolov V. A., Egorshev I. M. Nauchnye parki i tehnopolisy v razvityh kapitalisticheskih stranah [Scientific parks and technopolises in the developed capitalist countries // Outcomes of science and technology. 1991. Vol. 13. Pp. 142-177. (in Russian)

Brockhoff K., Chakraberti A. K., Hauschildt J. The Dynamics of Innovation: strategic and managerial implications. Heidelberg, 1999.

Chen C. J. Technology commercialization, incubator and venture capital, and new venture performance // J. Bus. Res. 2009. Vol. 62 (1). Pp. 93-103.

Chih Y., Zwikael O. Project benefit management: a conceptual framework of target benefit formulation // Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2015. Vol. 33 (1). Pp. 352-362.

Cui Y., Jiao J., Jiao H. Technological innovation in Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa (BRICS): an organizational ecology perspective // Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang, 2016. Vol. 107. Pp. 28-36. DOI: 10.1016/j. techfore.2016.02.001.

Drouin N., Bourgault M., Gervais C. Effects of organizational support on components of virtual project teams // Int. J. Manag. Proj. Bus. 2010. Vol. 3 (4). Pp. 625-641.

Fan Y. Research on factors influencing an individual’s behavior of energy management: a field study in China // J. Manag. An. 2017. Vol. 4 (3). Pp. 203-239. DOI: 10.1080/23270012.2017.1310000.

Fetschenko V., Shadob E., Katkow Yu., Shchelikova N., Glushak N. Worldwide trends in the development of education and academic research // Procedia — Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015. Т. 214. Pp. 243-251.

Fusfeld H. I. Industrial Research — Where it’s Been, Where It’s Going, Guide // Research Technology Management. Review of the industrial research process. 1995. Vol. 38 (4). Pp. 23-32.

He Z., Lim K., Wong P. Entry and competitive dynamics in the mobile telecommunications market // Res. Policy. 2006. Vol. 35 (8). Pp. 1147-1165.

Johnson J., Karen D., Boucher K. C., Robinson J. The criteria for success // Software Magazine. 2001. Vol. 21. No. 1. Pp. 3-11.

Kaplan A. W. From passive to active about solar electricity: innovation decisions process and photovoltaic interest generation // Technovation. 1999. Vol. 19 (8). Pp. 467-481.

Kartashova A., Shirko T., Khomenko I., Naumova L. Educational Activity of National Research Universities as a Basis for Integration of Science, Education and Industry in Regional Research and Educational Complexes // Procedia Computer Science. 2019. Т. 149. Pp. 483-490.

Lau A. K. W., Lo W. Regional innovation system, absorptive capacity and innovation performance: an empirical study // Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2015. Vol. 92. Pp. 99-114. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2014.11.005.

Oh D. S., Phillips F., Park S., Lee E. Innovation ecosystems: a critical examination // Technovation. 2014. Vol. 54. Pp. 1-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2016.02.004.

Lescevicaa M., Zamuelea A., Zakea M., Jirgensonsa J. Minimizing migration: Modeling of Latvian diaspora’s involvement in cooperation with education and science, and governmental institutions, businesses and society // Procedia Computer Science. 2019. Т. 149. Pp. 483-490.

McManus J. Risk Management in Software Development Projects. Oxford, 2004.

Phillips F., Chang J., Su Y.-S. When do efficiency and flexibility determine firm performance? A simulation study // J. Innov. Knowl. 2018. Vol. 2. Pp. 221-234. DOI: 10.1016/j.jik.2017.12.003

Venkataraman S. Regional transformation through technological entrepreneurship // J. Bus. Ventur. 2004. Vol. 19 (1). Pp. 153-167. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.04.001.

Walsh S. T., Kirchoff B. A., Newbert S. Differentiating market strategies for disruptive technologies // IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 2002. Vol. 49 (4). Pp. 341-351.

Xie K., Song Y., Zhang W., Hao J., Liu Z., Chen Y. Technological entrepreneurship in science parks: A case study of Wuhan Donghu High-Tech Zone. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j. techfore.2018.01.021.

Zhang G., Zhou J. The effects of forward and reverse engineering on firm innovation performance in the stages of technology catch-up: an empirical study of China // Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. Vol. 2016. Т. 104. Pp. 212-222. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.01.010.

Zhidebekkyzy A., Kupeshova S., Yesmurzayeva A. Project management in nanotechnology: A systematic literature review // Montenegrin Journal of Economics. 2019. 15 (3). Pp. 227-244.

Zwikael O. Top management involvement in project management — exclusive support practices for different project scenarios // International Journal of Managing Projects in Business. 2008. Vol. 1. No. 3. Pp. 387403.

Zwikael O., Meredith J. Effective organizational support practices for setting target benefits in the project front end // International Journal of Project Management. 2019. Vol. 37. Pp. 930-939.

Published
2021-03-10
How to Cite
1. Akhmetova Z. B., Kozhakhmetova A. K., Asanova A. D. THE ROLE OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT IN THE INTEGRATION OF SCIENCE, EDUCATION AND BUSINESS // Economics Profession Business, 2021. № 1. P. 5-10. URL: http://journal.asu.ru/ec/article/view/epb202101.
Issue
No 1 (2021): Economics Profession Business
Section
ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКИЕ НАУКИ

Copyright (c) 2021 Зауреш Болатхановна Ахметова , Асель Кошербаевна Кожахметова, Арайлым Данаевна Асанова

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Economics Profession Business is a golden publisher, as we allow self-archiving, but most importantly we are fully transparent about your rights.

Authors may present and discuss their findings ahead of publication: at biological or scientific conferences, on preprint servers, in public databases, and in blogs, wikis, tweets, and other informal communication channels.

Economics Profession Business (EPB) allows authors to deposit manuscripts (currently under review or those for intended submission to EPB) in non-commercial, pre-print servers such as ArXiv.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

 

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).