TRENDS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF SOCIO-CULTURAL INFRASTRUCTURE ASSIGNMENTS OF RURAL TERRITORIES
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8344-7710
Abstract
The article deals with the problem of developing the infrastructure of socio-cultural purpose of rural territories, which is relevant for the socio-economic system of the region. The purpose of the study is to study the features and trends of the development of socio-cultural infrastructure in rural areas. The author examines the dynamics of indicators of socio-cultural infrastructure of rural areas based on the analysis of data from Rosstat, the Federal State Statistics Service, statistical collections of the Russian Federation and the Vologda Oblast. The study of the state and main trends in the development of socio-cultural infrastructure of rural areas in modern conditions. The loss of the ability of rural municipal institutions to meet the socio-cultural needs of the population was noted. The article also offers an analysis of the results of the sociological survey of the National Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences "Socio-cultural portrait of regions" conducted with the participation of the author in 2019 and 2021, the purpose of which was to study the socio-cultural characteristics of the population of the Vologda region, data are provided for two major cities of the region (Vologda and Cherepovets) and by districts. The method of conducting the survey is a questionnaire at the respondent's place of residence, the sample size is 1500 people, the sample is representative, the error does not exceed 5%. The questionnaire questions used in the study study the cultural practices used by the residents of the region, the analysis focuses on the place of residence (urban and rural areas). An analysis of the results of a survey of residents of the Vologda Oblast revealed changes in the composition of leisure needs, as well as in ways to meet them among the rural population. In particular, in 2021, there was an increase in the interest of the population of rural areas in the use of previously less popular cultural practices (museums, cinemas, theaters). The analysis leads the author to think about the expansion of the list of preferred cultural practices among the inhabitants of rural areas. The obtained data and the results of the study can be used by federal and regional authorities in the development of management decisions; drawing up strategic programs for the development of socio-cultural infrastructure and the sphere of culture and leisure.
Downloads
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.
References
Ветлицина И. М. Культура российского села в центре культурной политики страны // Биб-лиотековедение. 2007. №2. С.19–24.
Гриценко Г. Развитие инфраструктуры сельских территорий на основе государственно-частного и муниципально-частного партнёрства // Общество и экономика. 2021. №7. С.73-93.
Груздева М. А. Цифровые навыки и бонусы использования цифровых услуг: признаки тер-риториальной асимметрии // Human Рrogress. 2020. Том 6, Выпуск 4. C. 1–15.
Долженкова М. И., Мурзина О. Б. Некоторые тенденции развития социально-культурной инфраструктуры постиндустриального города // Вестник тамбовского университета. Серия: гуманитарные науки. 2014. №2. С. 96–102.
Киселёва Т. Г. Социально-культурная деятельность. Москва: Изд-во Моск. гос. ун-та культу-ры и искусств, 2004. 539 с.
Костяев А. И., Никонов А. Г. Особенности и условия развития социальной инфраструктуры в сельской местности // Аграрная наука Евро-Северо-Востока. №6 (43). 2014. С. 68–73.
Соколов А. В. Общая теория социальной коммуникации. URL: http: www.evartist.narod.ru text16 071.htm. (дата обращения: 10.08.2020).
Хагуров А. А. Некоторые методологические аспекты исследования российского села // Со-циологические исследования. 2009. № 2. С. 95–101.
Шарипов А. Ю. Социальная инфраструктура в концепции ускорения. Новосибирск: Изд-во Новосиб. ун-та, 1990. 428 с.
Шубин Ю. А. Местное самоуправление социально-культурной сферой как институт граж-данского общества: автореф. дис. … канд. пед. наук. СПб., 2006.
Шулепов Е. Б., Задумкин К. А., Щербакова А. А. О подходах к построению новой системы государственного управления развитием сельских территорий Российской Федерации // Экономические и социальные перемены: факты, тенденции, прогноз. 2020. Том 13. №4. DOI: 10.15838 esc.2020.4.70.8
References
Ariarsky, M. A. (2008). Socio-cultural activity as a subject of scientific understanding. St. Petersburg, 792. (In Russ.).
Vetlicina, I. M. (2007). Culture of the Russian village in the center of the cultural policy of the country. Librarianship, 2, 19–24. (In Russ.).
Gritsenko, G. (2021). Development of rural infrastructure on the basis of public-private and munici-pal-private partnership. Society and Economics, 7, 73–3. (In Russ.).
Gruzdeva, M. A. (2020). Digital skills and bonuses of using digital services: signs of territorial asymmetry. Human Progress. 6(4), 1–15. (In Russ.).
Dolzhenkova, M. I., Murzina, O. B. (2014). Some trends in the development of the socio-cultural infrastructure of the post-industrial city. Bulletin of the Tambov University. Series: Humanities, 2, 96–102. (In Russ.).
Kiseleva, T. G. (2004). Socio-cultural activity. Moscow: Publishing House of the Moscow State University of Culture and Arts. (In Russ.).
Kostyaev, A. I. Nikonov, A. G. (2014). Features and conditions of development of social infrastruc-ture in rural areas. Agrarian science of the Euro-North-East, 6(43), 68–73. (In Russ.).
Sokolov, A. V. General theory of social communication. http: www.evartist.narod.ru text16 071.htm. (In Russ.).
Khagurov, A. A. (2009). Some methodological aspects of the study of the Russian village. Sociolog-ical research, 2, 95–101. (In Russ.).
Sharipov, A. Yu. (1990). Social infrastructure in the concept of acceleration. Novosibirsk: Novosi-birsk State University Publishing House. (In Russ.).
Shubin, Yu. A. (2006). Local self-government in the socio-cultural sphere as an institution of civil society: abstract. (Сandidate thesis, St. Petersburg state University, Saint Petersburg, Russian feder-ation). (In Russ.).
Shulepov, E. B., Zametkin, K. A., Shcherbakova, A. A. (2020). On approaches to the construction of a new system of public administration for the development of rural territories of the Russian Fed-eration. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 13(4). DOI:10.15838 esc.2020.4.70.8 (In Russ.).