CITIES AND RURAL PERIPHERY: KEY DIGITALIZATION TRENDS

Main Article Content

Mariya A. Gruzdeva Email: mariya_antonovarsa@mail.ru

Abstract

Digitalization processes for leveling the quality of life and opportunities in large settlements and remote peripheries are extremely important. The modern possibilities of digital services are a significant catalyst for the development of economic activity, social sectors, bringing a number of important advantages to everyday life. At the same time, various factors that determine the digital divide in modern Russia are significant. In this study, attention is drawn to the spatial feature, the goal was to highlight the key trends in the digitalization of various spheres of human life in cities and rural periphery. The information base is represented by available statistical data obtained in the course of monitoring the digital practices of the population, commercial organizations, in particular, agricultural and forestry, and social institutions. Concluded that agricultural organizations lag behind others in the digital development of internal processes. This is reflected in a lower number of employees with information and communication competencies, little experience in using ICT infrastructure, simplified practices for online interaction with suppliers and consumers (mainly information search, electronic settlements with suppliers, while placing an order and receiving payment from the buyer less than a third of organizations carry out in the network).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
Gruzdeva, M. A. (2023). CITIES AND RURAL PERIPHERY: KEY DIGITALIZATION TRENDS. Society and Security Insights, 5(4), 90-107. Retrieved from http://journal.asu.ru/ssi/article/view/11799
Section
STATE, CIVIL SOCIETY AND STABILITY
Author Biography

Mariya A. Gruzdeva, Vologda Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Cand. Sci (Economics), Senior Researcher, Deputy Head of the Department, Vologda Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

References

Александров И. Н., Федорова М. Ю. Влияние цифровой экономики на саморазвитие сельских территорий (на примере регионов Северо-Западного федерального округа России) // Проблемы современной экономики. № 3 (71). 2019. С. 246–250.
Грачев С. А. Анализ влияния цифровизации экономики на занятость в региональном научно-исследовательском секторе // Креативная экономика. 2021. Том 15. №3. С. 675–694. doi: 10.18334/ce.15.3.111767
Грошев И. В., Краснослободцев А. А. Цифровизация и креативность российских регионов // Социологические исследования. 2020. №5. С. 66-88. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250009390-2
Иванов В. А. Особенности и направления развития села и экономики сельской территории северного региона // Проблемы развития территории. 2019. № 4 (102). С. 55–71. DOI: 10.15838/ptd.2019.4.102.3
Ильин В. А., Ускова Т. В. Методы преодоления пространственной социально-экономической дифференциации // Федерализм. 2012. №3. С. 3–18.
Рожкова А. Ю., Андреянова И. В. Действие национальной системы квалификаций на рынке труда: подходы и перспективы // Управление устойчивым развитием. 2020. №4(29). С. 100–110.
Русановский В. А., Марков В. А. Цифровизация как драйвер опережающего развития агломераций в России // Научно-аналитический журнал «Наука и практика» Российского экономического университета им. Г. В. Плеханова. 2018. Т. 10. № 4 (32). С. 17–27.
Советова Н. П. Цифровизация сельских территорий: от теории к практике // Экономические и социальные перемены: факты, тенденции, прогноз. 2021. Т. 14. № 2. С. 105–124. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2021.2.74.7
Соловьева Т. С. Особенности занятости населения России в контексте пространственного развития территорий // Экономика труда. 2022. Том 9. № 7. doi: 10.18334/et.9.7.114801.
Троцковский А. Я. Пространственные исследования в работах российских регионалистов: нарративный обзор // Экономика Профессия Бизнес. 2021. № 3. С. 125-132. doi: 10.14258/epb202147
Усков В. С. К вопросу о цифровизации российской экономики // Проблемы развития территории. 2020. № 6(110). с. 157–175. doi: 10.15838/ptd.2020.6.110.10.
Шабунова А. А., Груздева М. А., Калачикова О. Н. Поселенческий аспект цифрового неравенства в современной России // Проблемы развития территории. 2020. № 4 (108). С. 7–19. DOI: 10.15838/ptd.2020.4.108.1
Шабунова А. А., Калачикова О. Н., Короленко А. В., Барсуков В. Н., Нацун Л. Н., Разварина И. Н., Груздева М. А. Динамика населения России в XXI веке. Социодемографический анализ. Вологда: ФГБУН ВолНЦ РАН, 2018. 275 с.
Banerjee A., Duflo E., Imbert C., Mathew S., Pande R. E-governance, Accountability, and Leakage in Public Programs: Experimental Evidence from a Financial Management Reform in India // NBER Working Paper. 2016. No. 22803. URL: https://www.nber.org/papers/w22803.pdf
Bannerjee А., Banerji R., Berry J., Duflo E., Kannan H., Mukherji S., Shotland M., Walton M. From Proof of Concept to Scalable Policies: Challenges and Solutions, with an Application // Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2017. Vol. 31. No. 4. P. 73–102. DOI: 10.1257/jep.31.4.73.
Billon M., Marco R., Lera-Lopez F. Disparities in ICT Adoption: a multidimensional approach to study the cross-country digital divide // Telecommunications Policy. 2009. Vol. 33. Iss. 10–11. Р. 596–610. DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2009.08.006.
Christensen J., Maskell P. The Industrial dynamics of the new digital economy. – London: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, 2003. 271 p.
Coyle D. The Weightless World: Strategies for Managing the Digital Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999. 250 p.
Dudek H. Determinants of Access to the Internet in Households – Probit Model Analysis // Polish Association for Knowledge Management. Series: Studies & Proceedings. 2007. No. 11. Р. 51–56.
Pohjola M. The Adoption and Diffusion of ICT across Countries: Patterns and Determinants // The New Economy Handbook. San Diego: Academic Press, 2003. Р. 77–100.
Townsend L., Wallace C., Fairhurst G. Stuck Out Here: The Critical Role of Broadband for Remote Rural Places. Scottish Geographical Journal. 2015. 131:3-4. 171-180. DOI: 10.1080/14702541.2014.978807

REFERENCES
Alexandrov, I. N., Fedorova, M. Yu. (2019). The impact of the digital economy on the self-development of rural areas (on the example of the regions of the North-Western Federal District of Russia). Problems of Modern Economics, 3(71), 246–250. (In Russ.).
Grachev, S. A. (2021). Analysis of the impact of digitalization of the economy on employment in the regional research sector. Creative Economy, 3, DOI: 10.18334/ce.15.3.111767 (In Russ.).
Groshev, I. V., Krasnoslobodtsev, A. A. (2020). Digitalization and creativity of Russian regions. Sociological research, 5, 66-88, DOI: 10.31857/S013216250009390-2 (In Russ.).
Ivanov, V.A. (2019), Features and directions of development of the village and the economy of the rural territory of the northern region. Problems of development of the territory, 4 (102), 55–71, DOI: 10.15838/ptd.2019.4.102.3 (In Russ.).
Ilyin, V.A. Uskova, T.V. (2012). Methods of overcoming spatial socio-economic differentiation. Federalism, 3, 3-18. (In Russ.).
Rozhkova, A.Yu., Andreyanova, I.V. (2020). Action of the National Qualifications System on the Labor Market: Approaches and Prospects. Management of Sustainable Development, 4(29), 100-110. (In Russ.).
Rusanovsky, V.A., Markov, V.A. (2018). Digitalization as a driver of advanced development of agglomerations in Russia. Scientific and analytical journal Science and Practice of the Russian University of Economics of G.V. Plekhanov, 4 (32), 17-27. (In Russ.).
Sovetova, N.P. (2021). Digitalization of rural areas: from theory to practice. Economic and social changes: facts, trends, forecast, 2, 105–124. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2021.2.74.7 (In Russ.).
Solovieva, T.S. (2022). Peculiarities of Russian Population Employment in the Context of Spatial Development of Territories. Labor Economics. 7. DOI: 10.18334/et.9.7.114801(In Russ.).
Trotskovsky, A.Ya. (2021). Spatial research in the works of Russian regionalists: a narrative review. Economics Profession Business, 3. 125-132. DOI: 10.14258/epb202147 (In Russ.).
Uskov, V.S. (2020). On the issue of digitalization of the Russian economy. Problems of territory development, 6 (110), 157-175, DOI: 10.15838/ptd.2020.6.110.10 (In Russ.).
Shabunova, A.A., Gruzdeva, M.A., Kalachikova, O.N. (2020). The Settlement Aspect of the Digital Divide in Modern Russia. Problems of Territorial Development, 4 (108), 7–19, DOI: 10.15838/ptd.2020.4.108.1(In Russ.).
Shabunova, A. A., Kalachikova, O. N., Korolenko, A.V., Barsukov, V.N., Natsun, L.N., Razvarina, I.N., Gruzdeva, M.A. (2018). Population dynamics in Russia in the XXI century. Sociodemographic analysis. Vologda: VolNTs RAS (In Russ.).
Banerjee, A., Duflo, E., Imbert, C., Mathew, S., Pande, R. (2016). E-governance, Accountability, and Leakage in Public Programs: Experimental Evidence from a Financial Management Reform in India. NBER Working Paper, 22803. URL: https://www.nber.org/papers/w22803.pdf
Bannerjee, А., Banerji, R., Berry, J., Duflo, E., Kannan, H., Mukherji, S., Shotland, M., Walton, M. (2017). From Proof of Concept to Scalable Policies: Challenges and Solutions, with an Application. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 4, 73–102, DOI: 10.1257/jep.31.4.73.
Billon, M., Marco, R., Lera-Lopez, F. (2009). Disparities in ICT Adoption: a multidimensional approach to study the cross-country digital divide. Telecommunications Policy, 10–11, 596–610, DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2009.08.006.
Christensen, J., Maskell, P. (2003). The Industrial dynamics of the new digital economy. – London: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
Coyle, D. (1999). The Weightless World: Strategies for Managing the Digital Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Dudek, H. (2007). Determinants of Access to the Internet in Households – Probit Model Analysis. Polish Association for Knowledge Management. Series: Studies & Proceedings, 11, 51–56.
Pohjola, M. (2003). The Adoption and Diffusion of ICT across Countries: Patterns and Determinants. In: The New Economy Handbook (pp. 77-100). San Diego: Academic Press.
Townsend, L., Wallace, C., Fairhurst, G. (2015). Stuck Out Here: The Critical Role of Broadband for Remote Rural Places. Scottish Geographical Journal, 131:3-4, 171-180, DOI: 10.1080/14702541.2014.978807