JUDICIAL AND CRIMINALISTIC PSYCHOLOGICAL DIAGNOSTICS: PROFILING, VERIFICATION AND USE OF THE POLYGRAPH
Article Sidebar
Published:
Nov 2, 2022
Keywords:
legal practice, forensic psychological examination, profiling, verification, polygraph, hyper-securization, corruption, conflict of interest
Main Article Content
Raisa I. Khoteeva
Email: khoteeva@ya.ru
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4580-7241
Mariam R. Arpentieva
Email: mariam_rav@mail.ru
Abstract
The issues of using non-traditional methods of forensic research attract the attention of both practitioners and theorists of forensic science and jurisprudence, as well as many specialists in related specialties, including doctors, psychologists, biologists, programmers and representatives of other sciences. The concept of “non-traditional methods of solving crimes” appeared in the 80-90s of the XX century and integrated the methods and approaches of applied psychology, psychodiagnostics and human psychophysiology. Although the world practice of using psychological and psychophysiological methods, approaches and technologies has more than half a century, these methods and devices, programs and technologies are gaining maximum popularity at the present time. Verification and profiling are two of the most interesting and closely related modern areas of psychological forensics as a science of psychological investigation of the event of a crime and its participants (according to the “ideal” and material traces of a crime). They are important parts of modern forensic psychology. Both of these parts are implemented in the practice of investigators / forensic scientists and judges both with the help of non-instrumental (expert) and instrumental (polygraph, etc.) psychological methods and techniques. The problems of modern psychological forensics, however, are not the devices and methods themselves, their development, which undoubtedly enriches both forensic science and psychodiagnostics in general, but that the results of research and practical developments in this area can be illegally expanded to other areas, including in the professor of hyper-securization, as well as in the fact that not always reliable and transparent conclusions of an expert and / or equipment created and used by people who consider themselves experts, equipment, including statistical methods implemented by digital devices, etc.... can be used in a corrupt community, for their own purposes, against people. The emergence of a conflict of interest is all the more likely, the less substantiated and transparent the procedures, methods and algorithms for verification and profiling, and the more the country's law enforcement system is aimed at ignoring the needs of the community in favor of the interests of the bureaucratic monolith. And only then it is possible and nuno to solve the issues of improving programs and techniques of profiling and verification: today the existing approaches and devices give rather high reliability indicators, but not always.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Metrics
Metrics Loading ...
Article Details
How to Cite
Khoteeva, R. I., & Arpentieva, M. R. (2022). JUDICIAL AND CRIMINALISTIC PSYCHOLOGICAL DIAGNOSTICS: PROFILING, VERIFICATION AND USE OF THE POLYGRAPH. Society and Security Insights, 5(3), 118-137. https://doi.org/10.14258/ssi(2022)3-08
Section
STATE, CIVIL SOCIETY AND STABILITY
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.
References
Алексеев Л. Г., Потемкин Ф. В. Проблемы прикладной психофизиологии. М. «Буки Веди», 2017. 292 с.
Анфиногенов А. И. Методика установления признаков преступника сопряженных с обстоятельствами происшествия / Под ред. И. А. Попова М.: Академия управления МВД России, 2003. 150 с.
Арпентьева М. Р. Метатехнологии неинструментального профайлинга // Реальная практика полиграфологов VI: Профайлинг и технологии детекции лжи в обеспечении кадровой безопасности организации : сборник материалов Международного научно-практического симпозиума / Отв. ред. Е. С. Легостаева. Екатеринбург : Уральский государственный педагогический университет, 2018. C. 10–30.
Арпентьева М. Р. Проблемы современного неинструментального профайлинга // Реальная практика полиграфологов VI: Профайлинг и технологии детекции лжи в обеспечении кадровой безопасности организации : сборник материалов Международного научно-практического симпозиума / Отв. ред. Е. С. Легостаева. Екатеринбург : Уральский государственный педагогический университет, 2018. С. 31–60.
Арпентьева М. Р. Криминальный профайлинг: история и современность // Актуальные вопросы уголовного права и криминологии на современном этапе.Ежегодный межвузовский сборник научных трудов. Выпуск 1 / отв. ред. С.М. Мальков. Красноярск, Изд-во Сибирского юридического института МВД России, 2018. 204 с.
Арпентьева М. Р., Макаренко И. А., Судебная и криминалистическая психологическая диагностика: методы профилирования, верификации и использования полиграфа. Калуга: КГУ им. К.Э. Циолковского, 2018. 260 с.
Блэкборн Р. Психология криминального поведения. СПб. : Питер, 2004. 496 с.
Васильев В. Л. Юридическая психология. СПб.: Питер, 2009. 608 с.
Гримак Л. П., Скрыпников А. И., Лаговский А. Ю., Зубрилова И. С. Методы прикладной психологии в раскрытии и расследовании преступлений. М., 1999. С. 7, 58, 79, 99, 133.
Енгалычев В. Ф., Южанинова А. Л. Некоторые особенности производства судебно-психологической экспертизы в гражданском судопроизводстве // Среднерусский вестник общественных наук: Межрегиональное научно-образовательное издание. 2007. № 2 (3). С. 36–39.
Енгалычев В. Ф., Шипшин С. С. Судебно- психологическая экспертиза. Методическое руководство. Калуга–Обнинск–Москва: КГПИ им К.Э. Циолковского, 1997. С. 156–159.
Ефимичев С. П., Ефимичев П. С. Расследование преступлений: теория, практика, обеспечение прав личности. М.: Юстицинформ, 2009. 504 c.
Исаева И. В., Сафуанов Ф. С. Анализ решений верховных судов по аффективным преступлениям и проблемы судебной экспертизы // Российский судья. 2015. № 12. С. 37-40.
Ищенко Е. П. Криминалистика. М.: Юрид. фирма «КОНТРАКТ» ИНФРА-М, 2003. С.10, 42
Косарев С. Ю. История и теория криминалистических методик расследования преступлений:. СПб.; Издательство Р. Асланова «Юридический центр Пресс»; 2006. 262 с.
Кроз М. В., Ратинова Н. А., Онищенко О. Р. Криминальное психологическое воздействие. М.: Юрлитинформ, 2008. 200 с.
Левченко О. В. Система средств познавательной деятельности в доказывании по уголовным делам и ее совершенствование. Дисс… докт. юрид. наук. M. Астрахань: АГТУ, 2004. 418 с.
Мочагин П. В. Особенности лжи, обмана, неправды как отдельные критерии, формирующие идеальную криминалистическую следовую информацию, выявляемую в ходе полиграфных проверок // Вестник Удмуртского университета. Серия «Экономика и право». 2013. №4. С.151–156.
Пирожков В. Ф. Криминальная психология. М.: Ось-89, 2007. 704 с.
Профайлинг и медиация: сферы, ценности, технологии, обучение. Коллективная монография. Серия «Актуальные проблемы практической психологии: кризис, развитие, поддержка». Вып. 2.. / Ответ. ред. М.Р. Арпентьева. Калуга: Калужский государственный университет им. К.Э. Циолковского, Эйдос, 2016. 290 с.
Ратинов А. Р. Судебная психология для следователей. Научно-практическое руководство. М: Юрлитинформ, 2001. 352 с.
Сафуанов Ф. С. Использование психологических познаний при производстве новых видов судебно-психиатрической экспертизы // Новые виды судебно-психиатрической экспертизы в гражданском процессе. Применительно к закону РФ «О психиатрической помощи и гарантиях прав граждан при ее оказании». М.: Изд-во Центра защиты прав и здоровья граждан, 1993. С. 87-99.
Холодный Ю. И., Подшибякин А. С. Криминалистическая полиграфология – новое направление в криминалистике, занимающееся исследованием «идеальных следов» // Криминалистика: актуальные вопросы теории и практики. Второй Всероссийский «круглый стол», 20-21.07.2002. Сборник материалов к 200-летию МВД России. Ростов наДону: РЮИ МВД России. 2002. 296 с.
Холодный Ю. И., Орлов Ю. К. Типовая методика производства психофизиологической экспертизы с применением полиграфа. М.: Академия следственного комитета РФ, 2013. 300 c.
Холопова Е. Н. Судебно-психологическая экспертиза как основная форма использования психологических знаний при раскрытии и расследовании преступлений // Вестник криминалистики. М., 2006. Выпуск 4 (20). С. 25–33.
Шипшин С.С. Ретроспективная диагностика психического состояния человека // Методы психологии: Материалы II Всерос. науч. конф. по психологии РПО. Ростов-на-Дону, 1997. С. 281-283.
Якимов И. Н. Криминалистика. Уголовная тактика.. М.: Изд. НКВД РСФСР, 1929. С. 161.
Ainsworth P. Offender profiling and crime analysis. Devon, UK: Willan: Willan Publishing 2001. 208 p.
Arrigo B. A., Sellers B. G. Psychological jurisprudence and the relational problems of de-vitalization and finalization: Rethinking the society of captives thesis. // Mental health in prisons: Critical perspectives on treatment and confinement / Eds. by A. Mills and K. Kendall, London: Palgrave MacMillan, 2018. P. 73–104.
Arrigo B.A. Managing risk and marginalizing identities: On the society-of-captives thesis and the harm of social disease // International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 2018. Vol. 357 (6). P. 672–693.
Arrigo B. A., Sellers B. Sostakas J. Pre-crime, Post-criminology, and the Captivity of Ultramodern Desire // International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique, 2020. Vol. 33, p. 497-514 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-020-09719-4
Bartol C. R., Bartol A. M. Criminal behavior: A Psychological Approach. New York: Pearson; 2017. 672p.
Bigo D. The field and the pan-opticon. // Terror, insecurity, and liberty: Illiberal practices of liberal regimes after 9/11/ D. Bigo and A. Tsoukala (eds.). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. 2008. P. 10–49.
Burgess A. W., Roberts A. R., Regehr Ch. Victimology: Theories and Applications. New York: Jones & Bartlett Learning, 2009, 2012, 594 p. P. 103–109.
Caruso G. D. Justice without Retribution: An Epistemic Argument against Retributive Criminal Punishment // Neuroethics, 2020. Vol. 13, p. 13–28 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-018-9357-8
Copson G. Coals to Newcastle: Part 1. A study of offender profiling. London: Home Office, Police Research Group, 1995. 50 p.
Criminal Profiling. An introduction to behavioral evidence analysis / Turvey, Br. (Ed.). New York: Academic Press. 2011. 717 p.
Gane N. The governmentalities of neoliberalism: Panopticism, post-panopticism, and beyond // The Sociological Review, 2012. Vol. 60. P. 611–634.
Garrido V. J. Perfiles criminales: Un recorrido por el lado oscuro del ser humano. Barcelona: Ariel, Planeta Publishing, 2012/2015. 464 p.
Hart A. J. P., Gresswell D. M., Braham L. G. Formulation of serious violent offending using multiple sequential functional analysis / En P. Sturmey & M. McMurran (Eds.), Forensic case formulation. Chichester, UK: Wiley, 2011. P. 129-152.
Hazelwood R. R., Burgess A. W. Practical Aspects of rape investigation. New York: CRC Press; 2016. 490 p.
Hickey E. W. Serial murderers and their victims. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 2015. 512 р.
Iacono W. G. Effective policing: Understanding how polygraph tests work and are used // Criminal Justice and Behavior. 2008. №35 (10). Р.1295–1308.
Kocsis R. N., Palermo G. B. Disentangling Criminal Profiling: Accuracy, Homology, and the Myth of Trait-Based Profiling // International Journal Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 2015. Vol.59. No. 1. Р. 313-332.
Marx G., Valerie St. From the beginning: Children as subjects and agents of surveillance //Surveillance and Society, 2010. Vol. 7 (3/4). P. 192–230.
Mathiesen Th. The viewer society: M. Foucault’s ‘panopticon’ revisited // Theoretical Criminology: An International Journal, 1997. Vol. 1 (2). P. 215–234.
Meehl P. E. Wanted — a good cookbook // American Psychologist. 1956. № 11. P. 262-272.
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. // The polygraph and lie detection. Washington, D.C: National Academies Press. 2003. 416 p. P. 4–5.
Palermo G. B., Kocsis R. N. Offender Profiling // American Series in Behavioral Science and Law. New York: Ch. C. Thomas, 2005. P. 145–146.
Pinizzotto A. J. Forensic psychology: Criminal personality profiling // Journal of Police Science and Administration, 1984. Vol. 12. P. 32–40.
Pinizzotto A. J., Finkel N. J. Criminal personality profiling // Law and Human Behavior. 1990. Vol. 14. P. 215–233.
Plato. The Republic. Trans. R. Waterfield. New York: Oxford University Press. 2018. 340 p.
Pozueco J. M., Moreno J. M., García-Baamonde M. E.Blázquez M. La perfilación psico-criminal y forense de los multicidas // Psychological and criminological motives analysis of serial killers, mass murders, and spree killers. 1st International Congress of Profiling & Criminal Behavior Analysis in Violent Crimes. Vol. Organizado por el Grupo de Estudios Avanzados en Investigación y Perfilación Criminal. Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, 2015. Р. 1–27.
Roy S., Kundu S., Sarkar D., Giri C., Jana P. Community Detection and Design of Recommendation System Based on Criminal Incidents // Proceedings of International Conference on Frontiers in Computing and Systems. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing / Bhattacharjee D., Kole D.K., Dey N., Basu S., Plewczynski D. (eds.). Singapore: Springer, 2021. Vol. 1255. Р. 71-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7834-2_7
Sellers B. G., and Arrigo B. A. Postmodern criminology and technocrime // Technocrime and criminological theory / Eds. by K.F. Steinmetz and Matt R. Nobles. Boca Raton: CRC Press., 2018. P. 133–146.
Vettor Sh., Woodhams J., Beech A. Offender profiling: A review and critique of the approaches and major assumption // Journal of Current Issues in Crime, Law and Law Enforcement. 2013. Vol. 6 (4). P. 353–387.
REFERENCES
Alekseev, L. G., Potemkin, F. V. (2017). Problems of applied psychophysiology. Moscow: Buki Vedi. (In Russ.).
Anfinogenov, A. I. (2003). The method of establishing the characteristics of a criminal associated with the circumstances of the incident. Moscow: Academy of Management of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. (In Russ.).
Arpentieva, M. R. (2018). Metatechnologies of non-instrumental profiling. In: E. S. Legostaeva (Ed.) Real practice of polygraph examiners VI: Profiling and lie detection technologies in ensuring the personnel security of an organization: collection of materials of the International Scientific and Practical Symposium (pp. 10–30). Yekaterinburg: Ural State Pedagogical University. (In Russ.).
Arpentieva, M. R. (2018). Problems of modern non-instrumental profiling. In: E. S. Legostaeva (Ed.). Real practice of polygraph examiners VI: Profiling and lie detection technologies in ensuring the personnel security of an organization: a collection of materials of the International Scientific and Practical Symposium. (pp. 31–60). Yekaterinburg: Ural State Pedagogical University. (In Russ.).
Arpentieva, M. R. (2018). Criminal profiling: history and modernity. In: C. M. Malkov (Ed.). Actual problems of criminal law and criminology at the present stage. Annual interuniversity collection of scientific papers. Issue 1. Krasnoyarsk: Siberian Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia Publ. (In Russ.).
Arpentyeva, M. R., & Makarenko, I. A. (2018). Forensic and forensic psychological diagnostics: methods of profiling, verification and use of the polygraph. Kaluga: KSU named after. K. E. Tsiolkovsky. (In Russ.).
Blackbourne, R. (2004). Psychology of criminal behavior. St. Petersburg: Peter. (In Russ.).
Vasilyev, V. L. (2009). Legal psychology. St. Petersburg: Peter. (In Russ.).
Grimak, L. P., Skrypnikov, A. I., Lagovskiy, A. Yu., & Zubrilova, I. S. (1999). Methods of applied psychology in the detection and investigation of crimes. Moscow: All-Russian Research Institute of the Russian Ministry of Internal Affairs. (In Russ.).
Engalychev, V. F., & Yuzhaninova A. L. (2007). Some features of the forensic psychological examination in civil proceedings. Srednerussky Vestnik Social Sciences: Interregional Scientific and Educational Edition, 2(3), 36–39. (In Russ.).
Engalychev, V. F., & Shipshin, S. S. (1997). Forensic psychological examination. Methodical guidance (pp. 156–159). Kaluga-Obninsk-Moscow. (In Russ.).
Efimichev, S. P., & Efimichev, P. S. (2009). Investigation of crimes: theory, practice, ensuring the rights of the individual. Moscow: Justicinform. (In Russ.).
Isaeva, I. V., & Safuanov, F. S. (2015). An analysis of the decisions of the Supreme Courts on affective crimes and the problems of forensic examination. The Russian Judge, 12, 37–40. (In Russ.).
Ishchenko, E. P. (2003). Forensic science: A short course (pp. 10–42). Moscow: INFRA-M. (In Russ.).
Kosarev, S. Yu. (2006). History and theory of criminalistic methods of investigating crimes. St. Petersburg: Legal Center Press. (In Russ.).
Kroz, M. V., Ratinova, N. A., & Onischenko, O. R. (2008). Criminal psychological impact. Moscow: Yurlitinform. (In Russ.).
Levchenko, O. V. (2004). The system of means of cognitive activity in proving in criminal cases and its improvement [Doctoral thesis, The Astrakhan State Technical University]. Moscow, Astrakhan: ASTU. (In Russ.).
Mochagin, P. V. (2013). Features of lies, deceit, untruth as separate criteria that form the ideal forensic trace information, revealed during polygraph checks. Bulletin of the Udmurt University. Series Economics and Law, 4, 151–156. (In Russ.).
Pirozhkov, V. F. (2007). Criminal psychology. Moscow: Os-89. (In Russ.).
Arpentieva M. R. (ed.). (2016). Profiling and mediation: spheres, values, technologies, training. Collective monograph. Series Actual problems of practical psychology: crisis, development, support. Issue. 2. Kaluga: Kaluga State University named after K. E. Tsiolkovsky, Eidos. (In Russ.).
Ratinov, A. R. (2001). Forensic psychology for investigators. Scientific and practical guidance. Moscow: Yurlitinform. (In Russ.).
Safuanov, F. S. (1993). Use of psychological knowledge in the production of new types of forensic psychiatric examination. In: New types of forensic psychiatric examination in the civil process. Applied to the law of the Russian Federation "On psychiatric care and guarantees of the rights of citizens in its provision" (pp. 87-99). Moscow: Publishing Center for the Protection of Rights and Health of Citizens. (In Russ.).
Kholodnyi, Yu. I., & Podshibyakin, A. S. (2002). Criminalistic polygraphy-a new trend in forensic science dealing with the study of "ideal traces". Forensic science: topical issues of theory and practice. The second All-Russian "round table", 20-21.07.2002. Collection of materials for the 200th anniversary of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. Rostov on Don: the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. (In Russ.).
Kholodnyi, Y. I., & Orlov, Yu. K. (2013). Typical methodology for the production of psychophysiological expertise with the use of polygraph. Moscow: Academy of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation. (In Russ.).
Kholopova, E. N. (2006). Forensic Psychological Examination as the Basic Form of Using Psychological Knowledge when investigation of crimes. Bulletin of Criminalistics, 4(20), 25–33. (In Russ.).
Shipshin, S. S. (1997). Retrospective diagnosis of a person's mental state. In: Methods of Psychology: Materials II Vseros. sci. Conf. on psychology of RPO (pp. 281–283). Rostov-on-Don. (In Russ.).
Yakimov, I. N. (1929). Forensic science. Criminal tactics. Moscow: NKVD (People's Commissariat of Internal Affairs) of the RSFSR. (In Russ.).
Ainsworth, P. (2001). Offender profiling and crime analysis. Devon, UK: Willan: Willan Publishing.
Arrigo, B. A., & Sellers, B. G. (2018). Psychological jurisprudence and the relational problems of de-vitalization and finalization: Rethinking the society of captive’s thesis. In: A. Mills and K. Kendall (eds.). Mental health in prisons: Critical perspectives on treatment and confinement (pp. 73–104.). London: Palgrave MacMillan.
Arrigo, B. A. (2018). Managing risk and marginalizing identities: On the society-of-captives thesis and the harm of social dis-ease. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 357(6), 672–693.
Arrigo, B. A., Sellers, B. & Sostakas, J. (2020). Pre-crime, Post-criminology, and the Captivity of Ultramodern Desire. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique, 33, 497–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-020-09719-4.
Bartol, C. R., & Bartol, A. M. (2017). Criminal behavior: A Psychological Approach. New York: Pearson.
Bigo, D. (2008). The field and the pan-opticon. In: D. Bigo, & A. Tsoukala (eds.). Terror, insecurity, and liberty: Illiberal practices of liberal regimes after 9/11, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
Burgess, A. W., Roberts, A. R., & Regehr, Ch. (2009, 2012). Victimology: Theories and Applications, New York: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Caruso, G. D. (2020). Justice without Retribution: An Epistemic Argument against Retributive Criminal Punishment. Neuroethics, 13, 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-018-9357-8.
Copson, G. (1995). Coals to Newcastle: Part 1. A study of offender profiling. London: Home Office, Police Research Group.
Turvey, Br. (Ed.). (2011). Criminal Profiling. An introduction to behavioral evidence analysis New York: Academic Press.
Gane, N. (2012). The governmentalities of neoliberalism: Panopticism, post-panopticism, and beyond. The Sociological Review, 60, 611–634.
Garrido, V. J. Perfiles criminales: Un recorrido por el lado oscuro del ser humano. Barcelona: Ariel, Planeta Publishing, 2012/2015. 464 p.
Hart, A. J. P., Gresswell, D. M., & Braham, L. G. (2011). Formulation of serious violent offending using multiple sequential functional analysis. In: P. Sturmey& M. McMurran (Eds.) Forensic case formulation (pp. 129–152). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Hazelwood, R. R., & Burgess, A. W. (2016) Practical Aspects of rape investigation. New York: CRC Press.
Hickey, E. W. (2015). Serial murderers and their victims. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Iacono, W. G. (2008). Effective policing: Understanding how polygraph tests work and are used". Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35(10), 1295–1308.
Kocsis, R. N., & Palermo, G. B. (2015). Disentangling Criminal Profiling: Accuracy, Homology, and the Myth of Trait-Based Profiling. International Journal Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 59(1), 313–332.
Marx, G., & Valerie St. (2010). From the beginning: Children as subjects and agents of surveillance. Surveillance and Society, 7(3/4), 192-230.
Mathiesen, Th. (1997). The viewer society: Michel Foucault’s ‘panopticon’ revisited. Theoretical Criminology: An International Journal, 1(2), 215–234.
Meehl, P.E. (1956). Wanted – a good cookbook. American Psychologist, 11, 262–272.
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. (2003). The polygraph and lie detection. Washington, D.C: National Academies Press. 2003. 416p. P. 4–5.
Palermo, G. B., Kocsis, R. N. (2005). Offender Profiling. American Series in Behavioral Science and Law. New York: Ch. C. Thomas.
Pinizzotto, A. J. (1984). Forensic psychology: Criminal personality profiling. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 12, 32–40.
Pinizzotto, A. J., & Finkel, N. J. (1990). Criminal personality profiling. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 215–233.
Plato (2018). The Republic. New York: Oxford University Press.
Pozueco, J. M., Moreno, J. M., García-Baamonde, M. E., & Blázquez, M. (2015). La perfilación psico-criminal y forense de los multicidas. Psycho criminal and forensic profiling of multicidal. In: Psychological and criminological motives analysis of serial killers, mass murders, and spree killers. 1st International Congress of Profiling & Criminal Behavior Analysis in Violent Crimes. Vol.: Organizado por el Grupo de Estudios Avanzados en Investigación y Perfilación Criminal (pp. 1–27). Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona.
Roy, S., Kundu, S., Sarkar, D., Giri, C., Jana, P. (2021). Community Detection and Design of Recommendation System Based on Criminal Incidents. In: Bhattacharjee, D., Kole, D.K., Dey, N., Basu, S., Plewczynski, D. (eds.). Proceedings of International Conference on Frontiers in Computing and Systems. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Singapore: Springer. Vol. 1255 (pp. 71-80). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7834-2_7
Sellers, B. G., & Arrigo, B. A. (2018). Postmodern criminology and technocrime. In: K.F. Steinmetz and Matt R. Nobles (eds.). Technocrime and criminological theory (pp. 113–146). Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Vettor, Sh., Woodhams, J., Beech, A. (2013). Offender profiling: A review and critique of the approaches and major assumption. Journal of Current Issues in Crime, Law and Law Enforcement, 6(4), 353–387.
Анфиногенов А. И. Методика установления признаков преступника сопряженных с обстоятельствами происшествия / Под ред. И. А. Попова М.: Академия управления МВД России, 2003. 150 с.
Арпентьева М. Р. Метатехнологии неинструментального профайлинга // Реальная практика полиграфологов VI: Профайлинг и технологии детекции лжи в обеспечении кадровой безопасности организации : сборник материалов Международного научно-практического симпозиума / Отв. ред. Е. С. Легостаева. Екатеринбург : Уральский государственный педагогический университет, 2018. C. 10–30.
Арпентьева М. Р. Проблемы современного неинструментального профайлинга // Реальная практика полиграфологов VI: Профайлинг и технологии детекции лжи в обеспечении кадровой безопасности организации : сборник материалов Международного научно-практического симпозиума / Отв. ред. Е. С. Легостаева. Екатеринбург : Уральский государственный педагогический университет, 2018. С. 31–60.
Арпентьева М. Р. Криминальный профайлинг: история и современность // Актуальные вопросы уголовного права и криминологии на современном этапе.Ежегодный межвузовский сборник научных трудов. Выпуск 1 / отв. ред. С.М. Мальков. Красноярск, Изд-во Сибирского юридического института МВД России, 2018. 204 с.
Арпентьева М. Р., Макаренко И. А., Судебная и криминалистическая психологическая диагностика: методы профилирования, верификации и использования полиграфа. Калуга: КГУ им. К.Э. Циолковского, 2018. 260 с.
Блэкборн Р. Психология криминального поведения. СПб. : Питер, 2004. 496 с.
Васильев В. Л. Юридическая психология. СПб.: Питер, 2009. 608 с.
Гримак Л. П., Скрыпников А. И., Лаговский А. Ю., Зубрилова И. С. Методы прикладной психологии в раскрытии и расследовании преступлений. М., 1999. С. 7, 58, 79, 99, 133.
Енгалычев В. Ф., Южанинова А. Л. Некоторые особенности производства судебно-психологической экспертизы в гражданском судопроизводстве // Среднерусский вестник общественных наук: Межрегиональное научно-образовательное издание. 2007. № 2 (3). С. 36–39.
Енгалычев В. Ф., Шипшин С. С. Судебно- психологическая экспертиза. Методическое руководство. Калуга–Обнинск–Москва: КГПИ им К.Э. Циолковского, 1997. С. 156–159.
Ефимичев С. П., Ефимичев П. С. Расследование преступлений: теория, практика, обеспечение прав личности. М.: Юстицинформ, 2009. 504 c.
Исаева И. В., Сафуанов Ф. С. Анализ решений верховных судов по аффективным преступлениям и проблемы судебной экспертизы // Российский судья. 2015. № 12. С. 37-40.
Ищенко Е. П. Криминалистика. М.: Юрид. фирма «КОНТРАКТ» ИНФРА-М, 2003. С.10, 42
Косарев С. Ю. История и теория криминалистических методик расследования преступлений:. СПб.; Издательство Р. Асланова «Юридический центр Пресс»; 2006. 262 с.
Кроз М. В., Ратинова Н. А., Онищенко О. Р. Криминальное психологическое воздействие. М.: Юрлитинформ, 2008. 200 с.
Левченко О. В. Система средств познавательной деятельности в доказывании по уголовным делам и ее совершенствование. Дисс… докт. юрид. наук. M. Астрахань: АГТУ, 2004. 418 с.
Мочагин П. В. Особенности лжи, обмана, неправды как отдельные критерии, формирующие идеальную криминалистическую следовую информацию, выявляемую в ходе полиграфных проверок // Вестник Удмуртского университета. Серия «Экономика и право». 2013. №4. С.151–156.
Пирожков В. Ф. Криминальная психология. М.: Ось-89, 2007. 704 с.
Профайлинг и медиация: сферы, ценности, технологии, обучение. Коллективная монография. Серия «Актуальные проблемы практической психологии: кризис, развитие, поддержка». Вып. 2.. / Ответ. ред. М.Р. Арпентьева. Калуга: Калужский государственный университет им. К.Э. Циолковского, Эйдос, 2016. 290 с.
Ратинов А. Р. Судебная психология для следователей. Научно-практическое руководство. М: Юрлитинформ, 2001. 352 с.
Сафуанов Ф. С. Использование психологических познаний при производстве новых видов судебно-психиатрической экспертизы // Новые виды судебно-психиатрической экспертизы в гражданском процессе. Применительно к закону РФ «О психиатрической помощи и гарантиях прав граждан при ее оказании». М.: Изд-во Центра защиты прав и здоровья граждан, 1993. С. 87-99.
Холодный Ю. И., Подшибякин А. С. Криминалистическая полиграфология – новое направление в криминалистике, занимающееся исследованием «идеальных следов» // Криминалистика: актуальные вопросы теории и практики. Второй Всероссийский «круглый стол», 20-21.07.2002. Сборник материалов к 200-летию МВД России. Ростов наДону: РЮИ МВД России. 2002. 296 с.
Холодный Ю. И., Орлов Ю. К. Типовая методика производства психофизиологической экспертизы с применением полиграфа. М.: Академия следственного комитета РФ, 2013. 300 c.
Холопова Е. Н. Судебно-психологическая экспертиза как основная форма использования психологических знаний при раскрытии и расследовании преступлений // Вестник криминалистики. М., 2006. Выпуск 4 (20). С. 25–33.
Шипшин С.С. Ретроспективная диагностика психического состояния человека // Методы психологии: Материалы II Всерос. науч. конф. по психологии РПО. Ростов-на-Дону, 1997. С. 281-283.
Якимов И. Н. Криминалистика. Уголовная тактика.. М.: Изд. НКВД РСФСР, 1929. С. 161.
Ainsworth P. Offender profiling and crime analysis. Devon, UK: Willan: Willan Publishing 2001. 208 p.
Arrigo B. A., Sellers B. G. Psychological jurisprudence and the relational problems of de-vitalization and finalization: Rethinking the society of captives thesis. // Mental health in prisons: Critical perspectives on treatment and confinement / Eds. by A. Mills and K. Kendall, London: Palgrave MacMillan, 2018. P. 73–104.
Arrigo B.A. Managing risk and marginalizing identities: On the society-of-captives thesis and the harm of social disease // International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 2018. Vol. 357 (6). P. 672–693.
Arrigo B. A., Sellers B. Sostakas J. Pre-crime, Post-criminology, and the Captivity of Ultramodern Desire // International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique, 2020. Vol. 33, p. 497-514 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-020-09719-4
Bartol C. R., Bartol A. M. Criminal behavior: A Psychological Approach. New York: Pearson; 2017. 672p.
Bigo D. The field and the pan-opticon. // Terror, insecurity, and liberty: Illiberal practices of liberal regimes after 9/11/ D. Bigo and A. Tsoukala (eds.). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. 2008. P. 10–49.
Burgess A. W., Roberts A. R., Regehr Ch. Victimology: Theories and Applications. New York: Jones & Bartlett Learning, 2009, 2012, 594 p. P. 103–109.
Caruso G. D. Justice without Retribution: An Epistemic Argument against Retributive Criminal Punishment // Neuroethics, 2020. Vol. 13, p. 13–28 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-018-9357-8
Copson G. Coals to Newcastle: Part 1. A study of offender profiling. London: Home Office, Police Research Group, 1995. 50 p.
Criminal Profiling. An introduction to behavioral evidence analysis / Turvey, Br. (Ed.). New York: Academic Press. 2011. 717 p.
Gane N. The governmentalities of neoliberalism: Panopticism, post-panopticism, and beyond // The Sociological Review, 2012. Vol. 60. P. 611–634.
Garrido V. J. Perfiles criminales: Un recorrido por el lado oscuro del ser humano. Barcelona: Ariel, Planeta Publishing, 2012/2015. 464 p.
Hart A. J. P., Gresswell D. M., Braham L. G. Formulation of serious violent offending using multiple sequential functional analysis / En P. Sturmey & M. McMurran (Eds.), Forensic case formulation. Chichester, UK: Wiley, 2011. P. 129-152.
Hazelwood R. R., Burgess A. W. Practical Aspects of rape investigation. New York: CRC Press; 2016. 490 p.
Hickey E. W. Serial murderers and their victims. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 2015. 512 р.
Iacono W. G. Effective policing: Understanding how polygraph tests work and are used // Criminal Justice and Behavior. 2008. №35 (10). Р.1295–1308.
Kocsis R. N., Palermo G. B. Disentangling Criminal Profiling: Accuracy, Homology, and the Myth of Trait-Based Profiling // International Journal Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 2015. Vol.59. No. 1. Р. 313-332.
Marx G., Valerie St. From the beginning: Children as subjects and agents of surveillance //Surveillance and Society, 2010. Vol. 7 (3/4). P. 192–230.
Mathiesen Th. The viewer society: M. Foucault’s ‘panopticon’ revisited // Theoretical Criminology: An International Journal, 1997. Vol. 1 (2). P. 215–234.
Meehl P. E. Wanted — a good cookbook // American Psychologist. 1956. № 11. P. 262-272.
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. // The polygraph and lie detection. Washington, D.C: National Academies Press. 2003. 416 p. P. 4–5.
Palermo G. B., Kocsis R. N. Offender Profiling // American Series in Behavioral Science and Law. New York: Ch. C. Thomas, 2005. P. 145–146.
Pinizzotto A. J. Forensic psychology: Criminal personality profiling // Journal of Police Science and Administration, 1984. Vol. 12. P. 32–40.
Pinizzotto A. J., Finkel N. J. Criminal personality profiling // Law and Human Behavior. 1990. Vol. 14. P. 215–233.
Plato. The Republic. Trans. R. Waterfield. New York: Oxford University Press. 2018. 340 p.
Pozueco J. M., Moreno J. M., García-Baamonde M. E.Blázquez M. La perfilación psico-criminal y forense de los multicidas // Psychological and criminological motives analysis of serial killers, mass murders, and spree killers. 1st International Congress of Profiling & Criminal Behavior Analysis in Violent Crimes. Vol. Organizado por el Grupo de Estudios Avanzados en Investigación y Perfilación Criminal. Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, 2015. Р. 1–27.
Roy S., Kundu S., Sarkar D., Giri C., Jana P. Community Detection and Design of Recommendation System Based on Criminal Incidents // Proceedings of International Conference on Frontiers in Computing and Systems. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing / Bhattacharjee D., Kole D.K., Dey N., Basu S., Plewczynski D. (eds.). Singapore: Springer, 2021. Vol. 1255. Р. 71-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7834-2_7
Sellers B. G., and Arrigo B. A. Postmodern criminology and technocrime // Technocrime and criminological theory / Eds. by K.F. Steinmetz and Matt R. Nobles. Boca Raton: CRC Press., 2018. P. 133–146.
Vettor Sh., Woodhams J., Beech A. Offender profiling: A review and critique of the approaches and major assumption // Journal of Current Issues in Crime, Law and Law Enforcement. 2013. Vol. 6 (4). P. 353–387.
REFERENCES
Alekseev, L. G., Potemkin, F. V. (2017). Problems of applied psychophysiology. Moscow: Buki Vedi. (In Russ.).
Anfinogenov, A. I. (2003). The method of establishing the characteristics of a criminal associated with the circumstances of the incident. Moscow: Academy of Management of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. (In Russ.).
Arpentieva, M. R. (2018). Metatechnologies of non-instrumental profiling. In: E. S. Legostaeva (Ed.) Real practice of polygraph examiners VI: Profiling and lie detection technologies in ensuring the personnel security of an organization: collection of materials of the International Scientific and Practical Symposium (pp. 10–30). Yekaterinburg: Ural State Pedagogical University. (In Russ.).
Arpentieva, M. R. (2018). Problems of modern non-instrumental profiling. In: E. S. Legostaeva (Ed.). Real practice of polygraph examiners VI: Profiling and lie detection technologies in ensuring the personnel security of an organization: a collection of materials of the International Scientific and Practical Symposium. (pp. 31–60). Yekaterinburg: Ural State Pedagogical University. (In Russ.).
Arpentieva, M. R. (2018). Criminal profiling: history and modernity. In: C. M. Malkov (Ed.). Actual problems of criminal law and criminology at the present stage. Annual interuniversity collection of scientific papers. Issue 1. Krasnoyarsk: Siberian Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia Publ. (In Russ.).
Arpentyeva, M. R., & Makarenko, I. A. (2018). Forensic and forensic psychological diagnostics: methods of profiling, verification and use of the polygraph. Kaluga: KSU named after. K. E. Tsiolkovsky. (In Russ.).
Blackbourne, R. (2004). Psychology of criminal behavior. St. Petersburg: Peter. (In Russ.).
Vasilyev, V. L. (2009). Legal psychology. St. Petersburg: Peter. (In Russ.).
Grimak, L. P., Skrypnikov, A. I., Lagovskiy, A. Yu., & Zubrilova, I. S. (1999). Methods of applied psychology in the detection and investigation of crimes. Moscow: All-Russian Research Institute of the Russian Ministry of Internal Affairs. (In Russ.).
Engalychev, V. F., & Yuzhaninova A. L. (2007). Some features of the forensic psychological examination in civil proceedings. Srednerussky Vestnik Social Sciences: Interregional Scientific and Educational Edition, 2(3), 36–39. (In Russ.).
Engalychev, V. F., & Shipshin, S. S. (1997). Forensic psychological examination. Methodical guidance (pp. 156–159). Kaluga-Obninsk-Moscow. (In Russ.).
Efimichev, S. P., & Efimichev, P. S. (2009). Investigation of crimes: theory, practice, ensuring the rights of the individual. Moscow: Justicinform. (In Russ.).
Isaeva, I. V., & Safuanov, F. S. (2015). An analysis of the decisions of the Supreme Courts on affective crimes and the problems of forensic examination. The Russian Judge, 12, 37–40. (In Russ.).
Ishchenko, E. P. (2003). Forensic science: A short course (pp. 10–42). Moscow: INFRA-M. (In Russ.).
Kosarev, S. Yu. (2006). History and theory of criminalistic methods of investigating crimes. St. Petersburg: Legal Center Press. (In Russ.).
Kroz, M. V., Ratinova, N. A., & Onischenko, O. R. (2008). Criminal psychological impact. Moscow: Yurlitinform. (In Russ.).
Levchenko, O. V. (2004). The system of means of cognitive activity in proving in criminal cases and its improvement [Doctoral thesis, The Astrakhan State Technical University]. Moscow, Astrakhan: ASTU. (In Russ.).
Mochagin, P. V. (2013). Features of lies, deceit, untruth as separate criteria that form the ideal forensic trace information, revealed during polygraph checks. Bulletin of the Udmurt University. Series Economics and Law, 4, 151–156. (In Russ.).
Pirozhkov, V. F. (2007). Criminal psychology. Moscow: Os-89. (In Russ.).
Arpentieva M. R. (ed.). (2016). Profiling and mediation: spheres, values, technologies, training. Collective monograph. Series Actual problems of practical psychology: crisis, development, support. Issue. 2. Kaluga: Kaluga State University named after K. E. Tsiolkovsky, Eidos. (In Russ.).
Ratinov, A. R. (2001). Forensic psychology for investigators. Scientific and practical guidance. Moscow: Yurlitinform. (In Russ.).
Safuanov, F. S. (1993). Use of psychological knowledge in the production of new types of forensic psychiatric examination. In: New types of forensic psychiatric examination in the civil process. Applied to the law of the Russian Federation "On psychiatric care and guarantees of the rights of citizens in its provision" (pp. 87-99). Moscow: Publishing Center for the Protection of Rights and Health of Citizens. (In Russ.).
Kholodnyi, Yu. I., & Podshibyakin, A. S. (2002). Criminalistic polygraphy-a new trend in forensic science dealing with the study of "ideal traces". Forensic science: topical issues of theory and practice. The second All-Russian "round table", 20-21.07.2002. Collection of materials for the 200th anniversary of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. Rostov on Don: the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. (In Russ.).
Kholodnyi, Y. I., & Orlov, Yu. K. (2013). Typical methodology for the production of psychophysiological expertise with the use of polygraph. Moscow: Academy of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation. (In Russ.).
Kholopova, E. N. (2006). Forensic Psychological Examination as the Basic Form of Using Psychological Knowledge when investigation of crimes. Bulletin of Criminalistics, 4(20), 25–33. (In Russ.).
Shipshin, S. S. (1997). Retrospective diagnosis of a person's mental state. In: Methods of Psychology: Materials II Vseros. sci. Conf. on psychology of RPO (pp. 281–283). Rostov-on-Don. (In Russ.).
Yakimov, I. N. (1929). Forensic science. Criminal tactics. Moscow: NKVD (People's Commissariat of Internal Affairs) of the RSFSR. (In Russ.).
Ainsworth, P. (2001). Offender profiling and crime analysis. Devon, UK: Willan: Willan Publishing.
Arrigo, B. A., & Sellers, B. G. (2018). Psychological jurisprudence and the relational problems of de-vitalization and finalization: Rethinking the society of captive’s thesis. In: A. Mills and K. Kendall (eds.). Mental health in prisons: Critical perspectives on treatment and confinement (pp. 73–104.). London: Palgrave MacMillan.
Arrigo, B. A. (2018). Managing risk and marginalizing identities: On the society-of-captives thesis and the harm of social dis-ease. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 357(6), 672–693.
Arrigo, B. A., Sellers, B. & Sostakas, J. (2020). Pre-crime, Post-criminology, and the Captivity of Ultramodern Desire. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique, 33, 497–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-020-09719-4.
Bartol, C. R., & Bartol, A. M. (2017). Criminal behavior: A Psychological Approach. New York: Pearson.
Bigo, D. (2008). The field and the pan-opticon. In: D. Bigo, & A. Tsoukala (eds.). Terror, insecurity, and liberty: Illiberal practices of liberal regimes after 9/11, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
Burgess, A. W., Roberts, A. R., & Regehr, Ch. (2009, 2012). Victimology: Theories and Applications, New York: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Caruso, G. D. (2020). Justice without Retribution: An Epistemic Argument against Retributive Criminal Punishment. Neuroethics, 13, 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-018-9357-8.
Copson, G. (1995). Coals to Newcastle: Part 1. A study of offender profiling. London: Home Office, Police Research Group.
Turvey, Br. (Ed.). (2011). Criminal Profiling. An introduction to behavioral evidence analysis New York: Academic Press.
Gane, N. (2012). The governmentalities of neoliberalism: Panopticism, post-panopticism, and beyond. The Sociological Review, 60, 611–634.
Garrido, V. J. Perfiles criminales: Un recorrido por el lado oscuro del ser humano. Barcelona: Ariel, Planeta Publishing, 2012/2015. 464 p.
Hart, A. J. P., Gresswell, D. M., & Braham, L. G. (2011). Formulation of serious violent offending using multiple sequential functional analysis. In: P. Sturmey& M. McMurran (Eds.) Forensic case formulation (pp. 129–152). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Hazelwood, R. R., & Burgess, A. W. (2016) Practical Aspects of rape investigation. New York: CRC Press.
Hickey, E. W. (2015). Serial murderers and their victims. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Iacono, W. G. (2008). Effective policing: Understanding how polygraph tests work and are used". Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35(10), 1295–1308.
Kocsis, R. N., & Palermo, G. B. (2015). Disentangling Criminal Profiling: Accuracy, Homology, and the Myth of Trait-Based Profiling. International Journal Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 59(1), 313–332.
Marx, G., & Valerie St. (2010). From the beginning: Children as subjects and agents of surveillance. Surveillance and Society, 7(3/4), 192-230.
Mathiesen, Th. (1997). The viewer society: Michel Foucault’s ‘panopticon’ revisited. Theoretical Criminology: An International Journal, 1(2), 215–234.
Meehl, P.E. (1956). Wanted – a good cookbook. American Psychologist, 11, 262–272.
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. (2003). The polygraph and lie detection. Washington, D.C: National Academies Press. 2003. 416p. P. 4–5.
Palermo, G. B., Kocsis, R. N. (2005). Offender Profiling. American Series in Behavioral Science and Law. New York: Ch. C. Thomas.
Pinizzotto, A. J. (1984). Forensic psychology: Criminal personality profiling. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 12, 32–40.
Pinizzotto, A. J., & Finkel, N. J. (1990). Criminal personality profiling. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 215–233.
Plato (2018). The Republic. New York: Oxford University Press.
Pozueco, J. M., Moreno, J. M., García-Baamonde, M. E., & Blázquez, M. (2015). La perfilación psico-criminal y forense de los multicidas. Psycho criminal and forensic profiling of multicidal. In: Psychological and criminological motives analysis of serial killers, mass murders, and spree killers. 1st International Congress of Profiling & Criminal Behavior Analysis in Violent Crimes. Vol.: Organizado por el Grupo de Estudios Avanzados en Investigación y Perfilación Criminal (pp. 1–27). Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona.
Roy, S., Kundu, S., Sarkar, D., Giri, C., Jana, P. (2021). Community Detection and Design of Recommendation System Based on Criminal Incidents. In: Bhattacharjee, D., Kole, D.K., Dey, N., Basu, S., Plewczynski, D. (eds.). Proceedings of International Conference on Frontiers in Computing and Systems. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Singapore: Springer. Vol. 1255 (pp. 71-80). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7834-2_7
Sellers, B. G., & Arrigo, B. A. (2018). Postmodern criminology and technocrime. In: K.F. Steinmetz and Matt R. Nobles (eds.). Technocrime and criminological theory (pp. 113–146). Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Vettor, Sh., Woodhams, J., Beech, A. (2013). Offender profiling: A review and critique of the approaches and major assumption. Journal of Current Issues in Crime, Law and Law Enforcement, 6(4), 353–387.