THE STUDENT-AGE POPULATION IMAGE OF DOMESTIC ABUSE
Main Article Content
Abstract
The problem of domestic violence does not lose its relevance: in a changing society, the institution of the family is also undergoing constant changes, contacts within the family are being transformed, and there is an escalation of negative trends in interpersonal communication. The consequences of domestic violence have the broadest profile of action: at the physiological, intrapersonal, interpersonal, institutional, and global levels. Domestic violence, being inherently an unlawful phenomenon that infringes on personal integrity and dignity, is still perceived in society as an ordinary phenomenon. However, one can confidently assert its unambiguously negative impact on both the social structure and the mental organization of the individual. This work aims to explore the student-age youth’s ideas about domestic violence, since it is young people who are both a reflection of modern society and a flagship of change within it. Identification of students' views on domestic violence was carried out through an appeal to the psychodiagnostic apparatus. The study revealed the dominant level of trust in the myths about domestic violence among students, revealed the absence of significant differences in the answers of boys and girls. This indicates a fairly deep spread of false ideas related to domestic violence, the eradication of which seems to be a difficult, but quite feasible process, which should originate not so much within an individual, but in a system of social relationships. We also assume the existence of a general trend towards the unification of standards of education for both sexes. In addition, in the context of the spread of humanistic values, it is quite natural to adopt a critical view of the problem of domestic violence. Finally, respondents who are inclined to minimize the damage of domestic violence are more likely to justify the abuser. This can be explained by the young people's belief that violence must be earned and that its actor has good reason to ‘punish’ his partner in this way.
Downloads
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.
References
Блажевска, В., Стойменовска К. Различия в личностном профиле женщин — жертв домашнего насилия и женщин, которые не являются жертвами домашнего насилия // Международный научно-исследовательский журнал. 2017. № 9–2. С. 62–64.
Волосова Н. Ю. Понятие семейного (домашнего) насилия: дискуссионные вопросы терминологического соответствия // Вопросы российского и международного права. 2020. № 11–1. С. 87–96.
Волосова Н. Ю. Семейное (домашнее) насилие как проблема междисциплинарного характера // Вопросы российского и международного права. 2017. №3. С. 310–319.
Дунаева О. Н. Преодоление насилия в семье в современном Китае. Закон «О борьбе с насилием в семье» // Виктимология. 2021. № 8(4). С. 303–317.
Истомина О. Б., Лукина А. А., Какаулина Е. В. Институт семьи в современном российском обществе: сущность, структура, тенденции функционирования. Иркутск: Аспринт, 2022. 123 с.
Качаева М. А., Дозорцева Е. Г., Нуцкова Е. В. Отсроченные последствия пережитого домашнего насилия у женщин и девочек // Психология и право. 2017. № 3. С. 110–126.
Кекелидзе З. И., Качаева М. А., Харитонова Н. К., Васянина В. И., Шишкина О. А., Скибина Н. В., Назарова Л. Н. Медицинские аспекты проблемы домашнего насилия в отношении женщин и девочек (обзор литературы) // Проблемы социальной гигиены, здравоохранения и истории медицины. 2019. №5. С. 936–939.
Летова Н. В. Общие предпосылки насилия в семье, его видовые признаки и особенности // Социально-политические науки. 2019. № 1. С. 71–76.
Макашова Т. П., Бачанова В. В. Семейно-бытовое насилие в отношении женщин в России: постановка проблемы // Виктимология. 2021. № 4. С. 290–295.
Матвеева Е. В., Пинегина Н. М. Домашнее насилие: проблема, факторы его определяющие и последствия у женщин, жертв домашнего насилия // Научный альманах. 2021. № 12–2. С. 97–101.
Носкова Е. В., Петракевич Т. В. Отдельные аспекты и последствия современного домашнего насилия // Домашнее насилие: предупреждение и ответственность. 2019. С. 65–75.
Пучнин В. М., Шуняев С. В. Значение дефиниций, составляющих понятие «насилие в семье», как асоциального явления, посягающего на свободу личности // Вестник ТГУ. 2010. № 12. С. 310–317.
Райкова К. А., Ефимов А. А., Савенкова Е. Н., Гирюк С. А., Корсак В. О. Анализ проблемы домашнего насилия и путей ее решения в современном мире // Современные проблемы науки и образования. 2022. № 3.
Садыков Р. М., Большакова Н. Л. Насилие в семье: сущность и виды // Международный журнал гуманитарных и естественных наук. 2022. № 7–2. С. 81–84.
Саламова С. Я. Домашнее насилие в современной России: общая характеристика // Lex Russica. 2018. № 9(142). С. 129–138.
Федосеева Л. А., Илюшина Е. С., Красильникова Г. А., Чегулова А. А., Бердникова К. Э. Виды, формы и последствия семейного насилия // Современные научные исследования и инновации. 2022. № 1.
Шпилинова А. Ю. Декриминализация домашнего насилия и его последствия // Via scientiarum — Дорога знаний. 2022. № 3. С. 27–32.
Щепельков В. Ф. Противодействие домашнему насилию в Российской Федерации: состояние и перспективы // Криминалистъ. 2022. № 2(39). С. 95–103.
Gombul O. Nurses attitudes towards violence imposed on women by her husband in the family and their professional role in violence // Nursing Research Journal. 2000. no. 1. P. 19–32.
Peters J. Measuring Myths about Domestic Violence: Development and Initial Validation of the Domestic Violence Myth Acceptance Scale // Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma. 2008. no. 16(1). P. 1–21.
Petretic-Jackson P., Genell S. Domestic violence blame scale // Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 1994. no. 18(7). P. 695–716.
REFERENCES
Arhipova, A. S. (2018). International practice of domestic violence countering. Mezhdunarodnyj zhurnal gumanitarnyh i estestvennyh nauk, 7, 234–237.
Blazhevska, V., Stoimenovska, K. (2017). Personality profile differences among women victims of domestic violence and women who are not victims of domestic violence. Mezhdunarodnyj nauchno-issledovatel'skij zhurnal, 9–2, 62-64. doi:10.23670/IRJ.2017.63.092
Volosova, N. Yu. (2020). Domestic abuse concept: controversial issue of terminology consistency. Voprosy rossijskogo i mezhdunarodnogo prava, 1–11, 87–96. (In Russ.)
Volosova, N. Yu. (2017). Domestic abuse as a problem of interdisciplinary nature. Voprosy rossijskogo i mezhdunarodnogo prava, 3, 310–319. (In Russ.)
Dunaeva, O. N. (2021). Overcoming domestic violence in contemporary China. The law against domestic violence. Viktimologiya, 8(4), 303–317. (In Russ.)
Istomina, O. B., Lukina, A. A., Kakaulina, E. V. (2022). Institution of the family in modern Russian society: essence, organization, operation dynamic. Irkutsk: Asprint (In Russ).
Kachaeva, M. A., Dozorceva, E. G., Nuckova, E. V. (2017). After-effects of domestic violence experience for women and girls. Psihologiya i parvo, 3, 110–126. (In Russ.)
Kekelidze, Z. I., Kachaeva, M. A., Haritonova, N. K., Vasyanina, V. I., Shishkina, O. A., Skibina, N. V., Nazarova, L. N. (2019). Medical aspects of the problem of domestic violence against women and girls (literature review). Problemy social'noj gigieny, zdravoohraneniya i istorii mediciny, 5, 936–939. (In Russ.)
Letova, N. V. (2019). General domestic violence preconditions, its generic features, and special aspects. Social'no-politicheskie nauki, 1, 71–76. (In Russ.)
Makashova, T. P., Bachanova, V. V. (2021). Domestic violence against women in Russia: articulation of issue. Viktimologiya, 4, 290–295. (In Russ.)
Matveeva, E. V., Pinegina, N. M. (2021). Domestic violence: the problem, determining factors and effects on female victims. Nauchnyj al'manah, 12–2, 97–101. (In Russ.)
Noskova, E. V., Petrakevich, T. V. (2019). General aspects and consequences of modern domestic violence. In: Domestic violence: prevention and responsibility. Tomsk (pp. 65–75). (In Russ.)
Puchnin, V. M., Shunyaev, S. V. (2010). The meaning of the definitions that make up the concept of domestic violence as an asocial phenomenon that encroaches on the freedom of the individual. Vestnik TGU, 12, 310–317. (In Russ.)
Rajkova, K. A., Efimov, A. A., Savenkova, E. N., Giryuk, S. A., Korsak, V. O. (2022). Domestic violence problem and solutions analysis in modern world. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya, 3. (In Russ.)
Sadykov, R. M., Bol'shakova, N. L. (2022). Domestic violence: essence and forms. Mezhdunarodnyj zhurnal gumanitarnyh i estestvennyh nauk, 7–2, 81–84. (In Russ.)
Salamova S. Ya. (2018). Domestic violence in modern Russia. Lex Russica, 9(142), 129–138. (In Russ.)
Fedoseeva, L. A., Ilyushina, E. S., Krasil'nikova, G. A., Chegulova, A. A., Berdnikova, K. E. (2022). Types, forms, and consequences of domestic violence, Sovremennye nauchnye issledovaniya i innovacii, 1. (In Russ.)
Shpilinova, A. Yu. (2022). Decriminalization of domestic abuse and its consequences. Via scientiarum — Doroga znanij, 3, 27–32. (In Russ.)
Shchepel'kov, V. F. (2022). Countering domestic abuse in Russian Federation: current situation and perspectives. Kriminalist", 2(39), 92–103. (In Russ).
Gombul, O. (2000). Nurses attitudes towards violence imposed on women by her husband in the family and their professional role in violence. Nursing Research Journal, 1, 19–32.
Peters, J. (2008). Measuring Myths about Domestic Violence: Development and Initial Validation of the Domestic Violence Myth Acceptance Scale. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 16(1), 1–21.
Petretic-Jackson, P., Genell, S. (1994). Domestic violence blame scale. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18(7), 695–716.