PHYSICAL ACTIVITY OF SENIOR CITIZENS IN THE CONTEXT OF INTERGENERATIONAL INTERACTIONS: OVERVIEW OF FOREIGN STUDIES
Article Sidebar
Published:
Jul 27, 2023
Keywords:
generations, elderly people, physical activity, physical education, sports, intergenerational relations
Main Article Content
Lyudmila V. Tarasova
Email: mila_vt@mail.ru
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3446-1345
Abstract
In the presented work, a review of foreign studies on the issues of stimulating physical activity of older citizens by means of social ties between representatives of different generations is conducted in order to study the potential of intergenerational relations as an incentive and motivator for the aging population to engage in physical education, sports and other forms of physical activity. The relevance of this topic is due to demographic and social trends: on the one hand, an increase in the life expectancy of citizens leads to population aging, and on the other – from the point of view of the goals of sustainable development of society, it is necessary that aging citizens maintain physical and mental health, be active, physically hardy, etc. The review was conducted by the method of content analysis of foreign scientific publications reflecting applied research on a given topic. The study showed that a significant condition for increasing the physical activity of the elderly is social interaction with family members – representatives of other, younger generations. Joint sports activities, participation (attendance and observation) in classes and competitions, assistance of children and grandchildren to their elderly parents in developing a system of exercises, as well as the development of digital assistants (fitness trackers and software applications) contribute to strengthening family ties, stimulate and motivate physical activity. The scientific value and practical significance of the work lies in the accumulation of scientific knowledge and their systematization for the development of concepts and policies to stimulate active longevity, the possibility of using foreign experience in the Russian practice of implementing programs involving older citizens in physical activity using intergenerational ties.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Metrics
Metrics Loading ...
Article Details
How to Cite
Tarasova, L. V. (2023). PHYSICAL ACTIVITY OF SENIOR CITIZENS IN THE CONTEXT OF INTERGENERATIONAL INTERACTIONS: OVERVIEW OF FOREIGN STUDIES. Society and Security Insights, 6(2), 211-222. https://doi.org/10.14258/SSI(2023)2-14
Section
SHORT COMMUNICATIONS AND FIRST RESEARCH EXPERIENCE
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.
References
Мозговая Е.И., Водолазова Ж.М., Горский А.А., Волкова О.А. Здоровый образ жизни населения в условиях пандемии: экспертные мнения исследователей и представителей некоммерческих организаций // Проблемы социальной гигиены, здравоохранения и истории медицины. 2021. Т. 29. № S1. С. 763-767. doi: 10.32687/0869-866x-2021-29-s1-763-767.
Политическая социология. В 2-х частях. Ч. 1. Власть и гражданское общество / Вертешин А.И., Волкова О.А., Гужавина Т.А. и др.; общая ред. В.К. Мокшина и С.И. Шубина. Часть 1. Власть и гражданское общество. – Архангельск: ИД САФУ, 2014. 363 с.
Ahtinen A., Isomursu M., Mukhtar M., Mäntyjärvi J., Häkkilä J., Blom J. Designing social features for mobile and ubiquitous wellness applications. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on mobile and ubiquitous multimedia (MUM '09), Article 12. Association for computing machinery. New York: UPC, 2009.
Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Hoboken: Prentice-Hall Inc, 1986.
Bengtson V.L. Beyond the Nuclear Family: The Increasing Importance of Multigenerational Bonds // Journal of Marriage and Family. 2001. №63(1). P.1-16.
Bengtson V.L., Oyama P.S. Intergenerational Solidarity and Conflict: What Does It Mean and What Are the Big Issues? Chapter two. Intergenerational Solidarity Strengthening Economic and Social Ties. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010. P.35.
Booth M.L., Owen N., Bauman A., Clavisi O., Leslie E. Social-cognitive and perceived environment influences associated with physical activity in older Australians // Preview Medicine. 2000. №31(1). P.15–22.
Boulton E. R., Horne M., Todd C. Multiple influences on participating in physical activity in older age: Developing a social ecological approach // Health Expectations. 2018. №21(1). Р.239–248.
Butts D.M. Intergenerational service learning and volunteering // New Directions for Philanthropic Fundraising. Special Issue: Philanthropy across the Generations. 2003. №42. P. 59-69.
D’Haeseleer I., Gerling K., Schreurs D., Vanrumste B., Vanden Abeele V. Ageing is not a disease: pitfalls for the acceptance of self-management health systems supporting healthy ageing. In: The 21st International ACM SIGACCESS conference on computers and accessibility (ASSETS '19). New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2019. P.286–298.
Dionigi R.A., Fraser-Thomas J., Logan J. The nature of family influences on sport participation in Masters athletes // Annals of Leisure Research. 2012. №15(4). P.366-388.
Flora P.K., Faulkner G.E.J. Physical activity: an innovative context for intergenerational programming // Journal of Intergeneration Relations. 2007. №4(4). P.63–74.
Harvey J.A., Chastin S.F.M., Skelton D.A. Prevalence of sedentary behavior in older adults: a systematic review // International Journal of Environmental Researchers in Public Health. 2013. №10(12). P.6645-6661.
Hatton-Yeo A. Connecting Generations — A Global Perspective. International Consortium of Intergenerational Programmes. Keel University, England. 2002. P.19.
Langhammer B., Bergland A., Rydwik E. The Importance of Physical Activity Exercise among Older People // Biomed Researchers. 2018. №5. Р.856823.
Matthew K. Using Technology to Connect Generations. Penn State Intergenerational Program. URL:http://aese.psu.edu/outreach/intergenerational/program-areas/technology (дата обращения: 19.03.2023).
Mitts N. Documenting Contributions of Civil Society Organisations to the WellBeing of Families. Interactive Internet Forum. The Vienna NGO Committee on the Family. Vienna, 2004. P.13.
Mori K., Harada E.T. Is learning a family matter?: experimental study of the influence of social environment on learning by older adults in the use of mobile phones // Japan Psychological Researches. 2010. №52(3). P.244–255.
Musich S., Wang S. S., Hawkins K., Greame C. The Frequency and Health Benefits of Physical Activity for Older Adults // Population Health Management. 2017. 20(3). Р.199–207.
Paterson D.H., Jones G.R., Rice C.L. Ageing and physical activity: Evidence to develop exercise recommendations for older adults // Canadian Journal of Public Health. 2007. №98 (suppl. 2). P.69-S108.
Phoenix C., Sparkes A.C. Keeping it in the family: narrative maps of ageing and young athletes’ perceptions of their futures // Ageing & Society. 2006. №26(4). P.631-648.
Powers M., Gray M., Garver K. Attitudes toward older adults: results from a fitness-based intergenerational learning experience // Journal of Intergeneration Relations. 2013. №11(1). P.50–61.
Rackow P., Scholz U., Hornung R. Received social support and exercising: an intervention study to test the enabling hypothesis // British Journal of Health Psychology. 2015. №20(4). P.763–776.
Ransdell L.B., Robertson L., Orne, L. et Moyer-Mileur L. Generations Exercising Together to Improve Fitness (GET FIT): A Pilot Study Designed to Increase Physical Activity and Improve Health-Related Fitness in Three Generations of Women. 2005. P.77-94.
Rothausen T.J. ‘Family’ in organizational research: A review and comparison of definitions and measures // Journal of Organizational Behavior. 1999. №20. P.817-836.
Sandbulte J., Beck J., Choe E.K., Carroll J.M.: Turning points: motivating intergenerational families to engage on sustainable health information sharing. In: International conference on information. Netherlands: Springer Publisher, 2019. P.741–753.
Thang L.L., Kalyani M. “Conclusion: Grandparenting in Contemporary Asia: Change and Continuity” In Mehta, Kalyani and Thang, Leng Leng, Experiencing Grandparenthood, Netherlands: Springer Publisher, 2012.
Trost S.G., Owen N., Bauman A.E., Sallis J.F., Brown W. Correlates of adults’ participation in physical activity: review and update // Medical Sciences and Sports Exercises. 2002. №34(12). P.1996–2001.
United Nation. Family Policy in a Changing World: Promoting Social Protection and Intergenerational Solidarity. Doha, Qatar. 14-16 April, 2009. P. 32.
United Nations. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. 1948. URL:http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html (дата обращения: 19.03.2023).
Vanderbeck R.M. Intergenerational geographies: age relations, segregation and re-engagements // Geography Compass. 2007. №1(2). P.200–221.
WHO. Global Recommendations on PA for Health. 2010.
REFERENCES
Mozgovaya, E.I., Vodolazova, Zh.M., Gorsky, A.A., Volkova O.A. (2021). Healthy lifestyle of the population in a pandemic: expert opinions of researchers and representatives of non-profit organizations. Problems of social hygiene, healthcare and history of medicine. Vol. 29. №S1. pp. 763-767. doi: 10.32687/0869-866x-2021-29- s1-763-767.
Political sociology. In 2 parts. Part 1. Government and civil society / Verteshin A.I., Volkova O.A., Guzhavina T.A. and others; general ed. by V.K. Mokshin and S.I. Shubin. Part 1. Government and civil society. Arkhangelsk: SAFU Publishing House, 2014.
Ahtinen, A., Isomursu, M., Mukhtar, M., Mäntyjärvi, J., Häkkilä, J., Blom, J. Designing social features for mobile and ubiquitous wellness applications. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on mobile and ubiquitous multimedia (MUM '09), Article 12. Association for computing machinery. New York: UPC, 2009.
Bandura, A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Hoboken: Prentice-Hall Inc, 1986.
Bengtson, V.L. (2001). Beyond the Nuclear Family: The Increasing Importance of Multigenerational Bonds. Journal of Marriage and Family. №63(1). P.1-16.
Bengtson, V.L., Oyama, P.S. Intergenerational Solidarity and Conflict: What Does It Mean and What Are the Big Issues? Chapter two. Intergenerational Solidarity Strengthening Economic and Social Ties. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010. P.35.
Booth, M.L., Owen, N., Bauman A., Clavisi O., Leslie E. (2000). Social-cognitive and perceived environment influences associated with physical activity in older Australians. Preview Medicine. №31(1). P.15–22.
Boulton, E. R., Horne, M., Todd, C. (2018). Multiple influences on participating in physical activity in older age: Developing a social ecological approach. Health Expectations. №21(1). Р.239–248.
Butts, D.M. (2003). Intergenerational service learning and volunteering. New Directions for Philanthropic Fundraising. Special Issue: Philanthropy across the Generations. №42. P. 59-69.
D’Haeseleer, I., Gerling, K., Schreurs, D., Vanrumste, B., Vanden Abeele, V. Ageing is not a disease: pitfalls for the acceptance of self-management health systems supporting healthy ageing. In: The 21st International ACM SIGACCESS conference on computers and accessibility (ASSETS '19). New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2019. P.286–298.
Dionigi, R.A., Fraser-Thomas J., Logan J. (2012). The nature of family influences on sport participation in Masters athletes. Annals of Leisure Research. №15(4). P.366-388.
Flora, P.K., Faulkner, G.E.J. (2007). Physical activity: an innovative context for intergenerational programming. Journal of Intergeneration Relations. №4(4). P.63–74.
Harvey, J.A., Chastin, S.F.M., Skelton, D.A. (2013). Prevalence of sedentary behavior in older adults: a systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Researchers in Public Health. №10(12). P.6645-6661.
Hatton-Yeo, A. Connecting Generations — A Global Perspective. International Consortium of Intergenerational Programmes. Keel University, England. 2002. P.19.
Langhammer, B., Bergland A., Rydwik E. (2018). The Importance of Physical Activity Exercise among Older People. Biomed Researchers. №5. Р.856823.
Matthew, K. Using Technology to Connect Generations. Penn State Intergenerational Program. URL:http://aese.psu.edu/outreach/intergenerational/program-areas/technology (дата обращения: 19.03.2023).
Mitts, N. Documenting Contributions of Civil Society Organisations to the WellBeing of Families. Interactive Internet Forum. The Vienna NGO Committee on the Family. Vienna, 2004. P.13.
Mori, K., Harada, E.T. (2010). Is learning a family matter?: experimental study of the influence of social environment on learning by older adults in the use of mobile phones. Japan Psychological Researches. №52(3). P.244–255.
Musich, S., Wang, S. S., Hawkins, K., Greame, C. (2017). The Frequency and Health Benefits of Physical Activity for Older Adults. Population Health Management. №20(3). Р.199–207.
Paterson, D.H., Jones, G.R., Rice, C.L. (2007). Ageing and physical activity: Evidence to develop exercise recommendations for older adults. Canadian Journal of Public Health. №98 (suppl. 2). P.69-S108.
Phoenix, C., Sparkes, A.C. (2006). Keeping it in the family: narrative maps of ageing and young athletes’ perceptions of their futures. Ageing & Society. №26(4). P.631-648.
Powers, M., Gray, M., Garver, K. (2013). Attitudes toward older adults: results from a fitness-based intergenerational learning experience. Journal of Intergeneration Relations. №11(1). P.50–61.
Rackow, P., Scholz, U., Hornung, R. (2015). Received social support and exercising: an intervention study to test the enabling hypothesis. British Journal of Health Psychology. №20(4). P.763–776.
Ransdell, L.B., Robertson, L., Orne, Moyer-Mileur, L. Generations Exercising Together to Improve Fitness (GET FIT): A Pilot Study Designed to Increase Physical Activity and Improve Health-Related Fitness in Three Generations of Women. 2005. P.77-94.
Rothausen, T.J. (1999). ‘Family’ in organizational research: A review and comparison of definitions and measures. Journal of Organizational Behavior. №20. P.817-836.
Sandbulte, J., Beck, J., Choe, E.K., Carroll, J.M.: Turning points: motivating intergenerational families to engage on sustainable health information sharing. In: International conference on information. Netherlands: Springer Publisher, 2019. P.741–753.
Thang, L.L., Kalyani, M. “Conclusion: Grandparenting in Contemporary Asia: Change and Continuity” In Mehta, Kalyani and Thang, Leng Leng, Experiencing Grandparenthood, Netherlands: Springer Publisher, 2012.
Trost, S.G., Owen, N., Bauman, A.E., Sallis, J.F., Brown, W. (2002). Correlates of adults’ participation in physical activity: review and update. Medical Sciences and Sports Exercises. №34(12). P.1996–2001.
United Nation. Family Policy in a Changing World: Promoting Social Protection and Intergenerational Solidarity. Doha, Qatar. 14-16 April, 2009. P. 32.
United Nations. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. 1948. URL:http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html (дата обращения: 19.03.2023).
Vanderbeck, R.M. (2007). Intergenerational geographies: age relations, segregation and re-engagements. Geography Compass. №1(2). P.200–221.
WHO. Global Recommendations on PA for Health. 2010.
Политическая социология. В 2-х частях. Ч. 1. Власть и гражданское общество / Вертешин А.И., Волкова О.А., Гужавина Т.А. и др.; общая ред. В.К. Мокшина и С.И. Шубина. Часть 1. Власть и гражданское общество. – Архангельск: ИД САФУ, 2014. 363 с.
Ahtinen A., Isomursu M., Mukhtar M., Mäntyjärvi J., Häkkilä J., Blom J. Designing social features for mobile and ubiquitous wellness applications. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on mobile and ubiquitous multimedia (MUM '09), Article 12. Association for computing machinery. New York: UPC, 2009.
Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Hoboken: Prentice-Hall Inc, 1986.
Bengtson V.L. Beyond the Nuclear Family: The Increasing Importance of Multigenerational Bonds // Journal of Marriage and Family. 2001. №63(1). P.1-16.
Bengtson V.L., Oyama P.S. Intergenerational Solidarity and Conflict: What Does It Mean and What Are the Big Issues? Chapter two. Intergenerational Solidarity Strengthening Economic and Social Ties. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010. P.35.
Booth M.L., Owen N., Bauman A., Clavisi O., Leslie E. Social-cognitive and perceived environment influences associated with physical activity in older Australians // Preview Medicine. 2000. №31(1). P.15–22.
Boulton E. R., Horne M., Todd C. Multiple influences on participating in physical activity in older age: Developing a social ecological approach // Health Expectations. 2018. №21(1). Р.239–248.
Butts D.M. Intergenerational service learning and volunteering // New Directions for Philanthropic Fundraising. Special Issue: Philanthropy across the Generations. 2003. №42. P. 59-69.
D’Haeseleer I., Gerling K., Schreurs D., Vanrumste B., Vanden Abeele V. Ageing is not a disease: pitfalls for the acceptance of self-management health systems supporting healthy ageing. In: The 21st International ACM SIGACCESS conference on computers and accessibility (ASSETS '19). New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2019. P.286–298.
Dionigi R.A., Fraser-Thomas J., Logan J. The nature of family influences on sport participation in Masters athletes // Annals of Leisure Research. 2012. №15(4). P.366-388.
Flora P.K., Faulkner G.E.J. Physical activity: an innovative context for intergenerational programming // Journal of Intergeneration Relations. 2007. №4(4). P.63–74.
Harvey J.A., Chastin S.F.M., Skelton D.A. Prevalence of sedentary behavior in older adults: a systematic review // International Journal of Environmental Researchers in Public Health. 2013. №10(12). P.6645-6661.
Hatton-Yeo A. Connecting Generations — A Global Perspective. International Consortium of Intergenerational Programmes. Keel University, England. 2002. P.19.
Langhammer B., Bergland A., Rydwik E. The Importance of Physical Activity Exercise among Older People // Biomed Researchers. 2018. №5. Р.856823.
Matthew K. Using Technology to Connect Generations. Penn State Intergenerational Program. URL:http://aese.psu.edu/outreach/intergenerational/program-areas/technology (дата обращения: 19.03.2023).
Mitts N. Documenting Contributions of Civil Society Organisations to the WellBeing of Families. Interactive Internet Forum. The Vienna NGO Committee on the Family. Vienna, 2004. P.13.
Mori K., Harada E.T. Is learning a family matter?: experimental study of the influence of social environment on learning by older adults in the use of mobile phones // Japan Psychological Researches. 2010. №52(3). P.244–255.
Musich S., Wang S. S., Hawkins K., Greame C. The Frequency and Health Benefits of Physical Activity for Older Adults // Population Health Management. 2017. 20(3). Р.199–207.
Paterson D.H., Jones G.R., Rice C.L. Ageing and physical activity: Evidence to develop exercise recommendations for older adults // Canadian Journal of Public Health. 2007. №98 (suppl. 2). P.69-S108.
Phoenix C., Sparkes A.C. Keeping it in the family: narrative maps of ageing and young athletes’ perceptions of their futures // Ageing & Society. 2006. №26(4). P.631-648.
Powers M., Gray M., Garver K. Attitudes toward older adults: results from a fitness-based intergenerational learning experience // Journal of Intergeneration Relations. 2013. №11(1). P.50–61.
Rackow P., Scholz U., Hornung R. Received social support and exercising: an intervention study to test the enabling hypothesis // British Journal of Health Psychology. 2015. №20(4). P.763–776.
Ransdell L.B., Robertson L., Orne, L. et Moyer-Mileur L. Generations Exercising Together to Improve Fitness (GET FIT): A Pilot Study Designed to Increase Physical Activity and Improve Health-Related Fitness in Three Generations of Women. 2005. P.77-94.
Rothausen T.J. ‘Family’ in organizational research: A review and comparison of definitions and measures // Journal of Organizational Behavior. 1999. №20. P.817-836.
Sandbulte J., Beck J., Choe E.K., Carroll J.M.: Turning points: motivating intergenerational families to engage on sustainable health information sharing. In: International conference on information. Netherlands: Springer Publisher, 2019. P.741–753.
Thang L.L., Kalyani M. “Conclusion: Grandparenting in Contemporary Asia: Change and Continuity” In Mehta, Kalyani and Thang, Leng Leng, Experiencing Grandparenthood, Netherlands: Springer Publisher, 2012.
Trost S.G., Owen N., Bauman A.E., Sallis J.F., Brown W. Correlates of adults’ participation in physical activity: review and update // Medical Sciences and Sports Exercises. 2002. №34(12). P.1996–2001.
United Nation. Family Policy in a Changing World: Promoting Social Protection and Intergenerational Solidarity. Doha, Qatar. 14-16 April, 2009. P. 32.
United Nations. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. 1948. URL:http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html (дата обращения: 19.03.2023).
Vanderbeck R.M. Intergenerational geographies: age relations, segregation and re-engagements // Geography Compass. 2007. №1(2). P.200–221.
WHO. Global Recommendations on PA for Health. 2010.
REFERENCES
Mozgovaya, E.I., Vodolazova, Zh.M., Gorsky, A.A., Volkova O.A. (2021). Healthy lifestyle of the population in a pandemic: expert opinions of researchers and representatives of non-profit organizations. Problems of social hygiene, healthcare and history of medicine. Vol. 29. №S1. pp. 763-767. doi: 10.32687/0869-866x-2021-29- s1-763-767.
Political sociology. In 2 parts. Part 1. Government and civil society / Verteshin A.I., Volkova O.A., Guzhavina T.A. and others; general ed. by V.K. Mokshin and S.I. Shubin. Part 1. Government and civil society. Arkhangelsk: SAFU Publishing House, 2014.
Ahtinen, A., Isomursu, M., Mukhtar, M., Mäntyjärvi, J., Häkkilä, J., Blom, J. Designing social features for mobile and ubiquitous wellness applications. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on mobile and ubiquitous multimedia (MUM '09), Article 12. Association for computing machinery. New York: UPC, 2009.
Bandura, A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Hoboken: Prentice-Hall Inc, 1986.
Bengtson, V.L. (2001). Beyond the Nuclear Family: The Increasing Importance of Multigenerational Bonds. Journal of Marriage and Family. №63(1). P.1-16.
Bengtson, V.L., Oyama, P.S. Intergenerational Solidarity and Conflict: What Does It Mean and What Are the Big Issues? Chapter two. Intergenerational Solidarity Strengthening Economic and Social Ties. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010. P.35.
Booth, M.L., Owen, N., Bauman A., Clavisi O., Leslie E. (2000). Social-cognitive and perceived environment influences associated with physical activity in older Australians. Preview Medicine. №31(1). P.15–22.
Boulton, E. R., Horne, M., Todd, C. (2018). Multiple influences on participating in physical activity in older age: Developing a social ecological approach. Health Expectations. №21(1). Р.239–248.
Butts, D.M. (2003). Intergenerational service learning and volunteering. New Directions for Philanthropic Fundraising. Special Issue: Philanthropy across the Generations. №42. P. 59-69.
D’Haeseleer, I., Gerling, K., Schreurs, D., Vanrumste, B., Vanden Abeele, V. Ageing is not a disease: pitfalls for the acceptance of self-management health systems supporting healthy ageing. In: The 21st International ACM SIGACCESS conference on computers and accessibility (ASSETS '19). New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2019. P.286–298.
Dionigi, R.A., Fraser-Thomas J., Logan J. (2012). The nature of family influences on sport participation in Masters athletes. Annals of Leisure Research. №15(4). P.366-388.
Flora, P.K., Faulkner, G.E.J. (2007). Physical activity: an innovative context for intergenerational programming. Journal of Intergeneration Relations. №4(4). P.63–74.
Harvey, J.A., Chastin, S.F.M., Skelton, D.A. (2013). Prevalence of sedentary behavior in older adults: a systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Researchers in Public Health. №10(12). P.6645-6661.
Hatton-Yeo, A. Connecting Generations — A Global Perspective. International Consortium of Intergenerational Programmes. Keel University, England. 2002. P.19.
Langhammer, B., Bergland A., Rydwik E. (2018). The Importance of Physical Activity Exercise among Older People. Biomed Researchers. №5. Р.856823.
Matthew, K. Using Technology to Connect Generations. Penn State Intergenerational Program. URL:http://aese.psu.edu/outreach/intergenerational/program-areas/technology (дата обращения: 19.03.2023).
Mitts, N. Documenting Contributions of Civil Society Organisations to the WellBeing of Families. Interactive Internet Forum. The Vienna NGO Committee on the Family. Vienna, 2004. P.13.
Mori, K., Harada, E.T. (2010). Is learning a family matter?: experimental study of the influence of social environment on learning by older adults in the use of mobile phones. Japan Psychological Researches. №52(3). P.244–255.
Musich, S., Wang, S. S., Hawkins, K., Greame, C. (2017). The Frequency and Health Benefits of Physical Activity for Older Adults. Population Health Management. №20(3). Р.199–207.
Paterson, D.H., Jones, G.R., Rice, C.L. (2007). Ageing and physical activity: Evidence to develop exercise recommendations for older adults. Canadian Journal of Public Health. №98 (suppl. 2). P.69-S108.
Phoenix, C., Sparkes, A.C. (2006). Keeping it in the family: narrative maps of ageing and young athletes’ perceptions of their futures. Ageing & Society. №26(4). P.631-648.
Powers, M., Gray, M., Garver, K. (2013). Attitudes toward older adults: results from a fitness-based intergenerational learning experience. Journal of Intergeneration Relations. №11(1). P.50–61.
Rackow, P., Scholz, U., Hornung, R. (2015). Received social support and exercising: an intervention study to test the enabling hypothesis. British Journal of Health Psychology. №20(4). P.763–776.
Ransdell, L.B., Robertson, L., Orne, Moyer-Mileur, L. Generations Exercising Together to Improve Fitness (GET FIT): A Pilot Study Designed to Increase Physical Activity and Improve Health-Related Fitness in Three Generations of Women. 2005. P.77-94.
Rothausen, T.J. (1999). ‘Family’ in organizational research: A review and comparison of definitions and measures. Journal of Organizational Behavior. №20. P.817-836.
Sandbulte, J., Beck, J., Choe, E.K., Carroll, J.M.: Turning points: motivating intergenerational families to engage on sustainable health information sharing. In: International conference on information. Netherlands: Springer Publisher, 2019. P.741–753.
Thang, L.L., Kalyani, M. “Conclusion: Grandparenting in Contemporary Asia: Change and Continuity” In Mehta, Kalyani and Thang, Leng Leng, Experiencing Grandparenthood, Netherlands: Springer Publisher, 2012.
Trost, S.G., Owen, N., Bauman, A.E., Sallis, J.F., Brown, W. (2002). Correlates of adults’ participation in physical activity: review and update. Medical Sciences and Sports Exercises. №34(12). P.1996–2001.
United Nation. Family Policy in a Changing World: Promoting Social Protection and Intergenerational Solidarity. Doha, Qatar. 14-16 April, 2009. P. 32.
United Nations. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. 1948. URL:http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html (дата обращения: 19.03.2023).
Vanderbeck, R.M. (2007). Intergenerational geographies: age relations, segregation and re-engagements. Geography Compass. №1(2). P.200–221.
WHO. Global Recommendations on PA for Health. 2010.