EVERYONE IS GUILTY: AN ISSUE OF THE CONSEQUENCES FOR THE FAMILY OF THE PERPETRATOR

Main Article Content

Oksana Yu. Kaplun Email: kaplun.oi@dvfu.ru
Helmut Kury Email: helmut.kury@web.de
Evgeny I. Ilchenko Email: ilchenko.ei@students.dvfu.ru

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to show that the family of convicted criminal has financial, social and psycho-emotional difficulties. The main goal of the deprivation of liberty of a person convicted of committing a crime is to punish the perpetrator. However, the criminal's family is also punished, in the sense that family members have a numerous hardship. At present, in the era of mass incarceration, a significant number of families feel the harmful consequences of the imprisonment of one of their members. There is almost no information in the Russian scientific literature about the processes that arise in families after the arrest of a criminal. So this article pays considerable attention to the analysis of the results of international research. The paper shows that since each family is different from the others, the consequences of imprisonment experienced by them are different. On the one hand, the removal of a delinquent from the family structure, which has a destructive effect on family members, can have a positive effect. On the other hand, the detention of a family member is a complete disaster, in which everything changes, changes dramatically. Family members of prisoners experience deep forms of discrimination that exacerbate already existing forms, such as ethnic, economic and gender discrimination and inequality. It should be noted that all members of the prisoner’s family suffer from the consequences: parents, brothers and sisters, but wives and children have the hardest time. That’s why the emphasis in this article is on the designation of the consequences experienced by women – official and unofficial marriage partners of men, who committed crime. All the family cares and burdens that a man used to carry out now are shifted to a woman: she becomes both the sole earner and a single parent. Women are forced to overcome financial, socio-psychological difficulties, condemnation of the inner circle, bureaucratic obstacles, shortcomings of the judicial and penitentiary systems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
Kaplun, O. Y., Kury, H., & Ilchenko, E. I. (2023). EVERYONE IS GUILTY: AN ISSUE OF THE CONSEQUENCES FOR THE FAMILY OF THE PERPETRATOR. Society and Security Insights, 6(3), 63-74. https://doi.org/10.14258/SSI(2023)3-0
Section
STATE, CIVIL SOCIETY AND STABILITY
Author Biographies

Oksana Yu. Kaplun, Far Eastern Federal University

Oksana Kaplun – Cand.Sci (Sociology), Associate Professor, Department of Psychology and Education of Far Eastern Federal University, Vladivostok, Russia.

Helmut Kury, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Crime

Helmut Kury – Prof. Dr. habil. Dipl. Psych., Prof. h.c. mult. Former: Senior Researcher at Max-Planck-Institute for Foreign and International Penal Law (currently the Max Planck Institute for the Study of Crime, Security and Law) – Department of Criminology and Prof. at the University of Freiburg,Germany.

Evgeny I. Ilchenko, Far Eastern Federal University

Ilchenko Evgeny Ivanovich – student of Far Eastern Federal University, Vladivostok, Russia.

References

Кури Х., Ильченко О. Ю. Эффективность наказания: результаты международных исследований //Актуальные проблемы экономики и права. 2013. №2(26). С. 240–256.
Мухина В. С. Психологическая и социальная помощь осужденным пожизненно» // Развитие личности. 2016. № 3. С. 139–163.
Шигуров А. В. Практика Европейского суда по правам человека по вопросам защиты прав осужденных // Мир науки и образования. 2016. №. 1(5). С. 53–75.
Хачикян А. М. Лишение свободы: Криминологические и уголовно-исполнительные проблемы. Изд. Ереванского госун-та.–Ер., 2008. 192 с.
Carlson B.E., Cervera N. Inmates and their wives: Incarceration and family life. London: Greenwood, 1992. 178 р.
Hagan J., Dinovitze, R. Collateral Consequences of Imprisonment for Children, Communities, and Prisoners // Crime and Justice. 1999. №. 26.С. 21-162.
Hairston C.F., Oliver W. Women’s experiences with men’s incarceration and reentry // Women, Girls, & Criminal Justice, 2003. №.7(5). С. 65-80.
Houchin R. Social exclusion and imprisonment in Scotland. Glasgow: Glasgow Caledonian University, 2005.89 р.
Kaplun O. Y. Female criminality in Russia: a research note from a penal colony //International journal of comparative and applied criminal justice. 2017. №. 3. С. 231-240.
Kotova A. Beyond courtesy stigma: Towards a multi-faceted and cumulative model of stigmatization of families of people in prison. Forensic Science International: Mind and Law. 2020. №1. С. 100021 (1-8).
Kury H. The effects of prison sentences on the family members and the community // European and Asian Law Review. 2020. №. 3 (2). С. 115–123.
Kury H., Kern J. Frauen und Kinder von Inhaftierten. Eine vergessene Gruppe // Kriminologisches Journal. 2003. № 35. С. 97-110.
Light R. Why Support Prisoners’ Family-Tie Groups? //The Howard Journal. 1993.№ 32. С. 322-329.
Sinko R. et al. Experience of stigma post incarceration: A qualitative study //The Open Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2020. Т. 8. №. 3. С. 1-16.
Turney K. The consequences of paternal incarceration for maternal neglect and harsh parenting // Social Forces. 2014. № 92(4). С. 1607-1636.
Watts H., Nightingale D. Adding It Up: The Economic Impact of Incarceration on Individuals, Families, and Communities // Journal of the Oklahoma Criminal Justice Research Consortium. 1996. № 3. Р. 55-62.


REFERENCES
Carlson, B.E., Cervera, N. (1992) Inmates and their wives: Incarceration and family life. London: Greenwood.
Hagan, J., Dinovitzer, R. (1999) Collateral Consequences of Imprisonment for Children, Communities, and Prisoners. Crime and Justice, 26, 21–162.
Hairston, C.F., Oliver, W., (2006) Women’s experiences with men’s incarceration and reentry. Women, Girls, & Criminal Justice, 7(5),65-80.
Houchin, R (2005). Social exclusion and imprisonment in Scotland. Glasgow: Glasgow Caledonian University.
Kaplun, O. (2017). Female criminality in Russia: a research note from a penal colony. International journal of comparative and applied criminal justice, 41(3), 231-240.
Khachikyan A M. Lishenie svobody: Kriminologicheskie i ugolovno-ispolnitel'nye problem [imprisonment: Criminological and penal problems. Erevan [Yerevan, 2008.
Kotova, A. (2020). Beyond courtesy stigma: Towards a multi-faceted and cumulative model of stigmatization of families of people in prison. Forensic Science International: Mind and Law, 1, 100021 (1-8).
Kury, H. (2020) The effects of prison sentences on the family members and the community. European and Asian Law Review, 3 (2), 115-123.
Kury, H., Kern, J. (2003). Zhenshiny i deti arestovanykh. Zabutaya gruppa. Women and children of convicted. The forgotten group// Kriminologicheskiy zhurnal. Criminological Journal, 35, 97-110.
Light, R. (1993) Why Support Prisoners’ Family-Tie Groups? The Howard Journal, 32, 322-329.
Mukhina, V. S. (2016). Psichologicheskaya I socialnaya pomoch osuzhdenym pozhizneno [Psychological and social assistance to convicts for life //Razvitie lichnosti [Personality Development, 3, 139-164.
Shigurov, A. B. Praktika Evropeiskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka po povoprosam zashity prav osuzgdenykh [a practice of the European court of humаn rights on the protection of convicted] //Mir nauki i obrazovania [The world of science and education],1 (5), 53–75.
Sinko,R., DeAngelis, T., Alpajora, B., Beker, J., Kramer, I. (2020). Experience of stigma post incarceration: A qualitative study. The Open Journal of Occupational Therapy, 8(3), 1-16.
Turney, K., 2014. The consequences of paternal incarceration for maternal neglect and harsh parenting. Social Forces, 92(4), 1607-1636.
Watts, H., Nightingale, D. (1996) Adding It Up: The Economic Impact of Incarceration on Individuals, Families, and Communities //Journal of the Oklahoma Criminal Justice Research Consortium, 3, August, 55-62.